Comments on: Twitter livid over Google search filtering

By: Benjaminp

Benjaminp — Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:28:00 +0000

We think that’s bad for people, publishers, news organizations and Twitter users.” BS your only concerned about your own bank balances!

By: Benjaminp

Benjaminp — Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:27:00 +0000

You had a deal and failed to renew it and now you want what you had for nothing!! Twitter your shit!

By: Jerry Mitchell

Jerry Mitchell — Tue, 10 Jan 2012 23:36:00 +0000

Dont use twitter never will. if your not subscribed to someones feed you never get a breaking news tweet till you see it on the news then follow so their reasoning is bad. by by twitter.

By: Wayne McKenzie

Wayne McKenzie — Tue, 10 Jan 2012 23:34:00 +0000

First, Twitter’s response does reach the level of “livid”. How about some truth in headlining? Second, too bad for Twitter. Google pretty much owns search. If Twitter doesn’t like it, they should figure out a way around Google like Apple did (Siri).

By: Aaron Mars

Aaron Mars — Tue, 10 Jan 2012 23:11:00 +0000

TL;DR:
Twitter: “Waaaahhhhh”

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 10 Jan 2012 23:11:00 +0000

Good riddance! I couldn’t stand those “live tweet” search results, so I’m glad that didn’t get renewed. Now this is even better news. If you Google tweets for “breaking news” then you’re Googling wrong lol