<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SlashGear &#187; fcc</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/fcc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:56:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google H840 media streamer hits FCC to potentially replace Nexus Q</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-h840-media-streamer-hits-fcc-to-potentially-replace-nexus-q-18282628/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/google-h840-media-streamer-hits-fcc-to-potentially-replace-nexus-q-18282628/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 12:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must Read Bits & Bytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Nexus Q]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Streaming media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=282628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google&#8217;s short-lived Nexus Q has already been left out of the Google Play Music All Access action, but there looks to be a successor in the pipeline, with a new Google media player spotted in FCC testing. The Google H840 (product code H2G2-42, an apparent play on The Hitchhiker&#8217;s Guide to the Galaxy) WiFi-testing listing  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/google-h840-media-streamer-hits-fcc-to-potentially-replace-nexus-q-18282628/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google&#8217;s short-lived <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/nexus-q" target="_blank">Nexus Q</a> has already been left out of the <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/google-play-music-all-access-hands-on-15282291/" target="_blank">Google Play Music All Access</a> action, but there looks to be a successor in the pipeline, with a new Google media player spotted in FCC testing. The Google H840 (product code H2G2-42, an apparent play on The Hitchhiker&#8217;s Guide to the Galaxy) <a href="https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&amp;RequestTimeout=500&amp;calledFromFrame=N&amp;application_id=735876&amp;fcc_id=A4RH2G2-42" target="_blank">WiFi-testing listing</a> has been pared back thanks to a confidentiality request, but the wireless report does confirm that it &#8220;functions as a media player&#8221; with 2.4GHz WiFi b/g/n connectivity.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-282629" alt="google_nexus_q" src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/google_nexus_q.jpeg" width="580" height="364" /></p>
<p><span id="more-282628"></span></p>
<p>Unfortunately there are no test photos, so we don&#8217;t know what the Google H840 looks like. The report suggests it was tested with a USB-connected Dell monitor, though that&#8217;s presumably to access either the LCD&#8217;s USB hub or its memory card slot, since that particular model doesn&#8217;t support video input over USB.</p>
<p>Anything else is, at this stage, speculative, though given the launch of Google Play Music All Access this past week at I/O, some sort of Sonos-style streaming box would seem an obvious guess. That could be hooked up to a set of external speakers or alternatively have onboard speakers and amplification.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-282630" alt="google_h840_fcc_1" src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/google_h840_fcc_1-580x306.png" width="580" height="306" /></p>
<p>Google isn&#8217;t the only company tipped to be working on a streaming media device. Earlier this month, it was rumored that Amazon&#8217;s hardware lab <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/amazon-smartphone-duo-with-glasses-free-3d-eye-tracking-tipped-09281315/" target="_blank">is developing a wireless audio adapter</a> which could be used with its own cloud music locker service.</p>
<p>The Google H840 would presumably be a more focused device than the Nexus Q, which was unveiled at I/O in 2012 and then swiftly killed off as market feedback proved uncertain. The orb-shaped streamer was intended to funnel YouTube videos, music, and other content direct to a TV, with communal playlist control from multiple Android-powered phones and tablets.</p>
<p>However, a combination of high price &#8211; partly because Google intended it to be manufactured in the US &#8211; and confusing purpose meant the Nexus Q project was axed. Earlier this week, it was confirmed that Google <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/google-play-music-update-quietly-drops-support-for-nexus-q-16282454/" target="_blank">would not be officially supporting the streamer</a> with the All Access subscription music jukebox service.</p>
<p>The H840 (its H2G2-42 product code a combination of the fan abbreviation for Hitchhiker&#8217;s Guide and the &#8220;meaning of life&#8221;: the number 42) looks to be the second attempt at the market, though when Google will actually unveil it officially remains to be seen.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-282631" alt="google_h840_label_fcc" src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/google_h840_label_fcc-580x435.png" width="580" height="435" /></p>
<p>VIA: <a href="http://www.tabletguide.nl/37376/google-werkt-aan-eigen-mediaspeler/" target="_blank">TabletGuide</a></p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/google-h840-media-streamer-hits-fcc-to-potentially-replace-nexus-q-18282628/" title="Google H840 media streamer hits FCC to potentially replace Nexus Q">Google H840 media streamer hits FCC to potentially replace Nexus Q</a> is written by <a href="http://twitter.com/c_davies" >Chris Davies</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/google-h840-media-streamer-hits-fcc-to-potentially-replace-nexus-q-18282628/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>President Obama to name Tom Wheeler as FCC head</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/president-obama-to-name-tom-wheeler-as-fcc-head-30280011/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/president-obama-to-name-tom-wheeler-as-fcc-head-30280011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 20:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Lloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=280011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The White House is set to announce the next chairman of the FCC, and the position will be going to telecom lobbyist and venture capitalist Tom Wheeler, according to several reports. President Obama is expected to make the announcement as early as tomorrow, which will see the Core Capital Partners managing director take over the  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/president-obama-to-name-tom-wheeler-as-fcc-head-30280011/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The White House is set to announce the next chairman of the FCC, and the position will be going to telecom lobbyist and venture capitalist Tom Wheeler, according to several reports. President Obama is expected to make the announcement as early as tomorrow, which will see the Core Capital Partners managing director take over the FCC helm at that point.</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/white-house-580x357.jpg" alt="white-house" width="580" height="357" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-280012" /></p>
<p><span id="more-280011"></span></p>
<p>Wheeler is taking over for Julius Genachowski, who stepped down from the position <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-chairman-julius-genachowski-reportedly-to-announce-departure-tomorrow-21274929/">last month</a>, and is temporarily being replaced by Commissioner Mignon Clyburn. Such credentials attached to Tom Wheeler include being the head of <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/ctia-wireless">CTIA Wireless</a> for over 10 years, as well serving as president of the National Cable Television Association.</p>
<p>Wheeler will be put into some tough shoes, as he becomes head of an organization that maintains and polices wireless airwaves and regulates telephone networks, as well as television. In a fast-paced technology world where standards are changing, Wheeler will hopefully add a fresh presence to the FCC.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s also the chance that the FCC will approve certain proposals under Wheeler that the FCC wouldn&#8217;t approve otherwise. For instance, Wheeler has said in the past that he would have allowed AT&#038;T to acquire T-Mobile, but a lawsuit brought on put an end to the acquisition, which was also supported by Genachowski.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323982704578455000613034748.html" target="_blank">via</a> Wall Street Journal]</p>
<div class="related-posts">
<div id="related-posts-MRP_all" class="related-posts-type">
<h4>Story Timeline</h4>
<ul class="st-related-posts">
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-takes-step-towards-opening-up-more-of-the-5ghz-spectrum-for-wi-fi-use-20270417/">FCC takes step towards opening up more of the 5GHz spectrum for unlicensed use</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-approves-t-mobile-merger-with-metropcs-12273499/">FCC approves T-Mobile merger with MetroPCS</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-lays-down-the-iron-fist-on-illegal-robocalls-18274483/">FCC lays down the iron fist on illegal robocalls</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-looks-into-cell-phone-radiation-decides-to-keep-limitations-same-as-before-30275866/">FCC looks into cell phone radiation, decides to keep limitations same as before</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/carriers-will-now-provide-high-bill-alerts-says-fcc-18278495/">Carriers will now provide high bill alerts, says FCC</a></li>
</ul></div>
</div>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/president-obama-to-name-tom-wheeler-as-fcc-head-30280011/" title="President Obama to name Tom Wheeler as FCC head">President Obama to name Tom Wheeler as FCC head</a> is written by <a href="" >Craig Lloyd</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/president-obama-to-name-tom-wheeler-as-fcc-head-30280011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New legislation aims for subsidized broadband in low-income homes</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/new-legislation-aims-for-subsidized-broadband-in-low-income-homes-24279181/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/new-legislation-aims-for-subsidized-broadband-in-low-income-homes-24279181/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Lloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=279181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an effort to update the FCC&#8217;s long-running Lifeline program that helps put telephone access in low-income homes, a new piece of legislation has been introduced to the House of Representatives that would aim to give low-income homes the opportunity for unsubsidized broadband internet access. The bill is backed by Rep. Doris Matsui (D-CA), and  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/new-legislation-aims-for-subsidized-broadband-in-low-income-homes-24279181/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an effort to update the FCC&#8217;s long-running Lifeline program that helps put telephone access in low-income homes, a new piece of legislation has been introduced to the House of Representatives that would aim to give low-income homes the opportunity for unsubsidized broadband internet access.</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/internet-580x435.jpg" alt="internet" width="580" height="435" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-279182" /></p>
<p><span id="more-279181"></span></p>
<p>The bill is backed by Rep. Doris Matsui (D-CA), and it&#8217;s being called the Broadband Adoption Act of 2013, which would instruct the <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/fcc">FCC</a> to modify the Lifeline program in order to include broadband internet. Matsui says that the Lifeline program is fantastic, but it needs to be updated and modernized to fit within the 21st century.</p>
<p>Lifeline is funded by the &#8220;Universal Service&#8221; system, which helps low-income Americans pay for their landline phone, but this new bill would see Universal Services also helping pay for broadband internet access. In addition to subsidizing services, the Universal Service also helps pay for telephone service in rural areas around the country.</p>
<p>However, the discussion of whether or not to provide low-income households with cheaper broadband internet has been up and down in Washington for several years now, with a 2010 government report showing up that recommended the addition of broadband internet to the existing Lifeline program. Plus, Matsui introduced similar legislation in 2011, but it quickly faded away.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/04/legislation-would-provide-subsidies-for-low-income-broadband-access/" target="_blank">via</a> Ars Technica]</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/new-legislation-aims-for-subsidized-broadband-in-low-income-homes-24279181/" title="New legislation aims for subsidized broadband in low-income homes">New legislation aims for subsidized broadband in low-income homes</a> is written by <a href="" >Craig Lloyd</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/new-legislation-aims-for-subsidized-broadband-in-low-income-homes-24279181/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carriers will now provide high bill alerts, says FCC</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/carriers-will-now-provide-high-bill-alerts-says-fcc-18278495/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/carriers-will-now-provide-high-bill-alerts-says-fcc-18278495/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 02:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brittany Hillen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carriers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless carrier]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=278495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The FCC has announced that ahead of yesterday&#8217;s deadline, carriers have instituted an alert system that will give subscribers a heads up when they&#8217;re nearing what will be a large bill. This follows many stories about unsuspecting consumers who have gone about their daily mobile usage, only to be faced with a massive bill at  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/carriers-will-now-provide-high-bill-alerts-says-fcc-18278495/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/fcc/" target="_blank">FCC</a> has announced that ahead of yesterday&#8217;s deadline, carriers have instituted an alert system that will give subscribers a heads up when they&#8217;re nearing what will be a large bill. This follows many stories about unsuspecting consumers who have gone about their daily mobile usage, only to be faced with a massive bill at the end of the month for exceeding their limits.</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/FCC-Logo.jpg" alt="FCC Logo" width="225" height="225" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-278496" /></p>
<p><span id="more-278495"></span></p>
<p>Says the Federal Communications Commission, 97-percent of mobile device users in the United States are now covered by the high bill alert system. The remaining 3-percent are using carriers who weren&#8217;t part of the voluntary agreement Consumer Code for Wireless Service. That doesn&#8217;t mean those carriers won&#8217;t send out alerts to their customers, only that they won&#8217;t be doing so under the CTIA-sponsored agreement.</p>
<p>Participating carriers include Verizon, AT&#038;T, Sprint, T-Mobile, US Cellular, Clearwire, Cellcome, and a few others, all of which provide voice, data, roaming, and text alerts (if applicable). The high bill alerts will be provided free of charge, so users don&#8217;t have to worry about the notifications eating into their text limits, for example. </p>
<p>Obviously, the alerts will only be given to those who have a plan where there&#8217;s a limitation in place with penalties for going over it, such as a limited number of minutes. Also, alerts will be provided if someone is roaming and doesn&#8217;t have a roaming package, putting them at risk of higher fees. The alerts are automatically generated and delivered. Those who want more info should head over to the CTIA&#8217;s <a href="http://www.ctia.org/consumer_info/service/index.cfm/AID/10352" target="_blank">website</a>.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.fcc.gov/bill-shock-alerts" target="_blank">via</a> FCC]</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/carriers-will-now-provide-high-bill-alerts-says-fcc-18278495/" title="Carriers will now provide high bill alerts, says FCC">Carriers will now provide high bill alerts, says FCC</a> is written by <a href="" >Brittany Hillen</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/carriers-will-now-provide-high-bill-alerts-says-fcc-18278495/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DOJ requires wireless spectrum auction to give smaller carriers a competitive chance</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/doj-requires-wireless-spectrum-auction-to-give-smaller-carriers-a-competitive-chance-13277721/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/doj-requires-wireless-spectrum-auction-to-give-smaller-carriers-a-competitive-chance-13277721/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2013 18:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Sin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spectrum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=277721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Department of Justice told the Federal Communications Commission that the upcoming wireless spectrum auction should give smaller carriers, like T-Mobile, a fighting chance to obtain spectrum in the low-frequency band. The wireless spectrum up for sale is being offered voluntarily by TV broadcasters so that wireless carriers can take advantage of them. However, with  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/doj-requires-wireless-spectrum-auction-to-give-smaller-carriers-a-competitive-chance-13277721/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="www.slashgear.com/tags/doj" target="_blank">Department of Justice</a> told the <a href="www.slashgear.com/tags/fcc" target="_blank">Federal Communications Commission</a> that the upcoming wireless spectrum auction should give smaller carriers, like <a href="www.slashgear.com/tags/t-mobile-usa" target="_blank">T-Mobile</a>, a fighting chance to obtain spectrum in the low-frequency band. The wireless spectrum up for sale is <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-approves-auction-to-reclaim-broadcast-tv-spectrum-28249659/" target="_blank">being offered voluntarily by TV broadcasters</a> so that wireless carriers can take advantage of them. However, with big-timers like AT&amp;T and Verizon Wireless looming around, smaller carriers are unable to compete.</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/US-DOJ-requires-wireless-spectrum-sale-to-ensure-competition1.jpg" alt="US DOJ requires wireless spectrum sale to ensure competition" width="499" height="500" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-277727" /><br />
<span id="more-277721"></span></p>
<p>The 600MHz frequency band will be sold at the auction. Currently, <a href="www.slashgear.com/tags/att" target="_blank">AT&amp;T</a> and <a href="www.slashgear.com/tags/verizon-wireless" target="_blank">Verizon Wireless</a> have a similar low-band 700MHz frequency, which they are currently using to build out their 4G LTE coverage. However, many smaller carriers have very little of these lower frequency bands. In fact, T-Mobile has none. These low-frequency bands are highly coveted, as they can penetrate through buildings, and travel long distances.</p>
<p>The DOJ told the FCC that if AT&amp;T and Verizon Wireless were to purchase all the spectrum they want from the auction, they won&#8217;t use the spectrum efficiently. It believes that the two major wireless carriers will purchase the spectrum just to make sure the smaller carriers don&#8217;t have the chance to use them. Without the added competition, the major carriers would be able to continue to charge high fees. The DOJ stated in its filing,</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;A large incumbent may benefit from acquiring spectrum even if its uses of the spectrum are not the most efficient if that acquisition helps preserve high prices.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>The DOJ also states,</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Namely, the more concentrated a wireless market is, the more likely a carrier will find it profitable to acquire spectrum with the aim of raising competitors&#8217; costs. This could take the shape, for example, of pursuing spectrum in order to prevent its use by a competitor, independent of how efficientialy the carrier uses.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>The DOJ states that by giving smaller carriers a chance to purchase the spectrum they need, more competition would ensue, which would be the best thing for the wireless business. If smaller carriers are able to secure low-band frequencies from the auction, they will be able to improve their coverage, and in turn &#8220;make them stronger, more aggressive competitors.&#8221; It&#8217;s still undecided how the DOJ and FCC will regulate the auction, however the DOJ suggested that the larger carriers be only allowed to purchase smaller blocks of the low-frequency spectrum.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57579433-38/justice-dept-to-fcc-give-small-carriers-a-chance-in-next-auction/" target="_blank">via</a> CNET]<br />
