<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Next Generation of Leak Sites: 5 Wikileaks Descendants</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/the-next-generation-of-leak-sites-5-wikileaks-descendants-28129174/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/the-next-generation-of-leak-sites-5-wikileaks-descendants-28129174/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 01:28:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: leaker</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/the-next-generation-of-leak-sites-5-wikileaks-descendants-28129174/#comment-110856</link>
		<dc:creator>leaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 15:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=129174#comment-110856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is also http://www.libreleaks.org]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is also <a href="http://www.libreleaks.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.libreleaks.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EnviroLeaks</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/the-next-generation-of-leak-sites-5-wikileaks-descendants-28129174/#comment-91705</link>
		<dc:creator>EnviroLeaks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 15:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=129174#comment-91705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Robert

Good to see EnviroLeaks mentioned here. We are not publishing a great deal of original material at the moment because there is a lot of information held in the US Cables that needs analysis - we try and tease out the motivation behind the contents of the cables rather than just republish. Nevertheless we have already published one major expose - that of a large PR company keen to assist with the relocation (destruction) of indigenous tribes, and there is more in the pipeline. We have also published a major article on the WIPP nuclear dump, which brings together information that up to now was scattered to the four winds, 

With the fighting going on between the two Greeleaks projects (how disappointing that there are trademark issues, when genuine environmentalists deplore commerce) we are keen to just keep doing what we do, and using appropriately what becomes available to us.

Best regards

EnviroLeaks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Robert</p>
<p>Good to see EnviroLeaks mentioned here. We are not publishing a great deal of original material at the moment because there is a lot of information held in the US Cables that needs analysis &#8211; we try and tease out the motivation behind the contents of the cables rather than just republish. Nevertheless we have already published one major expose &#8211; that of a large PR company keen to assist with the relocation (destruction) of indigenous tribes, and there is more in the pipeline. We have also published a major article on the WIPP nuclear dump, which brings together information that up to now was scattered to the four winds, </p>
<p>With the fighting going on between the two Greeleaks projects (how disappointing that there are trademark issues, when genuine environmentalists deplore commerce) we are keen to just keep doing what we do, and using appropriately what becomes available to us.</p>
<p>Best regards</p>
<p>EnviroLeaks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Bottomley (mightygoose)</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/the-next-generation-of-leak-sites-5-wikileaks-descendants-28129174/#comment-91624</link>
		<dc:creator>John Bottomley (mightygoose)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 02:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=129174#comment-91624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On what evidence do you base this statement: 

&quot;Julian Assange is suffering from a lack of support on all sides. The future of Wikileaks is questionable at best. But that website’s death (or neutering) won’t be enough to stop a new wave of whistleblowing.&quot;

the website is far from neutered, and assange has more support than ever, just because he isn&#039;t on the front page every day anymore does not mean he is out of favour.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On what evidence do you base this statement: </p>
<p>&#8220;Julian Assange is suffering from a lack of support on all sides. The future of Wikileaks is questionable at best. But that website’s death (or neutering) won’t be enough to stop a new wave of whistleblowing.&#8221;</p>
<p>the website is far from neutered, and assange has more support than ever, just because he isn&#8217;t on the front page every day anymore does not mean he is out of favour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
