<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UT Dallas discovery could lead to x-ray phones</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/ut-dallas-discovery-could-lead-to-x-ray-phones-20223826/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ut-dallas-discovery-could-lead-to-x-ray-phones-20223826/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 02:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CyberGusa</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ut-dallas-discovery-could-lead-to-x-ray-phones-20223826/#comment-203996</link>
		<dc:creator>CyberGusa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 03:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=223826#comment-203996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Eventually, everyone... potential applications ranges from something simple like the equivalent to a stud finder to something advance like a MRI like scanner capable of imaging tumors and other similar advance stuff...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Eventually, everyone&#8230; potential applications ranges from something simple like the equivalent to a stud finder to something advance like a MRI like scanner capable of imaging tumors and other similar advance stuff&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CyberGusa</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ut-dallas-discovery-could-lead-to-x-ray-phones-20223826/#comment-203888</link>
		<dc:creator>CyberGusa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 20:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=223826#comment-203888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Even X-Ray machines need a source, and the article never indicated that it wouldn&#039;t need a source. 

The difference is Terahertz radiation is a lot safer and can pass through clothing, paper, cardboard, wood, masonry, plastic and ceramics. It can also penetrate fog and clouds, but cannot penetrate conductive materials like metal or water.

The key advantage that they got here is that they shrunk the receiver part that actually records the image into something that fits in a phone or similar small device.

While whether they need a source on the other side of what is being scanned depends on the application and the level of detail they would need.

Since like microwaves used for RADAR, Terahertz radiation doesn&#039;t penetrate metal or water.  So could be configured like RADAR for a single hand held device for things like checking out the piping or electrical system of a house for example.

For medical purposes, and other high resolution requirements, though they&#039;ll have to have a dedicated source.  Along with more powerful computers to process the image for finer details.

However, Earth&#039;s atmosphere is a strong absorber of Terahertz radiation.  So range would be limited and &quot;Eerierook&#039;s&quot; idea of ambient source would be limited even with the sun angled behind the object. 

Given further advancement though it might be possible to make a basic portable scanner like a Tricorder and that would be pretty cool.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Even X-Ray machines need a source, and the article never indicated that it wouldn&#8217;t need a source. </p>
<p>The difference is Terahertz radiation is a lot safer and can pass through clothing, paper, cardboard, wood, masonry, plastic and ceramics. It can also penetrate fog and clouds, but cannot penetrate conductive materials like metal or water.</p>
<p>The key advantage that they got here is that they shrunk the receiver part that actually records the image into something that fits in a phone or similar small device.</p>
<p>While whether they need a source on the other side of what is being scanned depends on the application and the level of detail they would need.</p>
<p>Since like microwaves used for RADAR, Terahertz radiation doesn&#8217;t penetrate metal or water.  So could be configured like RADAR for a single hand held device for things like checking out the piping or electrical system of a house for example.</p>
<p>For medical purposes, and other high resolution requirements, though they&#8217;ll have to have a dedicated source.  Along with more powerful computers to process the image for finer details.</p>
<p>However, Earth&#8217;s atmosphere is a strong absorber of Terahertz radiation.  So range would be limited and &#8220;Eerierook&#8217;s&#8221; idea of ambient source would be limited even with the sun angled behind the object. </p>
<p>Given further advancement though it might be possible to make a basic portable scanner like a Tricorder and that would be pretty cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eerierook</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ut-dallas-discovery-could-lead-to-x-ray-phones-20223826/#comment-203747</link>
		<dc:creator>Eerierook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=223826#comment-203747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do You think the Sun radiation can be enought? Not for wall, but for some kind of &quot;lighter&quot; materials...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do You think the Sun radiation can be enought? Not for wall, but for some kind of &#8220;lighter&#8221; materials&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bibleverse1</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ut-dallas-discovery-could-lead-to-x-ray-phones-20223826/#comment-203720</link>
		<dc:creator>bibleverse1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=223826#comment-203720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Advanced tools for what kind of people]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Advanced tools for what kind of people</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Havins</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ut-dallas-discovery-could-lead-to-x-ray-phones-20223826/#comment-203708</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Havins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 12:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=223826#comment-203708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I call B.S.
The sensor needs a signal source on the other side of the wall that is not fully absorbed by the wall. So to make it work, you need an emitter powerful enough to get some signal through the wall. The phone by itself would see nothing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I call B.S.<br />
The sensor needs a signal source on the other side of the wall that is not fully absorbed by the wall. So to make it work, you need an emitter powerful enough to get some signal through the wall. The phone by itself would see nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