<div class="related-posts">
<div id="related-posts-MRP_all" class="related-posts-type">
<h4>Story Timeline</h4>
<ul class="st-related-posts">
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/t-mobile-turns-down-verizons-700mhz-spectrum-sale-10227662/">T-Mobile turns down Verizon's 700MHz spectrum sale</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-and-doj-approve-verizons-cable-spectrum-deal-16243101/">FCC and DoJ approve Verizon's cable spectrum deal</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-approves-verizons-3-9-billion-spectrum-purchase-23243745/">FCC approves Verizon's $3.9 billion spectrum purchase</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-approves-auction-to-reclaim-broadcast-tv-spectrum-28249659/">FCC approves auction to reclaim broadcast TV spectrum</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/dish-sends-fcc-a-message-on-their-aws-4-spectrum-rules-21257939/">Dish sends FCC an angry message on their AWS-4 Spectrum rules</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/att-4g-spectrum-buy-gets-fcc-blessing-19261627/">AT&T 4G spectrum buy gets FCC blessing</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-will-crack-open-unlicensed-spectrum-to-avoid-wireless-traffic-jam-09264716/">FCC will crack open unlicensed spectrum to speed up wireless Internet</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/rogers-wireless-buys-mountain-cablevision-option-to-buy-wireless-spectrum-licenses-14265289/">Rogers Wireless buys Mountain Cablevision, option to buy wireless spectrum licenses</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/verizon-sells-1-9-billion-worth-of-spectrum-to-att-25266779/">Verizon sells $1.9 billion worth of spectrum to AT&amp;T</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/uk-4g-spectrum-auction-closes-all-carriers-winners-but-bid-totals-disappoint-20270182/">UK 4G spectrum auction closes: All carriers winners but bid totals disappoint</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-takes-step-towards-opening-up-more-of-the-5ghz-spectrum-for-wi-fi-use-20270417/">FCC takes step towards opening up more of the 5GHz spectrum for unlicensed use</a></li>
</ul></div>
</div></p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/doj-requires-wireless-spectrum-auction-to-give-smaller-carriers-a-competitive-chance-13277721/" title="DOJ requires wireless spectrum auction to give smaller carriers a competitive chance">DOJ requires wireless spectrum auction to give smaller carriers a competitive chance</a> is written by <a href="" >Brian Sin</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/doj-requires-wireless-spectrum-auction-to-give-smaller-carriers-a-competitive-chance-13277721/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC looks into cell phone radiation, decides to keep limitations same as before</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-looks-into-cell-phone-radiation-decides-to-keep-limitations-same-as-before-30275866/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-looks-into-cell-phone-radiation-decides-to-keep-limitations-same-as-before-30275866/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 05:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brittany Hillen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=275866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our cell phones go with us just about everywhere: at school, work, in our pocket, in bed. Those who have been around long enough will have heard ever-changing stances on the health safety of the handsets, with some claiming that the radiation causes brain tumors and others claiming that there are no health problems associated  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-looks-into-cell-phone-radiation-decides-to-keep-limitations-same-as-before-30275866/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our cell phones go with us just about everywhere: at school, work, in our pocket, in bed. Those who have been around long enough will have heard ever-changing stances on the health safety of the handsets, with some claiming that the radiation causes brain tumors and others claiming that there are no health problems associated with phone use. All was quiet on the health front until last year, when the government said it was time to take another look at acceptable RF levels.</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/fcc-seal_black-large-500x500.png" alt="fcc-seal_black-large" width="500" height="500" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-275867" /></p>
<p><span id="more-275866"></span></p>
<p>In 2012, the Government Accountability Office released a report after spending a year researching the health aspects of cell phone usage that stated the radiation limit needed to be reevaluated, the first time such a required had been made in nearly two decades. At the time of the report, the FCC had the SAR (specific absorption rate) set at 1.6W/kg.</p>
<p>The FCC reevaluated the radiation limit after the report was published, and has now published its own response, in which it states that the SAR limit is staying the same as it has been for many years. However, all is not staying unchanged. Per the report, the outer part of the ear has been reclassified as an extremity, a designation that legally allows it to absorb more radiation under current specifications.</p>
<p>The effects of cell phone radiation on humans is mostly unknown, but is typically regarded to be safe and to not cause some of the speculated conditions that populate conspiracy boards. Still, more research is needed on RF radiation and its potential health effects, something that could be prodded by the ever-increasing use of smartphones in our digital, mobile world.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.theverge.com/2013/3/29/4162774/fcc-keeps-cellphone-rf-exposure-limits-the-same" target="_blank">via</a> The Verge]</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-looks-into-cell-phone-radiation-decides-to-keep-limitations-same-as-before-30275866/" title="FCC looks into cell phone radiation, decides to keep limitations same as before">FCC looks into cell phone radiation, decides to keep limitations same as before</a> is written by <a href="" >Brittany Hillen</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-looks-into-cell-phone-radiation-decides-to-keep-limitations-same-as-before-30275866/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski reportedly to announce departure tomorrow</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-chairman-julius-genachowski-reportedly-to-announce-departure-tomorrow-21274929/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-chairman-julius-genachowski-reportedly-to-announce-departure-tomorrow-21274929/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brittany Hillen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=274929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The FCC&#8217;s Chairman Julius Genachowski has been at the helm of the agency during a time when gadgets and wireless technology have grown exponentially. During his time, the chairman has prodded the FAA to loosen its in-flight gadget restrictions, has overseen plans to open the unlicensed spectrum to wireless Internet, and has spoken fondly of  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-chairman-julius-genachowski-reportedly-to-announce-departure-tomorrow-21274929/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The FCC&#8217;s Chairman Julius Genachowski has been at the helm of the agency during a time when gadgets and wireless technology have grown exponentially. During his time, the chairman has <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-tells-faa-to-relax-on-strict-gadget-rules-during-flights-07259992/" target="_blank">prodded the FAA</a> to loosen its in-flight gadget restrictions, has overseen <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-will-crack-open-unlicensed-spectrum-to-avoid-wireless-traffic-jam-09264716/" target="_blank">plans to open</a> the unlicensed spectrum to wireless Internet, and has <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-ceo-touts-the-fastest-growing-technology-in-history-08226790/" target="_blank">spoken fondly of the wireless industry</a> as a whole, to name a few. And now, according to sources, he will announce his departure tomorrow.</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/genachowski.jpg" alt="genachowski" width="195" height="259" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-274932" /></p>
<p><span id="more-274929"></span></p>
<p>The information was given to the <em>Wall Street Journal</em> by a source said to be an FCC official. This doesn&#8217;t come as a surprise to anyone who has been watching the situation, with unnamed sources telling the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/new-washington-parlor-game-who-will-replace-julius/2013/03/08/902e007a-882d-11e2-999e-5f8e0410cb9d_story.html" target="_blank">Washington Post</a> earlier this month that Genachowski would be stepping down in the relatively near future &#8211; as early as April, in fact.</p>
<p>This is despite the fact that Genachowski&#8217;s term will end this upcoming July; a request for an official statement on the matter was declined. Notes the Washington Post, the top candidates to replace the current chairman include venture capitalist Tom Wheeler, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development ambassador Karen Kornbluh, and the Commerce Department&#8217;s head of tech Lawrence Strickling.</p>
<p>Such a rumor not only prompts speculation about who will replace Genachowski, but also what he plans to do after he steps down. He could already have plans in place for where he will go next, but nothing has been provided and he could very well be eyeing retirement. Regardless, if the rumor proves true, we&#8217;ll have more details for you tomorrow, so stay tuned.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.theverge.com/2013/3/21/4133338/fcc-chairman-julius-genachowski-to-announce-he-is-stepping-down-on" target="_blank">via</a> The Verge]</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-chairman-julius-genachowski-reportedly-to-announce-departure-tomorrow-21274929/" title="FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski reportedly to announce departure tomorrow">FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski reportedly to announce departure tomorrow</a> is written by <a href="" >Brittany Hillen</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-chairman-julius-genachowski-reportedly-to-announce-departure-tomorrow-21274929/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AT&amp;T LG Optimus G Pro tipped in FCC post</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-lg-optimus-g-pro-tipped-in-fcc-post-21274926/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/att-lg-optimus-g-pro-tipped-in-fcc-post-21274926/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 21:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4G LTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jelly Bean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LG Optimus G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LG Optimus G Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=274926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week the LG Optimus G Pro appears to have popped its head up with AT&#038;T 4G LTE in mind as the FCC approves with a resounding thumbs up. What we&#8217;re seeing here is an FCC approval process posting with what&#8217;s said to be the code-name for the LG Optimus G Pro, just a few  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/att-lg-optimus-g-pro-tipped-in-fcc-post-21274926/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week the <a href="http://slashgear.com/tags/lg-optimus-g-pro/" target="_blank">LG Optimus G Pro</a> appears to have popped its head up with AT&#038;T 4G LTE in mind as the FCC approves with a resounding thumbs up. What we&#8217;re seeing here is an FCC approval process posting with what&#8217;s said to be the code-name for the LG Optimus G Pro, just a few characters away from the original <a href="http://slashgear.com/tags/lg-optimus-g/" target="_blank">Optimus G</a>. This device, if indeed coming to AT&#038;T this Spring, will be a competitor for the also-giant <a href="http://slashgear.com/tags/samsung-galaxy-note-ii/" target="_blank">Samsung Galaxy Note II</a> (and possibly III) the whole year long.</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/lg_optimus_g_pro_hands-on_sg_16-1-580x348.jpg" alt="lg_optimus_g_pro_hands-on_sg_16-1" width="580" height="348" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-274927" /></p>
<p><span id="more-274926"></span></p>
<p>As it&#8217;s been discovered by <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/03/21/lg-e980-fcc-optimus-g-pro-att/" target="_blank">Engadget</a>, the LG Optimus G Pro phantom is running on the bands that AT&#038;T does indeed use. That&#8217;s 4G LTE and all, ready to rock with all the Optimus G Pro excellence we&#8217;ve seen come out of this device just this past month internationally. When we had a look at it, we made sure to test out what LG let us know it was very proud of in its photography skills.</p>
<p><p><center><iframe title="YouTube video player" width="584" height="362" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/QD8mMc4QjtI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></center></p>
</p>
<p>The LG Optimus G Pro works with a massive 5.5-inch display that&#8217;s sharp as a tack &#8211; 1080p and working with the Qualcomm Snadragon 600 quad-core processor. That&#8217;s the same beast we&#8217;re seeing work some real magic in the HTC One, this time also packing heat with 2GB of RAM and Android 4.1+ Jelly Bean up front. We&#8217;ve seen this device in white and in black &#8211; and they&#8217;re both rather fabulous.</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/lg_optimus_g_pro_hands-on_sg_4-580x477.jpg" alt="lg_optimus_g_pro_hands-on_sg_4" width="580" height="477" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-274928" /></p>
<p>Have a peek at our <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/lg-optimus-g-pro-photo-tour-barcelona-mwc-2013-01272089/" target="_blank">LG Optimus G Pro tour of Barcelona</a> and let us know if you&#8217;d be all about this smartphone if it&#8217;d be released by AT&#038;T super, super soon. Or better yet, if you&#8217;re thinking about getting a massive smartphone such as this but want to wait to see if <a href="http://androidcommunity.com/samsung-galaxy-tab-3-and-note-iii-announcement-expected-during-ifa-2013-20130321/" target="_blank">IFA 2013 is home to the release of the Samsung Galaxy Note III</a>! Or maybe just a Tab or two.</p>
<p>Have a peek at the LG Optimus G Pro timeline below as well for more up-to-date massively LG action than you can handle!</p>
<div class="related-posts">
<div id="related-posts-MRP_all" class="related-posts-type">
<h4>Story Timeline</h4>
<ul class="st-related-posts">
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/leaked-image-tips-lg-optimus-g-pro-18265832/">Leaked image tips LG Optimus G Pro</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/lg-optimus-g-pro-1-7ghz-hd-phablet-announced-in-japan-will-hit-shelves-in-april-21266174/">LG Optimus G Pro 1.7GHz HD phablet announced in Japan, will hit shelves in April</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/lg-optimus-g-pro-spotted-with-extra-massive-display-07268541/">LG Optimus G Pro+ spotted with extra massive display</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/lg-optimus-g-pro-revealed-with-beastly-full-hd-display-12269020/">LG Optimus G Pro revealed with beastly Full HD display</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/lg-optimus-g-pro-starts-us-and-global-spread-in-q2-18269659/">LG Optimus G Pro starts US and global spread in Q2</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/lg-optimus-g-pro-hands-on-its-a-big-un-25271187/">LG Optimus G Pro hands-on: It's a big 'un</a></li>
</ul></div>
</div>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/att-lg-optimus-g-pro-tipped-in-fcc-post-21274926/" title="AT&#038;T LG Optimus G Pro tipped in FCC post">AT&#038;T LG Optimus G Pro tipped in FCC post</a> is written by <a href="" >Chris Burns</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/att-lg-optimus-g-pro-tipped-in-fcc-post-21274926/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC lays down the iron fist on illegal robocalls</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-lays-down-the-iron-fist-on-illegal-robocalls-18274483/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-lays-down-the-iron-fist-on-illegal-robocalls-18274483/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 19:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Lloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=274483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all know the feeling of receiving robocalls. These are when you receive a phone call and the other end is an automated message advertising a certain product, or in this case, attempting to get your support for a specific political candidate. It turns out that some of these robocalls have been illegal, and the  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-lays-down-the-iron-fist-on-illegal-robocalls-18274483/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all know the feeling of receiving robocalls. These are when you receive a phone call and the other end is an automated message advertising a certain product, or in this case, attempting to get your support for a specific political candidate. It turns out that some of these robocalls have been illegal, and the FCC is cracking down on it as we speak.</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/noway.jpg" alt="noway" width="580" height="498" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-274484" /></p>
<p><span id="more-274483"></span></p>
<p>Robocalls are allowed on most landline numbers if certain rules are met, but they are strictly prohibited to mobile phones unless it’s for emergency purposes or the person receiving the call has given prior permission. The FCC has cited two marketing companies for making millions of robocalls to mobile phones illegally.</p>
<p>Robocalls were made from Dialing Services of Roswell, New Mexico and Democratic Dialing of Aurora, Colorado, both companies didn&#8217;t have permission from mobile phone users to call them. The FCC found that these two companies sent out millions of robocalls in 2011 and 2012, including the 2012 presidential election campaigns.</p>
<p>The maximum penalty for making illegal robocalls to mobile phones is $16,000 per call, which means that if each company made millions of robocalls throughout the past couple of years, they could end up owing billions of dollars in fines. It&#8217;s estimated that 4.7 million illegal robocalls were made from Dialing Services and 1.1 million by Democratic Dialing.</p>
<p>Chris Kolker, founder and CEO of Dialing Services, said that his company is “simply a service provider” that makes it possible for another company to make robocalls. He says that his company doesn&#8217;t make the calls themselves, and that they &#8220;inform customers about the laws, but [the company] cannot possibly police all of them.&#8221;</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.nbcnews.com/business/fcc-goes-after-political-robocalls-sent-cellphones-1C8929796" target="_blank">via</a> NBC News]</p>
<div class="related-posts">
<div id="related-posts-MRP_all" class="related-posts-type">
<h4>Story Timeline</h4>
<ul class="st-related-posts">
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-chairman-proposes-gigabit-internet-in-all-50-states-by-2015-18265904/">FCC Chairman proposes gigabit internet in all 50 states by 2015</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-calling-for-free-nationwide-wifi-for-the-public-04268019/">FCC calling for free nationwide WiFi for the public</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-wifi-expansion-sees-slight-auto-industry-hold-up-13269240/">FCC Wifi expansion sees slight Auto Industry hold-up</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-takes-step-towards-opening-up-more-of-the-5ghz-spectrum-for-wi-fi-use-20270417/">FCC takes step towards opening up more of the 5GHz spectrum for unlicensed use</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/nokia-lumia-720-usa-release-imminent-fcc-tapped-05272657/">Nokia Lumia 720 USA release imminent: FCC tapped</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-approves-t-mobile-merger-with-metropcs-12273499/">FCC approves T-Mobile merger with MetroPCS</a></li>
</ul></div>
