<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SlashGear &#187; Penryn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/penryn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:17:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>iMac refresh appearing on Retail stock systems [Updated]</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/imac-refresh-appearing-on-retail-stock-systems-2811368/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/imac-refresh-appearing-on-retail-stock-systems-2811368/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iMac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penryn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=11368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Update: They've been announced!] Rumors began last week that Apple was prepping an iMac refresh, two months after rejuvenating the MacBook and MacBook Pro lines.  Now retailers are discretely reporting new model numbers appearing on their stock systems.  The assumption is still that Apple will officially release the new desktops tomorrow, and while screen size options are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[<strong>Update:</strong> They've <a href="http://cdn.slashgear.com/apple-refreshes-imac-with-faster-processor-and-fsb-2811377.php" target="_blank">been announced</a>!] Rumors <a href="http://cdn.slashgear.com/imac-update-predicted-for-next-tuesday-2511346.php" target="_blank">began last week</a> that Apple was prepping an iMac refresh, two months after <a href="http://cdn.slashgear.com/macbook-pro-and-macbook-refreshed-with-penryn-2610451.php" target="_blank">rejuvenating</a> the MacBook and MacBook Pro lines.  Now retailers are <a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2008/04/26/retail-sources-confirm-imac-refresh/" target="_blank">discretely reporting</a> new model numbers appearing on their stock systems.  The assumption is still that Apple will officially release the new desktops tomorrow, and while screen size options are expected to stay the same that hasn&#8217;t stopped some <a href="http://cdn.slashgear.com/imac-update-predicted-for-next-tuesday-2511346.php#comment-40542" target="_blank">SlashGear readers</a> dreaming:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.slashgear.com/gallery/data_files/7/4/iMac_30-inch_speculation.jpg" alt="iMac 30-inch wishful-thinking" width="480" height="240" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>Mock-up <a href="http://www.aidemac.fr/" target="_blank">source</a></em></p>
<p><span id="more-11368"></span></p>
<p>While a huge 30-inch display would be a great addition, what&#8217;s actually expected is Intel&#8217;s latest Penryn chipset, with memory, storage and perhaps video card hardware all getting a nudge upwards too.  Aesthetically, the iMacs are expected to stay the same.  Similarly, functionality and, sadly, screen size are not predicted to change.</p>
<p>As was tipped, pricing for the new models has remained the same.  Retailers are reporting that same $1199, $1499 and $1799 pre-configurations.  Since we&#8217;ve not heard of any stock shortages for existing moels, look out for discounted end-of-line pre-built iMacs if you&#8217;re after a potential bargain.  After all, it&#8217;s been argued that Penryn&#8217;s energy efficiency, while <a href="http://cdn.slashgear.com/macbook-pro-with-penryn-cpu-multitouch-is-it-worth-an-upgrade-1210719.php" target="_blank">useful for a notebook</a>, has limited appeal in a desktop system.</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/imac-refresh-appearing-on-retail-stock-systems-2811368/" title="iMac refresh appearing on Retail stock systems [Updated]">iMac refresh appearing on Retail stock systems [Updated]</a> is written by <a href="http://twitter.com/c_davies" >Chris Davies</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/imac-refresh-appearing-on-retail-stock-systems-2811368/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fujitsu LOOX R 12-inch ultraportable updated</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/fujitsu-loox-r-12-inch-ultraportable-updated-2211277/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/fujitsu-loox-r-12-inch-ultraportable-updated-2211277/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fujitsu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hsdpa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penryn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ultraportable]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=11277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Fujitsu announced its LOOX R notebook last December it was the first model we&#8217;d seen with Intel&#8217;s Penryn chipset. Of course, last year&#8217;s laptops are old news now, and so the company has updated the range with an Intel Core 2 Duo SL7100 processor running at 1.2GHz. It still has a 12.1-inch LCD display, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Fujitsu announced its LOOX R notebook <a href="http://cdn.slashgear.com/fujitsu-s-loox-to-run-on-mobile-penryn-189100.php" target="_blank">last December</a> it was the first model we&#8217;d seen with Intel&#8217;s Penryn chipset.  Of course, last year&#8217;s laptops are old news now, and so the company has updated the range with an Intel Core 2 Duo SL7100 processor running at 1.2GHz.  It still has a 12.1-inch LCD display, but Fujitsu have switched to LED backlighting for better clarity and improved battery life.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.slashgear.com/gallery/data_files/7/4/Fujitsu_LOOX_R_1.jpg" alt="Fujitsu LOOX R" width="480" height="360" /></p>
