<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The new iPad Review Round-Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/the-new-ipad-review-round-up-15218593/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/the-new-ipad-review-round-up-15218593/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: heliopian</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/the-new-ipad-review-round-up-15218593/#comment-195278</link>
		<dc:creator>heliopian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=218593#comment-195278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As far as I&#039;ve experienced on my iPhone, the photos I&#039;ve edited in iPhoto have not been moved to &quot;photos&quot; unless I&#039;ve chosen to export them to my photo roll.  When I do export them to my photo roll, I can delete the original unedited photo.  As far as I can see, it&#039;s not possible to delete the edited photo in iPhoto, but I&#039;m not completely convinced that the photo is being stored twice on the device.  Instead, &quot;moving&quot; it to &quot;photos&quot; may be instead a sort of link to the edited photo where it&#039;s being stored on the device.  I need to investigate this more thoroughly, but I haven&#039;t seen my iPhone&#039;s paltry 16 gigs diminish since I&#039;ve been using iPhoto.  However, say that it DOES store the photo twice on the device.  I have a hard time understanding how what seems like a failing of a brand new app indicates that the iPad itself is failing.  One thing I have experienced with apple products is that updates may eventually eliminate issues with particular apps that initially annoy.  I&#039;ve worked with several tablets and I have yet to find another that offers the level of organization and editing my photographs.  That&#039;s if you consider the more practical aspects instead of just the fact that browsing through photos on the new iPad looks amazing.  And honestly, if anyone&#039;s interested in keeping 9 gigs of their photos on the iPad without ever moving them to their computer, I&#039;d probably steer them toward a higher capacity device anyway.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I&#8217;ve experienced on my iPhone, the photos I&#8217;ve edited in iPhoto have not been moved to &#8220;photos&#8221; unless I&#8217;ve chosen to export them to my photo roll.  When I do export them to my photo roll, I can delete the original unedited photo.  As far as I can see, it&#8217;s not possible to delete the edited photo in iPhoto, but I&#8217;m not completely convinced that the photo is being stored twice on the device.  Instead, &#8220;moving&#8221; it to &#8220;photos&#8221; may be instead a sort of link to the edited photo where it&#8217;s being stored on the device.  I need to investigate this more thoroughly, but I haven&#8217;t seen my iPhone&#8217;s paltry 16 gigs diminish since I&#8217;ve been using iPhoto.  However, say that it DOES store the photo twice on the device.  I have a hard time understanding how what seems like a failing of a brand new app indicates that the iPad itself is failing.  One thing I have experienced with apple products is that updates may eventually eliminate issues with particular apps that initially annoy.  I&#8217;ve worked with several tablets and I have yet to find another that offers the level of organization and editing my photographs.  That&#8217;s if you consider the more practical aspects instead of just the fact that browsing through photos on the new iPad looks amazing.  And honestly, if anyone&#8217;s interested in keeping 9 gigs of their photos on the iPad without ever moving them to their computer, I&#8217;d probably steer them toward a higher capacity device anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom49504</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/the-new-ipad-review-round-up-15218593/#comment-194771</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom49504</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 03:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=218593#comment-194771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I did have a chance to play today with the new ipad , and I do have a question. What i did is I went to iphoto and iphoto imported pictures from &quot;PHOTOS&quot; .I made one picture brighter since was to dark ( ipad have no flash) . That picture was not changed in &quot;PHOTOS&quot; . I went back to iPHOTO and the picture was brighter - like I want it. Then I delete that picture from (iPHOTO) , but the picture was not deleted in my &quot;PHOTOS&quot;. So it looks like iPhoto imports pictures (COPY) and they stay in iphoto folder. I asked the guy in Apple store if iPhoto create a new folder. He told me YES .My &quot;beef&quot; with that is that if you got only 9GB of pictures, and they are copy to iPhoto folder - now you got 18GB of data on your ipad, and your 16GB ipad is to small for only 9GB of pictures (if you use iPhoto ) . If you fix the picture in iphoto it stay in iphoto. We could not find a way  ( with apple guy ) to fix the original (with iPhoto ) and than delete pictures from iphoto. Question is - Is 64GB  ipad  good only for 32GB of storage ( since iphoto copy your picture files ) ? Can anyone answer this ? Take iOS plus apps, and 16GB ipad is good ( if true) for only 6-7 GB of storage. This would make the new 16GB ipad, the worst 9.7&quot; tablet ( as far as storage ) on the market.Jack of all trades, but still - master of none.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did have a chance to play today with the new ipad , and I do have a question. What i did is I went to iphoto and iphoto imported pictures from &#8221;PHOTOS&#8221; .I made one picture brighter since was to dark ( ipad have no flash) . That picture was not changed in &#8221;PHOTOS&#8221; . I went back to iPHOTO and the picture was brighter - like I want it. Then I delete that picture from (iPHOTO) , but the picture was not deleted in my &#8221;PHOTOS&#8221;. So it looks like iPhoto imports pictures (COPY) and they stay in iphoto folder. I asked the guy in Apple store if iPhoto create a new folder. He told me YES .My &#8221;beef&#8221; with that is that if you got only 9GB of pictures, and they are copy to iPhoto folder - now you got 18GB of data on your ipad, and your 16GB ipad is to small for only 9GB of pictures (if you use iPhoto ) . If you fix the picture in iphoto it stay in iphoto. We could not find a way  ( with apple guy ) to fix the original (with iPhoto ) and than delete pictures from iphoto. Question is - Is 64GB  ipad  good only for 32GB of storage ( since iphoto copy your picture files ) ? Can anyone answer this ? Take iOS plus apps, and 16GB ipad is good ( if true) for only 6-7 GB of storage. This would make the new 16GB ipad, the worst 9.7&#8243; tablet ( as far as storage ) on the market.Jack of all trades, but still - master of none.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gitoffmenuts_google</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/the-new-ipad-review-round-up-15218593/#comment-194682</link>
