<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: World&#8217;s largest Rube Goldberg machine created at Purdue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/worlds-largest-rube-goldberg-machine-created-at-purdue-09222049/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/worlds-largest-rube-goldberg-machine-created-at-purdue-09222049/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 21:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Umperovitch</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/worlds-largest-rube-goldberg-machine-created-at-purdue-09222049/#comment-201235</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Umperovitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=222049#comment-201235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This was the very first successful run of the machine. A new, professional video is in production.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was the very first successful run of the machine. A new, professional video is in production.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LSM</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/worlds-largest-rube-goldberg-machine-created-at-purdue-09222049/#comment-200991</link>
		<dc:creator>LSM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 11:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=222049#comment-200991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Too bad they couldn&#039;t spend $29.99 on a tripod for the camera, almost unwatchable due to the shake
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad they couldn&#8217;t spend $29.99 on a tripod for the camera, almost unwatchable due to the shake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