</div>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-lays-down-the-iron-fist-on-illegal-robocalls-18274483/" title="FCC lays down the iron fist on illegal robocalls">FCC lays down the iron fist on illegal robocalls</a> is written by <a href="" >Craig Lloyd</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-lays-down-the-iron-fist-on-illegal-robocalls-18274483/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC approves T-Mobile merger with MetroPCS</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-approves-t-mobile-merger-with-metropcs-12273499/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-approves-t-mobile-merger-with-metropcs-12273499/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carrier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metropcs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spectrum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=273499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well on its way to approval from every legal entity required to make it a reality, the merger between T-Mobile USA and MetroPCS has been given the thumbs-up by the FCC. This merger is referred to by the FCC in the official documentation issued today as &#8220;Newco&#8221; but will be called &#8220;T-Mobile US, Inc.&#8221; when  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-approves-t-mobile-merger-with-metropcs-12273499/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well on its way to approval from every legal entity required to make it a reality, the merger between T-Mobile USA and MetroPCS has been given the thumbs-up by the FCC. This merger is referred to by the FCC in the official documentation issued today as &#8220;Newco&#8221; but will be called &#8220;T-Mobile US, Inc.&#8221; when all is said and done. Together they&#8217;ll move forward into the future with such possibilities as the advanced facilitation of 4G LTE and the expansion of what up until now has been MetroPCS&#8217;s brand into &#8220;new geographical markets.&#8221;</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/approved.jpg" alt="approved" width="458" height="193" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-273500" /></p>
<p><span id="more-273499"></span></p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.fcc.gov/document/order-and-declaratory-ruling-approving-t-mobile-metropcs-applications" target="_Blank">FCC&#8217;s statement</a> also makes clear that this merger will very possibly create a &#8220;more robust, national network&#8221; and will move to make the fourth-largest carrier in the United States a service provider with &#8220;improved quality of service&#8221; from top to bottom. The FCC has concluded that, per their mission to decide, </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Any potential public interest harms would be outweighed by the resulting public interest benefits&#8221; &#8211; FCC</p></blockquote>
<p>This decision is made with several conclusions including that Deutsche Telekom has the right to select a name other than the one listed above any time prior to the close of the deal &#8220;Deutsche Telekom AG Application, ULS File No. 0005446627, Exhibit 1, Description of Transaction and Public Interest Statement at 3 n.5&#8243; Deutsche Telekom is the parent company of T-Mobile USA, you should know, if you did not know before right this minute.</p>
<p>Four FCC heads, Chairman Genachowski, Commissioner Rosenworcel, and Commissioner Pai, have released statements in support of the approval, letting the public know why they&#8217;ve supported the merger and how it&#8217;ll affect us all.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;When markets are competitive, consumers are better off when the government forbears from intervening and allows private parties to negotiate and enter into voluntary agreements. As I have said before, mutual consent implies mutual benefit, and it is accordingly in the public interest for freely-negotiated contracts to be allowed and enforced so long as third parties are not harmed. &#8221; &#8211; Commissioner Pai</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;I have expressed to the parties my concern that as they move ahead, American workers do not get left behind. Major job losses are not in the public interest. The companies have pledged to me that they have no plans to close any domestic call centers, to move them offshore, to close any retail stores, or to reduce retail positions as a result of this deal. They have also assured me that they plan to increase the overall number of workers they employ in the United States. I expect that the company will keep its word—and live up to these promises.” &#8211; Commissioner Goldman</p></blockquote>
<p>Above you&#8217;ll see <a href="http://www.fcc.gov/document/pai-statement-t-mobile-metropcs-license-transfer-approval" target="_blank">Commissioner Pai</a>&#8216;s statement as well as the statement of <a href="http://www.fcc.gov/document/commissioner-rosenworcel-t-mobile-metropcs-transaction" target="_Blank">Commissioner Goldman</a>. You&#8217;ll see that Goldman made a point to assure the public hat both T-Mobile and MetroPCS have promised to keep all of the stores and workers they&#8217;d had before this deal, and have no plans to fire any workers or close any stores as a result of the deal.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Mobile broadband is a key engine of economic growth, with U.S. annual wireless capital investment up 40% over the last four years, the largest increase in the world, and few sectors having more potential to create jobs. In this fast-moving space, of course challenges remain, including the need to unleash even more spectrum for mobile broadband and continuing to promote competition and protect consumers. The Commission will stay focused on these vital goals.&#8221; &#8211; Chairman Genachoswki</p></blockquote>
<p>Above you&#8217;ll also see the statement of <a href="http://www.fcc.gov/document/chairmans-statement-t-mobile-and-metropcs-transaction-approval" target="_blank">FCC Chairman Genachoswki</a>, who opts to address the situation from a more broad perspective. Have a peek at the timeline below to see more on the history of this deal as it began and ran through to today, where it&#8217;s closer than ever to being fully approved.</p>
<div class="related-posts">
<div id="related-posts-MRP_all" class="related-posts-type">
<h4>Story Timeline</h4>
<ul class="st-related-posts">
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/t-mobile-metropcs-merger-tips-lte-rollout-on-aws-03250207/">T-Mobile MetroPCS merger tips LTE rollout on AWS</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/t-mobile-ceo-speaks-on-metropcs-merger-as-a-deal-to-thrive-03250282/">T-Mobile CEO speaks on MetroPCS merger as "a deal to thrive"</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/t-mobile-metropcs-deal-faces-sprint-counter-offer-threat-05250566/">T-Mobile MetroPCS deal faces Sprint counter-offer threat</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/t-mobile-metropcs-merger-may-not-close-until-q2-2013-13251780/">T-Mobile, MetroPCS merger may not close until Q2 2013</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/metropcs-shareholders-sue-to-block-t-mobile-merger-16252017/">MetroPCS shareholders sue to block T-Mobile merger</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/dish-network-tried-to-buy-metropcs-before-t-mobile-19257532/">Dish Network tried to buy MetroPCS before T-Mobile</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/metropcs-moves-back-shareholders-meeting-to-april-12th-02272256/">MetroPCS moves back shareholders meeting to April 12th</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/t-mobile-metropcs-merger-gets-approval-from-department-of-justice-06272828/">T-Mobile, MetroPCS merger gets approval from Department of Justice</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/t-mobile-to-layoff-employees-before-metropcs-merger-sources-say-06272901/">T-Mobile to layoff employees before MetroPCS merger, sources say</a></li>
</ul></div>
</div>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-approves-t-mobile-merger-with-metropcs-12273499/" title="FCC approves T-Mobile merger with MetroPCS">FCC approves T-Mobile merger with MetroPCS</a> is written by <a href="" >Chris Burns</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-approves-t-mobile-merger-with-metropcs-12273499/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nokia Lumia 720 USA release imminent: FCC tapped</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/nokia-lumia-720-usa-release-imminent-fcc-tapped-05272657/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/nokia-lumia-720-usa-release-imminent-fcc-tapped-05272657/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 17:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lumia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nokia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nokia Lumia 720]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Phone 8]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=272657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today the Nokia Lumia 720 has been spotted running through the hoops at the FCC, this being one of the prerequisites for a USA release and a generally OK indicator that a launch here in the states is imminent. We got to take a peek at the Lumia 720 just a week ago at Mobile  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/nokia-lumia-720-usa-release-imminent-fcc-tapped-05272657/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today the <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/nokia-lumia-720-official-high-end-for-non-lte-25271185/" target="_blank">Nokia Lumia 720</a> has been spotted running through the hoops at the FCC, this being one of the prerequisites for a USA release and a generally OK indicator that a launch here in the states is imminent. We got to take a peek at the Lumia 720 just a week ago at Mobile World Congress 2013 and found it to be a rather impressive machine &#8211; especially considering how inexpensive the company aims for it to be. We&#8217;re to understand that this device may be heated to AT&#038;T first, with the other major carriers coming up quickly behind.</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/sg_nokia_mwc2013_16-580x325.jpg" alt="sg_nokia_mwc2013_16-580x325" width="580" height="325" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-272660" /></p>
<p><span id="more-272657"></span></p>
<p>This device works with a lovely 4.3-inch back-lit color display with a 1GHz dual-core processor from Qualcomm and will be arriving in the states in a variety of colors. Though we&#8217;ve seen the device in just Blue and White, you&#8217;ll be seeing Black and possible Red coming in as well. And then there&#8217;s the case options &#8211; case options galore!</p>
<p>UPDATE: We&#8217;ve seen black as well &#8211; the colors are endless!</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/sg_nokia_mwc2013_14-580x325.jpg" alt="sg_nokia_mwc2013_14" width="580" height="325" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-272661" /></p>
<p>Below you&#8217;re going to see a hands-on look at the Nokia Lumia 720 as we saw it at Mobile World Congress. Here we&#8217;re rolling out at the official Nokia stand, you&#8217;ll notice too. This stand was more of a whole experience in and of itself, complete with massive shows of the devices revealed that week &#8211; Nokia Lumia 520 as well as the smaller devices too! Have a peek at more of our MWC 2013 content right this minute to see the full run-down.</p>
<p><p><center><iframe title="YouTube video player" width="584" height="362" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/oz2UuVoykDI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></center></p>
</p>
<p>WIth the Lumia 720 we&#8217;re expecting some more awesome customization of options too &#8211; have a peek at our <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/nokia-nfc-wireless-charging-car-holder-hands-on-with-lumia-720-25271424/" target="_blank">hands-on with the brand new Nokia NFC-laden car stand</a> to see how Nokia continues to innovate with their accessories surrounding the whole Lumia lineup. Then get pumped up about the release of the Lumia 720 which should be coming up quick &#8211; with Windows Phone 8 included &#8211; straight to a AT&#038;T outlet near you!</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/fccgoods-580x469.png" alt="fccgoods" width="580" height="469" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-272659" /></p>
<p>[<a href="https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&#038;RequestTimeout=500&#038;calledFromFrame=N&#038;application_id=634652&#038;fcc_id=QTLA">via</a> FCC]</p>
<div class="related-posts">
<div id="related-posts-MRP_all" class="related-posts-type">
<h4>Story Timeline</h4>
<ul class="st-related-posts">
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/nokia-lumia-520-and-lumia-720-pictures-leaked-22270796/">Nokia Lumia 520 and Lumia 720 pictures leaked</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/nokia-lumia-720-official-high-end-for-non-lte-25271185/">Nokia Lumia 720 official: high-end for non-LTE</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/nokia-lumia-720-hands-on-high-end-on-a-budget-25271277/">Nokia Lumia 720 hands-on: high-end on a budget</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/nokia-nfc-wireless-charging-car-holder-hands-on-with-lumia-720-25271424/">Nokia NFC Wireless Charging Car Holder hands-on with Lumia 720</a></li>
</ul></div>
</div>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/nokia-lumia-720-usa-release-imminent-fcc-tapped-05272657/" title="Nokia Lumia 720 USA release imminent: FCC tapped">Nokia Lumia 720 USA release imminent: FCC tapped</a> is written by <a href="" >Chris Burns</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/nokia-lumia-720-usa-release-imminent-fcc-tapped-05272657/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Spectrum Database hits public FCC trial</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-spectrum-database-hits-public-fcc-trial-04272421/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/google-spectrum-database-hits-public-fcc-trial-04272421/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 18:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Sin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spectrum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=272421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google will be conducting a 45-day public trial with the FCC to create a centralized database containing information on free spectrum. The Google Spectrum Database will analyze TV white spaces, which are unused spectrum between TV stations, that can open many doors for possible wireless spectrum expansion in the future. By unlocking these white spaces,  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/google-spectrum-database-hits-public-fcc-trial-04272421/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google will be conducting a 45-day public trial with the FCC to create a centralized database containing information on free spectrum. The Google Spectrum Database will analyze TV white spaces, which are unused spectrum between TV stations, that can open many doors for possible wireless spectrum expansion in the future. By unlocking these white spaces, wireless providers will be able to provide more coverage in places that need it.</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Google-Spectrum-Database-hits-public-FCC-trial-580x326.jpg" alt="Google Spectrum Database hits public FCC trial" width="580" height="326" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-272423" /><br />
<span id="more-272421"></span></p>
<p>The public trial brings <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/google/" target="_blank">Google</a> one step closer to becoming a certified database administrator for white spaces. Currently the only database administrators are Spectrum Bridge, Inc. and Telcordia Technologies, Inc. Many other companies are applying to be certified, including a big dog like <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/microsoft" target="_blank">Microsoft</a>. With companies like Google and Microsoft becoming certified, discovery of white spaces should increase monumentally.</p>
<p>Google&#8217;s trial allows all industry stakeholders, including broadcasters, cable, wireless microphone users, and licensed spectrum holders, to provide feedback to the Google Spectrum Database. It also allows anyone to track how much TV white space is available in their given area. This entire process is known as dynamic spectrum sharing. </p>
<p>Google&#8217;s trial, as well as the collective help of all the other spectrum data administrators, will help unlock more wireless spectrum. It&#8217;s a necessity as there is an increasing number of people who are wirelessly connecting to the internet via smartphones, laptops, tablets, and other wireless devices. This trial will open new doors to more wireless coverage (especially in dead zones), Wi-Fi hotspots, and other &#8220;wireless technologies&#8221;.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://blog.google.org/2013/03/identifying-available-spectrum.html" target="_blank">via</a> Google]<br />
<div class="related-posts">
<div id="related-posts-MRP_all" class="related-posts-type">
<h4>Story Timeline</h4>
<ul class="st-related-posts">
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/chromebook-pixel-hands-on-does-google-tempt-the-daring-27271765/">Chromebook Pixel hands-on: does Google tempt the daring?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/sergey-brin-talks-google-glass-at-ted-conference-27271788/">Sergey Brin talks Google Glass at TED conference</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/motorolas-device-pipeline-isnt-wow-says-google-cfo-28271943/">Motorola's device pipeline isn't wow, says Google CFO</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/google-nestles-a-harlem-shake-easter-egg-in-youtube-01272170/">Google nestles a Harlem Shake Easter egg in YouTube</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/germany-votes-that-google-can-display-snippets-of-news-without-paying-01272181/">Germany votes that Google can display snippets of news without paying</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/google-cfo-discusses-reports-of-samsunggoogle-conflicts-03272298/">Google CFO discusses reports of Samsung/Google conflicts</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/a-few-issues-plaguing-googles-self-driving-car-03272325/">A few issues plaguing Google's self-driving car</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/microsoft-ending-scroogled-tv-campaign-against-google-04272392/">Microsoft ending "Scroogled" TV campaign against Google</a></li>
</ul></div>
</div></p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/google-spectrum-database-hits-public-fcc-trial-04272421/" title="Google Spectrum Database hits public FCC trial">Google Spectrum Database hits public FCC trial</a> is written by <a href="" >Brian Sin</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/google-spectrum-database-hits-public-fcc-trial-04272421/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC takes step towards opening up more of the 5GHz spectrum for unlicensed use</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-takes-step-towards-opening-up-more-of-the-5ghz-spectrum-for-wi-fi-use-20270417/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-takes-step-towards-opening-up-more-of-the-5ghz-spectrum-for-wi-fi-use-20270417/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 02:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brittany Hillen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=270417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The FCC as launched a proceeding over its plan to open more of the 5GHz spectrum to alleviate wireless Internet congestion. This is a rule-making proceeding, and although there&#8217;s still no word on when the expansion will roll out, it&#8217;s a step in the right direction. In doing this, not only could wireless congestion ease  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-takes-step-towards-opening-up-more-of-the-5ghz-spectrum-for-wi-fi-use-20270417/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/fcc/" target="_blank">FCC</a> as launched a proceeding over its plan to <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-will-crack-open-unlicensed-spectrum-to-avoid-wireless-traffic-jam-09264716/" target="_blank">open more of the 5GHz spectrum</a> to alleviate wireless Internet congestion. This is a rule-making proceeding, and although there&#8217;s still no word on when the expansion will roll out, it&#8217;s a step in the right direction. In doing this, not only could wireless congestion ease up, but speeds could also increase to 1GBps.</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/fcc-seal_black-large-1.png" alt="fcc-seal_black-large (1)" width="350" height="350" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-270419" /></p>
<p><span id="more-270417"></span></p>
<p>Earlier today, the FCC approved an NPRM (Notice of Proposed Rulemaking), to look at opening up parts of the 5GHz spectrum to unlicensed use; presently, it is reserved for government and similar use. Specifically, the agency is looking at opening up 195MHz of the 5GHz, increasing the unlicensed access to the spectrum by 35-percent. </p>
<p>Said the FCC&#8217;s Chairman Julius Genachowski: &#8220;Wi-Fi congestion is a very real and growing problem. Like licensed spectrum, demand for unlicensed spectrum threatens to outpace supply.&#8221; Wi-Fi congestion is particularly high as cellular carriers unload some of their tasks onto wireless networks, in addition to the growing number of mobile users and the increasing demand for data and speeds.</p>
