<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Y-Cam Bullet wireless network webcam takes on Logitech Alert</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/y-cam-bullet-wireless-network-webcam-takes-on-logitech-alert-0496470/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/y-cam-bullet-wireless-network-webcam-takes-on-logitech-alert-0496470/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 14:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: modulok</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/y-cam-bullet-wireless-network-webcam-takes-on-logitech-alert-0496470/#comment-65775</link>
		<dc:creator>modulok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 16:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=96470#comment-65775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for your reply, I agree the two cameras don&#039;t seem to directly compete one with another. The Y-cam seems very impressive actually. Congratulations on a successful launch. I will have to investigate both cameras further.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your reply, I agree the two cameras don&#8217;t seem to directly compete one with another. The Y-cam seems very impressive actually. Congratulations on a successful launch. I will have to investigate both cameras further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Y-cam</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/y-cam-bullet-wireless-network-webcam-takes-on-logitech-alert-0496470/#comment-65764</link>
		<dc:creator>Y-cam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 10:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=96470#comment-65764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Modulok, thanks for the comments and feedback. The release of our camera wasn&#039;t intended to compete directly with the Logitech - our camera is a much more professional solution - but I guess bloggers love to compare ;)

As mentioned in the article, our camera uses WiFi, so no trailing cables everywhere (something the Logitech camera skips over in the demo video!).  It also has other professional features - such as true day/night vision with a very strong infrared output, as well as Digital I/O for connecting the camera in to Home Security or Automation systems.

The Y-cam has no ongoing charges - notice the Logitech camera charges $79.99 per YEAR for remote access - something the Y-cam provides for free FOREVER - along with free apps to view the Y-cam for iPhone, Android, Symbian and Blackberry.

If you have any further questions about Y-cam please let me know through here or via our social [at] y-cam.com email address, we&#039;d be happy to help.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Modulok, thanks for the comments and feedback. The release of our camera wasn&#8217;t intended to compete directly with the Logitech &#8211; our camera is a much more professional solution &#8211; but I guess bloggers love to compare ;)</p>
<p>As mentioned in the article, our camera uses WiFi, so no trailing cables everywhere (something the Logitech camera skips over in the demo video!).  It also has other professional features &#8211; such as true day/night vision with a very strong infrared output, as well as Digital I/O for connecting the camera in to Home Security or Automation systems.</p>
<p>The Y-cam has no ongoing charges &#8211; notice the Logitech camera charges $79.99 per YEAR for remote access &#8211; something the Y-cam provides for free FOREVER &#8211; along with free apps to view the Y-cam for iPhone, Android, Symbian and Blackberry.</p>
<p>If you have any further questions about Y-cam please let me know through here or via our social [at] y-cam.com email address, we&#8217;d be happy to help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: modulok</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/y-cam-bullet-wireless-network-webcam-takes-on-logitech-alert-0496470/#comment-65748</link>
		<dc:creator>modulok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 18:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=96470#comment-65748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The point is you are paying $479 for 640x480 instead of $350 for 960x720. If you like to pay more for less then go right ahead.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point is you are paying $479 for 640&#215;480 instead of $350 for 960&#215;720. If you like to pay more for less then go right ahead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdf417</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/y-cam-bullet-wireless-network-webcam-takes-on-logitech-alert-0496470/#comment-65736</link>
		<dc:creator>pdf417</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 15:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=96470#comment-65736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t see the point in a resolution higher than 320x240 if the camera is being viewed on a smart phone since display size is just as small and bandwidth requirements would be higher.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t see the point in a resolution higher than 320&#215;240 if the camera is being viewed on a smart phone since display size is just as small and bandwidth requirements would be higher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: modulok</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/y-cam-bullet-wireless-network-webcam-takes-on-logitech-alert-0496470/#comment-65735</link>
		<dc:creator>modulok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 15:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=96470#comment-65735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[costs more and has a lower resolution than the Logitech cam. Seems an odd comparison.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>costs more and has a lower resolution than the Logitech cam. Seems an odd comparison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
