<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SlashGear &#187; Java</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/java/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:36:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google Glass developers make Mirror API simple with Cat Facts</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-glass-developers-make-mirror-api-simple-with-cat-facts-16282471/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/google-glass-developers-make-mirror-api-simple-with-cat-facts-16282471/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 21:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[developers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google IO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project Glass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=282471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google&#8217;s 2013 developer conference this year didn&#8217;t give immediate attention to Glass, at least not at its one and only keynote address &#8211; but behind the scenes, development ran deep. Speaking together at a developer chat session centered on &#8220;Building Glassware&#8221; with what the company calls its Google Mirror API, Jenny Murphy and Alain Vongsouvanh  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/google-glass-developers-make-mirror-api-simple-with-cat-facts-16282471/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/google-glass-developers-make-mirror-api-simple-with-cat-facts-16282471/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RuneScape 3 drops Java in favor of HTML5</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/runescape-3-drops-java-in-favor-of-html5-04280581/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/runescape-3-drops-java-in-favor-of-html5-04280581/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 17:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Sin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTML5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=280581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jagex, the developers of the infamous web-browser MMORPG RuneScape, has decided that it&#8217;s time to put Java away and welcome in HTML5. The game developer knew that in order for the next sequel of RuneScape, RuneScape 3, to be successful, it needed to transition into a new engine. It considered Adobe Flash, but Flash didn&#8217;t  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/runescape-3-drops-java-in-favor-of-html5-04280581/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/runescape-3-drops-java-in-favor-of-html5-04280581/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oracle rolls out patch for Java vulnerabilities, Apple responds with update</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/oracle-rolls-out-patch-for-java-vulnerabilities-apple-responds-with-update-05272507/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/oracle-rolls-out-patch-for-java-vulnerabilities-apple-responds-with-update-05272507/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 08:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brittany Hillen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=272507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another day, another Java security alert. In this case, Oracle has released Security Alert CVE-2013-1493, which highlights two vulnerabilities that are particular to Java in browsers. The patch for these issues was originally slated for release in April as part of Oracle&#8217;s Critical Patch Update for Java SE. Because the vulnerabilities are being exploited in  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/oracle-rolls-out-patch-for-java-vulnerabilities-apple-responds-with-update-05272507/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/oracle-rolls-out-patch-for-java-vulnerabilities-apple-responds-with-update-05272507/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Java zero-day exploit strikes again</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/java-zero-day-exploit-strikes-again-01272061/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/java-zero-day-exploit-strikes-again-01272061/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 18:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Lloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hackers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=272061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Java zero-day exploit has been making the rounds lately, hitting both Facebook and Apple just recently. However, it doesn&#8217;t seem to be slowing down anytime soon. A newly discovered zero-day vulnerability in the most recent versions of Java 6 and Java 7 has been discovered, and it allows attackers to install malicious software on  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/java-zero-day-exploit-strikes-again-01272061/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/java-zero-day-exploit-strikes-again-01272061/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update Java warns Apple after Mac hack</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/update-java-warns-apple-after-mac-hack-20270190/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/update-java-warns-apple-after-mac-hack-20270190/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=270190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple has pushed out a new Java update to address the malware loophole that saw hackers attempt to extract data from the company, stripping out the Apple-provided browser plugin in the process. The update, which follows Apple&#8217;s confirmation that a &#8220;small number&#8221; of its systems had been compromised by an unknown hacking group, basically removes  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/update-java-warns-apple-after-mac-hack-20270190/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/update-java-warns-apple-after-mac-hack-20270190/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple targeted by Java zero-day bug [UPDATE]</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-targeted-by-java-zero-day-bug-19270018/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-targeted-by-java-zero-day-bug-19270018/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Lloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hackers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=270018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, Facebook was attacked by a zero-day Java exploit. While the social network said that no personal data was stolen, it&#8217;s never too comforting when companies and services get hacked. This week, however, Apple was the target this time around, saying that a &#8220;small number&#8221; Mac computers have been infected. Apple has confirmed the  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/apple-targeted-by-java-zero-day-bug-19270018/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-targeted-by-java-zero-day-bug-19270018/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook security reveals zero-day Java attack</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/facebook-security-reveals-zero-day-java-attack-15269551/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/facebook-security-reveals-zero-day-java-attack-15269551/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 22:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=269551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s never good when you have to make an official report to the public about a hacker attack your multi-billion dollar social network has had. That&#8217;s what&#8217;s happened this week as Facebook&#8217;s Chief Security Officer Joe Sullivan lets it be known that several engineers on staff with Facebook had been the subject of a zero-day  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/facebook-security-reveals-zero-day-java-attack-15269551/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/facebook-security-reveals-zero-day-java-attack-15269551/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oracle releases Java SE&#8217;s February 2013 Critical Patch Update</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/oracle-releases-java-ses-february-2013-critical-patch-update-01267927/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/oracle-releases-java-ses-february-2013-critical-patch-update-01267927/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 05:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brittany Hillen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=267927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oracle has rolled out its February 2013 Critical Patch Update for Java SE, which addresses dozens of security vulnerabilities. The patch was originally slated for release on February 19, but because of an active exploitation problem that was targeting Java in browsers, the company elected to roll it out early. The patch update fixes 50  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/oracle-releases-java-ses-february-2013-critical-patch-update-01267927/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/oracle-releases-java-ses-february-2013-critical-patch-update-01267927/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple says no to Java 7, blocks browser plug-in</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-says-no-to-java-7-blocks-browser-plug-in-31267667/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-says-no-to-java-7-blocks-browser-plug-in-31267667/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 22:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Abent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=267667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#8217;ve likely already heard of the Java security scandal, which was something Oracle looked to fix quickly with an update to the software. Even though Oracle says it has patched the issue, some entities disagree. The latest to add its name to the list of dissenters seems to be Apple, as it has decided to  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/apple-says-no-to-java-7-blocks-browser-plug-in-31267667/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-says-no-to-java-7-blocks-browser-plug-in-31267667/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SlashGear Evening Wrap-Up: January 15, 2013</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-evening-wrap-up-january-15-2013-15265449/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-evening-wrap-up-january-15-2013-15265449/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Abent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BlackBerry 10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nexus 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SlashGear Evening Wrap-Up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=265449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome to Tuesday evening, everyone. The afternoon started off with something of a bang with Facebook&#8217;s big event, during which the company revealed the service&#8217;s new Graph Search and explained the difference between the new feature and traditional web search. It also announced that it was partnering with Bing for search results in Graph Search,  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-evening-wrap-up-january-15-2013-15265449/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-evening-wrap-up-january-15-2013-15265449/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Java tipped in Red October &#8211; may be Homeland Security&#8217;s hang-up</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/java-tipped-in-red-october-may-be-homeland-securitys-hang-up-15265398/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/java-tipped-in-red-october-may-be-homeland-securitys-hang-up-15265398/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 17:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=265398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the past several days, the US Department of Homeland Security has issued warnings against using Java due to newly discovered security weaknesses &#8211; today it&#8217;s been tipped that the Red October cyberespionage attacks may have had their own Java iterations. The two have not been put together by the Israeli IT security firm Seculert,  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/java-tipped-in-red-october-may-be-homeland-securitys-hang-up-15265398/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/java-tipped-in-red-october-may-be-homeland-securitys-hang-up-15265398/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Homeland Security still warns against Java use despite fix</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/homeland-security-still-warns-against-java-use-despite-fix-14265254/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/homeland-security-still-warns-against-java-use-despite-fix-14265254/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 20:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Abent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=265254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well that didn&#8217;t last very long: this morning Oracle released a fix for a Java vulnerability that had the government suggesting users turn off the software. As it turns out, The Department of Homeland Security is still saying that Java poses a risk, despite the fix. The Department said in an updated security note this  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/homeland-security-still-warns-against-java-use-despite-fix-14265254/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/homeland-security-still-warns-against-java-use-despite-fix-14265254/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Java fix released after &#8220;do not use&#8221; warning</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/java-fix-released-after-do-not-use-warning-14265099/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/java-fix-released-after-do-not-use-warning-14265099/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 09:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=265099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oracle has quickly whipped up a fix for its much-maligned Java, after the US Department of Homeland Security recommended web users disable or remove the software to secure their internet use. Java 7 Update 11, released late on Sunday, changes the default security settings so that unsigned Java applets or Web Start applications prompt for  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/java-fix-released-after-do-not-use-warning-14265099/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/java-fix-released-after-do-not-use-warning-14265099/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Turn