<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: USPTO invalidates Apple&#8217;s pinch-to-zoom patent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/uspto-invalidates-apples-pinch-to-zoom-patent-19261714/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/uspto-invalidates-apples-pinch-to-zoom-patent-19261714/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerome</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/uspto-invalidates-apples-pinch-to-zoom-patent-19261714/#comment-262240</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 23:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=261714#comment-262240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Stranger, but I do know about it - and I know it doesn&#039;t appear in a stock Android but it was added to skins by HTC and Samsung, probably others, and they were sued by Apple over it. The patent was invalidated a few months back and briefly mentioned in the last paragraph of the story above &quot;rubber banding ’381 patent&quot;.. which is what I was referring to.

I wasn&#039;t suggesting it had anything to with pinch-to-zoom (which does appear in a number of Google apps..Maps..GMail..) - just that it was another one of the big Apple patents being used to sue others and that it has been invalidated.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Stranger, but I do know about it &#8211; and I know it doesn&#8217;t appear in a stock Android but it was added to skins by HTC and Samsung, probably others, and they were sued by Apple over it. The patent was invalidated a few months back and briefly mentioned in the last paragraph of the story above &#8220;rubber banding ’381 patent&#8221;.. which is what I was referring to.</p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t suggesting it had anything to with pinch-to-zoom (which does appear in a number of Google apps..Maps..GMail..) &#8211; just that it was another one of the big Apple patents being used to sue others and that it has been invalidated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerome</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/uspto-invalidates-apples-pinch-to-zoom-patent-19261714/#comment-262206</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 20:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=261714#comment-262206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s truly very depressing that this question is even being asked.

It&#039;s a simple gesture which is a small feature of a bit of software - it&#039;s not like they&#039;ve discovered a new chemical element or a unified theory of physics. There isn&#039;t much of an inventive step to be honest - it&#039;s an implementation detail. An implementation which was first demonstrated by a group of academics well before Apple claimed they invented it and that it could change your world. It&#039;s not worth $1 let alone millions or billions.  On the other hand, the discoveries of fundamental properties of information theory or radio propagation which led to patents required by LTE standards are significant - yet Apple don&#039;t want to pay a fair price for them (they offered $1 per iPhone for the hundreds of LTE patents - even the judge laughed) , nor cross-license their patents. They deserve a good kicking. One of their crap patents at a time.

Who discovered that turning a steering wheel clockwise will turn the car right? Who the hell cares?!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s truly very depressing that this question is even being asked.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a simple gesture which is a small feature of a bit of software &#8211; it&#8217;s not like they&#8217;ve discovered a new chemical element or a unified theory of physics. There isn&#8217;t much of an inventive step to be honest &#8211; it&#8217;s an implementation detail. An implementation which was first demonstrated by a group of academics well before Apple claimed they invented it and that it could change your world. It&#8217;s not worth $1 let alone millions or billions.  On the other hand, the discoveries of fundamental properties of information theory or radio propagation which led to patents required by LTE standards are significant &#8211; yet Apple don&#8217;t want to pay a fair price for them (they offered $1 per iPhone for the hundreds of LTE patents &#8211; even the judge laughed) , nor cross-license their patents. They deserve a good kicking. One of their crap patents at a time.</p>
<p>Who discovered that turning a steering wheel clockwise will turn the car right? Who the hell cares?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerome</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/uspto-invalidates-apples-pinch-to-zoom-patent-19261714/#comment-262207</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 20:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=261714#comment-262207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s truly very depressing that this question is even being asked.

It&#039;s a simple gesture which is a small feature of a bit of software - it&#039;s not like they&#039;ve discovered a new chemical element or a unified theory of physics. There isn&#039;t much of an inventive step to be honest - it&#039;s an implementation detail. An implementation which was first demonstrated by a group of academics well before Apple claimed they invented it and that it could change your world. It&#039;s not worth $1 let alone millions or billions.  On the other hand, the discoveries of fundamental properties of information theory or radio propagation which led to patents required by LTE standards are significant - yet Apple don&#039;t want to pay a fair price for them (they offered $1 per iPhone for the hundreds of LTE patents - even the judge laughed) , nor cross-license their patents. They deserve a good kicking. One of their crap patents at a time.