		<dc:creator>gitoffmenuts_google</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2012 18:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=218593#comment-194682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[cry more Fandroids.  Doesn&#039;t change the fact that Android is a laggy POS mess of a platform.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cry more Fandroids.  Doesn&#8217;t change the fact that Android is a laggy POS mess of a platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OgilvyTheAstronomer</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/the-new-ipad-review-round-up-15218593/#comment-194343</link>
		<dc:creator>OgilvyTheAstronomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 12:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=218593#comment-194343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That would be because the iPad is the only tablet that actually &lt;i&gt;matters.&lt;/i&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would be because the iPad is the only tablet that actually <i>matters.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mario Irelan</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/the-new-ipad-review-round-up-15218593/#comment-194281</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario Irelan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 03:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=218593#comment-194281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[rofl.... people are also stupid enough to believe that simple graph will no real numbers and flip about the new ipad.... ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rofl&#8230;. people are also stupid enough to believe that simple graph will no real numbers and flip about the new ipad&#8230;. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/the-new-ipad-review-round-up-15218593/#comment-194253</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 00:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=218593#comment-194253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because apples marketing budget is second only to it&#039;s lawsuit for making square objects with screens and buttons budget.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because apples marketing budget is second only to it&#8217;s lawsuit for making square objects with screens and buttons budget.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacqueline El-Nil</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/the-new-ipad-review-round-up-15218593/#comment-194201</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacqueline El-Nil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=218593#comment-194201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The word you&#039;re looking for is &#039;manufacture&#039; which does not imply IP in any form.  The word I used is &#039;copy&#039;.  Learn the difference schoolboy.
Mactard or not...My English is pretty good (even as a second language). ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The word you&#8217;re looking for is &#8216;manufacture&#8217; which does not imply IP in any form.  The word I used is &#8216;copy&#8217;.  Learn the difference schoolboy.<br />
Mactard or not&#8230;My English is pretty good (even as a second language). </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/the-new-ipad-review-round-up-15218593/#comment-194180</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=218593#comment-194180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So how come the iPad gets a review Round-up, yet NONE of other non-Apple device do?


]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So how come the iPad gets a review Round-up, yet NONE of other non-Apple device do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justinblanton</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/the-new-ipad-review-round-up-15218593/#comment-194168</link>
		<dc:creator>Justinblanton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 18:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=218593#comment-194168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[spoken like a true mactard. bravo.

FYI samsung makes 30% of crapple products...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>spoken like a true mactard. bravo.</p>
<p>FYI samsung makes 30% of crapple products&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Robie</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/the-new-ipad-review-round-up-15218593/#comment-194164</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Robie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 18:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=218593#comment-194164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Samsung redesigned their paperweight?? Oh goodie, now my papers won&#039;t fly away as I use my new IPAD....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samsung redesigned their paperweight?? Oh goodie, now my papers won&#8217;t fly away as I use my new IPAD&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Robie</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/the-new-ipad-review-round-up-15218593/#comment-194163</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Robie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 18:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=218593#comment-194163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or two months lol]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or two months lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NewJ</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/the-new-ipad-review-round-up-15218593/#comment-194154</link>
		<dc:creator>NewJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=218593#comment-194154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I meant &quot;wait&quot; not &quot;weight&quot;. I need my coffee.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant &#8220;wait&#8221; not &#8220;weight&#8221;. I need my coffee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacqueline El-Nil</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/the-new-ipad-review-round-up-15218593/#comment-194155</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacqueline El-Nil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=218593#comment-194155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If it&#039;s a tablet, this is it.  We own three (3) iPad2s. We&#039;ll trade in one and pick up one of these.
For you others... next tuesday at 3:29 pm Samsung will have an Android copy right on schedule.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it&#8217;s a tablet, this is it.  We own three (3) iPad2s. We&#8217;ll trade in one and pick up one of these.<br />
For you others&#8230; next tuesday at 3:29 pm Samsung will have an Android copy right on schedule.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NewJ</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/the-new-ipad-review-round-up-15218593/#comment-194152</link>
		<dc:creator>NewJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=218593#comment-194152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tomorrow it is going to be ugly all those people lining up to get their brand new iPad. I&#039;d rather weight a week or two.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tomorrow it is going to be ugly all those people lining up to get their brand new iPad. I&#8217;d rather weight a week or two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