off Java, they warn&#8230; Here&#8217;s how you do it</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/turn-off-java-they-warn-heres-how-you-do-it-12265037/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/turn-off-java-they-warn-heres-how-you-do-it-12265037/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 19:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must Read Bits & Bytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=265037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Security advice for web users last week from the US Department of Homeland Security recommended that Java should be disabled, lest a growing number of exploits leave your computer open to hacking. &#8220;Java vulnerabilities have been widely targeted by attackers, and new Java vulnerabilities are likely to be discovered&#8221; the US-CERT warned, and argued that users  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/turn-off-java-they-warn-heres-how-you-do-it-12265037/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/turn-off-java-they-warn-heres-how-you-do-it-12265037/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Users advised to disable Java due to security weakness</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/users-advised-to-disable-java-due-to-security-weakness-11265030/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/users-advised-to-disable-java-due-to-security-weakness-11265030/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 04:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brittany Hillen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=265030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, the Department of Homeland Security issued a warning regarding Java, advising users to disable it in their web browsers. Following this was a Critical Patch Update Pre-Release Announcement from Oracle, which suggests that users temporarily disable it because of security issues. Says the advisement, Java leaves the computer open to attack. The warning was  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/users-advised-to-disable-java-due-to-security-weakness-11265030/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/users-advised-to-disable-java-due-to-security-weakness-11265030/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple removes Java from OS X browsers with Mac update</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-removes-java-from-os-x-browsers-with-mac-update-18252740/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-removes-java-from-os-x-browsers-with-mac-update-18252740/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 02:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brittany Hillen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=252740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Wednesday, Apple released a Mac update for Lion and Mountain Lion that strips all Mac browsers of the Java plugin, another move in the company&#8217;s effort to distance itself from Oracle&#8217;s Java software. Once the update is installed, users presented with Java content will see a placeholder that reads &#8220;Missing Plug-in.&#8221; After which point,  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/apple-removes-java-from-os-x-browsers-with-mac-update-18252740/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-removes-java-from-os-x-browsers-with-mac-update-18252740/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oracle agrees to $0 and moves to appeal vs Google</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/oracle-agrees-to-0-and-moves-to-appeal-vs-google-20235008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/oracle-agrees-to-0-and-moves-to-appeal-vs-google-20235008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 22:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=235008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a case whose roots go much further back than the few weeks and months that the actual in-court session has lasted, Oracle has accepted defeat at the hands of Google with a total of $0 damages. This case had Oracle suing Google for codes used in Android that they said the latter company had  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/oracle-agrees-to-0-and-moves-to-appeal-vs-google-20235008/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/oracle-agrees-to-0-and-moves-to-appeal-vs-google-20235008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oracle ordered to pay Google&#8217;s legal fees</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/oracle-ordered-to-pay-googles-legal-fees-07232838/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/oracle-ordered-to-pay-googles-legal-fees-07232838/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 20:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must Read Bits & Bytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=232838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the latest of a series of burns Google is issuing to Oracle amid the ruling that they were not in the wrong in their recent legal spat, the judge presiding over the case has ruled that Oracle is now responsible for all of Google&#8217;s legal fees. Thusly they&#8217;ll have lost a whole lot more  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/oracle-ordered-to-pay-googles-legal-fees-07232838/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/oracle-ordered-to-pay-googles-legal-fees-07232838/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pro-Google jury doubted Oracle all along says foreman</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/pro-google-jury-doubted-oracle-all-along-says-foreman-24229737/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/pro-google-jury-doubted-oracle-all-along-says-foreman-24229737/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 10:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=229737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oracle faced a stronger than expected challenge convincing the jury in the Android case that Google had willfully infringed Java patents, post-trial comments have revealed, with most leaning heavily toward the search company throughout the case. Despite earlier speculation that the 12-strong jury was looking negatively on Google&#8217;s arguments, jury foreman Greg Thompson told Ars Technica that in fact it  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/pro-google-jury-doubted-oracle-all-along-says-foreman-24229737/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/pro-google-jury-doubted-oracle-all-along-says-foreman-24229737/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Java judge scolds Oracle for Google fair-use ruling desperation</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/java-judge-scolds-oracle-for-google-fair-use-ruling-desperation-10227667/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/java-judge-scolds-oracle-for-google-fair-use-ruling-desperation-10227667/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 17:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=227667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oracle has been spanked by the judge in the Android Java case for flip-flopping on its demands for a jury verdict, telling the firm he won&#8217;t rule on whether Google overstepped &#8220;fair use&#8221; in its