<p>In addition to this issue, the FCC also approved earlier today a measure to set rules concerning signal boosters. The rules give carriers, which have complained that signal boosters can cause interference, the ability to block use of certain boosters, as well as requiring consumers to register their boosters before using them. </p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/2028935/fcc-makes-a-move-to-lessen-wi-fi-congestion.html" target="_blank">via</a> PC World]</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-takes-step-towards-opening-up-more-of-the-5ghz-spectrum-for-wi-fi-use-20270417/" title="FCC takes step towards opening up more of the 5GHz spectrum for unlicensed use">FCC takes step towards opening up more of the 5GHz spectrum for unlicensed use</a> is written by <a href="" >Brittany Hillen</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-takes-step-towards-opening-up-more-of-the-5ghz-spectrum-for-wi-fi-use-20270417/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC Wifi expansion sees slight Auto Industry hold-up</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-wifi-expansion-sees-slight-auto-industry-hold-up-13269240/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-wifi-expansion-sees-slight-auto-industry-hold-up-13269240/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Automotive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wifi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=269240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week the FCC&#8217;s proposal for opening up a new large bit of spectrum in the USA reserved for wifi internet having some car trouble. The auto industry &#8211; via the Transportation Society of America (ITSA) has sent a letter to the Federal Communications Commission asking them to to heed their warning. Their warning, in  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-wifi-expansion-sees-slight-auto-industry-hold-up-13269240/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week the FCC&#8217;s proposal for opening up a new large bit of spectrum in the USA reserved for wifi internet having some car trouble. The auto industry &#8211; via the Transportation Society of America (ITSA) has sent a letter to the Federal Communications Commission asking them to to heed their warning. Their warning, in this case, was that these new wifi networks could potentially interfere with vehicle-to-vehicle communications networks coming in the near future.</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/PB279605-siri-sonic-580x326.jpeg" alt="PB279605-siri-sonic--580x326" width="580" height="326" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-269241" /></p>
<p><span id="more-269240"></span></p>
<p>This call to action (or call to stop action, as it were), comes after FCC Chairman Julius Genachoski spoke up at CES 2013 about <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-will-crack-open-unlicensed-spectrum-to-avoid-wireless-traffic-jam-09264716/" target="_Blank">cracking open unlicensed spectrum</a> for a speed boost in wireless internet across the USA. It was then that Genachowski let it be known that this move would &#8220;free up a substantial amount of spectrum for wifi to relieve wifi congestion and improve wifi speeds&#8221; across the country &#8211; conferences, airports, and homes included.</p>
<p>Image above <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/chevrolet-sonic-and-siri-integration-hands-on-27258597/" target="_Blank">via</a> SlashGear Chevrolet Sonic post about Siri integration and other wireless-related technologies therein. Slightly different from what the future holds with car-to-car communications.</p>
<p>The FCC&#8217;s plan includes a clearing of 195 MHz of spectrum in the 5GHz band to be used by wifi networks exclusively. The ITSA has spoken up this week with a note that their future plans for a highly secure wireless technology connecting network-ready cars could be interfered with by the FCC&#8217;s new move. This technology would allow cars to get information about their speed, acceleration, breaking, trajectories, and destinations to allow them better knowledge on how they&#8217;ll be getting where they&#8217;re going.</p>
<p>Instead of asking that this wifi expansion be stopped before its started, the auto group has asked that the FCC put safeguards in place to guarantee their future networks would not be hindered in any way. If the two sets of wireless technology did cross over in one way or another, the auto industry would be on the short end of the stick. Any sign of safety being at risk in vehicles using this up and coming short-range technology would be a big boon for the whole collection of auto makers hoping to make usage widespread.</p>
<p>The Intelligent Transportation Society of America is made up of members such as Chrysler, Hyundai, and Mercedes-Benz &#8211; not to mention AAA. This should be an interesting battle (or kind, gentle, measured talk between friends) that you&#8217;ll want to follow!</p>
<p>[<a href="http://gigaom.com/2013/02/12/wi-fi-expansion-plan-has-automakers-worried-over-the-connected-cars-future/" target="_Blank">via</a> GigaOM]</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-wifi-expansion-sees-slight-auto-industry-hold-up-13269240/" title="FCC Wifi expansion sees slight Auto Industry hold-up">FCC Wifi expansion sees slight Auto Industry hold-up</a> is written by <a href="" >Chris Burns</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-wifi-expansion-sees-slight-auto-industry-hold-up-13269240/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Subsidy scam: Lifeline phone program misuse rife as FCC weighs fines</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/subsidy-scam-lifeline-phone-program-misuse-rife-as-fcc-weighs-fines-12269006/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/subsidy-scam-lifeline-phone-program-misuse-rife-as-fcc-weighs-fines-12269006/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 17:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=269006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lax self-certification rules and poor record keeping have seen the Lifeline program &#8211; the subsidized cellphone scheme aiming to give low-income Americans access to a mobile phone &#8211; taken advantage of, according to new research. The program &#8211; which spent roughly $2.2bn on subsidized phones in 2012 &#8211; has seen rules tightened by the FCC  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/subsidy-scam-lifeline-phone-program-misuse-rife-as-fcc-weighs-fines-12269006/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lax self-certification rules and poor record keeping have seen the Lifeline program &#8211; the subsidized cellphone scheme aiming to give low-income Americans access to a mobile phone &#8211; taken advantage of, according to new research. The program &#8211; which spent roughly $2.2bn on subsidized phones in 2012 &#8211; has seen rules tightened by the FCC after concerns that carriers were not doing due-diligence on whether participants were actually eligible. However, according to research by the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323511804578296001368122888.html" target="_blank">WSJ</a>, there are suggestions a sizable portion of those still using Lifeline may not, in fact, fall within its remit.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-269011" alt="pile_of_cellphones-e1287763549200-580x344" src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/pile_of_cellphones-e1287763549200-580x344.jpg" width="580" height="344" /></p>
<p><span id="more-269006"></span></p>
<p><em>[Image credit: </em><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/matthijs/3514892055/lightbox/" target="_blank"><em>Matthijs Rouw</em></a><em>]</em></p>
<p>Research conducted by the FCC for the newspaper into subscribers on Virgin Mobile, AT&amp;T, Telrite, Tag Mobile, and Verizon, indicated more than 40-percent of Lifeline subscribers either could not demonstrate their eligibility, or simply did not respond to demands for proof.</p>
<p>Changes in the FCC rules around Lifeline <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-lifeline-program-for-low-income-telephone-service-overhauled-31211450/" target="_blank">came into effect last year</a>, toughening considerably what hoops would-be subscribers needed to jump through in order to get service. For instance, some states had permitted applications without any evidence of eligibility &#8211; which includes being on Medicaid, food stamps, or various other criteria &#8211; while others allowed self-certification rather than production of official evidence.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-269012" alt="lifeline_stats" src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/lifeline_stats.jpg" width="555" height="399" /></p>
<p>Carriers are paid $9.25 per customer, per month by the Universal Service Administrative Co., which organizes the Lifeline scheme. Roughly $2.50 is contributed per month by American tax payers, though that is subsequently spread across several of the subsidy schemes, including broadband and landline access.</p>
<p>As a result of the new research, the FCC is apparently considering levying fines on carriers which have been particularly liberal with their Lifeline sign-ups. That could prove expensive: up to $150,000 per violation per day, though that&#8217;s capped at $1.5m.</p>
<p>The carriers, meanwhile, argue that the previous lax criteria &#8211; and the absence of a central database of those involved in the scheme &#8211; had made it difficult for them to monitor users; there were also few checks as to whether households did indeed have only one active Lifeline account, as is the rules. Still, the FCC expects savings of up to $2bn over the next three years through toughening the checks.</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/subsidy-scam-lifeline-phone-program-misuse-rife-as-fcc-weighs-fines-12269006/" title="Subsidy scam: Lifeline phone program misuse rife as FCC weighs fines">Subsidy scam: Lifeline phone program misuse rife as FCC weighs fines</a> is written by <a href="http://twitter.com/c_davies" >Chris Davies</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/subsidy-scam-lifeline-phone-program-misuse-rife-as-fcc-weighs-fines-12269006/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung Wireless Charging Pad clears FCC (but will the Galaxy S4 need it?)</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-wireless-charging-pad-clears-fcc-but-will-the-galaxy-s4-need-it-11268791/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-wireless-charging-pad-clears-fcc-but-will-the-galaxy-s4-need-it-11268791/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accessory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless Charging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=268791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Samsung is apparently making a renewed push into wireless charging, with a new Qi-compatible charging accessory spotted clearing the FCC and potentially tipping native support in the upcoming Galaxy S4. The Samsung Wireless Charging Pad, as the user manual included in the filing names it, offers a simple, straightforward way to rejuice a mobile device, with  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-wireless-charging-pad-clears-fcc-but-will-the-galaxy-s4-need-it-11268791/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samsung is apparently making a renewed push into wireless charging, with a new Qi-compatible charging accessory spotted clearing the FCC and potentially tipping native support in the upcoming Galaxy S4. The Samsung Wireless Charging Pad, as the user manual included in <a href="https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&amp;RequestTimeout=500&amp;calledFromFrame=N&amp;=0810&amp;application_id=570893&amp;fcc_id=A3LEAD-W10EWE" target="_blank">the filing</a> names it, offers a simple, straightforward way to rejuice a mobile device, with an off-white plate holding a single phone on your desk.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-268792" alt="samsung_wireless_charger_qi_fcc_1" src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/samsung_wireless_charger_qi_fcc_1-580x438.png" width="580" height="438" /></p>
<p><span id="more-268791"></span></p>
<p>The FCC tested the accessory with a Verizon Galaxy S III (SCH-I535) equipped with an official Qi-compatible battery cover. Wireless power support was one of <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-wireless-charging-kit-for-galaxy-s-iii-revealed-03226053/" target="_blank">the launch-day features of the Galaxy S III</a>, albeit with a separate charging station and back plate, but Samsung has yet to capitalize on those plans.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-268795" alt="samsung_wireless_charger_qi_fcc_4" src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/samsung_wireless_charger_qi_fcc_4-580x322.png" width="580" height="322" /></p>
<p>Interestingly, Samsung doesn&#8217;t appear too bothered about confidentiality at this stage. According to the company&#8217;s cover letter to the FCC, the only aspects of the EAD-W10EWE pad that need to be kept secret are the block diagram, operational description, schematics, and part list. Everything else &#8211; including the terse user guide, which basically amounts to &#8220;plug it in and put your phone on it&#8221; is left open.</p>
<p>When, then, Samsung might decide to officially launch the charging pad is unclear, though with Mobile World Congress at the end of the month, that seems a strong possibility. Whether it also means that the much-rumored Galaxy S4 will also come set up for wireless charging out of the box remains to be seen, but the feature was one of the few absences from the Galaxy S III&#8217;s native capabilities, something that is likely to leave it high on the agenda for inclusion this time around.</p>

<a href='http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-wireless-charging-pad-clears-fcc-but-will-the-galaxy-s4-need-it-11268791/samsung_wireless_charger_qi_fcc_1/' title='samsung_wireless_charger_qi_fcc_1'><img width="150" height="100" src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/samsung_wireless_charger_qi_fcc_1-150x100.png" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="samsung_wireless_charger_qi_fcc_1" /></a>
<a href='http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-wireless-charging-pad-clears-fcc-but-will-the-galaxy-s4-need-it-11268791/samsung_wireless_charger_qi_fcc_2/' title='samsung_wireless_charger_qi_fcc_2'><img width="150" height="100" src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/samsung_wireless_charger_qi_fcc_2-150x100.png" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="samsung_wireless_charger_qi_fcc_2" /></a>
<a href='http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-wireless-charging-pad-clears-fcc-but-will-the-galaxy-s4-need-it-11268791/samsung_wireless_charger_qi_fcc_3/' title='samsung_wireless_charger_qi_fcc_3'><img width="150" height="100" src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/samsung_wireless_charger_qi_fcc_3-150x100.png" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="samsung_wireless_charger_qi_fcc_3" /></a>
<a href='http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-wireless-charging-pad-clears-fcc-but-will-the-galaxy-s4-need-it-11268791/samsung_wireless_charger_qi_fcc_4/' title='samsung_wireless_charger_qi_fcc_4'><img width="150" height="100" src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/samsung_wireless_charger_qi_fcc_4-150x100.png" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="samsung_wireless_charger_qi_fcc_4" /></a>
<a href='http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-wireless-charging-pad-clears-fcc-but-will-the-galaxy-s4-need-it-11268791/samsung_wireless_charger_qi_fcc_5/' title='samsung_wireless_charger_qi_fcc_5'><img width="150" height="100" src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/samsung_wireless_charger_qi_fcc_5-150x100.png" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="samsung_wireless_charger_qi_fcc_5" /></a>
<a href='http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-wireless-charging-pad-clears-fcc-but-will-the-galaxy-s4-need-it-11268791/samsung_wireless_charger_qi_fcc_6/' title='samsung_wireless_charger_qi_fcc_6'><img width="150" height="100" src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/samsung_wireless_charger_qi_fcc_6-150x100.png" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="samsung_wireless_charger_qi_fcc_6" /></a>

<p>[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/02/11/samsung-qi-charger-fcc/" target="_blank">via</a> Engadget]</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-wireless-charging-pad-clears-fcc-but-will-the-galaxy-s4-need-it-11268791/" title="Samsung Wireless Charging Pad clears FCC (but will the Galaxy S4 need it?)">Samsung Wireless Charging Pad clears FCC (but will the Galaxy S4 need it?)</a> is written by <a href="http://twitter.com/c_davies" >Chris Davies</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-wireless-charging-pad-clears-fcc-but-will-the-galaxy-s4-need-it-11268791/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC calling for free nationwide WiFi for the public</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-calling-for-free-nationwide-wifi-for-the-public-04268019/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-calling-for-free-nationwide-wifi-for-the-public-04268019/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 16:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Lloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wifi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=268019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While some may argue that internet access shouldn&#8217;t be a basic human right, a majority of people agree that internet access should be easily accessible by anyone for free, or at least at low costs. It looks like the FCC is finally recognizing that and is calling for nationwide WiFi to the public for free,  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-calling-for-free-nationwide-wifi-for-the-public-04268019/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/vint-cerf-contends-internet-not-a-human-right-05206446/">some may argue</a> that internet access shouldn&#8217;t be a basic human right, a majority of people agree that internet access should be easily accessible by anyone for free, or at least at low costs. It looks like the <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/fcc">FCC</a> is finally recognizing that and is calling for nationwide WiFi to the public for free, and it seems they&#8217;re going to do it without the help of ISPs</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/0105OPEDyasko-popup-580x424.jpg" alt="0105OPEDyasko-popup-580x424" width="580" height="424" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-268020" /></p>
<p><span id="more-268019"></span></p>
<p>According to the <em>Washington Post</em>, the FCC is thinking about buying back spectrum from TV stations that would allow for &#8220;super WiFi,&#8221; that would blanket the country with wide-ranging, highly-penetrative networks. While ISPs are furious about the proposition, the large tech companies like <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/google">Google</a> and <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/microsoft">Microsoft</a> are all for the idea.</p>
<p>This free WiFi network would work similarly to how cellular networks work now. You would have constant connection to the internet no matter where you were, and while you can easily achieve this through LTE, that obviously costs quite a bit per month, while this new WiFi network would be absolutely free, and potentially faster than LTE.</p>
