<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SlashGear &#187; privacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/privacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:17:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google petitions for further transparency with national security requests</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-petitions-for-further-transparency-with-national-security-requests-18286923/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/google-petitions-for-further-transparency-with-national-security-requests-18286923/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Lloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=286923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the recent uproar with The National Security Agency and PRISM, many tech companies have come forward to deny any claims that they give the government user information without the users knowing, and to prove that, companies are now wanting to publicly post national security requests for full transparency. However, Google wants to take it  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/google-petitions-for-further-transparency-with-national-security-requests-18286923/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/google-petitions-for-further-transparency-with-national-security-requests-18286923/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yahoo! reveals law enforcement data request numbers</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/yahoo-reveals-law-enforcement-data-request-numbers-17286774/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/yahoo-reveals-law-enforcement-data-request-numbers-17286774/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 04:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brittany Hillen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=286774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On June 11, Google made public a letter it sent to the Attorney General and the FBI requesting permission to include FISA and similar data requests in it Transparency Report. A couple days later, Facebook and Microsoft revealed aggregated government data request numbers, followed soon after by other companies. Now Yahoo! has revealed its own  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/yahoo-reveals-law-enforcement-data-request-numbers-17286774/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/yahoo-reveals-law-enforcement-data-request-numbers-17286774/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google requests permission to publish FISA requests in Transparency Report</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-requests-permission-to-publish-fisa-requests-in-transparency-report-11286117/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/google-requests-permission-to-publish-fisa-requests-in-transparency-report-11286117/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 00:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brittany Hillen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PRISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=286117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In case you&#8217;ve somehow missed all the hoopla, the Internet has been in various states of uproar over PRISM and the allegations that several major companies give the government unrestricted access to their servers. Apple, Google, and others have been vocal about such statements, saying they are not true, but that has not stymied the  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/google-requests-permission-to-publish-fisa-requests-in-transparency-report-11286117/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/google-requests-permission-to-publish-fisa-requests-in-transparency-report-11286117/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EFF, Mozilla, Reddit send open letter to Congress over NSA spying</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/eff-mozilla-reddit-send-open-letter-to-congress-over-nsa-spying-11286047/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/eff-mozilla-reddit-send-open-letter-to-congress-over-nsa-spying-11286047/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Lloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EFF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PRISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=286047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The National Security Agency has been on thin ice with the general public lately when whistleblower Edward Snowden revealed that the US government was spying on American citizens by secretly recording phone calls and tracking users&#8217; online activity with the alleged help from big internet companies like Google and Facebook. Because of this, 86 civil  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/eff-mozilla-reddit-send-open-letter-to-congress-over-nsa-spying-11286047/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/eff-mozilla-reddit-send-open-letter-to-congress-over-nsa-spying-11286047/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PRISM progress: Director of National Intelligence speaks, Google responds again</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/prism-progress-director-of-national-intelligence-speaks-google-responds-again-08285485/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/prism-progress-director-of-national-intelligence-speaks-google-responds-again-08285485/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 23:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must Read Bits & Bytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PRISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=285485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s not often that a government scandal sees a run-time like the NSA&#8217;s &#8220;PRISM&#8221; program &#8211; but then again, it&#8217;s not often that every major technology company is suggested to be taking part in a spy program such as this. Today&#8217;s updates to this situation comes from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/prism-progress-director-of-national-intelligence-speaks-google-responds-again-08285485/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/prism-progress-director-of-national-intelligence-speaks-google-responds-again-08285485/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google PRISM involvement denied by Larry Page: no &#8220;back door&#8221; here</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-prism-involvement-denied-by-larry-page-no-back-door-here-07285423/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/google-prism-involvement-denied-by-larry-page-no-back-door-here-07285423/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 20:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must Read Bits & Bytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PRISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=285423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the NSA&#8217;s PRISM program has been unveiled &#8211; or leaked, in some cases &#8211; Google has taken to the web to make their involvement (or lack