<p><span id="more-11277"></span></p>
<p>There are also seven new, swappable covers available, one of which features a small puppy.  I&#8217;m not sure why you&#8217;d want a puppy on your laptop, but then perhaps that just means I&#8217;m not the target audience.  More to my tastes are the 2GB or 4GB of RAM, the fact that the screen is 1,280 x 800 resolution and the optional 7.2Mbps WWAN module (not specified, but presumably HSDPA).</p>
<p><img src="http://www.slashgear.com/gallery/data_files/7/4/Fujitsu_LOOX_R_2.jpg" alt="Fujitsu LOOX R swappable covers" width="480" height="320" /></p>
<p>There&#8217;s also a dual-layer DVD rewriter and WiFi in a/b/g/n flavors.  No word on how the updated LOOX R compares to the old in terms of Fujitsu&#8217;s claimed 9.7hrs of battery life.  Considering the current craze for compact ultraportables, pricing &#8211; similarly yet to be announced &#8211; will be key in whether the LOOX R is positioned as an Eee/Wind/2133 rival or a challenge to the VAIO TZ/Air/X300.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://www.akihabaranews.com/en/news_details.php?id=15872" target="_blank">Akihabara</a>]</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fujitsu-loox-r-12-inch-ultraportable-updated-2211277/" title="Fujitsu LOOX R 12-inch ultraportable updated">Fujitsu LOOX R 12-inch ultraportable updated</a> is written by <a href="http://twitter.com/c_davies" >Chris Davies</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/fujitsu-loox-r-12-inch-ultraportable-updated-2211277/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MacBook Pro with Penryn CPU &amp; MultiTouch: is it worth an upgrade?</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/macbook-pro-with-penryn-cpu-multitouch-is-it-worth-an-upgrade-1210719/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/macbook-pro-with-penryn-cpu-multitouch-is-it-worth-an-upgrade-1210719/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ewdison Then</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SlashGear Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penryn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/macbook-pro-with-penryn-cpu-multitouch-is-it-worth-an-upgrade-1210719.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After three generations of MacBook Pro, Apple have had plenty of time to refine their flagship super-strength laptop. However, users have also had time to refine their expectations; with this latest update to Intel&#8217;s 45nm Penryn CPU and a switch from CCFL to LED screen back-lighting (for the 17-inch; 15-inch has been using LED since [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After three generations of <a href="http://www.apple.com/macbookpro/" target="_blank">MacBook Pro</a>, Apple have had plenty of time to refine their flagship super-strength laptop.  However, users have also had time to refine their expectations; with this latest update to Intel&#8217;s 45nm Penryn CPU and a switch from CCFL to LED screen back-lighting (for the 17-inch; 15-inch has been using LED since last revision with Santa Rosa platform), the MacBook Pro is trying to be both powerful <em>and</em> efficient.  SlashGear sat down with the 2.5GHz, 15-inch version &#8211; with 4GB DDR RAM and 512MB VRAM &#8211; and its 2.2GHz predecessor (Santa Rosa), to see both whether the changes are worth the upgrade for existing owners and, perhaps more importantly, whether the MacBook Pro keeps its position (arguably) at the top of the notebook pile.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.slashgear.com/gallery/data_files/1/macbookpro_penryn.jpg" height="320" width="480" /></p>
<p><span id="more-10719"></span></p>
<p>First off, the full change sheet.  Obviously the biggest difference is the processor, with the latest MacBook Pro switching from Intel&#8217;s 65nm Santa Rosa CPUs to its 45nm Penryn chips.  Our last-gen comparison machine has a quarter of the video RAM, too; just 128MB versus the new model&#8217;s 512MB.  Apple have also used LEDs to backlight the screen as in the MacBook Air, rather than the power-hungry CCFL used previously, and the ultraportable&#8217;s MultiTouch capabilities have been carried over too, albeit in a touchpad the same, smaller size as earlier Pros.  Finally, the keyboard has been slightly re-fettled, with the F-keys as seen on the Air.</p>
<p>MultiTouch works, certainly, though the reduced size of the pad compared to the Air does force you to gesture slightly differently.  Apple would still have it that they&#8217;ve put the same interface from the iPhone onto their notebook range, and while being able to rotate images, zoom and flick is all well and good, it&#8217;s certainly not as intuitive as it is with their cellphone&#8217;s touchscreen.</p>