<p>Pretty much all wireless providers, including handset manufacturers, and those invested in the mobile phone industry are not liking the idea one bit, and they don&#8217;t want their lucrative business interrupted. However, Google and Microsoft both said that increased internet access means more potential users, and it would open up to a massive boom in innovation if more people could access the internet anywhere.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not said exactly when the free nationwide WiFi could be set up. It would have to get approval first, and even after that&#8217;s done, it would take several years for the network to be completely built. So, while it may come in the future, don&#8217;t expect it anytime soon.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/tech-telecom-giants-take-sides-as-fcc-proposes-large-public-wifi-networks/2013/02/03/eb27d3e0-698b-11e2-ada3-d86a4806d5ee_story.html" target="_blank">via</a> The Washington Post]</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-calling-for-free-nationwide-wifi-for-the-public-04268019/" title="FCC calling for free nationwide WiFi for the public">FCC calling for free nationwide WiFi for the public</a> is written by <a href="" >Craig Lloyd</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-calling-for-free-nationwide-wifi-for-the-public-04268019/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Glasses make an appearance at the FCC</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-glasses-make-an-appearance-at-the-fcc-31267658/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/google-glasses-make-an-appearance-at-the-fcc-31267658/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 20:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Lloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glasses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project Glass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartglass]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=267658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We already know that the Explorer Edition of Google Glasses is about to make its public debut shortly, but not before it makes a trip through the FCC first in order to get approval for public sale. An application for Google Glasses was spotted at the FCC, and we&#8217;re now getting a closer look at  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/google-glasses-make-an-appearance-at-the-fcc-31267658/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We already know that the Explorer Edition of Google Glasses is <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/brin-google-glass-explorer-edition-will-ship-in-a-couple-of-months-22266238/">about to make its public debut</a> shortly, but not before it makes a trip through the <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/fcc">FCC</a> first in order to get approval for public sale. An application for Google Glasses was <a href="https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&amp;RequestTimeout=500&amp;calledFromFrame=N&amp;application_id=287362&amp;typ=8374&amp;fcc_id=A4R-X1" target="_blank">spotted at the FCC</a>, and we&#8217;re now getting a closer look at the details of the HUD-equipped glasses before they get handed out to developers.</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/google-glasses-fcc-copy-580x318.jpg" alt="google-glasses-fcc copy" width="580" height="318" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-267660" /></p>
<p><span id="more-267658"></span></p>
<p>In the FCC paperwork, the model number is referred to as &#8220;XEB,&#8221; and this was the first model that was tested back in November. The application mentions that the glasses will have 2.4GHz 802.11 b/g WiFi and Bluetooth 4.0, but it won&#8217;t support both at the same time, meaning communication can only be active through one or the other at a time.</p>
<p>Other than that, we&#8217;re not seeing anything else too special, but we&#8217;re positive that we&#8217;ll hear more about them in no time. Of course, we were promised a January 2013 release date for the glasses back during Google I/O, and now it looks like it won&#8217;t be for a couple more months, but a trip through the FCC is proof that these glasses are actually real, and that we&#8217;ll see them real soon.</p>
<p>We saw glimpses of Google&#8217;s Glass project earlier last year, and at Google I/O over the summer, the company went all-out to demonstrate the new technology. Developers will be able to get their hands on a pair soon, at a price of $1,500, while regular consumers are said to be able buy a pair sometime within a year from now.</p>
<div class="related-posts">
<div id="related-posts-MRP_all" class="related-posts-type">
<h4>Story Timeline</h4>
<ul class="st-related-posts">
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/are-1500-google-glasses-a-bargain-27236046/">Are $1,500 Google Glasses a bargain?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/google-glasses-stunt-demo-dive-video-released-28236223/">Google Glasses stunt demo dive video released</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/consumer-google-glasses-due-less-than-12-months-after-developer-version-28236256/">Consumer Google Glasses due less than 12 months after developer version</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/google-io-2012-jelly-bean-nexus-7-google-glasses-and-nexus-q-28236110/">Google IO 2012: Jelly Bean, Nexus 7, Google Glasses and Nexus Q</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/google-glasses-expand-beyond-wearable-camera-11246848/">Google Glasses expand beyond wearable camera</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/google-glasses-rapid-prototype-built-in-just-two-hours-06259858/">Google Glasses rapid prototype built in just two hours</a></li>
</ul></div>
</div>
<p>[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/31/google-glass-fcc/" target="_blank">via</a> Engadget]</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/google-glasses-make-an-appearance-at-the-fcc-31267658/" title="Google Glasses make an appearance at the FCC">Google Glasses make an appearance at the FCC</a> is written by <a href="" >Craig Lloyd</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/google-glasses-make-an-appearance-at-the-fcc-31267658/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google patent filing shows off multi-flash smartphone camera</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-patent-filing-shows-off-multi-flash-smartphone-camera-29267274/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/google-patent-filing-shows-off-multi-flash-smartphone-camera-29267274/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 05:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brittany Hillen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=267274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Smartphone cameras have come a long way in a relatively short period of time, progressing from sub-1-megapixel sensors incapable of taking images in anything but the brightest locations to modern sensors that are challenging the point-and-shoot camera market. Earlier today, a patent filing from Google cropped up showing a multi-flash camera model for smartphones, an  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/google-patent-filing-shows-off-multi-flash-smartphone-camera-29267274/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smartphone cameras have come a long way in a relatively short period of time, progressing from sub-1-megapixel sensors incapable of taking images in anything but the brightest locations to modern sensors that are challenging the point-and-shoot camera market. Earlier today, a patent filing from <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/google/" target="_blank">Google </a>cropped up showing a multi-flash camera model for smartphones, an intriguing idea that may never see the light of day. </p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/google-multiple-flash-patent-filing-01-373x540-345x500.jpg" alt="google-multiple-flash-patent-filing-01-373x540" width="345" height="500" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-267276" /></p>
<p><span id="more-267274"></span></p>
<p>Despite the improvements in mobile phone cameras, inadequate lighting is still a common issue and one of the reasons photographs end up dim and grainy. Google&#8217;s patent filing would seem to be a partial solution to that issue with multiple flash lights on a phone. Depending on the external lighting situation, one flash or multiple flashes would be utilized by the phone.</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/23.jpg" alt="2" width="540" height="364" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-267281" /></p>
<p>One of the sketches gives us a good idea of what Google is up to, showing multiple flash bulbs that can be re-positioned via tracking in the back of the phone. Another image shows a different design with the flashes stationary. The flashes that are mobile are nestled in different designs, with one being circular in nature and the other resembling the π symbol. </p>
<p>Not only would multiple flashes increase the overall lighting, but it would also provide better lighting in individual environments and help eliminate shadows by adjusting which lights go off. Another use indicated for the multi-flashes is HDR photography, with the flashes being used to simulate different exposures, which would then be stitched together. Of course, as with all patents, this might never come to fruition, but it is an interesting concept nonetheless.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://androidcommunity.com/google-patent-filing-points-towards-a-multi-flash-camera-setup-20130129/" target="_blank">via</a> Android Community]</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/google-patent-filing-shows-off-multi-flash-smartphone-camera-29267274/" title="Google patent filing shows off multi-flash smartphone camera">Google patent filing shows off multi-flash smartphone camera</a> is written by <a href="" >Brittany Hillen</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/google-patent-filing-shows-off-multi-flash-smartphone-camera-29267274/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple TV shows up at the FCC as the smaller model A1469</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-tv-shows-up-at-the-fcc-as-the-smaller-model-a1469-29267270/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-tv-shows-up-at-the-fcc-as-the-smaller-model-a1469-29267270/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 03:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brittany Hillen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=267270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An FCC filing has popped up showing a new Apple TV model smaller than the current version, dubbed model A1469. As far as design goes, not much appears changed besides the smaller dimensions, although there isn&#8217;t much to go on at this point. Not surprisingly, Apple hasn&#8217;t said anything about the device. You can check  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/apple-tv-shows-up-at-the-fcc-as-the-smaller-model-a1469-29267270/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/fcc/" target="_blank">FCC</a> filing has popped up showing a new Apple TV model smaller than the current version, dubbed model A1469. As far as design goes, not much appears changed besides the smaller dimensions, although there isn&#8217;t much to go on at this point. Not surprisingly, Apple hasn&#8217;t said anything about the device. You can check out its diagram after the jump.</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/apple-tv1.png" alt="apple-tv" width="475" height="450" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-267271" /></p>
<p><span id="more-267270"></span></p>
<p>According to the diagram, the A1469 model measures in at 93.7mm, while the current model is 98mm, making it just a tad smaller. <em><a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2013/01/28/apple-updates-apple-tv-with-up-next-and-bluetooth-keyboard-new-appletv32-model-revealed/" target="_blank">MacRumors</a></em> noted Apple TV&#8217;s software update shows an <em>AppleTV3,2</em> model, rumored to be for international shelves. Whether it is and this model is that one or a different one altogether is unknown.</p>
<p>This follows the Apple TV update <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/apple-tv-update-brings-bluetooth-keyboard-and-up-next-28267000/" target="_blank">we reported</a> on yesterday, which added Bluetooth keyboard support, iTunes Match improvements, and a feature called Up Next. Owners of 2nd and 3rd generation Apple TVs can nab the update over-the-air if they haven&#8217;t already installed it. After downloading, the device can be synced with a Bluetooth keyboard, freeing things up.</p>
<p>The Up Next feature added via the update is the same that was rolled out on iTunes 11, queuing and automatically playing content for the user without the need to create a specific playlist. As for the A1469 model, little else is known aside from its existence and dimensions. We&#8217;ll keep an eye out for any new details that surface, so stay tuned.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/29/apple-tv-fcc-model-a1469/" target="_blank">via</a> Engadget]</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/apple-tv-shows-up-at-the-fcc-as-the-smaller-model-a1469-29267270/" title="Apple TV shows up at the FCC as the smaller model A1469">Apple TV shows up at the FCC as the smaller model A1469</a> is written by <a href="" >Brittany Hillen</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-tv-shows-up-at-the-fcc-as-the-smaller-model-a1469-29267270/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alcatel One Touch Evo 7 pops up in FCC filing</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/alcatel-one-touch-evo-7-pops-up-in-fcc-filing-25266795/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/alcatel-one-touch-evo-7-pops-up-in-fcc-filing-25266795/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 20:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Abent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=266795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When it comes to Alcatel&#8217;s new tablet line up, the One Touch Evo 7 HD is arguably the more exciting one. Today, however, its standard resolution sibling is making an appearance at the FCC, with all kinds of information about the tablet on display in the filing. Most of this is stuff that we already  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/alcatel-one-touch-evo-7-pops-up-in-fcc-filing-25266795/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to Alcatel&#8217;s new tablet line up, the One Touch Evo 7 HD is arguably the more exciting one. Today, however, its standard resolution sibling is making an appearance at the <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/fcc/" target="_blank">FCC</a>, with all kinds of information about the tablet on display in the filing. Most of this is stuff that we already knew, but if you&#8217;ve been waiting for the One Touch Evo 7, this FCC filing means that it&#8217;s one step closer to release.</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/OneTouchEvo7.jpg" alt="OneTouchEvo7" width="550" height="410" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-266798" /><br />
<span id="more-266795"></span></p>
<p>In the One Touch Evo 7, we&#8217;re working with a 7-inch display that touts 1024 x 600 resolution. Under the hood, you&#8217;ll have a single-core CPU clocked at 1GHz working in tandem with 1GB of RAM. The tablet&#8217;s 4GB of internal storage can be expanded on thanks to the microSD slot the Evo 7 ships with, and users can expect it to be running Android 4.0 <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/ice-cream-sandwich/" target="_blank">Ice Cream Sandwich</a> out of the box.</p>
<p>In other words, there&#8217;s next to nothing for technophiles to get excited about with the One Touch Evo 7. Even though Alcatel hasn&#8217;t announced a price yet, we&#8217;re expecting this tablet to be pretty cheap, and that&#8217;s where the main draw will be. The HD variant will have a price tag of $179, so we can probably expect a price point around $150 for the standard Evo 7.</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/OneTouchEvo7inside.jpg" alt="OneTouchEvo7inside" width="551" height="412" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-266799" /></p>
<p>That definitely isn&#8217;t bad for someone who&#8217;s looking to enter the realm of tablets for the first time, but for everyone else, we imagine they&#8217;ll ultimately look someplace else. In any case, if you&#8217;re interested, you can take a look at some of the internal and external shots Alcatel has included in its <a href="https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&amp;RequestTimeout=500&amp;calledFromFrame=N&amp;application_id=170309&amp;fcc_id=" target="_blank">FCC filing</a>. There isn&#8217;t any release date for the standard Evo 7 yet, but for what it&#8217;s worth, the HD model should begin shipping in May.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/25/alcatel-one-touch-evo-7-fcc/" target="_blank">via</a> Engadget]</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/alcatel-one-touch-evo-7-pops-up-in-fcc-filing-25266795/" title="Alcatel One Touch Evo 7 pops up in FCC filing">Alcatel One Touch Evo 7 pops up in FCC filing</a> is written by <a href="" >Eric Abent</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/alcatel-one-touch-evo-7-pops-up-in-fcc-filing-25266795/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC Chairman proposes gigabit internet in all 50 states by 2015</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-chairman-proposes-gigabit-internet-in-all-50-states-by-2015-18265904/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-chairman-proposes-gigabit-internet-in-all-50-states-by-2015-18265904/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 20:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Lloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiber optics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Fiber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=265904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may know a little about Google Fiber, the insanely fast internet that arrived in Kansas City not too long ago, but the unfortunate news is that Google isn&#8217;t really planning on rolling its Fiber service out to a majority of the US. However, FCC Chairman Julius Genachoski is calling for gigabit internet in all  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-chairman-proposes-gigabit-internet-in-all-50-states-by-2015-18265904/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may know a little about <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/google-fiber">Google Fiber</a>, the insanely fast internet that arrived in Kansas City not too long ago, but the unfortunate news is that Google isn&#8217;t really planning on rolling its Fiber service out to a majority of the US. However, FCC Chairman Julius Genachoski is <a href="http://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-chairman-genachowski-issues-gigabit-city-challenge" target="_blank">calling for gigabit internet in all 50 states by 2015</a>.</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/fcc-chairman-genachowski-580x427.jpg" alt="fcc-chairman-genachowski" width="580" height="427" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-265905" /></p>
<p><span id="more-265904"></span></p>
<p>Genachowski is calling it the &#8220;Gigabit City Challenge,&#8221; and he wants all 50 states to have at least one city with gigabit internet availability by the time 2015 rolls around. He&#8217;s relying upon ISPs and state governments to help make it all a reality. Of course, other areas in the US have already implemented the faster internet protocol, mostly thanks to private funding, but Genachowski wants ISPs to step up.</p>
<p>Overall, the FCC said that there are currently 42 communities in 14 states with access to fiber-based internet, so we&#8217;re already seeing some progress, but Genachowksi notes that as long as &#8220;we build it, innovation will come.&#8221; He also says that the US ultimately needs this in order to &#8220;drive economic growth&#8221; and compete globally.</p>
<p>Of course, this is only a goal of the FCC&#8217;s and not necessarily a mandate, so they&#8217;re really only encouraging ISPs and state governments to step up, rather than force them to introduce gigabit internet, so we&#8217;re going to have to see a lot of cooperation between certain parties if we want to see high-speed, fiber internet in all 50 states anytime soon.</p>
<p><em>Image <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/us-mission/6749946767/in/photostream/" target="_blank">via</a> Flickr</em></p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-chairman-proposes-gigabit-internet-in-all-50-states-by-2015-18265904/" title="FCC Chairman proposes gigabit internet in all 50 states by 2015">FCC Chairman proposes gigabit internet in all 50 states by 2015</a> is written by <a href="" >Craig Lloyd</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-chairman-proposes-gigabit-internet-in-all-50-states-by-2015-18265904/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SlashGear Evening Wrap-Up: January 17, 2013</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-evening-wrap-up-january-17-2013-17265790/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-evening-wrap-up-january-17-2013-17265790/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 00:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Abent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PlayStation 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PS Vita]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[siri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SlashGear Evening Wrap-Up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Softbank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valve]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=265790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome to Thursday evening folks. Today we heard that Samsung may use MWC 2013 to unveil a new Galaxy Note 8.0 tablet, which is certainly exciting to say the least. According to new rumors, Verizon may be shipping the Samsung ATIV Odyssey on January 24, while a new Apple job listing suggests some major Siri  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-evening-wrap-up-january-17-2013-17265790/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to Thursday evening folks. Today we heard that Samsung may use MWC 2013 to unveil a new <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-galaxy-note-8-0-tablet-tipped-for-mwc-2013-17265732/" target="_blank">Galaxy Note 8.0 tablet</a>, which is certainly exciting to say the least. According to new rumors, Verizon may be shipping the <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/verizon-samsung-ativ-odyssey-shipping-tipped-january-24th-17265771/" target="_blank">Samsung ATIV Odyssey</a> on January 24, while a new <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/apple-job-listing-hints-at-major-siri-improvements-17265736/" target="_blank">Apple job listing</a> suggests some major Siri improvements coming in the future. Instagram said today that it has <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/instagram-boasts-90-million-monthly-active-users-40-million-photos-per-day-17265781/" target="_blank">90 million monthly active users</a> who are uploading 40 million photos per day, and even though Intel&#8217;s earnings for Q4 2012 were down, the company still managed to pull in <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/intel-q4-2012-earnings-down-but-still-massive-at-13-3-billion-in-revenue-17265788/" target="_blank">$13.3 billion in revenue</a>.</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/siri1.jpg" alt="siri" width="580" height="386" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-265792" /><br />
