<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I&#8217;m Willing to Give 3D TV A Try</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/why-im-willing-to-give-3d-tv-a-try-11118944/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/why-im-willing-to-give-3d-tv-a-try-11118944/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 02:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/why-im-willing-to-give-3d-tv-a-try-11118944/#comment-81493</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=118944#comment-81493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m curious, isn&#039;t there some sort of technology out there that enables one to watch a 3D movie using glasses like these 3D glasses but without the TV? Then it would all be in the glasses and would be everything you see. Looking at a 3D TV through glasses just seems stupid to me, take the TV out of the equation and put it in the glasses, that would be awesome! When I looked through the glasses to see the 3D TV at best buy, well, I could still see around the TV and it was cool to see the 3D action in the TV, but seeing around it was odd right away. It&#039;s something we&#039;d get desensatized to, but there&#039;s obviously a better solution, get rid of the TV and put it in the glasses! To resolve this though I assume it would be best to watch a 3D TV in a dark room, like pitch black, so you only see the TV, that would be awesome, but unless you have a gigantic TV it still would be better to just have it all in the glasses... So I ask, is there such a product?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious, isn&#8217;t there some sort of technology out there that enables one to watch a 3D movie using glasses like these 3D glasses but without the TV? Then it would all be in the glasses and would be everything you see. Looking at a 3D TV through glasses just seems stupid to me, take the TV out of the equation and put it in the glasses, that would be awesome! When I looked through the glasses to see the 3D TV at best buy, well, I could still see around the TV and it was cool to see the 3D action in the TV, but seeing around it was odd right away. It&#8217;s something we&#8217;d get desensatized to, but there&#8217;s obviously a better solution, get rid of the TV and put it in the glasses! To resolve this though I assume it would be best to watch a 3D TV in a dark room, like pitch black, so you only see the TV, that would be awesome, but unless you have a gigantic TV it still would be better to just have it all in the glasses&#8230; So I ask, is there such a product?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/why-im-willing-to-give-3d-tv-a-try-11118944/#comment-81484</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=118944#comment-81484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@shirin
no its exactly the same as normal tv except you get to wear shades.

seriously WTF]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@shirin<br />
no its exactly the same as normal tv except you get to wear shades.</p>
<p>seriously WTF</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adriano</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/why-im-willing-to-give-3d-tv-a-try-11118944/#comment-79562</link>
		<dc:creator>adriano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 01:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=118944#comment-79562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re may have to have to wait a long time for that feature.

You could certainly do it for computer generated animation, or video by but capturing the light field. This would mean the data stream would be much greater that what it presently is for 1080p.

But it&#039;s possible. Check out: http://www.refocusimaging.com/

I&#039;m not in any way connected to this technology, but I feel Slashgear should advocate and champion the acceptance of this technology in consumer digital photography, eventually pushing it to video.

It&#039;s just really incredible stuff, and opens up endless artistic possibilities.

I know I&#039;d buy a camera featuring this in a heartbeat.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re may have to have to wait a long time for that feature.</p>
<p>You could certainly do it for computer generated animation, or video by but capturing the light field. This would mean the data stream would be much greater that what it presently is for 1080p.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s possible. Check out: <a href="http://www.refocusimaging.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.refocusimaging.com/</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m not in any way connected to this technology, but I feel Slashgear should advocate and champion the acceptance of this technology in consumer digital photography, eventually pushing it to video.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just really incredible stuff, and opens up endless artistic possibilities.</p>
<p>I know I&#8217;d buy a camera featuring this in a heartbeat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shirin</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/why-im-willing-to-give-3d-tv-a-try-11118944/#comment-79189</link>
		<dc:creator>shirin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2010 13:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=118944#comment-79189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I still don&#039;t understand what 3D is all about. Is it any different from normal TV other than wearing shades?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still don&#8217;t understand what 3D is all about. Is it any different from normal TV other than wearing shades?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joker</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/why-im-willing-to-give-3d-tv-a-try-11118944/#comment-79186</link>
		<dc:creator>joker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2010 13:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=118944#comment-79186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hi
is not a good. i can&#039;t watch tv very good]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi<br />
is not a good. i can&#8217;t watch tv very good</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abhi</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/why-im-willing-to-give-3d-tv-a-try-11118944/#comment-78985</link>
		<dc:creator>Abhi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2010 05:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=118944#comment-78985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow I didn&#039;t even notice that giant TV in the picture.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow I didn&#8217;t even notice that giant TV in the picture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: micrapple</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/why-im-willing-to-give-3d-tv-a-try-11118944/#comment-78825</link>
		<dc:creator>micrapple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 22:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=118944#comment-78825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I enjoy watching the model more than the TV.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoy watching the model more than the TV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ImperfectLink</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/why-im-willing-to-give-3d-tv-a-try-11118944/#comment-78782</link>
		<dc:creator>ImperfectLink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 20:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=118944#comment-78782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree Chris. I enjoy looking at a different part of the screen when I&#039;m watching a movie for the second time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Chris. I enjoy looking at a different part of the screen when I&#8217;m watching a movie for the second time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Burns</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/why-im-willing-to-give-3d-tv-a-try-11118944/#comment-78755</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 19:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=118944#comment-78755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[do not want - not until my eyes are allowed to focus on whichever part of the 3D scene im looking at]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>do not want &#8211; not until my eyes are allowed to focus on whichever part of the 3D scene im looking at</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
