Monday, Aug 4th 2008 by Chris Davies


Worth Reading?


YesNo


+4 [4 votes]
Loading ...

Earlier on today we posted about VIA’s anti-Atom video in which the company demonstrated their OpenBook reference design going head to head with an ASUS Eee in a battle of 1080p playback.  VIA’s stance was that their 1.3GHz processor was better at rendering the high-definition video than Intel’s 1.6GHz chip, and sure enough the Eee juddered along while the OpenBook was smooth.  Now, though, jkkmobile have thrown a spanner into the VIA works, with their own video of an Atom-powered Eee playing the same video clip originally used but without any problems.

VIA_Nano_vs_Intel_Atom_2

Check out the video after the cut

In case you want to try it on your own netbook, the clip is Robotica from Microsoft’s high-def showcase.  It apparently isn’t running well on Celeron-powered machines (such as the original Eee 900-series)

Did VIA have a bad Eee?  I find it hard to believe they would’ve tweaked things to make the Atom machine underperform, knowing that this sort of test only really appeals to the sort of tech-fanatic who will want to go and test it out for themselves.

YouTube Preview Image

Tags: , , ,
Subscribe via RSS or Email | Read 394 times


  1.  Tim   View all comments by Tim  Neutral  Add karma Subtract karma Quote

    Jk’s video is showing a celeron based EeePC not an Atom based one.. the VIA video is trying to compare CPUs not mini-notes per se

  2.  Tim   View all comments by Tim  Neutral  Add karma Subtract karma Quote

    actually … sorry his is an Atom based one also… EeePC 901, just not the same EeePC 1000H we used in our tests at VIA.

    Not sure why the performance is so different.


Add your comments

Fill in the required fields below to leave a comment or login to your account. If you haven't signed up, you can do so free here. With SlashGear account, you will be able to participate on SlashGear Forums discussion.





Close [X]
E-mail It
About / Advertise / Contact / Archives / Privacy Policy / Terms of Use
Copyright © 2006-2008 SlashGear, All Rights Reserved.