thereof) completely transparent. What&#8217;s been noted this afternoon comes from Google CEO Larry Page and Google Chief Legal Officer David Drummond, and suggests that until yesterday, Google had  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/google-prism-involvement-denied-by-larry-page-no-back-door-here-07285423/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/google-prism-involvement-denied-by-larry-page-no-back-door-here-07285423/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Xbox One privacy concerns assuaged by Microsoft in &#8220;always on&#8221; explanation</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/xbox-one-privacy-concerns-assuaged-by-microsoft-in-always-on-explanation-06285298/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/xbox-one-privacy-concerns-assuaged-by-microsoft-in-always-on-explanation-06285298/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 03:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brittany Hillen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Game Console]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kinect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Kinect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xbox One]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=285298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft wasn&#8217;t terribly clear on certain aspects of the Xbox One upon its unveiling, and one area that raised concerns was a claim that the device was &#8220;always on,&#8221; serving as a type of spy in your living room listening to your conversations and peeking at your activities. Microsoft made a couple attempts to clear  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/xbox-one-privacy-concerns-assuaged-by-microsoft-in-always-on-explanation-06285298/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/xbox-one-privacy-concerns-assuaged-by-microsoft-in-always-on-explanation-06285298/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NSA and FBI reportedly pulling data directly from Google, Microsoft and more [UPDATE]</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/nsa-and-fbi-reportedly-pulling-data-directly-from-google-microsoft-and-more-06285292/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/nsa-and-fbi-reportedly-pulling-data-directly-from-google-microsoft-and-more-06285292/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 01:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brittany Hillen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dropbox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PRISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=285292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, it was revealed that a secret court order initiated by the FBI strong-armed Verizon into handing over detailed phone records of millions of US consumers to the NSA. Such an action made it obvious that other activities of a similar nature are likely taking place, something confirmed today by The Washington Post, which says  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/nsa-and-fbi-reportedly-pulling-data-directly-from-google-microsoft-and-more-06285292/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/nsa-and-fbi-reportedly-pulling-data-directly-from-google-microsoft-and-more-06285292/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Researchers create device that obscures unwanted photographs</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/researchers-create-device-that-obscures-unwanted-photographs-05285166/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/researchers-create-device-that-obscures-unwanted-photographs-05285166/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 00:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brittany Hillen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital photograph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=285166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We live in a time when cameras are in the hands of nearly every individual, as well as mounted in store corners, on top of utility poles, and more. Anyone can snap a picture of you when you&#8217;re in public, often without your knowledge, and concerns about privacy in this area are increasing as devices  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/researchers-create-device-that-obscures-unwanted-photographs-05285166/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/researchers-create-device-that-obscures-unwanted-photographs-05285166/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google says no to facial recognition Glassware until privacy issues are addressed</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-says-no-to-facial-recognition-glassware-until-privacy-issues-are-addressed-31284498/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/google-says-no-to-facial-recognition-glassware-until-privacy-issues-are-addressed-31284498/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 04:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brittany Hillen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project Glass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=284498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Glass presents a lot of exciting possibilities, but a fairly equal amount of concerns, one in particular being facial recognition and potential privacy issues that could result. On May 17, Congress sent a formal letter to Google addressing several privacy concerns, one of which was facial recognition. It has been a couple weeks, and  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/google-says-no-to-facial-recognition-glassware-until-privacy-issues-are-addressed-31284498/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/google-says-no-to-facial-recognition-glassware-until-privacy-issues-are-addressed-31284498/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iCloud not protected by Apple&#8217;s two-factor authentication, say researchers</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/icloud-not-protected-by-apples-two-factor-authentication-say-researchers-31284411/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/icloud-not-protected-by-apples-two-factor-authentication-say-researchers-31284411/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 13:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Lloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloud Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iCloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=284411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple introduced two-factor authentication (or two-step verification if you&#8217;d like to call it that) with iCloud back in March, adding an extra layer of security to its cloud backup system. However, security researchers say that iCloud is still vulnerable to a break-in if your password is stolen. ElcomSoft, a company that specializes in password-cracking software,  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/icloud-not-protected-by-apples-two-factor-authentication-say-researchers-31284411/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/icloud-not-protected-by-apples-two-factor-authentication-say-researchers-31284411/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Xbox