<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows 7 WARP makes for DirectX10 acceleration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/windows-7-warp-makes-for-directx10-acceleration-2824506/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/windows-7-warp-makes-for-directx10-acceleration-2824506/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 12:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: random guy</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/windows-7-warp-makes-for-directx10-acceleration-2824506/#comment-55317</link>
		<dc:creator>random guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 20:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=24506#comment-55317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More nonsense from Redmond. Another kludge to fix design decisions that should never have been implemented. They would not need to spend development time creating WARP if Vista&#039;s performance wasn&#039;t so underwhelming.

The sad thing is that so many of Microsoft&#039;s potential customers will continue to lap this up. Where are the innovations? Where are the features promised since NT 3.5? All they&#039;ll deliver with Windows 7 will be more gimmicks like &#039;support&#039; for touch interfaces.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More nonsense from Redmond. Another kludge to fix design decisions that should never have been implemented. They would not need to spend development time creating WARP if Vista&#8217;s performance wasn&#8217;t so underwhelming.</p>
<p>The sad thing is that so many of Microsoft&#8217;s potential customers will continue to lap this up. Where are the innovations? Where are the features promised since NT 3.5? All they&#8217;ll deliver with Windows 7 will be more gimmicks like &#8216;support&#8217; for touch interfaces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark F</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/windows-7-warp-makes-for-directx10-acceleration-2824506/#comment-55313</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 19:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=24506#comment-55313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt;results were quite impressive with 7.36fps frame rate with 800 x 600 on a PC running Core i7

Impressive?  That&#039;s a slideshow.  

Other than providing a reference implementation for developers I don&#039;t see any use for this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;results were quite impressive with 7.36fps frame rate with 800 x 600 on a PC running Core i7</p>
<p>Impressive?  That&#8217;s a slideshow.  </p>
<p>Other than providing a reference implementation for developers I don&#8217;t see any use for this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