<p>Earlier MacBooks couldn&#8217;t really be accused of having dim screens but, as with any LED-backlit model we&#8217;ve seen, the difference is always impressive.  It&#8217;s difficult to do a direct comparison, but it was comfortable using the new MacBook Pro with the brightness turned down a few extra notches below the old model.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s Penryn that makes the biggest difference, though.  Not so much in speed &#8211; although there was an 11-percent performance increase over the 2.2GHz Santa Rosa &#8211; but in how cool the notebook runs and how efficiently it manages power.  On the lap, the new Pro felt more comfortable than the old, despite the Penryn CPU itself getting hotter than the Santa Rosa under load.</p>
<p>All that adds up to saved battery power, and this is where the Penryn-powered MacBook Pro really impresses.  With light web browsing via WiFi, we managed 5.2hrs of use before the battery died &#8211; even the MacBook Air didn&#8217;t last that long, and it&#8217;s actually more than the 5hrs Apple quote in their own figures.  Apple have toughened up their battery tests, but are claiming that generally you get an extra half-hour from the new CPU and the same again from the new backlight.</p>
<p>At the start, we asked whether the updates were enough to maintain the MacBook Pro&#8217;s admirable reputation, as well as whether it made a convincing argument for an upgrade.  The former is certainly true: all the old MacBook Pro strengths are there unchanged, and the addition of Penryn, LEDs and MultiTouch only add to them.  The latter, though, is harder to judge.  An hour, at most, above an earlier Pro&#8217;s battery life is perhaps not quite strong enough a reason for someone with, say, a one-year-old MacBook Pro to upgrade; similarly, MultiTouch is nice but certainly doesn&#8217;t rank among must-have functionality.  To such a buyer, we&#8217;d say wait until Apple&#8217;s fifth range refresh; to anyone else, we&#8217;d wholeheartedly recommend the Penryn MacBook Pro.</p>
<p><p><strong>Rating:</strong><ul class="star-list">4 out of 5 gears</ul></p><div class="clear"></div><div style="height: 1px;"></div></p>
<p>Unboxing</p>
<p><p><center><iframe title="YouTube video player" width="584" height="362" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/r6t60_m8urY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></center></p>
</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/macbook-pro-with-penryn-cpu-multitouch-is-it-worth-an-upgrade-1210719/" title="MacBook Pro with Penryn CPU &#038; MultiTouch: is it worth an upgrade?">MacBook Pro with Penryn CPU &#038; MultiTouch: is it worth an upgrade?</a> is written by <a href="http://www.ewdisonthen.com" >Ewdison Then</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/macbook-pro-with-penryn-cpu-multitouch-is-it-worth-an-upgrade-1210719/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iMacs getting processor upgrade too?</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/imacs-getting-processor-upgrade-too-2510433/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/imacs-getting-processor-upgrade-too-2510433/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Allan Brady</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iMac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keyboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacBook Air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penryn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/imacs-getting-processor-upgrade-too-2510433.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So we all know that Apple hasn’t updated their precious MacBook Pro line in quite sometime, nor have they updated their MacBooks any time recently, so updates for both are likely on their way. The catch is, whatever processor/graphics/FSB the MacBook Pros are using/have usually gets passed on to the iMacs. So, chances are, when [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So we all know that Apple hasn’t updated their precious MacBook Pro line in quite sometime, nor have they updated their MacBooks any time recently, so updates for both are likely on their way. The catch is, whatever processor/graphics/FSB the MacBook Pros are using/have usually gets passed on to the iMacs.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.slashgear.com/gallery/data_files/2/7/8/imac_3_20071026.jpg" /></p>
<p><span id="more-10433"></span></p>
<p>So, chances are, when Apple upgrades their MBPs the iMacs will receive the Penryn upgrade as well. For the MBPs you’ll also be able to look for keyboard and trackpad updates allowing similar multi-touch functionality as the MacBook Air.</p>
<p>The only thing we aren’t sure of is whether we’ll see these upgrades at the rumored end-of-February thing or if we’ll see them at the Mid-March thing. If its at the end of February, you can probably only expect to see the processor, keyboard, and trackpad updates, if its Mid-March, the MBP might get a complete overhaul.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://www.9to5mac.com/new-iMAc-updates-2008-34543646" target="_blank">9to5mac</a>]</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/imacs-getting-processor-upgrade-too-2510433/" title="iMacs getting processor upgrade too?">iMacs getting processor upgrade too?