<span id="more-265790"></span></p>
<p>New photos from the incoming <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/steve-jobs-biopic-photos-reveal-woz-in-action-17265720/" target="_blank">Steve Jobs biopic</a> are showing us what John Gad looks like as Steve Wozniak, with Time Warner Cable <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/netflix-is-discriminating-against-its-customers-accuses-time-warner-cable-17265700/" target="_blank">accusing Netflix</a> of discriminating against its customers today. Carrier-specific <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/carrier-specific-galaxy-nexus-get-android-4-2-1-update-while-verizon-lags-17265785/" target="_blank">Galaxy Nexus phones</a> are getting updates to Android 4.2.1 Jelly Bean save for Verizon&#8217;s version, while Sony showed off the construction of products that were new to CES in a <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/sony-handcrafts-new-ces-products-in-five-minute-video-17265779/" target="_blank">five-minute video</a>. King.com has <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/king-com-overtakes-zynga-for-top-spot-on-facebook-17265777/" target="_blank">unseated Zynga</a> for the top spot on Facebook&#8217;s charts, and <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/13-inch-retina-macbooks-now-available-in-apples-refurbished-store-17265770/" target="_blank">13-inch Retina MacBooks</a> are now available in Apple&#8217;s refurbished store. </p>
<p>Dish network is asking the FCC view SoftBank&#8217;s deal with Sprint as &#8220;<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/dish-demands-ffc-see-softbank-sprint-deal-unripe-for-consideration-17265783/" target="_blank">unripe for consideration</a>,&#8221; and Sony announced that <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/classic-white-playstation-3-bundle-hits-the-us-on-january-27-17265766/" target="_blank">Classic White PS3</a> bundles will be making their way to North America on January 27. Speaking of the PlayStation family, we learned today that the PS Vita can <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/playstation-vita-only-stores-100-apps-17265746/" target="_blank">only hold 100 apps</a>, even if there&#8217;s room on the memory card for more. Google CEO Larry Page talked about <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/larry-page-talks-googles-fragile-influence-on-motorola-17265725/" target="_blank">what kind of influence</a> the company has over Motorola, while in the same interview talking about why Google may not exist if it weren&#8217;t for <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/why-google-may-have-never-been-if-not-for-nikola-tesla-17265768/" target="_blank">Nikola Tesla</a>.</p>
<p>Skype said today that it <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/skype-were-not-powering-facebooks-messenger-phone-calls-17265745/" target="_blank">isn&#8217;t helping Facebook</a> with its new calling service, while <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/google-glass-sees-laser-projected-keyboard-possibilities-17265741/" target="_blank">a new patent</a> suggests that Google Glass could be outfitted with laser-projected keyboards. <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/american-airlines-unveils-new-look-more-tech-17265731/" target="_blank">American Airlines</a> unveiled a new look today, and <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/temple-run-2-reaches-1-in-less-than-12-hours-17265747/" target="_blank"><em>Temple Run 2</em></a> was busy burning up the iOS App Store&#8217;s free chart just hours after release. NASA says 2012 was the <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/nasa-says-2012-was-9th-warmest-year-on-record-17265715/" target="_blank">9th-warmest year</a> on record since the 1880s, and Valve has announced that it will be showing off a <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/valve-to-unveil-team-fortress-2-virtual-reality-port-at-gdc-2013-17265724/" target="_blank">virtual reality port</a> of <em>Team Fortress 2</em> at GDC 2013. Finally tonight, Don Reisinger asks <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/is-apple-doubt-starting-to-creep-in-17265737/" target="_blank">if Apple doubt is beginning to creep in</a>. That does it for tonight&#8217;s Evening Wrap-Up, we hope you enjoy the rest of your night everyone!</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-evening-wrap-up-january-17-2013-17265790/" title="SlashGear Evening Wrap-Up: January 17, 2013">SlashGear Evening Wrap-Up: January 17, 2013</a> is written by <a href="" >Eric Abent</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-evening-wrap-up-january-17-2013-17265790/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dish demands FCC see Softbank-Sprint deal &#8220;unripe for consideration&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/dish-demands-ffc-see-softbank-sprint-deal-unripe-for-consideration-17265783/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/dish-demands-ffc-see-softbank-sprint-deal-unripe-for-consideration-17265783/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 22:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must Read Bits & Bytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clearwire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dish Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Softbank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sprint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=265783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week the folks at Dish Network have made it clear that they&#8217;re going to go hardcore with their business tactics when it comes to attaining Clearwire &#8211; their methods including hitting the competition where it hurts: Sprint&#8217;s merger with Softbank. Several months ago Softbank made a bid to attain US-based Sprint while Sprint made  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/dish-demands-ffc-see-softbank-sprint-deal-unripe-for-consideration-17265783/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week the folks at Dish Network have made it clear that they&#8217;re going to go hardcore with their business tactics when it comes to attaining Clearwire &#8211; their methods including hitting the competition where it hurts: Sprint&#8217;s merger with Softbank. Several months ago Softbank made a bid to attain US-based Sprint while Sprint made a bid to attain Clearwire, their ability to purchase Clearwire being based on they themselves being purchased by Softbank. Because Dish Network sees Softbank&#8217;s acquisition of Sprint as contingent on Sprint&#8217;s future purchase of Clearwire, they&#8217;ve filed for the whole stack of cards to come tumbling down.</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/stopit.jpg" alt="stopit" width="580" height="417" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-265784" /></p>
<p><span id="more-265783"></span></p>
<p>A regulatory filing has been filed this week by Dish Network that they hope will ultimately leave Sprint on its own without the cash to purchase Clearwire, leaving them able to do so themselves. The following fact list should make this situation rather clear to you &#8211; or to the FCC &#8211; or both! Have a peek at how this is all about to go down &#8211; these are in chronological order, mind you:</p>
<p>1. Sprint owns 50% of Clearwire (and has since before these dealings started last year).</p>
<p>2. Softbank enters into agreement to <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/softbank-buys-sprint-in-20-1bn-deal-15251813/" target="_Blank">purchase Sprint</a> (a controlling interest, that is, 70% of the company) for $20.1bn USD. This deal remains under consideration by the FCC to this day.</p>
<p>3. Sprint <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/sprint-offers-2-1bn-for-clearwire-as-long-as-softbank-deal-goes-through-13260781/" target="_Blank">offers</a> Clearwire $2.90 USD a share for all remaining shares ($2.1bn USD contingent on Softbank deal going through)</p>
<p>4. Softbank limits Sprint&#8217;s bid on Clearwire to $2.97 a share ($2.2bn total) and <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/sprint-grabs-100-of-clearwire-in-2-2bn-deal-17261119/" target="_Blank">Clearwire accepts</a>. (December 14th, 2012) <strong>NOTE:</strong> <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-01-17/dish-network-asks-fcc-to-pause-sprint-softbank-merger-review.html?cmpid=yhoo" target="_Blank">Bloomberg</a> reports here now on January 17th, 2013, that the following is true: &#8220;While it has made no decision to reconsider Sprint’s offer, Clearwire said it plans to talk to Dish, which is led by Chairman Charlie Ergen, and will keep its options open by not drawing on financing offered by Sprint.&#8221;</p>
<p>5. According to <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-57562883-94/dish-counters-sprint-makes-$5b-offer-for-clearwire/" target="_Blank">CNET</a>, Dish Network makes an unsolicited bid of $3.30 USD a share for the stocks they&#8217;ve just agreed to sell to Sprint, (this being the same 50% of Clearwire not yet owned by Sprint), this totaling $5.15bn USD. Clearwire states that it is &#8220;severely limited by its current contractual obligations.&#8221; (January 8th, 2013)</p>
<p>6. Dish initiates regulatory filing with FCC that you can <a href="http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7022105956" target="_Blank">access at the FCC right now</a> with a big fat &#8220;REQUEST TO HOLD PROCEEDING IN ABEYANCE&#8221; neat the head:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;DISH Network L.L.C. (“DISH”) requests that the above-captioned proceeding, for which petitions to deny are currently due January 28, 2013, be held in abeyance, and that the “shot clock” in this proceeding be paused, until the resolution of significant unresolved contingencies concerning Sprint Nextel Corporation’s (“Sprint”) offer to acquire all of Clearwire Corporation (“Clearwire”).  In this proceeding, Sprint seeks not only the authority to be acquired by SoftBank Corporation (“SoftBank”); it also requests authority to acquire the stock of Clearwire that it does not already own, as well as de facto control over Clearwire. </p>
<p>But Sprint’s acquisition of control over Clearwire is subject to, among other things, a vote of the non-Sprint shareholders in the face of a higher value offer made by DISH and Clearwire’s response to DISH’s offer.  These contingencies make SoftBank’s and Sprint’s applications unripe for consideration.&#8221; &#8211; Dish Network</p></blockquote>
<p>They add the following &#8211; and a whole lot more that you can read on your own if you wish &#8211; including reference to &#8220;the Eagle River purchase.&#8221; Eagle River is the group from which whoever ends up purchasing the remaining shares of Clearwire will be buying them from, clean and simple. Also included is a reference to &#8220;Crest&#8221;, this being Crest Financial, a minority stakeholder in Clearwire and one of two groups seeking the FCC&#8217;s reconsideration in approving Sprint&#8217;s purchase of the remaining stocks in Clearwire (the other being Dish). This is Dish Network&#8217;s case:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Moreover, whether the Eagle River purchase gave Sprint de facto control (as Crest alleges) or not (as Clearwire does), there is no doubt that it facilitates the acceptance of Sprint’s offer to buy the rest of Clearwire.  First things first:  the Commission should evaluate the propriety of the cursory treatment received by the Eagle River purchase before it takes up the larger SoftBank-Sprint transaction. &#8221; &#8211; Dish Network</p></blockquote>
<p>So it&#8217;s a good time had by all! It would seem that if Dish Network is successful detaching Softbank&#8217;s deal with Sprint to pick up Clearwire, the remaining stocks would probably be delivered to Dish with a bow. It all depends on the FCC though, of course, and we&#8217;ll be watching this deal closely as it continues to unfold through the Spring of 2013. </p>
<p><strong>Bonus!</strong> AT&#038;T <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/att-carefully-objects-to-softbanks-sprint-deal-18252666/" target="_Blank">carefully objected</a> to the Softbank/Sprint acquisition two days after it was announced, well before the Clearwire dealings, too!</p>
<p>[<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-57564543-94/dish-network-to-fcc-pause-the-sprint-softbank-merger-review/" target="_blank">via</a> CNET]</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/dish-demands-ffc-see-softbank-sprint-deal-unripe-for-consideration-17265783/" title="Dish demands FCC see Softbank-Sprint deal &#8220;unripe for consideration&#8221;">Dish demands FCC see Softbank-Sprint deal &#8220;unripe for consideration&#8221;</a> is written by <a href="" >Chris Burns</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/dish-demands-ffc-see-softbank-sprint-deal-unripe-for-consideration-17265783/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC will crack open unlicensed spectrum to speed up wireless Internet</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-will-crack-open-unlicensed-spectrum-to-avoid-wireless-traffic-jam-09264716/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-will-crack-open-unlicensed-spectrum-to-avoid-wireless-traffic-jam-09264716/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 02:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brittany Hillen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CES 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=264716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The FCC has unveiled its plan to open an unlicensed spectrum that it says will relieve a wireless internet traffic jam. The announcement came via the Federal Communications Commission&#8217;s Chairman Julius Genachowski at CES earlier today. Reportedly, this move will not only make things faster at your local Starbucks, library, and anywhere else you&#8217;ll find  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-will-crack-open-unlicensed-spectrum-to-avoid-wireless-traffic-jam-09264716/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/fcc/" target="_blank">FCC</a> has unveiled its plan to open an unlicensed spectrum that it says will relieve a wireless internet traffic jam. The announcement came via the Federal Communications Commission&#8217;s Chairman Julius Genachowski at CES earlier today. Reportedly, this move will not only make things faster at your local Starbucks, library, and anywhere else you&#8217;ll find public wifi, but also in your home.</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/fcc-seal_black-large.png" alt="fcc-seal_black-large" width="350" height="350" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-264717" /></p>
<p><span id="more-264716"></span></p>
<p>Talk has been focused primarily on mobile broadband, with demand for both bandwidth and speed increasing rapidly. Wireless Internet needs some attention too, however, according to the FCC. By making this move, wireless networks in general, and particularly public wifi networks, will be relieved by sharing this new spectrum.</p>
<p>Genachowski offered this statement. &#8220;[The FCC is] announcing today that we&#8217;re moving to free up a substantial amount of spectrum for wifi to relieve wifi congestion and improve wifi speeds at conferences and airports and, ultimately, in people&#8217;s homes. There&#8217;s also a wifi traffic jam, and anyone who has been to conferences and airports knows that it is true.&#8221;</p>
<p>The spectrum in question is the 5GHz band, which is currently in use by the Department of Defense and other government agencies. For now, a proceeding is set for February to move forward with opening the spectrum. Genachowski is estimating that 35-percent of the spectrum will be opened, but says the number may change.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/01/10/fcc_wi_fi_speactrum_increase/" target="_blank">via</a> The Register]</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-will-crack-open-unlicensed-spectrum-to-avoid-wireless-traffic-jam-09264716/" title="FCC will crack open unlicensed spectrum to speed up wireless Internet">FCC will crack open unlicensed spectrum to speed up wireless Internet</a> is written by <a href="" >Brittany Hillen</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-will-crack-open-unlicensed-spectrum-to-avoid-wireless-traffic-jam-09264716/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mysterious BlackBerry 10 device arrives at FCC</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/mysterious-blackberry-10-device-arrives-at-fcc-31262646/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/mysterious-blackberry-10-device-arrives-at-fcc-31262646/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 18:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Abent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blackberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BlackBerry 10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=262646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those who have been following the development of BlackBerry 10 might like to know that a new device has arrived at the FCC. Its model number is RFH121LW, but other than that, we don&#8217;t know much about this phone. The documents that accompany the filing are merely an exposure report and its appendices, along with  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/mysterious-blackberry-10-device-arrives-at-fcc-31262646/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those who have been following the development of <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/blackberry-10/" target="_blank">BlackBerry 10</a> might like to know that a new device has arrived at the <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/FCC" target="_blank">FCC</a>. Its model number is RFH121LW, but other than that, we don&#8217;t know much about this phone. The documents that accompany <a href="https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&amp;RequestTimeout=500&amp;calledFromFrame=N&amp;application_id=608187&amp;fcc_id=%27L6ARFH120LW%27" target="_blank">the filing</a> are merely an exposure report and its appendices, along with some letters and a test report. This means we don&#8217;t get any images and hardly any idea of the phone&#8217;s specifications.</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/BlackBerry-10-logo-vc81.png" alt="BlackBerry-10-logo-vc8" width="472" height="248" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-262655" /><br />
<span id="more-262646"></span></p>
<p>So, we&#8217;ll just have to use our imaginations for another month or so. The RFH121LW could possibly be one of the phones RIM plans to unveil during its BlackBerry 10 launch event next month, so we may see more of it then. Whatever happens there, we know it&#8217;s going to be big, as <a href="http://slashgear.com/tags/RIM" target="_blank">RIM</a> has to blow the socks off everyone if it wants to make an impact and get people to pay attention to the new mobile operating system meant to bring the company back from the brink.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve seen our share of BlackBerry 10 handsets before this, though. Over the weekend, new images of what&#8217;s reportedly the BlackBerry X10 leaked out, following numerous leaks of the BlackBerry Z10. RIM will be offering all-touch BlackBerry 10 devices alongside phones that retain the famous BlackBerry QWERTY keyboard, so there should be something for all kinds of smartphones lovers when it comes to BlackBerry 10.</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/BlackBerry10label-580x234.jpg" alt="BlackBerry10label" width="580" height="234" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-262654" /></p>
<p>So far, we&#8217;ve been hearing pretty good things about BlackBerry 10. RIM has been citing an enthusiastic response from developers and retail partners alike, so there&#8217;s a chance that the company could knock it out of the park with this release. We&#8217;ll be seeing all of what BlackBerry 10 has to offer in no time at all, as RIM is set to host its launch event on January 30. Stay tuned.</p>
<div class="related-posts">
<div id="related-posts-MRP_all" class="related-posts-type">
<h4>Story Timeline</h4>
<ul class="st-related-posts">