One can shut down entirely to prevent always-listening Kinect</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/xbox-one-can-shut-down-entirely-to-prevent-always-listening-kinect-28283934/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/xbox-one-can-shut-down-entirely-to-prevent-always-listening-kinect-28283934/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 17:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Lloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kinect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Kinect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voice control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xbox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xbox One]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=283934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been a lot of confusion surrounding the various new features of the Xbox One, but one of those features seems to have been settled. The Kinect sensor that many people feared would always be listening to your conversations can actually be turned off when not needed. Otherwise, you can use the Kinect to  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/xbox-one-can-shut-down-entirely-to-prevent-always-listening-kinect-28283934/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/xbox-one-can-shut-down-entirely-to-prevent-always-listening-kinect-28283934/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Glass facial-recognition service likely to stoke privacy fears</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-glass-facial-recognition-service-likely-to-stoke-privacy-fears-25283608/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/google-glass-facial-recognition-service-likely-to-stoke-privacy-fears-25283608/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 14:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must Read Bits & Bytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[face recognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project Glass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wearable]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=283608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google&#8217;s Glass wearable could soon be able to recognize faces of those around the wearer, thanks to a dedicated service for human and object recognition that could be built into third-party apps. The handiwork of Lambda Labs, the special Glass facial recognition API will integrate into software and services using Google&#8217;s Mirror API for Glass,  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/google-glass-facial-recognition-service-likely-to-stoke-privacy-fears-25283608/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/google-glass-facial-recognition-service-likely-to-stoke-privacy-fears-25283608/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Xbox One Kinect includes &#8220;no listening&#8221; modes for living room privacy</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/xbox-one-kinect-includes-no-listening-modes-for-living-room-privacy-22283117/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/xbox-one-kinect-includes-no-listening-modes-for-living-room-privacy-22283117/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 11:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kinect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xbox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xbox One]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=283117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft has attempted to reassure privacy-perplexed gamers that the new Xbox One will not be a permanent spy camera in their living room, promising that the updated Kinect sensor will support &#8220;completely secure&#8221; shut-down modes. Kinect will be a standard part of the new Xbox One package, with the new motion-tracking bar even more accurate  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/xbox-one-kinect-includes-no-listening-modes-for-living-room-privacy-22283117/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/xbox-one-kinect-includes-no-listening-modes-for-living-room-privacy-22283117/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google+ and Glass just got the upgrade for lifelogging everything</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-and-glass-just-got-the-upgrade-for-lifelogging-everything-18282633/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/google-and-glass-just-got-the-upgrade-for-lifelogging-everything-18282633/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 15:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Plus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memoto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project Glass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wearable]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=282633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re still laughing at Google+, and at Google Glass, then it might be time to stop; Google has just shown that they&#8217;re its next route to digitally understanding everything about you, and it slipped that through in the guise of a simple photo gallery tool. Highlights is one of the few dozen new features  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/google-and-glass-just-got-the-upgrade-for-lifelogging-everything-18282633/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/google-and-glass-just-got-the-upgrade-for-lifelogging-everything-18282633/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Glass privacy concerns must be addressed by June 14 says Congress</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-glass-privacy-concerns-must-be-addressed-by-june-14-says-congress-17282525/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/google-glass-privacy-concerns-must-be-addressed-by-june-14-says-congress-17282525/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 07:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brittany Hillen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project Glass]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=282525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glass was nary more than a twinkle in Google&#8216;s eye (pun intended) when many started voicing their concerns over privacy, followed shortly by preemptive bans against the wearable device by bars and similar associations. While Google has talked about Glass and privacy to various degrees over the past weeks, it is going to have to  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/google-glass-privacy-concerns-must-be-addressed-by-june-14-says-congress-17282525/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/google-glass-privacy-concerns-must-be-addressed-by-june-14-says-congress-17282525/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PayPal wants to get rid of passwords in favor of biometric