<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Voyager Mobile finally open for business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/voyager-mobile-finally-open-for-business-21229178/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/voyager-mobile-finally-open-for-business-21229178/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 05:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Immersed</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/voyager-mobile-finally-open-for-business-21229178/#comment-214189</link>
		<dc:creator>Immersed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 07:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=229178#comment-214189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeepers, it takes a little more than a little flexibility. A lot of quick disposable money first, and then you can afford to think about flexibility. Sorry, I saw &quot;New MVNO&quot;, and I thought there might be an outside chance of a new approach, or at the very least a change in perspective: Instead of targeting smart phone wannabe&#039;s,and selling data-centric plans, I had hoped for a more modest offer to people who like, and need a phone for doing exactly that: phoning. In the hype (and probably profit), the small users really are getting lost. And consequently it&#039;s opening up the low-income market to all kinds of extortion. Take the senior&#039;s cellphone market for example; there&#039;s a host of providers out there selling &#039;specialized&#039; devices for seniors, but as soon as you attach that term to anything, it suddenly quadruples the price - for a basic device?! And so that leaves budget minded pensioners with the only prepaid, nationwide option: tracfone&#039;s SVC brand of phone, and plans. Now how healthy is that? Apart from at least having the option, which is good, I think carriers need to rethink strategies a little, and offer products across the board of markets.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeepers, it takes a little more than a little flexibility. A lot of quick disposable money first, and then you can afford to think about flexibility. Sorry, I saw &#8220;New MVNO&#8221;, and I thought there might be an outside chance of a new approach, or at the very least a change in perspective: Instead of targeting smart phone wannabe&#8217;s,and selling data-centric plans, I had hoped for a more modest offer to people who like, and need a phone for doing exactly that: phoning. In the hype (and probably profit), the small users really are getting lost. And consequently it&#8217;s opening up the low-income market to all kinds of extortion. Take the senior&#8217;s cellphone market for example; there&#8217;s a host of providers out there selling &#8216;specialized&#8217; devices for seniors, but as soon as you attach that term to anything, it suddenly quadruples the price &#8211; for a basic device?! And so that leaves budget minded pensioners with the only prepaid, nationwide option: tracfone&#8217;s SVC brand of phone, and plans. Now how healthy is that? Apart from at least having the option, which is good, I think carriers need to rethink strategies a little, and offer products across the board of markets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