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/blackberry-10-l-series-flaunted-in-video-walkthrough-12260538/">BlackBerry 10 L-Series flaunted in video walkthrough</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/blackberry-10-l-series-fondle-video-sticks-around-for-the-duration-12260646/">BlackBerry 10 L-Series fondle video sticks around for the duration</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/blackberry-10-keyboard-gets-a-video-walkthrough-14261049/">BlackBerry 10 keyboard gets a video walkthrough</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/blackberry-10-screenshots-leaked-17261074/">BlackBerry 10 screenshots leaked</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/blackberry-10-gets-vote-of-confidence-in-uk-including-4g-model-19261590/">BlackBerry 10 gets vote of confidence in UK (including 4G model)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/blackberry-z10-smartphone-leaks-with-two-color-combos-20261852/">BlackBerry Z10 smartphone leaks with two color combos</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/blackberry-x10-qwerty-touch-smartphone-leaked-26262155/">BlackBerry X10 QWERTY touch smartphone leaked in single white-case photo</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/blackberry-10-slides-leak-video-chat-and-screen-sharing-via-bbm-27262323/">BlackBerry 10 slides leak video chat and screen sharing via BBM</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/blackberry-x10-poses-for-the-camera-once-more-29262528/">BlackBerry X10 poses for the camera once more</a></li>
</ul></div>
</div>
<p>[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/12/31/blackberry-10-rfh121lw-hits-fcc/" target="_blank">via</a> Engadget]</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/mysterious-blackberry-10-device-arrives-at-fcc-31262646/" title="Mysterious BlackBerry 10 device arrives at FCC">Mysterious BlackBerry 10 device arrives at FCC</a> is written by <a href="" >Eric Abent</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/mysterious-blackberry-10-device-arrives-at-fcc-31262646/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC loosens its grip, makes it easier to get Internet in-flight</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-loosens-its-grip-makes-it-easier-to-get-internet-in-flight-28262508/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-loosens-its-grip-makes-it-easier-to-get-internet-in-flight-28262508/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 04:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brittany Hillen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wifi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=262508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For now, airlines have to go through a lengthy hassle in order to get in-flight Internet access established. The airline has to get the FCC&#8216;s go-ahead to utilize the satellite-delivered airwaves that bring wifi to aircraft, as well as approval from the FAA. To decrease the red tape and streamline the process, the FCC has  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-loosens-its-grip-makes-it-easier-to-get-internet-in-flight-28262508/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For now, airlines have to go through a lengthy hassle in order to get in-flight Internet access established. The airline has to get the <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/fcc/" target="_blank">FCC</a>&#8216;s go-ahead to utilize the satellite-delivered airwaves that bring wifi to aircraft, as well as approval from the FAA. To decrease the red tape and streamline the process, the FCC has approved an application process that will let airlines more easily get licensing.</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/fcc-wifi-image.jpg" alt="Print" width="400" height="166" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-262509" /></p>
<p><span id="more-262508"></span></p>
<p>According to some critics of the current process, the hassle involved in obtaining licensing for in-flight wireless Internet is the reason why it is not more widely available. According to the FCC&#8217;s Chairman Julius Genachowski, once the application process is in place, the amount of time it takes for an airline to get in-flight Internet approval will be cut in half.</p>
<p>The Federal Aviation Administration requires in-flight wireless Internet to be thoroughly tested for possible navigation/piloting interference. Says the Washington Post, while the FAA acknowledged that the FCC&#8217;s application process will indeed speed up the time it takes to get an in-flight wifi system in place on planes, it did not specify anything pertaining to its own involvement and requirements.</p>
<p>This comes at a time when the FAA has been reviewing its regulations about the use of certain devices that do not interfere with the safe operation of an aircraft, such as ereaders. Internet and gadgets are becoming a staple of society, and as such, both airlines and government agencies are being forced to adjust to keep pace. Says the FCC, &#8220;Whether traveling for work or leisure, Americans increasingly expect broadband access everywhere they go.&#8221;</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/fcc-eases-restrictions-on-internet-use-on-flights/2012/12/28/873ec966-5125-11e2-839d-d54cc6e49b63_story.html" target="_blank">via</a> Washington Post]</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-loosens-its-grip-makes-it-easier-to-get-internet-in-flight-28262508/" title="FCC loosens its grip, makes it easier to get Internet in-flight">FCC loosens its grip, makes it easier to get Internet in-flight</a> is written by <a href="" >Brittany Hillen</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-loosens-its-grip-makes-it-easier-to-get-internet-in-flight-28262508/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pebble smartwatch gets FCC approval, is closer to shipping</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/pebble-smartwatch-gets-fcc-approval-is-closer-to-shipping-27262356/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/pebble-smartwatch-gets-fcc-approval-is-closer-to-shipping-27262356/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 01:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brittany Hillen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pebble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartwatch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=262356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Pebble smartwatch has been promised multiple times now, only to be delayed for whatever reason. As such, some investors may be getting antsy, wondering if the product will ever come to light. Those worries can be eased, with the e-ink smartwatch gaining FCC approval, a sign that it is not only real, but closer  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/pebble-smartwatch-gets-fcc-approval-is-closer-to-shipping-27262356/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/pebble/" target="_blank">Pebble </a><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/smartwatch/" target="_blank">smartwatch</a> has been promised multiple times now, only to be delayed for whatever reason. As such, some investors may be getting antsy, wondering if the product will ever come to light. Those worries can be eased, with the e-ink smartwatch gaining FCC approval, a sign that it is not only real, but closer to shipping than ever.</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/photo-full.jpg" alt="photo-full" width="560" height="420" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-262357" /></p>
<p><span id="more-262356"></span></p>
<p>The Pebble has enjoyed widespread success on Kickstarter, hitting the $1 million mark in funding and breaking records &#8211; the smartwatch got to its $100k goal in only 120 minutes, in fact. But the product has been likewise plagued with continually delayed shipping. Back in July, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/pebble-smartwatch-wont-make-september-ship-date-25240170/" target="_blank">it was revealed</a> that the smartwatch wouldn&#8217;t be shipping in September, as it was originally intended.</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/26.jpg" alt="2" width="517" height="388" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-262360" /></p>
<p>Then there was bad news again on December 7, when <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/pebble-smartwatch-is-delayed-again-wont-arrive-in-time-for-the-holidays-07260068/" target="_blank">it was announced</a> that shipping had been delayed once again. Those who were expecting to receive the smartwatch by the holidays would have to run out and grab something else, because all they were getting on the Pebble front was a digital card with a cheesy apology rhyme. Now it seems the watch is closer to shipping than it ever has been, appearing on the FCC&#8217;s website and gaining approval.</p>
<p>The filing doesn&#8217;t show us much of anything that we didn&#8217;t already know about the watch. Pebble recently stated that the product verification build starts this week, meaning that the next phase is mass production. There&#8217;s no word on how long product verification will take, however, and no info on when backers can expect the watch to ship.</p>
<p><div class="related-posts">
<div id="related-posts-MRP_all" class="related-posts-type">
<h4>Story Timeline</h4>
<ul class="st-related-posts">
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/pebble-smartwatch-reaches-9m-adds-bluetooth-4-0-08226794/">Pebble smartwatch reaches $9m: adds Bluetooth 4.0</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/pebble-smartwatch-sells-out-after-10m-raised-10227605/">Pebble smartwatch sells out after $10m raised</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/pebble-smartwatch-wont-make-september-ship-date-25240170/">Pebble smartwatch won't make September ship date</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/pebble-kickstarter-smartwatch-ui-video-delivered-14242888/">Pebble Kickstarter smartwatch UI video delivered</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/pebble-smartwatch-adds-color-option-as-backers-asked-for-ship-details-04245832/">Pebble smartwatch adds color option as backers asked for ship details</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/pebble-smartwatch-is-delayed-again-wont-arrive-in-time-for-the-holidays-07260068/">Pebble smartwatch delayed again, won't arrive in time for the holidays</a></li>
</ul></div>
</div><br />
[<a href="http://androidcommunity.com/pebble-smartwatch-fcc-filing-revealed-as-the-product-verification-build-begins-20121227/" target="_blank">via</a> Android Community]</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/pebble-smartwatch-gets-fcc-approval-is-closer-to-shipping-27262356/" title="Pebble smartwatch gets FCC approval, is closer to shipping">Pebble smartwatch gets FCC approval, is closer to shipping</a> is written by <a href="" >Brittany Hillen</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/pebble-smartwatch-gets-fcc-approval-is-closer-to-shipping-27262356/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sonos PLAYBAR hits FCC</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/sonos-playbar-hits-fcc-27262254/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/sonos-playbar-hits-fcc-27262254/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 14:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SONOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Streaming media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=262254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new Sonos music component, the Sonos PLAYBAR, has cropped up in FCC testing, suggesting the streaming company is readying a push into TV audio. The PLAYBAR, spotted in an FCC filing, is believed to be Sonos&#8217; first proper home theater device, likely including support for both streaming music in the same way as the current PLAY:3 and  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/sonos-playbar-hits-fcc-27262254/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/sonos" target="_blank">Sonos</a> music component, the Sonos PLAYBAR, has cropped up in FCC testing, suggesting the streaming company is readying a push into TV audio. The PLAYBAR, spotted in an <a href="https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&amp;RequestTimeout=500&amp;calledFromFrame=N&amp;application_id=568299&amp;fcc_id=" target="_blank">FCC filing</a>, is believed to be Sonos&#8217; first proper home theater device, likely including support for both streaming music in the same way as the current PLAY:3 and PLAY:5, and the soundtrack from your TV.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-262255" alt="sonos_playbar_fcc_1" src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/sonos_playbar_fcc_1-580x371.png" width="580" height="371" /></p>
<p><span id="more-262254"></span></p>
<p>It&#8217;s not clear if that soundtrack will be played in stereo or some sort of virtual surround sound; the FCC filing is sparse on details, with only the label (and its rough location on the PLAYBAR itself) shown. However, the presence of WiFi 802.11n is confirmed, though since Sonos uses that for its proprietary mesh-networking system, that comes as little surprise. The fact that it is dual-band is an advancement on current Sonos components, nonetheless.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-262256" alt="sonos_playbar_fcc_2" src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/sonos_playbar_fcc_2-580x260.png" width="580" height="260" /></p>
<p>Sonos hasn&#8217;t been shy about its ambitions to challenge the A/V industry. The company&#8217;s CEO <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/sonos-ceo-apples-airplay-doesnt-work-very-well-20166275/" target="_blank">confirmed last year</a> that some sort of home theater system could be on the cards, but argued that Sonos would do so in a way that challenged traditional &#8220;straightforward&#8221; options such as from Bose with greater audio quality.</p>
<p>The speakerbar would make a natural companion to the Sonos SUB subwoofer <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/sonos-sub-review-05259674/" target="_blank">we reviewed recently</a>, and the ideal centerpiece to a Sonos home theater system. Throw in a few &#8220;PLAY:1&#8243; satellite speakers and the setup would do equally well for music as for accompanying your big-screen TV.</p>
<div class="related-posts">
<div id="related-posts-MRP_all" class="related-posts-type">
<h4>Story Timeline</h4>
<ul class="st-related-posts">
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/sonos-play3-official-cheaper-entry-to-the-streaming-music-club-20166227/">Sonos PLAY:3 official: cheaper entry to the streaming music club</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/small-sonos-is-multi-room-music-overkill-in-a-tiny-apartment-10237902/">Small Sonos: Is multi-room music overkill in a tiny apartment?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/sonos-adds-airplay-style-streaming-from-iphone-and-ipad-music-05259529/">Sonos adds AirPlay-style streaming from iPhone and iPad music</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/sonos-sub-review-05259674/">Sonos SUB Review</a></li>
</ul></div>
</div>
<p>[<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5971309/sonos-sound-bar-filing-hits-the-fcc-and-may-land-in-your-living-room-soon" target="_blank">via</a> Gizmodo]</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/sonos-playbar-hits-fcc-27262254/" title="Sonos PLAYBAR hits FCC">Sonos PLAYBAR hits FCC</a> is written by <a href="http://twitter.com/c_davies" >Chris Davies</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/sonos-playbar-hits-fcc-27262254/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC filing shows the ZTE Grand X heading to T-Mobile</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-filing-shows-the-zte-grand-x-heading-to-t-mobile-27262229/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-filing-shows-the-zte-grand-x-heading-to-t-mobile-27262229/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 08:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brittany Hillen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZTE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=262229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We first started to see ZTE&#8216;s Grand X smartphone this past summer, following it up with a hands-on review of the rather sleek-looking handset. Now the device has made a new appearance, this time over at the FCC with a nice T-Mobile brand on its back, indicating that we&#8217;ll be seeing the handset show up  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-filing-shows-the-zte-grand-x-heading-to-t-mobile-27262229/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We first started to see <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/zte/" target="_blank">ZTE</a>&#8216;s Grand X smartphone this past summer, following it up with <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/zte-grand-x-hands-on-18239093/" target="_blank">a hands-on review</a> of the rather sleek-looking handset. Now the device has made a new appearance, this time over at the FCC with a nice T-Mobile brand on its back, indicating that we&#8217;ll be seeing the handset show up at the carrier sometime soon. Nothing official has been announced.</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/15.jpg" alt="1" width="540" height="325" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-262232" /></p>
<p><span id="more-262229"></span></p>
<p>Lending further support to what we see in the images is the filing itself, which mentions T-Mobile&#8217;s WCDMA 1700 AWS network. It is safe to assume, then, that the Grand X will be hitting the market via the carrier, although when that could happen and what price range we&#8217;re looking at is anybody&#8217;s guess. Thus far, nary a peep has been uttered in the rumorsphere about either of them.</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/25.jpg" alt="2" width="540" height="201" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-262233" /></p>
<p>ZTE&#8217;s Grand X features a nicely-sized IPS display at 4.3-inches with a resolution of 960 x 540. Inside you&#8217;ll find a dual-core 1GHz processor, and, assuming the specs are the same as the one we got our hands on back in July, there will be 4GB of internal storage space and 512MB of RAM. Around back you&#8217;ll find a 5-megapixel camera, and a 1,650mAH battery to run it all.</p>
<p>We took a peek through the user manual up on the FCC&#8217;s website, and nothing stands out as particularly different or new. While the specs are decent, the handset will run Android Ice Cream Sandwich, meaning there is officially nothing exciting about the device. Still, given ZTE&#8217;s usually low price-point, this could end up being a decent budget phone for those wanting a large display.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://androidcommunity.com/zte-grand-x-fcc-filing-reveals-support-for-t-mobile-usa-20121226/" target="_blank">via</a> Android Community]</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-filing-shows-the-zte-grand-x-heading-to-t-mobile-27262229/" title="FCC filing shows the ZTE Grand X heading to T-Mobile">FCC filing shows the ZTE Grand X heading to T-Mobile</a> is written by <a href="" >Brittany Hillen</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-filing-shows-the-zte-grand-x-heading-to-t-mobile-27262229/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panasonic P-02E 1080p Android smartphone hits FCC</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/panasonic-p-02e-1080p-android-smartphone-hits-fcc-26262191/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/panasonic-p-02e-1080p-android-smartphone-hits-fcc-26262191/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 20:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MWC 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=262191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The folks at Panasonic have been tipped to be smartphone-bound for years; today they&#8217;ve basically confirmed the idea that they&#8217;re making a big effort in 2013 with the P-02E. The FCC listing appearing today has everything the Panasonic ELUGA had and a whole lot more, upping the ante from what was tipped this Autumn without  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/panasonic-p-02e-1080p-android-smartphone-hits-fcc-26262191/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The folks at Panasonic have been <a href="http://www.phonearena.com/news/Panasonic-P-02E-Android-smartphone-is-real-clears-the-FCC-on-its-way-to-Japan_id38060" target="_blank">tipped to be smartphone-bound</a> for years; today they&#8217;ve basically confirmed the idea that they&#8217;re making a big effort in 2013 with the P-02E. The FCC listing appearing today has everything the Panasonic ELUGA had and a whole lot more, upping the ante from what was tipped this Autumn without a full confirmation from an official source &#8211; the FCC is just about as good as it gets!</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/panasonic_eluga_hands-on_sg_2-580x493.jpeg" alt="panasonic_eluga_hands-on_sg_2" width="580" height="493" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-262192" /></p>
<p><span id="more-262191"></span></p>