security</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/paypal-wants-to-get-rid-of-passwords-in-favor-of-biometric-security-10281447/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/paypal-wants-to-get-rid-of-passwords-in-favor-of-biometric-security-10281447/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 17:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Lloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biometrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PayPal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=281447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While passwords are the way of the land on the internet, PayPal&#8217;s chief information security officer Michael Barrett says that passwords and PINs are obsolete and we need a new standard for security on computers and the internet. Barrett thinks that the next step is fingerprint scanners, which he believes will debut on smartphones at  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/paypal-wants-to-get-rid-of-passwords-in-favor-of-biometric-security-10281447/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/paypal-wants-to-get-rid-of-passwords-in-favor-of-biometric-security-10281447/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DOJ docs reveal Facebook and email digging without a warrant</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/doj-docs-reveal-facebook-and-email-digging-without-a-warrant-08281028/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/doj-docs-reveal-facebook-and-email-digging-without-a-warrant-08281028/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 14:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=281028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US Department of Justice and FBI can read your email, Facebook and Twitter messages, and other electronic content without needing a warrant first, government documentation reveals, in what&#8217;s being seen as another slap at due process and privacy. Internal guidelines from US Attorney offices in multiple locations and acquired by the American Civil Liberties  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/doj-docs-reveal-facebook-and-email-digging-without-a-warrant-08281028/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/doj-docs-reveal-facebook-and-email-digging-without-a-warrant-08281028/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House hires Twitter legal director as chief privacy officer</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/white-house-hires-twitter-legal-director-as-chief-privacy-officer-07280933/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/white-house-hires-twitter-legal-director-as-chief-privacy-officer-07280933/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 20:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Lloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=280933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The White House has hired its first ever chief privacy officer, and the the person to take the helm for the first time is Twitter&#8216;s legal director Nicole Wong, who has over a decade of experience dealing with both copyright and privacy law. The appointment of a chief privacy officer comes at a curious time,  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/white-house-hires-twitter-legal-director-as-chief-privacy-officer-07280933/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/white-house-hires-twitter-legal-director-as-chief-privacy-officer-07280933/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Path &#8220;Find Friends&#8221; blocked by Facebook for suspicious spam</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/path-find-friends-blocked-by-facebook-for-suspicious-spam-04280617/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/path-find-friends-blocked-by-facebook-for-suspicious-spam-04280617/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 23:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Sin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=280617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facebook has blocked Path&#8217;s access to its social graph due to Path&#8217;s recent spam debacle. This will prevent Path from being able to access the social network&#8217;s &#8220;Find Friends&#8221; feature, meaning the app won&#8217;t be able to spam your contacts list with invites. However, users will still be able to login to Path via Facebook  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/path-find-friends-blocked-by-facebook-for-suspicious-spam-04280617/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/path-find-friends-blocked-by-facebook-for-suspicious-spam-04280617/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Syrian Electronic Army takes over E! Online&#8217;s Twitter Account</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/syrian-electronic-army-takes-over-e-onlines-twitter-account-04280596/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/syrian-electronic-army-takes-over-e-onlines-twitter-account-04280596/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 18:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Sin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hackers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=280596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Syrian Electronic Army strikes again, and this time, their target was both E! Online and Justin Bieber. In a series of tweets, the SEA stated that Justin Bieber was coming out of the closet and admitting to his homosexuality in an E! Online exclusive. The group provided links following those tweets, presumably to malware  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/syrian-electronic-army-takes-over-e-onlines-twitter-account-04280596/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/syrian-electronic-army-takes-over-e-onlines-twitter-account-04280596/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FBI seeks to fine tech companies failing to comply with real-time wiretaps</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/fbi-seeks-to-fine-tech-companies-failing-to-comply-with-real-time-wiretaps-01280174/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/fbi-seeks-to-fine-tech-companies-failing-to-comply-with-real-time-wiretaps-01280174/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 19:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Sin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[messaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=280174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new proposal from the government would require tech companies like Facebook or Google to allow law enforcement to place real-time wiretaps on a suspect&#8217;s communication mediums, like messaging apps, emails, and more. Law officials would present a court-ordered request to the companies, and if the companies don&#8217;t comply, they would receive a fine amounting  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fbi-seeks-to-fine-tech-companies-failing-to-comply-with-real-time-wiretaps-01280174/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/fbi-seeks-to-fine-tech-companies-failing-to-comply-with-real-time-wiretaps-01280174/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EFF praises