<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TI OMAP 5 blows past quadcore Tegra 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/ti-omap-5-blows-past-quadcore-tegra-3-23215003/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ti-omap-5-blows-past-quadcore-tegra-3-23215003/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 00:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RoadsterHD1</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ti-omap-5-blows-past-quadcore-tegra-3-23215003/#comment-205505</link>
		<dc:creator>RoadsterHD1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 17:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=215003#comment-205505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s put this puppy in the BIONIC!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s put this puppy in the BIONIC!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ericdabbs</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ti-omap-5-blows-past-quadcore-tegra-3-23215003/#comment-187216</link>
		<dc:creator>ericdabbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 06:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=215003#comment-187216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ehh I think this is not a good comparison.  The TI OMAP 5 chip will be based off of ARM Cortex-A15 while the Tegra 3 is based off of ARM Cortex-A9.  The Tegra 4 chip will be based off of ARM Cortex-A15 so I think when that chip comes out, it will be a more of a fair comparison.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ehh I think this is not a good comparison.  The TI OMAP 5 chip will be based off of ARM Cortex-A15 while the Tegra 3 is based off of ARM Cortex-A9.  The Tegra 4 chip will be based off of ARM Cortex-A15 so I think when that chip comes out, it will be a more of a fair comparison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matti</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ti-omap-5-blows-past-quadcore-tegra-3-23215003/#comment-187132</link>
		<dc:creator>Matti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 23:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=215003#comment-187132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Also, Google, please get someone other than Samsung to make it!!
Maybe Motorola or a Japanese firm, for a change.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Also, Google, please get someone other than Samsung to make it!!<br />
Maybe Motorola or a Japanese firm, for a change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Cardin</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ti-omap-5-blows-past-quadcore-tegra-3-23215003/#comment-187116</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Cardin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 22:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=215003#comment-187116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like the one on the right has more stuff running on it. (look at the bottom right)
Everything should be identical except the hardware so this test is bogus.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the one on the right has more stuff running on it. (look at the bottom right)<br />
Everything should be identical except the hardware so this test is bogus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enoel69</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ti-omap-5-blows-past-quadcore-tegra-3-23215003/#comment-187115</link>
		<dc:creator>Enoel69</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 22:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=215003#comment-187115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow incredible results...that&#039;s what i call a more than double smoking. If at just 800 MHz dual core this thing can smoke a 1.3GHz quad core, can u imagine what the results will be when both cores are upped to say 1.5 to 2GHz. I see this chip inside the belly of the Next Nexus (N4). Google plz don&#039;t screw up the next Nexus...give it a cam with abt 16Mpx, 4.7&quot; 720p HD Super amoled plus screen, 3000mAh battery, a device that is less that 130mm tall, less than 65mm wide and between 10-12mm thin.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow incredible results&#8230;that&#8217;s what i call a more than double smoking. If at just 800 MHz dual core this thing can smoke a 1.3GHz quad core, can u imagine what the results will be when both cores are upped to say 1.5 to 2GHz. I see this chip inside the belly of the Next Nexus (N4). Google plz don&#8217;t screw up the next Nexus&#8230;give it a cam with abt 16Mpx, 4.7&#8243; 720p HD Super amoled plus screen, 3000mAh battery, a device that is less that 130mm tall, less than 65mm wide and between 10-12mm thin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harvz</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ti-omap-5-blows-past-quadcore-tegra-3-23215003/#comment-187110</link>
		<dc:creator>Harvz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 21:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=215003#comment-187110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right now i care more about battery than games.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right now i care more about battery than games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sircolby45</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ti-omap-5-blows-past-quadcore-tegra-3-23215003/#comment-187088</link>
		<dc:creator>sircolby45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 21:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=215003#comment-187088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It doesn&#039;t really seem like a good comparison when the Tegra 3 will have been out a year+ by the time OMAP 5 ever shows. It may be competing with Tegra 4 by then.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t really seem like a good comparison when the Tegra 3 will have been out a year+ by the time OMAP 5 ever shows. It may be competing with Tegra 4 by then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sircolby45</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ti-omap-5-blows-past-quadcore-tegra-3-23215003/#comment-187089</link>
		<dc:creator>sircolby45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 21:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=215003#comment-187089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It doesn&#039;t really seem like a good comparison when the Tegra 3 will have been out a year+ by the time OMAP 5 ever shows. It may be competing with Tegra 4 by then.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t really seem like a good comparison when the Tegra 3 will have been out a year+ by the time OMAP 5 ever shows. It may be competing with Tegra 4 by then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