Who discovered that turning a steering wheel clockwise will turn the car right? Who the hell cares?!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s truly very depressing that this question is even being asked.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a simple gesture which is a small feature of a bit of software &#8211; it&#8217;s not like they&#8217;ve discovered a new chemical element or a unified theory of physics. There isn&#8217;t much of an inventive step to be honest &#8211; it&#8217;s an implementation detail. An implementation which was first demonstrated by a group of academics well before Apple claimed they invented it and that it could change your world. It&#8217;s not worth $1 let alone millions or billions.  On the other hand, the discoveries of fundamental properties of information theory or radio propagation which led to patents required by LTE standards are significant &#8211; yet Apple don&#8217;t want to pay a fair price for them (they offered $1 per iPhone for the hundreds of LTE patents &#8211; even the judge laughed) , nor cross-license their patents. They deserve a good kicking. One of their crap patents at a time.</p>
<p>Who discovered that turning a steering wheel clockwise will turn the car right? Who the hell cares?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerome</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/uspto-invalidates-apples-pinch-to-zoom-patent-19261714/#comment-262109</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 17:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=261714#comment-262109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello, let me start by pointing out that by using all capitals you increase your chances of being ignored, or just flamed, significantly.
Regarding &quot;ADMITTEDLY COMPUTER ILLITERATE,&amp; HAVE ONLY WORD OF MOUTH/ OTHERS OPINIONS&quot; - I&#039;m not sure your problem is lack of technical knowledge, I think it is lack of critical thinking and reasoning (I don&#039;t mean this as an insult - it&#039;s genuine advice).  Apple does one thing very very well - marketing - much better than technical innovation, which they don&#039;t really do as the world is slowly seeing - and anyone who keeps a calm head and doesn&#039;t get caught up in the hype and hysteria of all things Apple can see it. It&#039;s all a con. While the opiated masses see the Apple adverts, those with an ability to think for themselves see the adverts more like this:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFUz6vHEQCM
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Os87PLlyU4k
The opiated may think slide to unlock is OMIG!! extramazinarylutioning!! - others, think, yeah, toilet cubicle.

The critical thinking can be extended to the whole of iTunes and the controlled nature of it - but anyone &gt; 40 years old who remembers communism up close (through friends, distant family, East Germany) should see right through it. Ask your parents maybe.

In terms of which company to go with - get the phone that suits YOU - if you need the Apple logo - great! get one. If you prefer a more open eco-system, not being over-charged, customisable devices, perhaps try Android. Remember however, that like PCs, there are a number of manufacturers and they each have their pluses and minuses. If you like colourful and simple in a device with lots of promised enterprise features in the future - try WinPhone. Compare the phones/systems on their own merits, *don&#039;t make it an impulse buy*, realise that with some systems you&#039;re locking yourself in effectively by buying into an accessory system that will only work with that system and could be dropped at the next iteration of the device. A standard connector such as USB would work on Blackberrys, Nokias, pretty much any device which isn&#039;t an Apple.

Think for yourself. Take a step back. Ask questions. Sometimes, think different. Be rational, not emotional. It&#039;s only a phone. Read. Listen. Think. Don&#039;t fall for marketing and flashy things - it&#039;s a con.