code. The ongoing lawsuit was thrown into confusion earlier this week, when the jury decided it could not settle on  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/java-judge-scolds-oracle-for-google-fair-use-ruling-desperation-10227667/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/java-judge-scolds-oracle-for-google-fair-use-ruling-desperation-10227667/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oracle targets Dalvik VM as Google case continues</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/oracle-targets-dalvik-vm-as-google-case-continues-08226903/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/oracle-targets-dalvik-vm-as-google-case-continues-08226903/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 21:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Crider</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=226903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Though the first portion of the Oracle vs Google case ended on something of a hollow victory for Oracle, the networking giant intends to plow on with its patent claims in the second section. Oracle&#8217;s attorneys contend that the Dalvik virtual machine used to speed up Android&#8217;s processes infringes on two of the patents that  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/oracle-targets-dalvik-vm-as-google-case-continues-08226903/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/oracle-targets-dalvik-vm-as-google-case-continues-08226903/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oracle vs Google suit could set dangerous API openness precedent</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/oracle-vs-google-suit-could-set-dangerous-api-openness-precedent-08226788/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/oracle-vs-google-suit-could-set-dangerous-api-openness-precedent-08226788/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 16:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=226788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Google vs Oracle trial could have serious and long-lasting implications for app developers and manufacturers, experts have warned, with decisions around fair-use of APIs potentially casting coders into the morass of copyright hell. &#8221;Treating APIs as copyrightable would have a profound negative impact on interoperability, and, therefore, innovation&#8221; Julie Samuels, staff attorney at the Electronics Frontier  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/oracle-vs-google-suit-could-set-dangerous-api-openness-precedent-08226788/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/oracle-vs-google-suit-could-set-dangerous-api-openness-precedent-08226788/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google vs Oracle: Jury torn but case plows on</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-vs-oracle-jury-torn-but-case-plows-on-08226721/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/google-vs-oracle-jury-torn-but-case-plows-on-08226721/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 11:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=226721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google and Oracle may be unable to decide who is the victor after the latest jury decision in the Android Java trial, but even with no clear decision on fair use the case moves on now to whether Oracle&#8217;s Sun patents have been infringed. Presiding Judge Alsup accepted no delay in the momentum of the  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/google-vs-oracle-jury-torn-but-case-plows-on-08226721/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/google-vs-oracle-jury-torn-but-case-plows-on-08226721/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oracle vs Google: jury deadlocked over copyright fair use</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/oracle-vs-google-jury-deadlocked-over-copyright-fair-use-07226521/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/oracle-vs-google-jury-deadlocked-over-copyright-fair-use-07226521/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 19:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Crider</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must Read Bits & Bytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=226521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Deliberations in the first portion of Oracle vs Google have gone on for the better part of a week, with little movement in the case. The jury reached a verdict late Monday afternoon, declaring that Google&#8217;s use of Java APIs in the Android platform constituted copyright infringement. However, the jury was deadlocked over whether or  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/oracle-vs-google-jury-deadlocked-over-copyright-fair-use-07226521/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/oracle-vs-google-jury-deadlocked-over-copyright-fair-use-07226521/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oracle vs Google verdict to drop Monday</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/oracle-vs-google-verdict-to-drop-monday-04226309/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/oracle-vs-google-verdict-to-drop-monday-04226309/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 20:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must Read Bits & Bytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[developer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=226309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As it stands today, the jury has delivered note to the judge in the case of Oracle vs Google which says that all but one count has had a unanimous decision made on it. The case at hand has been going on for a little over a week here in the spring of 2012 and  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/oracle-vs-google-verdict-to-drop-monday-04226309/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/oracle-vs-google-verdict-to-drop-monday-04226309/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jury closing in on verdict in Oracle vs Google</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/jury-closing-in-on-verdict-in-oracle-vs-google-03226106/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/jury-closing-in-on-verdict-in-oracle-vs-google-03226106/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 22:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Crider</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=226106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In what&#8217;s easily the highest-profile patent case so far this year, the jury is narrowing down its information while it prepares for a verdict. Three days into deliberations, the jury for Oracle vs Google is asking for more specific information of who uses the Java software, the patents of which are the central crux of  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/jury-closing-in-on-verdict-in-oracle-vs-google-03226106/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/jury-closing-in-on-verdict-in-oracle-vs-google-03226106/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Xamarin XobotOS ports Android to C# and .NET framework</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/xamarin-xobotos-ports-android-to-c-and-net-framework-02225604/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/xamarin-xobotos-ports-android-to-c-and-net-framework-02225604/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 09:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shane McGlaun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=225604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are a fan of Android, I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;re familiar with the legal wrangling going on between Google and Oracle. A company called Xamarin has announced that it has ported the Java-based Android operating system over to C# and the .NET framework. The new operating system resulting from the port is being called XobotOS.  