Twitter, slams Verizon over user data protection</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/eff-praises-twitter-slams-verizon-over-user-data-protection-01280110/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/eff-praises-twitter-slams-verizon-over-user-data-protection-01280110/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 14:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Lloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EFF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=280110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Digital rights advocacy group Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has released their annual report of which companies are the best at protecting its users data from the government, and the results may be surprising to some. The EFF reports that Twitter is the best when it comes to protecting user data, while Verizon, Apple, and didn&#8217;t  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/eff-praises-twitter-slams-verizon-over-user-data-protection-01280110/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/eff-praises-twitter-slams-verizon-over-user-data-protection-01280110/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Glass Bulletproof lockscreen adds unofficial wearable security</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-glass-bulletproof-lockscreen-adds-unofficial-wearable-security-01280077/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/google-glass-bulletproof-lockscreen-adds-unofficial-wearable-security-01280077/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 09:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project Glass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wearable]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=280077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Security concerns around Google Glass and what data access those casually &#8211; or nefariously &#8211; picking up your wearable might have has prompted the first DIY lock system for the headset, Bulletproof. Resembling the standard Android lockscreen, but adding some head-detection smarts to prevent you from having to swipe in a code every time you  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/google-glass-bulletproof-lockscreen-adds-unofficial-wearable-security-01280077/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/google-glass-bulletproof-lockscreen-adds-unofficial-wearable-security-01280077/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Former AOL VP becomes new head of CIA tech and science division</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/former-aol-vp-becomes-new-head-of-cia-tech-and-science-division-30280026/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/former-aol-vp-becomes-new-head-of-cia-tech-and-science-division-30280026/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 23:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Sin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=280026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The CIA has appointed Dawn Meyerriecks, former AOL Senior Vice President for Product Technology, as its new Chief of Science and Technology. While it seems like a strange move on the CIA&#8217;s part, after reading through Meyerricks&#8217;s resume, we now understand why she is one of the best candidates. According to Wired, Meyerrick&#8217;s is the  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/former-aol-vp-becomes-new-head-of-cia-tech-and-science-division-30280026/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/former-aol-vp-becomes-new-head-of-cia-tech-and-science-division-30280026/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hacker shows how Google Glass could watch its user&#8217;s every move</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/hacker-shows-how-google-glass-could-watch-its-users-every-move-30280024/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/hacker-shows-how-google-glass-could-watch-its-users-every-move-30280024/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 22:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Sin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project Glass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=280024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jay Freeman, an iOS and Android developer known for his popular Cydia app store accessible by jailbroken iPhones, has discovered a scary security flaw in Google Glass. While toying around with the Explorer edition of Google Glass, Freeman discovered that the device&#8217;s lack of a PIN code or any other form of authentication could make  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/hacker-shows-how-google-glass-could-watch-its-users-every-move-30280024/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/hacker-shows-how-google-glass-could-watch-its-users-every-move-30280024/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Syrian Electronic Army targets The Guardian&#8217;s Twitter accounts</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/syrian-electronic-army-targets-the-guardians-twitter-accounts-29279806/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/syrian-electronic-army-targets-the-guardians-twitter-accounts-29279806/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Sin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=279806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Syrian Electronic Army has struck again, and this time they decided to hack into several accounts belonging to The Guardian. A couple of the accounts hacked were @GuardianBusiness and @GuardianFilm, and they were used to send out tweets promoting the Syrian Electronic Army. This is the latest attack coming from the SEA, and is  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/syrian-electronic-army-targets-the-guardians-twitter-accounts-29279806/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/syrian-electronic-army-targets-the-guardians-twitter-accounts-29279806/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet cookies get five year death sentence</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/internet-cookies-get-five-year-death-sentence-28279675/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/internet-cookies-get-five-year-death-sentence-28279675/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Sin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertisement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tracking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=279675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Internet tracking cookies may soon see their demise, at least according to Paul Cimino, the Vice President and General Manager at Brilig Digital Data Solutions, a company that looks through 1st and 3rd party data to leverage for marketing campaigns. He says that the internet cookie has &#8220;5 years at most&#8221; to live before its  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/internet-cookies-get-five-year-death-sentence-28279675/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/internet-cookies-get-five-year-death-sentence-28279675/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NYC