<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wireless carriers eye charging a fee per service</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/wireless-carriers-eye-charging-a-fee-per-service-20120251/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/wireless-carriers-eye-charging-a-fee-per-service-20120251/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 21:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: acupunc</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/wireless-carriers-eye-charging-a-fee-per-service-20120251/#comment-83314</link>
		<dc:creator>acupunc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 16:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=120251#comment-83314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This would be no different than when dial-up ISP&#039;s were charging via time on-line or per data usage. What happened then? At least one company offered &quot;all you can eat&quot; and they did very well while the others didn&#039;t. If the big wireless companies do this it will just help the &quot;budget&quot; wireless services that already offer a buffet type of service.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This would be no different than when dial-up ISP&#8217;s were charging via time on-line or per data usage. What happened then? At least one company offered &#8220;all you can eat&#8221; and they did very well while the others didn&#8217;t. If the big wireless companies do this it will just help the &#8220;budget&#8221; wireless services that already offer a buffet type of service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamieson</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/wireless-carriers-eye-charging-a-fee-per-service-20120251/#comment-83287</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamieson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 14:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=120251#comment-83287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That really seems like they&#039;re shooting themselves in the foot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That really seems like they&#8217;re shooting themselves in the foot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryant</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/wireless-carriers-eye-charging-a-fee-per-service-20120251/#comment-83277</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=120251#comment-83277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This cannot happen, people will go back to getting their internet content the old-fashioned way...from a laptop or desktop at least until net neutrality rules take affect.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This cannot happen, people will go back to getting their internet content the old-fashioned way&#8230;from a laptop or desktop at least until net neutrality rules take affect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benjitek</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/wireless-carriers-eye-charging-a-fee-per-service-20120251/#comment-83275</link>
		<dc:creator>benjitek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=120251#comment-83275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a nightmare for the customer and the customer service department that would have to handle all those millions of calls regarding disputed charges.  A real can of worms if there ever was one ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a nightmare for the customer and the customer service department that would have to handle all those millions of calls regarding disputed charges.  A real can of worms if there ever was one ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