</a> is written by <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" >James Allan Brady</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/imacs-getting-processor-upgrade-too-2510433/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dell Inspiron 1420, 1520, and 1720 can now be configured and purchased with Penryn Inside</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/dell-inspiron-1420-1520-and-1720-can-now-be-configured-and-purchased-with-penryn-inside-2110394/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/dell-inspiron-1420-1520-and-1720-can-now-be-configured-and-purchased-with-penryn-inside-2110394/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Allan Brady</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Battery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Core 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penryn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Processor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/dell-inspiron-1420-1520-and-1720-can-now-be-configured-and-purchased-with-penryn-inside-2110394.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Each of those numbers correspond mainly to the available screen sizes with the 1420 having a 14.1-inch screen, the 1520 having a 15.4” screen, and the 1720 having a 17-inch screen. The 1420 and 1520 will now have the T8300 Penryn chip running at 2.4GHz as an option. The 1720 will have the T8300 as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Each of those numbers correspond mainly to the available screen sizes with the 1420 having a 14.1-inch screen, the 1520 having a 15.4” screen, and the 1720 having a 17-inch screen. The 1420 and 1520 will now have the T8300 Penryn chip running at 2.4GHz as an option.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.slashgear.com/gallery/data_files/2/7/8/dell_inspiron_eight_colors.jpg" /></p>
<p><span id="more-10394"></span></p>
<p>The 1720 will have the T8300 as well as the T9300 running at 2.5GHz both as options. The benefits of these processors, other than better performance, are that they have lower power consumption and lower heat output resulting in a longer battery life compared to their 65nm Core 2 Duo counterparts.</p>
<p>The older chips had the codename of Merom applied to them and used the larger 65nm process instead of the new 45nm process the Penryn chips apply. No word on what the premium is for a Penryn chip, but I assume that for the performance bump that goes with it, it isn’t much.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://laptoping.com/dell-inspiron-1420-1520-1720-core-2-duo-penryn-t8300-t9300.html" target="_blank">laptoping</a>]</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/dell-inspiron-1420-1520-and-1720-can-now-be-configured-and-purchased-with-penryn-inside-2110394/" title="Dell Inspiron 1420, 1520, and 1720 can now be configured and purchased with Penryn Inside">Dell Inspiron 1420, 1520, and 1720 can now be configured and purchased with Penryn Inside</a> is written by <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" >James Allan Brady</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/dell-inspiron-1420-1520-and-1720-can-now-be-configured-and-purchased-with-penryn-inside-2110394/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dell XPS M1730 is now Penryn powered &#8211; Latitude is next in line for refresh</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/dell-xps-m1730-is-now-penryn-powered-latitude-is-next-in-line-for-refresh-1510285/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/dell-xps-m1730-is-now-penryn-powered-latitude-is-next-in-line-for-refresh-1510285/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Satsuki Then</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penryn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/dell-xps-m1730-is-now-penryn-powered-latitude-line-is-next-in-line-for-refresh-1510285.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dell XPS M1730 gaming laptop has been refreshed! It is now available with Intel’s latest processor, Penryn. The new CPUs from Intel are manufactured in 45-nanometer process and was announced during the 2008 CES. Dell replaces the Merom based T7700 and T7800 CPUs with T9300 and T9500 Penryn chips without any price changes. Dell refreshed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dell XPS M1730 gaming laptop has been refreshed! It is now available with Intel’s latest processor, Penryn. The new CPUs from Intel are manufactured in 45-nanometer process and was announced during the 2008 CES.</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/dell_xps_m1730_270x202.gif" alt="Dell XPS M1730 is now Penryn powered" /></p>
<p><span id="more-10285"></span></p>
<p>Dell replaces the Merom based T7700 and T7800 CPUs with T9300 and T9500 Penryn chips without any price changes.</p>