police chief: more surveillance cameras coming, privacy is &#8220;off the table&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/nyc-police-chief-more-surveillance-cameras-coming-privacy-is-off-the-table-26279562/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/nyc-police-chief-more-surveillance-cameras-coming-privacy-is-off-the-table-26279562/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 20:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Lloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=279562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now more than ever, people are becoming more worried about their privacy, specifically being monitored while out in the public. Whether it&#8217;d be commuting to work or going out with friends, people aren&#8217;t too comfortable with the idea that there are people watching them. However, it&#8217;s not going away anytime soon, according to NYC police  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/nyc-police-chief-more-surveillance-cameras-coming-privacy-is-off-the-table-26279562/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/nyc-police-chief-more-surveillance-cameras-coming-privacy-is-off-the-table-26279562/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACLU: CISPA bill essentially dead</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/aclu-cispa-bill-essentially-dead-25279406/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/aclu-cispa-bill-essentially-dead-25279406/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 20:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Lloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cispa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=279406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The controversial CISPA bill recently passed through the House of Representatives with flying colors, and it&#8217;s now in the Senate, where it will then be passed on to the President if the bill passes in the Senate. However, many groups and organizations are almost positive that the bill will be vetoed in the Senate, including  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/aclu-cispa-bill-essentially-dead-25279406/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/aclu-cispa-bill-essentially-dead-25279406/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google teams up with FIDO for password replacement</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-teams-up-with-fido-for-password-replacement-24279194/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/google-teams-up-with-fido-for-password-replacement-24279194/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Sin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=279194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google and FIDO, the Fast IDentity Online Alliance, have joined forces in an effort to replace passwords completely with a new authentication system altogether. FIDO is only looking to replace passwords used when trying to log in into online sites and services, saying that the current password system isn&#8217;t secure enough to protect users. Its  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/google-teams-up-with-fido-for-password-replacement-24279194/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/google-teams-up-with-fido-for-password-replacement-24279194/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter tipped to be testing out two-factor authentication system</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/twitter-tipped-to-be-testing-out-two-factor-authentication-system-24279179/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/twitter-tipped-to-be-testing-out-two-factor-authentication-system-24279179/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Sin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=279179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amidst all of the recent Twitter accounts being breached by hackers, Twitter is tipped to be working on a two-factor authentication system to better protect its users. According to Wired, Twitter is currently performing internal tests on the two-factor authentication system and when the tests are complete, the new feature will be shortly distributed to  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/twitter-tipped-to-be-testing-out-two-factor-authentication-system-24279179/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/twitter-tipped-to-be-testing-out-two-factor-authentication-system-24279179/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter and Syrian Electronic Army go to battle</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/twitter-and-syrian-electronic-army-go-to-battle-23278926/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/twitter-and-syrian-electronic-army-go-to-battle-23278926/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Sin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hackers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=278926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After the Syrian Electronic Army took over several of CBS&#8217;s Twitter accounts recently, Twitter has focused its priorities on taking the hackers down, well at least their Twitter accounts. Twitter proceeded to shut down the SEA&#8217;s official Twitter account, and the hackers responded by creating another Twitter account named @Official_SEA. This quickly led to a  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/twitter-and-syrian-electronic-army-go-to-battle-23278926/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/twitter-and-syrian-electronic-army-go-to-battle-23278926/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft shows users how to manage their online privacy</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/microsoft-shows-users-how-to-manage-their-online-privacy-22278820/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/microsoft-shows-users-how-to-manage-their-online-privacy-22278820/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 22:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Sin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=278820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft is launching a new consumer awareness campaign in hopes of informing more users on how to better improve their online privacy. The online awareness campaign involves a series of methods that will inform users about their online privacy, and what technologies and tools they can use to control the type of information that they  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/microsoft-shows-users-how-to-manage-their-online-privacy-22278820/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/microsoft-shows-users-how-to-manage-their-online-privacy-22278820/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A new age of Glass social etiquette dawns says Google&#8217;s Schmidt</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/a-new-age-of-glass-social-etiquette-dawns-says-googles-schmidt-22278731/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/a-new-age-of-glass-social-etiquette-dawns-says-googles-schmidt-22278731/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must