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/xamarin-xobotos-ports-android-to-c-and-net-framework-02225604/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/xamarin-xobotos-ports-android-to-c-and-net-framework-02225604/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oracle vs Google Wrap-up: All Possibilities</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/oracle-vs-google-wrap-up-all-possibilities-01225482/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/oracle-vs-google-wrap-up-all-possibilities-01225482/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 16:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=225482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The are several different things that could happen as the jury deliberates in the most massive case in code in recent history: Oracle vs Google with Android&#8216;s life in the balance and the freedom of all developers hanging in the balance. Or so some would have you believe. In reality there are more than just  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/oracle-vs-google-wrap-up-all-possibilities-01225482/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/oracle-vs-google-wrap-up-all-possibilities-01225482/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oracle&#8217;s final rebuttal against Google</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/oracles-final-rebuttal-against-google-30225325/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/oracles-final-rebuttal-against-google-30225325/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 21:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=225325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This afternoon we&#8217;ve seen another set of updates coming from the Oracle vs Google case as the former continues to assert that the latter did indeed infringe on JAVA patents they&#8217;ve held for some time, with closing arguments being the final bits of info we&#8217;ll get today. We&#8217;ve had a look at what Google has  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/oracles-final-rebuttal-against-google-30225325/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/oracles-final-rebuttal-against-google-30225325/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google closes against Oracle</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-closes-against-oracle-30225311/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/google-closes-against-oracle-30225311/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 20:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=225311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today is the day that it appears the Google vs Oracle case will close for the first time with Closing Arguments from both parties. I say for the first time because there&#8217;s always a way for a court case to be re-opened after its final verdict &#8211; always. In this case, we&#8217;re hearing from Google  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/google-closes-against-oracle-30225311/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/google-closes-against-oracle-30225311/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Google totally slimed Sun&#8221; says Java father</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-totally-slimed-sun-says-java-father-30225256/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/google-totally-slimed-sun-says-java-father-30225256/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=225256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Father of Java and former Sun employee James Gosling has weighed in on the legal furore around Android&#8217;s use of the programming language, claiming that &#8220;Google totally slimed Sun.&#8221; With the courtroom battle between Oracle &#8211; which acquired Sun and its Java patents &#8211; and Google picking up for its second week today, Gosling echoed Sun  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/google-totally-slimed-sun-says-java-father-30225256/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/google-totally-slimed-sun-says-java-father-30225256/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sun vs Sun at Google Oracle case</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/sun-vs-sun-at-google-oracle-case-26224954/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/sun-vs-sun-at-google-oracle-case-26224954/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 22:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=224954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two former Sun leaders have sparred off this week in the Oracle vs Google case that&#8217;s shaking the Android universe to its knees with its implications. Though we first heard about this Oracle business with Google over a year ago, the case has only just started officially this past month, today showing Oracle&#8217;s case for  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/sun-vs-sun-at-google-oracle-case-26224954/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/sun-vs-sun-at-google-oracle-case-26224954/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ex-Sun chief supports Google in Oracle trial</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ex-sun-chief-supports-google-in-oracle-trial-26224925/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/ex-sun-chief-supports-google-in-oracle-trial-26224925/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 19:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rue Liu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=224925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oracle may have hit a roadblock in its trial against Google over Java licensing issues in Android. Former Sun Microsystems CEO Jonathan Schwartz took the stand today as a witness for the defense, disputing Oracle&#8217;s claims that the Java APIs in question were Sun&#8217;s proprietary code. When asked by Google&#8217;s counsel Robert Van Nest whether  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/ex-sun-chief-supports-google-in-oracle-trial-26224925/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/ex-sun-chief-supports-google-in-oracle-trial-26224925/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Original Google Phone revealed</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/original-google-phone-revealed-25224720/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/original-google-phone-revealed-25224720/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 19:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must Read Bits & Bytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=224720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week at Google&#8217;s court case against Oracle, an original slide deck has been shown with photos of the original