<p>Dell refreshed the XPS M1330 last week by replacing Merom based CPUs with Penryn. Dell will also refresh Latitude laptops this month.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://crave.cnet.com/8301-1_105-9873040-1.html" title="source" target="_blank">crave</a>]</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/dell-xps-m1730-is-now-penryn-powered-latitude-is-next-in-line-for-refresh-1510285/" title="Dell XPS M1730 is now Penryn powered &#8211; Latitude is next in line for refresh">Dell XPS M1730 is now Penryn powered &#8211; Latitude is next in line for refresh</a> is written by <a href="" >Satsuki Then</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/dell-xps-m1730-is-now-penryn-powered-latitude-is-next-in-line-for-refresh-1510285/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fujitsu LifeBook A6120 is now shipping &#8211; powered by Penryn CPU</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/fujitsu-lifebook-a6120-is-now-shipping-powered-by-penryn-cpu-0310051/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/fujitsu-lifebook-a6120-is-now-shipping-powered-by-penryn-cpu-0310051/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 16:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Satsuki Then</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fujitsu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penryn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/fujitsu-lifebook-a6120-is-now-shipping-powered-by-penryn-cpu-0310051.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Penryn based laptops has started to ship! Fujitsu’s LifeBook A6120 desktop replacement notebook is now available for order. Fujitsu’s online store is also giving estimated shipping date when you add the system to your cart. Fujitsu LifeBook A6120 features Core 2 Duo “Penryn” based CPU (45nm) clocked at 2.1Ghz (T8100) up to 2.4Ghz (T8300), 3GB [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Penryn based laptops has started to ship! Fujitsu’s LifeBook A6120 desktop replacement notebook is now available for order. Fujitsu’s online store is also giving estimated shipping date when you add the system to your cart.</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/a6120.jpg" alt="Fujitsu LifeBook A6120 is now shipping - powered by Penryn CPU" height="224" width="480" /></p>
<p><span id="more-10051"></span></p>
<p>Fujitsu LifeBook A6120 features Core 2 Duo “Penryn” based CPU (45nm) clocked at 2.1Ghz (T8100) up to 2.4Ghz (T8300), 3GB of DDR2 (4GB max), 15.4-inch screen with resolution of 1280&#215;800. It has built-in 1.3 megapixel webcam, finger print reader, Bluetooth and Intel 4965AGN wireless. The system comes with both ExpressCard and PC card slot.</p>
<p>The A6120 uses integrated graphics card (GMA X3100). It  weighs 6.6lbs with battery and battery life is up to 2.4 hours. The LifeBook A6120 starts at $1299 with $50 mail-in rebate.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://store.shopfujitsu.com/fpc/Ecommerce/buildseriesbean.do?series=A6120">Fujitsu Store</a>]</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fujitsu-lifebook-a6120-is-now-shipping-powered-by-penryn-cpu-0310051/" title="Fujitsu LifeBook A6120 is now shipping &#8211; powered by Penryn CPU">Fujitsu LifeBook A6120 is now shipping &#8211; powered by Penryn CPU</a> is written by <a href="" >Satsuki Then</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/fujitsu-lifebook-a6120-is-now-shipping-powered-by-penryn-cpu-0310051/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple unveiled Penryn Mac Pros and Xserves</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-unveiled-penryn-mac-pros-and-xserves-089501/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-unveiled-penryn-mac-pros-and-xserves-089501/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ewdison Then</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penryn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/apple-unveiled-penryn-mac-pros-and-xserves-089501.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple refreshed its Mac Pro and Xserve line today with Intel’s new Penryn CPU. Mac Pro standard configuration now comes with two Quad-Core Intel Xeons running at 2.8Ghz. All Mac Pros is equipped with ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT 256MB graphics card. The base configuration for Mac Pro starts at $2799. The standard 8-core Mac [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple refreshed its Mac Pro and Xserve line today with Intel’s new Penryn CPU. Mac Pro standard configuration now comes with two Quad-Core Intel Xeons running at 2.8Ghz. All Mac Pros is equipped with ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT 256MB graphics card. The base configuration for Mac Pro starts at $2799.</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/macpro_display.jpg" alt="Apple unveiled Penryn Mac Pros and Xserves" /></p>
<p><span id="more-9501"></span></p>
<p>The standard 8-core Mac Pro, retailed at $2,799 (US), includes:</p>
<p>- 2 x 2.8 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon processors with dual-independent 1600 MHz front side buses;<br />
- 2GB of 800 MHz DDR2 ECC fully-buffered DIMM memory, expandable up to 32GB;<br />
- ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT with 256MB of GDDR3 memory;<br />
- 320GB Serial ATA 3Gb/s hard drive running at 7200 rpm;<br />
- 16x SuperDrive(TM) with double-layer support (DVD+/-R DL/DVD+/-RW/CD-RW);<br />
- 2 x PCI Express 2.0 slots and two PCI Express slots;<br />
- Bluetooth 2.0+EDR; and<br />
- ships with Apple Keyboard and Mighty Mouse.</p>
<p>Apple also revised the Xserve today with the same architecture. Xserve standard configuration, with a suggested retail price of $2,999 (US), includes:</p>
<p>- A single 64-bit 2.8 GHz Quad-Core Xeon processor with 12MB of L2 cache and a 1600 Mhz front side bus;<br />
- 2GB of 800 MHz DDR2 ECC FB-DIMM RAM, expandable up to 32GB;<br />
- A single 80GB SATA Apple Drive Module;<br />