Read Bits & Bytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Lifestyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project Glass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wearable]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=278731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Glass will spur an evolution in social etiquette, Google chair Eric Schmidt has predicted, though he argues users of the wearable have a responsibility to &#8220;behave appropriately&#8221; as well. The augmented reality headset has already been preemptively banned from bars, casinos, and other locations, over concerns that users might film their fellow patrons; however,  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/a-new-age-of-glass-social-etiquette-dawns-says-googles-schmidt-22278731/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/a-new-age-of-glass-social-etiquette-dawns-says-googles-schmidt-22278731/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s Street View goof sees biggest fine yet (but regulators wanted more)</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/googles-street-view-goof-sees-biggest-fine-yet-but-regulators-wanted-more-22278725/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/googles-street-view-goof-sees-biggest-fine-yet-but-regulators-wanted-more-22278725/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 12:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Street View]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=278725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Germany privacy regulators have fined Google €145,000 ($189,000) for its Street View cars inadvertently harvesting WiFi network data, in what was described as &#8220;one of the biggest data protection rules violations known.&#8221; The penalty is nearly the biggest amount permitted for negligent data rule contravention in Germany, and comfortably exceeds a €100,000 fine imposed in France two  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/googles-street-view-goof-sees-biggest-fine-yet-but-regulators-wanted-more-22278725/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/googles-street-view-goof-sees-biggest-fine-yet-but-regulators-wanted-more-22278725/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anonymous calls for &#8220;Internet Blackout Day&#8221; April 22nd to combat CISPA</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/anonymous-calls-for-internet-blackout-day-april-22nd-to-combat-cispa-21278671/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/anonymous-calls-for-internet-blackout-day-april-22nd-to-combat-cispa-21278671/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 18:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Sin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cispa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=278671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tomorrow has been dubbed &#8220;Internet Blackout Day&#8221; by Anonymous. It has asked that many website owners blackout their websites on April 22nd at 6:00AM GMT in protest against CISPA. The protest will last for 24 hours, and will show the government the &#8220;unity and power of the internet they&#8217;re trying to exploit.&#8221; Along with making  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/anonymous-calls-for-internet-blackout-day-april-22nd-to-combat-cispa-21278671/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/anonymous-calls-for-internet-blackout-day-april-22nd-to-combat-cispa-21278671/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawmakers debate increasing video surveillance in U.S.</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/lawmakers-debate-increasing-video-surveillance-in-u-s-21278666/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/lawmakers-debate-increasing-video-surveillance-in-u-s-21278666/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 16:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Sin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Camera]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=278666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Authorities are debating whether or not video surveillance should be increased in the United States due to their importance in uncovering the suspects of the Boston Marathon bombings. Lawmakers are in talks about the importance of increasing surveillance and how CCTV (close-circuit television) cameras will be able to increase security and protect citizens as well  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/lawmakers-debate-increasing-video-surveillance-in-u-s-21278666/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/lawmakers-debate-increasing-video-surveillance-in-u-s-21278666/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple keeps anonymized Siri data for two years</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-keeps-anonymized-siri-data-for-two-years-19278560/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-keeps-anonymized-siri-data-for-two-years-19278560/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 14:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Lloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[siri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voice control]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=278560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After releasing Siri on the iPhone 4S back in 2011, Apple has finally disclosed how long it keeps all of those commands and hankering questions you have for Siri. The Cupertino-based company says that it keeps all Siri data for two years, but they state that all of the data from Siri that the company  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/apple-keeps-anonymized-siri-data-for-two-years-19278560/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-keeps-anonymized-siri-data-for-two-years-19278560/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House passes CISPA bill with flying colors</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/house-passes-cispa-bill-with-flying-colors-18278439/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/house-passes-cispa-bill-with-flying-colors-18278439/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 17:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Lloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cispa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=278439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After being squashed in the Senate last year, the CISPA bill has made a reappearance in the House of Representatives once again, and it passed with flying colors. The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act, as it&#8217;s called, passed in the House by a majority vote of 288 to 127. It&#8217;s now on to the  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/house-passes-cispa-bill-with-flying-colors-18278439/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/house-passes-cispa-bill-with-flying-colors-18278439/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