Also, when it comes to journalism and especially blogs and sites like SG - follow the money - it leads the opinion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, let me start by pointing out that by using all capitals you increase your chances of being ignored, or just flamed, significantly.<br />
Regarding &#8220;ADMITTEDLY COMPUTER ILLITERATE,&amp; HAVE ONLY WORD OF MOUTH/ OTHERS OPINIONS&#8221; &#8211; I&#8217;m not sure your problem is lack of technical knowledge, I think it is lack of critical thinking and reasoning (I don&#8217;t mean this as an insult &#8211; it&#8217;s genuine advice).  Apple does one thing very very well &#8211; marketing &#8211; much better than technical innovation, which they don&#8217;t really do as the world is slowly seeing &#8211; and anyone who keeps a calm head and doesn&#8217;t get caught up in the hype and hysteria of all things Apple can see it. It&#8217;s all a con. While the opiated masses see the Apple adverts, those with an ability to think for themselves see the adverts more like this:<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFUz6vHEQCM" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFUz6vHEQCM</a><br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Os87PLlyU4k" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Os87PLlyU4k</a><br />
The opiated may think slide to unlock is OMIG!! extramazinarylutioning!! &#8211; others, think, yeah, toilet cubicle.</p>
<p>The critical thinking can be extended to the whole of iTunes and the controlled nature of it &#8211; but anyone &gt; 40 years old who remembers communism up close (through friends, distant family, East Germany) should see right through it. Ask your parents maybe.</p>
<p>In terms of which company to go with &#8211; get the phone that suits YOU &#8211; if you need the Apple logo &#8211; great! get one. If you prefer a more open eco-system, not being over-charged, customisable devices, perhaps try Android. Remember however, that like PCs, there are a number of manufacturers and they each have their pluses and minuses. If you like colourful and simple in a device with lots of promised enterprise features in the future &#8211; try WinPhone. Compare the phones/systems on their own merits, *don&#8217;t make it an impulse buy*, realise that with some systems you&#8217;re locking yourself in effectively by buying into an accessory system that will only work with that system and could be dropped at the next iteration of the device. A standard connector such as USB would work on Blackberrys, Nokias, pretty much any device which isn&#8217;t an Apple.</p>
<p>Think for yourself. Take a step back. Ask questions. Sometimes, think different. Be rational, not emotional. It&#8217;s only a phone. Read. Listen. Think. Don&#8217;t fall for marketing and flashy things &#8211; it&#8217;s a con.</p>
<p>Also, when it comes to journalism and especially blogs and sites like SG &#8211; follow the money &#8211; it leads the opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerome</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/uspto-invalidates-apples-pinch-to-zoom-patent-19261714/#comment-262110</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 17:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=261714#comment-262110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello, let me start by pointing out that by using all capitals you increase your chances of being ignored, or just flamed, significantly.
Regarding &quot;ADMITTEDLY COMPUTER ILLITERATE,&amp; HAVE ONLY WORD OF MOUTH/ OTHERS OPINIONS&quot; - I&#039;m not sure your problem is lack of technical knowledge, I think it is lack of critical thinking and reasoning (I don&#039;t mean this as an insult - it&#039;s genuine advice).  Apple does one thing very very well - marketing - much better than technical innovation, which they don&#039;t really do as the world is slowly seeing - and anyone who keeps a calm head and doesn&#039;t get caught up in the hype and hysteria of all things Apple can see it. It&#039;s all a con. While the opiated masses see the Apple adverts, those with an ability to think for themselves see the adverts more like this:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFUz6vHEQCM
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Os87PLlyU4k
The opiated may think slide to unlock is OMIG!! extramazinarylutioning!! - others, think, yeah, toilet cubicle.

The critical thinking can be extended to the whole of iTunes and the controlled nature of it - but anyone &gt; 40 years old who remembers communism up close (through friends, distant family, East Germany) should see right through it. Ask your parents maybe.

In terms of which company to go with - get the phone that suits YOU - if you need the Apple logo - great! get one. If you prefer a more open eco-system, not being over-charged, customisable devices, perhaps try Android. Remember however, that like PCs, there are a number of manufacturers and they each have their pluses and minuses. If you like colourful and simple in a device with lots of promised enterprise features in the future - try WinPhone. Compare the phones/systems on their own merits, *don&#039;t make it an impulse buy*, realise that with some systems you&#039;re locking yourself in effectively by buying into an accessory system that will only work with that system and could be dropped at the next iteration of the device. A standard connector such as USB would work on Blackberrys, Nokias, pretty much any device which isn&#039;t an Apple.

Think for yourself. Take a step back. Ask questions. Sometimes, think different. Be rational, not emotional. It&#039;s only a phone. Read. Listen. Think. Don&#039;t fall for marketing and flashy things - it&#039;s a con.