- 2 x Gigabit Ethernet on-board;<br />
- Internal graphics;<br />
- 2 x FireWire(R) 800 and three USB 2.0 ports; and<br />
- An unlimited client license for Mac OS X Server version 10.5 Leopard.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2008/01/08/apple-announces-penryn-mac-pros-and-xserve/" title="source">macrumors</a>]</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/apple-unveiled-penryn-mac-pros-and-xserves-089501/" title="Apple unveiled Penryn Mac Pros and Xserves">Apple unveiled Penryn Mac Pros and Xserves</a> is written by <a href="http://www.ewdisonthen.com" >Ewdison Then</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-unveiled-penryn-mac-pros-and-xserves-089501/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fujitsu’s LOOX to Run on Mobile Penryn</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/fujitsu-s-loox-to-run-on-mobile-penryn-189100/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/fujitsu-s-loox-to-run-on-mobile-penryn-189100/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Lim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fujitsu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penryn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/fujitsu%e2%80%99s-loox-to-run-on-mobile-penryn-189100.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hate my Macbook pro, it’s powerful alright but the battery is rather pathetic. I can’t finish one good night of blogging if I left the power adapter at work. The Santa Rosa didn’t improve much but i hope the upcoming Penryn will. I was psyched to read the Fujitsu’s LOOX R70 with mobile penryn [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.slashgear.com/gallery/data_files/2/8/2/LOOX-R70Y.jpg" alt="Fujitsu’s LOOX to run on Mobile Penryn" /></p>
<p>I hate my Macbook pro, it’s powerful alright but the battery is rather pathetic. I can’t finish one good night of blogging if I left the power adapter at work.  The Santa Rosa didn’t improve much but i hope the upcoming Penryn will. I was psyched to read the Fujitsu’s LOOX R70 with mobile penryn has an optimized battery life up to 9.7 hours with stock battery.  That’s right, Fujitsu unveils the first Penryn notebook today. It has a compact size of 12.1” screen and weight only 2.8lb. The new LOOX will equip with 1GB of memory and 120GB of storage space in Windows Vista Business and has the schedule to release in Japan next month.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/07/12/18/fujitsu.loox.r70/" target="_blank">Fujitsu hints at first Penryn notebook</a> [via electronista]</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fujitsu-s-loox-to-run-on-mobile-penryn-189100/" title="Fujitsu’s LOOX to Run on Mobile Penryn">Fujitsu’s LOOX to Run on Mobile Penryn</a> is written by <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" >Daniel Lim</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/fujitsu-s-loox-to-run-on-mobile-penryn-189100/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel&#8217;s new Penryn line &#8211; faster and smaller</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/intels-new-penryn-line-making-118435/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/intels-new-penryn-line-making-118435/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Reece Bailey Schofield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Core 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penryn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/intels-new-penryn-line-making-118435.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can you imagine a smaller, faster, more energy efficient processor than what is in our computers today? Well, Intel can, and they did. Today Intel unveiled its new Penryn lineup of super small, super fast chips. We can speculate that these new chips will be sold under the Core 2 and Xeon brand name. But [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you imagine a smaller, faster, more energy efficient processor than what is in our computers today? Well, Intel can, and they did. Today Intel unveiled its new Penryn lineup of super small, super fast chips.</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/penryn_intel.jpg" alt="Intel’s new Penryn line - faster and smaller" /></p>
<p><span id="more-8435"></span></p>
<p>We can speculate that these new chips will be sold under the Core 2 and Xeon brand name. But expect them to be one-third smaller, and 15% faster, and expect to pay a little bit more for these chips.</p>
<p>The Penryn based processors will start appearing initially in servers and network solutions in Q1. Expect to see these processors as a new standard for mobile computing. Look for these chips taking over the industry in mid 2008.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSN1135220820071111">Intel launches new chips with smaller circuits</a> (Reuters)</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/intels-new-penryn-line-making-118435/" title="Intel&#8217;s new Penryn line &#8211; faster and smaller">Intel&#8217;s new Penryn line &#8211; faster and smaller</a> is written by <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" >Reece Bailey Schofield</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/intels-new-penryn-line-making-118435/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

