The point at this time is, who is this officer who’s respnosible for May Zhou’s case, whom I should talk to? Could you have me connect with this officer? I have serious stuff to report

Meanwhile, why don’t you help us to figure out what’s the motivation behind May Zhou’s death

The logic and evidence presented in the initial official report to draw the conclusion of May Zhou’s death as suicide are superficial and inconvincible. e.g. the major evidence presented to support official conclusion of suicide is on the finding that May Zhou had bought some sleeping pills before her death. But that evidence is too weak (she might as well buy that amount of sleeping pills for use of the whole academic quarter), which could easily be challenged by other evidence, as there is a big gap between buying sleeping pills and committing suicide; at least that would not explain why May Zhou would transfer money to pay off credit card debt before her disappearance

According to media report, Stanford police had spent hundreds of hours interviewing all of May Zhou’s friends and relatives but found no indication that May Zhou had the tendency to commit suicide. The official conclusion of suicide in May Zhou’s case had not clearly stated the motivation behind May Zhou’s death either. The evidence found on scene like empty sleeping pill bottles, empty water bottle, flash light, etc., these ostentatious evidence are superficial, which could be staged by anyone with average capability and average intelligence to make it look like a suicide. And obviously the criminal intended to stage those evidence to mislead investigators to draw the conclusion of suicide, which the criminals succeed so far.

… … … for more serious discussion please discuss it here or contact me peter_vista@yahoo.com

I believe the officer who drew suicide theory know my challenges, and I wish could get connect with this officer to have a direct discussion with this officer to clarify major suspicious points we all have in mind.

Sebastian Thrun and Eric Schmidt’s side is now depending on such questionable suicide theory to cover up their real crimes.

Anyway, Eric Schmidt and Sebastian Thrun’s names are not clear in Stanford Student May Zhou’s death, nor in their conspiracies on my life last year; and neither Eric Schmidt nor Sebastian Thrun dare deny their involvment into such crimes to the public. But without clarification of this case, the criminal suspect side had committed more and more retaliatory crimes on victims. Can anyone deny this fact?

What’s the problem? I bet that’s because they are afraid of facing the legal consequences once they deny these accusations to the public. That is the point.

Time to clarify these anti-humanity crimes to the public and have those criminals concurred at authorities and get them pay for their crimes

It started from a 2004 Stanford campus assault case, in which a lady named Gabriele Scheler bitterly assaulted me; Police concluded that I am a victim while Scheler is a criminal suspect after serious investigation; However Sebastian Thrun later joined Scheler to false accuse me at Stanford, and Eric Schmidt had joined them to support Sebastian Thrun and Gabriele Scheler against ruling from Stanford and police. During their tough fight with Stanford in the early 2007, Eric Schmidt and Sebasitan Thrun’s side had murderred May Zhou to threaten me, by telling me: “You see May Zhou, she’s an Asian (me too an Asian), … Police might not even find out who did it, what if it happened to you?” , and to terrorize Stanford (because May Zhou is Stanford student), and they did plot a murder on me as well last year when they found I would not compromise but insist on clarifying their crimes