Also, when it comes to journalism and especially blogs and sites like SG - follow the money - it leads the opinion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, let me start by pointing out that by using all capitals you increase your chances of being ignored, or just flamed, significantly.<br />
Regarding &#8220;ADMITTEDLY COMPUTER ILLITERATE,&amp; HAVE ONLY WORD OF MOUTH/ OTHERS OPINIONS&#8221; &#8211; I&#8217;m not sure your problem is lack of technical knowledge, I think it is lack of critical thinking and reasoning (I don&#8217;t mean this as an insult &#8211; it&#8217;s genuine advice).  Apple does one thing very very well &#8211; marketing &#8211; much better than technical innovation, which they don&#8217;t really do as the world is slowly seeing &#8211; and anyone who keeps a calm head and doesn&#8217;t get caught up in the hype and hysteria of all things Apple can see it. It&#8217;s all a con. While the opiated masses see the Apple adverts, those with an ability to think for themselves see the adverts more like this:<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFUz6vHEQCM" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFUz6vHEQCM</a><br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Os87PLlyU4k" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Os87PLlyU4k</a><br />
The opiated may think slide to unlock is OMIG!! extramazinarylutioning!! &#8211; others, think, yeah, toilet cubicle.</p>
<p>The critical thinking can be extended to the whole of iTunes and the controlled nature of it &#8211; but anyone &gt; 40 years old who remembers communism up close (through friends, distant family, East Germany) should see right through it. Ask your parents maybe.</p>
<p>In terms of which company to go with &#8211; get the phone that suits YOU &#8211; if you need the Apple logo &#8211; great! get one. If you prefer a more open eco-system, not being over-charged, customisable devices, perhaps try Android. Remember however, that like PCs, there are a number of manufacturers and they each have their pluses and minuses. If you like colourful and simple in a device with lots of promised enterprise features in the future &#8211; try WinPhone. Compare the phones/systems on their own merits, *don&#8217;t make it an impulse buy*, realise that with some systems you&#8217;re locking yourself in effectively by buying into an accessory system that will only work with that system and could be dropped at the next iteration of the device. A standard connector such as USB would work on Blackberrys, Nokias, pretty much any device which isn&#8217;t an Apple.</p>
<p>Think for yourself. Take a step back. Ask questions. Sometimes, think different. Be rational, not emotional. It&#8217;s only a phone. Read. Listen. Think. Don&#8217;t fall for marketing and flashy things &#8211; it&#8217;s a con.</p>
<p>Also, when it comes to journalism and especially blogs and sites like SG &#8211; follow the money &#8211; it leads the opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AmiRami</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/uspto-invalidates-apples-pinch-to-zoom-patent-19261714/#comment-262093</link>
		<dc:creator>AmiRami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 16:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=261714#comment-262093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hope this gives Samsung leverage to once again go back to Judge Koh and demand a retrial!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope this gives Samsung leverage to once again go back to Judge Koh and demand a retrial!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AmiRami</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/uspto-invalidates-apples-pinch-to-zoom-patent-19261714/#comment-262094</link>
		<dc:creator>AmiRami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 16:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=261714#comment-262094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hope this gives Samsung leverage to once again go back to Judge Koh and demand a retrial!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope this gives Samsung leverage to once again go back to Judge Koh and demand a retrial!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeFunktastic</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/uspto-invalidates-apples-pinch-to-zoom-patent-19261714/#comment-262054</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeFunktastic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 14:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=261714#comment-262054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yup, I remember even seeing one of these guys demonstrating pinch-to-zoom motions while playing Warcraft III on a projected screen, if I&#039;m not mistaken.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, I remember even seeing one of these guys demonstrating pinch-to-zoom motions while playing Warcraft III on a projected screen, if I&#8217;m not mistaken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stranger</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/uspto-invalidates-apples-pinch-to-zoom-patent-19261714/#comment-262032</link>
		<dc:creator>Stranger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 08:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=261714#comment-262032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One problem, the rubber band feature you clearly don&#039;t know about...isn&#039;t on Android and what it is is this. 
When a user is done scrolling on a web page and tries to scroll further, the image on the screen pulls up to show a grey area...that&#039;s all I can gather.  From what it sounds like it&#039;s a way to scroll to the top of the page without having to constantly gesture upwards on your device.  It brings you to the top of the page.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One problem, the rubber band feature you clearly don&#8217;t know about&#8230;isn&#8217;t on Android and what it is is this.<br />
When a user is done scrolling on a web page and tries to scroll further, the image on the screen pulls up to show a grey area&#8230;that&#8217;s all I can gather.  From what it sounds like it&#8217;s a way to scroll to the top of the page without having to constantly gesture upwards on your device.  It brings you to the top of the page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stranger</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/uspto-invalidates-apples-pinch-to-zoom-patent-19261714/#comment-262030</link>
		<dc:creator>Stranger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 08:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=261714#comment-262030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, we already knew the pinch zoom feature wasn&#039;t quite unique.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, we already knew the pinch zoom feature wasn&#8217;t quite unique.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: colcustard</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/uspto-invalidates-apples-pinch-to-zoom-patent-19261714/#comment-262027</link>