Google Phone &#8211; well before the first actual Android-based product. The slide deck containing these images shows several mentions of Java integration and is being used against Google on account of Oracle&#8217;s claim that they  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/original-google-phone-revealed-25224720/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/original-google-phone-revealed-25224720/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s Andy Rubin didn&#8217;t believe Android needed Java API licensing</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/googles-andy-rubin-didnt-believe-android-needed-java-api-licensing-25224714/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/googles-andy-rubin-didnt-believe-android-needed-java-api-licensing-25224714/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 19:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rue Liu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=224714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google&#8217;s Android chief Andy Rubin has just wrapped up his three days of testimony in the Oracle trial over the copyright issues in Android. The testimony today mainly covered issues regarding Java API licensing requirements from Sun Microsystems, which Rubin said he was unaware of, saying, &#8220;We did not believe that we needed a license  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/googles-andy-rubin-didnt-believe-android-needed-java-api-licensing-25224714/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/googles-andy-rubin-didnt-believe-android-needed-java-api-licensing-25224714/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s Bloch on Oracle: &#8216;it was a mistake&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/googles-bloch-on-oracle-it-was-a-mistake-20223916/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/googles-bloch-on-oracle-it-was-a-mistake-20223916/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 19:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must Read Bits & Bytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=223916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oracles lawsuit against Google may have just taken a turn for the worse for the latter company as it appears their own Java guru Joshua Bloch may have admitted some incriminating evidence this Friday. According to Bryan Bishop of The Verge, Oracle&#8217;s attorneys questioned Bloch today and appear to have turned up some interesting admissions.  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/googles-bloch-on-oracle-it-was-a-mistake-20223916/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/googles-bloch-on-oracle-it-was-a-mistake-20223916/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Apple Flashback removal for non-Java Lion Macs released</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/new-apple-flashback-removal-for-non-java-lion-macs-released-14222920/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/new-apple-flashback-removal-for-non-java-lion-macs-released-14222920/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 15:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=222920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple has already delivered one Flashback malware removal option for Mac users, and now the company has released a second clean-up tool for those who don&#8217;t have Java installed on their systems. The new Flashback malware removal tool (DL1517) is intended for users of OS X 10.7 Lion who, for one reason or another, are avoiding  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/new-apple-flashback-removal-for-non-java-lion-macs-released-14222920/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/new-apple-flashback-removal-for-non-java-lion-macs-released-14222920/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google/Oracle Java patent trial date set</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/googleoracle-java-patent-trial-date-set-02221164/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/googleoracle-java-patent-trial-date-set-02221164/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 22:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must Read Bits & Bytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=221164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All talks of settlement over what&#8217;s sure to be an electric case between Oracle and Google over copyright infringement of the former by the latter have failed and a trail date has been set to end the conflict. It will all end (or begin in ernest, rather) on April 16, 2012, and Google may be  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/googleoracle-java-patent-trial-date-set-02221164/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/googleoracle-java-patent-trial-date-set-02221164/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oracle vs Google Android lawsuit headed to settlement talks</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/oracle-vs-google-android-lawsuit-headed-to-settlement-talks-07177829/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/oracle-vs-google-android-lawsuit-headed-to-settlement-talks-07177829/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 21:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must Read Bits & Bytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=177829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In one of the most important law-related situations in Google&#8217;s mobile OS Android&#8217;s relatively short history, Google and Oracle appear to be heading to a settlement agreement over whether Android does indeed infringe upon Java code owned by the other party. In a case we&#8217;ve been covering since its inception in over a year ago  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/oracle-vs-google-android-lawsuit-headed-to-settlement-talks-07177829/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/oracle-vs-google-android-lawsuit-headed-to-settlement-talks-07177829/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Java creator James Gosling ditches Google for robotics firm after less than 6 months on the job</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/java-creator-james-gosling-ditches-google-for-robotics-firm-after-less-than-6-months-on-the-job-31175537/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/java-creator-james-gosling-ditches-google-for-robotics-firm-after-less-than-6-months-on-the-job-31175537/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 10:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shane McGlaun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=175537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In March of 2011, Google hired James Gosling, the father of Java for an unspecified position. We naturally assumed that Gosling was going to work on Android in some capacity. Strangely, at the time Gosling landed at Google, it and Oracle were in a legal battle over the alleged use of some Java code in  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/java-creator-james-gosling-ditches-google-for-robotics-firm-after-less-than-6-months-on-the-job-31175537/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/java-creator-james-gosling-ditches-google-for-robotics-firm-after-less-than-6-months-on-the-job-31175537/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