		<dc:creator>colcustard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 07:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=261714#comment-262027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was invented by a group of techies in a university, early 2000 I believe.  Most of apples so called great patents are copies]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was invented by a group of techies in a university, early 2000 I believe.  Most of apples so called great patents are copies</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cleste Manninv</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/uspto-invalidates-apples-pinch-to-zoom-patent-19261714/#comment-262025</link>
		<dc:creator>Cleste Manninv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 07:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=261714#comment-262025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FOR THOSE OF US WHO ARE ADMITTEDLY COMPUTER ILLITERATE,&amp; HAVE ONLY WORD OF MOUTH/ OTHERS OPINIONS AS TO WHICH COMPANY TO GO WITH, IT IS BEYOND CONFUSING.HONOSTY &amp; LAYMAN&#039;S TERMS,WOULD B GREATLY APPRECIATED. CONFUSINGCIATE]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FOR THOSE OF US WHO ARE ADMITTEDLY COMPUTER ILLITERATE,&amp; HAVE ONLY WORD OF MOUTH/ OTHERS OPINIONS AS TO WHICH COMPANY TO GO WITH, IT IS BEYOND CONFUSING.HONOSTY &amp; LAYMAN&#8217;S TERMS,WOULD B GREATLY APPRECIATED. CONFUSINGCIATE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spicy magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/uspto-invalidates-apples-pinch-to-zoom-patent-19261714/#comment-262019</link>
		<dc:creator>Spicy magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 05:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=261714#comment-262019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So who invented pinch to zoom, if not Apple? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So who invented pinch to zoom, if not Apple? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chezki</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/uspto-invalidates-apples-pinch-to-zoom-patent-19261714/#comment-262017</link>
		<dc:creator>chezki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 05:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=261714#comment-262017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s up now koh!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s up now koh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerome</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/uspto-invalidates-apples-pinch-to-zoom-patent-19261714/#comment-262003</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 04:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=261714#comment-262003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Already happening - rubber band patent as mentioned in story.
I just hope they pull down that &#039;kin Steve Jobs exhibit/shrine on the grounds of the USPTO head office.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Already happening &#8211; rubber band patent as mentioned in story.<br />
I just hope they pull down that &#8216;kin Steve Jobs exhibit/shrine on the grounds of the USPTO head office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdogg13</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/uspto-invalidates-apples-pinch-to-zoom-patent-19261714/#comment-262001</link>
		<dc:creator>jdogg13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 04:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=261714#comment-262001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HA HA!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HA HA!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerome</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/uspto-invalidates-apples-pinch-to-zoom-patent-19261714/#comment-262000</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 04:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=261714#comment-262000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A long time ago they used to check patents for novelty and an innovative step however the rules changed quite a few years back in the US IIRC. Today they check for the correct formalities of filing and accept the patents without checking any technical aspects.. Then, if there is a legal case they examine the patent for novelty and innovation, or it gets settled in court before that happens.
Things are about to get worse, though - the requirement for novelty is effectively about to be dropped and it&#039;ll only be about who first patented the concept/idea rather than implemented the idea.. So, assuming there is no patent for the wheel already, someone could patent the wheel and claim it as their invention even though it&#039;s been in use for millennia.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A long time ago they used to check patents for novelty and an innovative step however the rules changed quite a few years back in the US IIRC. Today they check for the correct formalities of filing and accept the patents without checking any technical aspects.. Then, if there is a legal case they examine the patent for novelty and innovation, or it gets settled in court before that happens.<br />
Things are about to get worse, though &#8211; the requirement for novelty is effectively about to be dropped and it&#8217;ll only be about who first patented the concept/idea rather than implemented the idea.. So, assuming there is no patent for the wheel already, someone could patent the wheel and claim it as their invention even though it&#8217;s been in use for millennia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cooldoods</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/uspto-invalidates-apples-pinch-to-zoom-patent-19261714/#comment-261992</link>
		<dc:creator>cooldoods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 03:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=261714#comment-261992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would have been better overall if the USPTO would do some research for a change before awarding a patent.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would have been better overall if the USPTO would do some research for a change before awarding a patent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Rossi</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/uspto-invalidates-apples-pinch-to-zoom-patent-19261714/#comment-261990</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Rossi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 03:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=261714#comment-261990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ditto and it wouldn&#039;t surprise me in the least if more so called Apple patents are invalidated.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto and it wouldn&#8217;t surprise me in the least if more so called Apple patents are invalidated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerome</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/uspto-invalidates-apples-pinch-to-zoom-patent-19261714/#comment-261988</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 02:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=261714#comment-261988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So... where are all those genius commentators that couldn&#039;t stop crowing about the innovative &quot;genius&quot; of Apple now?

Glad to see common sense is slowly prevailing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230; where are all those genius commentators that couldn&#8217;t stop crowing about the innovative &#8220;genius&#8221; of Apple now?</p>
<p>Glad to see common sense is slowly prevailing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