<p>What we saw from Panasonic before was the ELUGA (also seen above), a device we <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/we-give-panasonics-eluga-a-bath-27215761/" target="_blank">tossed in a dish of water</a> at Mobile World Congress 2012. That machine was fairly neat at the time, but looks positively lacking compared to what the P-02E is being tipped as bringing to the smartphone game. Unfortunate for everyone outside of Japan is the rumor that this machine will only be hitting that small land mass, but we can dream!</p>
<p>What we&#8217;re seeing here is the Panasonic P-02E, complete with a massive 1080 x 1920 pixel display which we must assume will be spread across an approximately 5-inch display diagonally. This machine will be running Android 4.1.2 Jelly Bean and will working with 4G LTE, NFC, and mobile TV. This is another indicator that it&#8217;ll only be appearing in Japan: in its current showing, it&#8217;s got a real retractable antenna.</p>
<p>The FCC approval generally lends itself to a USA or Euro release, but in this case given the Panasonic market share and their ability to push devices abroad in the smartphone segment, we&#8217;re almost certainly looking to see a home-terf release. We&#8217;ll quite likely be seeing this device appear at Mobile World Congress 2013 &#8211; seeya there! Hit up our MWC 2013 tag to check out all the action from here until February!</p>
<p>[<a href="https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&#038;RequestTimeout=500&#038;calledFromFrame=N&#038;application_id=653888&#038;fcc_id='UCE312057A'" target="_blank">via</a> FCC]</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/panasonic-p-02e-1080p-android-smartphone-hits-fcc-26262191/" title="Panasonic P-02E 1080p Android smartphone hits FCC">Panasonic P-02E 1080p Android smartphone hits FCC</a> is written by <a href="" >Chris Burns</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/panasonic-p-02e-1080p-android-smartphone-hits-fcc-26262191/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senator introduces bill in Washington to regulate data caps</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/senator-introduces-bill-in-washington-to-regulate-data-caps-21261933/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/senator-introduces-bill-in-washington-to-regulate-data-caps-21261933/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 11:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shane McGlaun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=261933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mobile data users have been exceptionally unhappy over data caps since they were first introduced. Many argue that these data caps have nothing to do with controlling congestion on mobile networks and everything to do with charging customers as much as possible. A white paper was published this week from the New America Foundation arguing  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/senator-introduces-bill-in-washington-to-regulate-data-caps-21261933/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mobile data users have been exceptionally unhappy over data caps since they were first introduced. Many argue that these data caps have nothing to do with controlling congestion on mobile networks and everything to do with charging customers as much as possible. A white paper was published this week from the New America Foundation arguing that data caps were designed to maximize revenue rather than minimize congestion.</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/wyden-580x385.jpg" alt="wyden" width="580" height="385" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-261934" /></p>
<p><span id="more-261933"></span></p>
<p>Apparently, the white paper caught the attention of a Democratic senator from Oregon named Ron Wyden. Wyden has introduced legislation to regulate the use of data caps this week. The Senators Bill would allow the use of data caps only to control congestion on a network and would not allow them to be used to maximize a carrier&#8217;s revenue.</p>
<p>Wyden plans to address three major issues with his bill. He wants to increase the accuracy and amount of information carriers provide consumers. This bill also proposes to allow the FCC to regulate methods used by carriers for measuring bandwidth. The second major issue the bill seeks to address would be to require any data caps used by ISPs to &#8220;reasonably limit network congestion without unnecessarily restricting Internet use.&#8221;</p>
<p> A statement released along with the legislation noted that some data caps might work to discourage Internet use even when it has no effect on network congestion. The third thing the legislation seeks to address could be the most controversial. The bill would require any data cap in place not be used to provide preferential treatment of data based on the source or content of the data. That would mean the legislation would eliminate any paid fast lane for data, which has been proposed by some users.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/12/senator-introduces-bill-to-regulate-data-caps/">via</a> ArsTechnica]</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/senator-introduces-bill-in-washington-to-regulate-data-caps-21261933/" title="Senator introduces bill in Washington to regulate data caps">Senator introduces bill in Washington to regulate data caps</a> is written by <a href="" >Shane McGlaun</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/senator-introduces-bill-in-washington-to-regulate-data-caps-21261933/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AT&amp;T 4G spectrum buy gets FCC blessing</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-4g-spectrum-buy-gets-fcc-blessing-19261627/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/att-4g-spectrum-buy-gets-fcc-blessing-19261627/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 16:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carrier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LTE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=261627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The FCC has approved AT&#38;T&#8217;s purchase of wireless spectrum from Comcast, Horizon, NextWave, and San Diego Gas &#38; Electric, a deal which will see the carrier snap up further airwaves for its LTE roll-out. Describing the wireless frequencies as &#8220;long-underutilized&#8221; the Federal Communications Commission deemed the transactions as &#8220;in the public interest&#8221; as they will help support  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/att-4g-spectrum-buy-gets-fcc-blessing-19261627/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The FCC <a href="http://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-approves-att-acquistions-wcs-and-aws-licenses" target="_blank">has approved</a> AT&amp;T&#8217;s purchase of wireless spectrum from Comcast, Horizon, NextWave, and San Diego Gas &amp; Electric, a deal which will see the carrier snap up further airwaves for its <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/lte" target="_blank">LTE</a> roll-out. Describing the wireless frequencies as &#8220;long-underutilized&#8221; the Federal Communications Commission deemed the transactions as &#8220;in the public interest&#8221; as they will help support its goals of mobile broadband deployment.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-261638" alt="cell_tower-580x435" src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/cell_tower-580x435.jpg" width="580" height="435" /></p>
<p><span id="more-261627"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;In this Order, we consider the applications of AT&amp;T Inc., Comcast, Horizon, NextWave, and San Diego Gas &amp; Electric (the “Applicants”) for Commission consent to the assignment and transfer of control to AT&amp;T of Wireless Communications Service (WCS) and Advanced Wireless Services (AWS-1) licenses in 608 CMAs. Based on our review of the competitive effects of AT&amp;T’s post-transaction spectrum holdings on a local and national level, we find that these transactions are not likely to result in competitive or other public interest harms. We also anticipate that these transactions are likely to result in certain public interest benefits by facilitating the transition of long-underutilized WCS spectrum towards mobile broadband use, thereby supporting our goal of expanding mobile broadband deployment throughout the country. Thus, we conclude that, on balance, these transactions are in the public interest and accordingly approve them&#8221; FCC</p></blockquote>
<p>According to the deal, AT&amp;T gains AWS-1 and WCS spectrum in 608 CMAs, fifteen of which cover 82-percent of the population of the contiguous 48 US states. Currently, problems with incompatibility with other spectrum use and the cost of rolling out new networks have seen the frequencies left idle.</p>
<p>AT&amp;T&#8217;s attempt to secure new spectrum isn&#8217;t the only wireless deal in progress in the US. Back in August, the FCC approved <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-approves-verizons-3-9-billion-spectrum-purchase-23243745/" target="_blank">Verizon&#8217;s purchase of $3.9bn in spectrum holdings</a> from a variety of cable companies. Part of that deal involved licensing out some of the newly acquired spectrum to T-Mobile USA.</p>
<p>All of the major US carriers are in the process of developing out their 4G networks. Sprint announced plans to <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/sprint-grabs-100-of-clearwire-in-2-2bn-deal-17261119/" target="_blank">acquire the entirety of Clearwire</a> in a $2.2bn deal earlier this week, while Verizon marked its <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/verizon-celebrates-two-years-of-4g-lte-provides-some-amazing-statistics-05259700/" target="_blank">two year anniversary</a> of LTE coverage recently.</p>

<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/att-4g-spectrum-buy-gets-fcc-blessing-19261627/" title="AT&#038;T 4G spectrum buy gets FCC blessing">AT&#038;T 4G spectrum buy gets FCC blessing</a> is written by <a href="http://twitter.com/c_davies" >Chris Davies</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/att-4g-spectrum-buy-gets-fcc-blessing-19261627/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wireless AMBER Alert program shutting down at end of year</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/wireless-amber-alert-program-shutting-down-at-end-of-year-14261034/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/wireless-amber-alert-program-shutting-down-at-end-of-year-14261034/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 20:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Abent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[text messaging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=261034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The coalition of groups and government agencies that brought us Wireless AMBER Alerts announced today that the program will be ending at the end of the year. AMBER Alerts, as most you already know, aim to alert the public to recent abductions in an effort to get kidnapped children home safely as quickly as possible.  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/wireless-amber-alert-program-shutting-down-at-end-of-year-14261034/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The coalition of groups and <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/government/" target="_blank">government</a> agencies that brought us <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/wireless/" target="_blank">Wireless</a> AMBER Alerts announced today that the program will be ending at the end of the year. AMBER Alerts, as most you already know, aim to alert the public to recent abductions in an effort to get kidnapped children home safely as quickly as possible. Never fear though, as Wireless AMBER Alerts aren&#8217;t going away, they&#8217;re just being rolled into a new program called Wireless Emergency Alerts, which was launched earlier this year.</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/amberalerts-580x463.jpg" alt="amberalerts" width="580" height="463" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-261038" /><br />
<span id="more-261034"></span></p>
<p>With the Wireless Emergency Alerts system, those who sign up will get locally-relevant alerts about abductions on top of &#8220;Presidential and Imminent threat alerts.&#8221; Rolled out by CTIA, the <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/fcc/" target="_blank">FCC</a>, and FEMA, WEA offers one particularly useful improvement over WAA. Those who are signed up to receive WEA will get AMBER Alerts for the area they&#8217;re presently in, regardless of whether or not they live in that area.</p>
<p>The announcement gives an example of someone from Chicago who is visiting Boston. If that person is signed up to receive Wireless Emergency Alerts and an abduction happens in Boston, they&#8217;ll get the alert despite the fact that they&#8217;re normally in Chicago. On the flip side, alerts for abductions that occur in Chicago while this person is in Boston won&#8217;t be sent to their phone.</p>
<p>So, mobile AMBER Alerts aren&#8217;t going away, they&#8217;re just being rolled into a more comprehensive alert system. The Wireless AMBER Alert system is scheduled to go dark on December 31, 2012 after running since 2005. We&#8217;ll likely hear more about this shut down as we get closer to December 31, so stay tuned.</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/wireless-amber-alert-program-shutting-down-at-end-of-year-14261034/" title="Wireless AMBER Alert program shutting down at end of year">Wireless AMBER Alert program shutting down at end of year</a> is written by <a href="" >Eric Abent</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/wireless-amber-alert-program-shutting-down-at-end-of-year-14261034/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dish gets FCC thumbs up on its wireless aspirations</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/dish-gets-fcc-thumbs-up-on-its-wireless-aspirations-12260450/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/dish-gets-fcc-thumbs-up-on-its-wireless-aspirations-12260450/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 06:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brittany Hillen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dish Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=260450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dish Network has been pining to launch its own wireless service, which it will likely advertise in its semi-recently-acquired Blockbuster stores. Thus far, its plans have been on hold pending FCC approval, which it was granted today. This comes a week after rumor spread that Sprint had requested a partnership with Dish, which is looking  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/dish-gets-fcc-thumbs-up-on-its-wireless-aspirations-12260450/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dish Network has been pining to launch its own wireless service, which it will likely advertise in its semi-recently-acquired Blockbuster stores. Thus far, its plans have been on hold pending FCC approval, which it was granted today. This comes a week after rumor spread that Sprint had requested a partnership with Dish, which is looking to fire up its own 4G LTE network.</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/200px-Original_Dish_Network_logo.svg_.png" alt="" width="200" height="200" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-260455" /></p>
<p><span id="more-260450"></span></p>
<p>Dish Network requested FCC approval for a waiver that would allow it to utilize the 2GHz band&#8217;s 40MHz spectrum. The FCC then dragged its feet in approving the request, and stated that Dish Network would have to follow some limitations put in place to keep it from disrupting other airwaves. The idea of Dish launching its own wireless network, however, was warmly received due to the competition it would add to the industry.</p>
<p>Dish&#8217;s Senior Vice President Jeff Blum offered this statement. &#8220;We appreciate the hard work and focus of the FCC and its staff throughout this process &#8230; Following a more thorough review of the order and its technical details, DISH will consider its strategic options and the optimal approach to put this spectrum to use for the benefit of consumers.&#8221;</p>
<p>Dish Network is the second biggest satellite provider in the United States, falling behind DirecTV. Although it has not been confirmed what Dish plans to do with its newly acquired airwaves, we can make a guess based on things the company has stated over the past few months. On December 5, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/blockbuster-plans-to-sell-phones-at-its-retail-stores-sources-say-05259717/" target="_blank">we reported </a>that Dish-owned Blockbuster plans to sell phones in its retail stores following a statement by the company&#8217;s chairman stating that Dish planed to unveil a wireless service pending FCC approval.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324024004578173802194105128.html?mod=googlenews_wsj" target="_blank">via</a> WSJ]</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/dish-gets-fcc-thumbs-up-on-its-wireless-aspirations-12260450/" title="Dish gets FCC thumbs up on its wireless aspirations">Dish gets FCC thumbs up on its wireless aspirations</a> is written by <a href="" >Brittany Hillen</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/dish-gets-fcc-thumbs-up-on-its-wireless-aspirations-12260450/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC tells FAA to relax on strict gadget rules during flights</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-tells-faa-to-relax-on-strict-gadget-rules-during-flights-07259992/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-tells-faa-to-relax-on-strict-gadget-rules-during-flights-07259992/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 14:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Lloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=259992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Federal Aviation Association (FAA) has been reconsidering their ban on the use of electronics during flights for a while now with no real progress, but the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is stepping in to urge the FAA to chill out on their strict no-gadget policy during takeoff and landing. FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski write  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-tells-faa-to-relax-on-strict-gadget-rules-during-flights-07259992/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/faa">Federal Aviation Association</a> (FAA) has been <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/faa-reconsiders-ban-on-passenger-electronics-19218976/">reconsidering their ban</a> on the use of electronics during flights for a while now with no real progress, but the <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/fcc">Federal Communications Commission</a> (FCC) is stepping in to urge the FAA to chill out on their strict no-gadget policy during takeoff and landing.</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/5731787914_3e2c1b90d9_z-580x435.jpg" alt="" width="580" height="435" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-259993" /></p>
<p><span id="more-259992"></span></p>
<p>FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski write a letter to acting administrator of the FAA, Michael Huerta, calling on the administration to &#8220;enable greater use of tablets, e-readers, and other portable devices&#8221; during flights. In the letter, Genachowski also said that he would be willing to work with the FAA, airlines, and manufacturers to make his proposal a reality. </p>
<p>Genachowski&#8217;s reasoning is something that all passengers can agree with. He says that &#8220;mobile devices are increasingly interwoven in our daily lives. They empower people to stay informed and connected with friends and family, and they enable both large and small businesses to be more productive and efficient, helping drive economic growth and boost U.S. competitiveness.&#8221; We certainly can&#8217;t argue with him on that, but the reason behind the electronics ban during flights is much deeper than what&#8217;s on the cover.</p>
<p>While you can still technically use electronics once the aircraft hits cruising altitude, usually you&#8217;re required to keep them in airplane mode unless the airline offers WiFi. However, it&#8217;s always been a strict rule that all electronics are supposed to be completely turned off during landing and takeoff. Hopefully the letter from Genachowski will help the FAA aim in the right direction.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/271565-fcc-chairman-to-faa-allow-greater-use-of-electronic-devices-during-flights" target="_blank">via</a> The Hill]</p>
<p><em>Image <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/globalx/5731787914/in/photostream/" target="_blank">via</a> Flickr</em></p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-tells-faa-to-relax-on-strict-gadget-rules-during-flights-07259992/" title="FCC tells FAA to relax on strict gadget rules during flights">FCC tells FAA to relax on strict gadget rules during flights</a> is written by <a href="" >Craig Lloyd</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/fcc-tells-faa-to-relax-on-strict-gadget-rules-during-flights-07259992/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Four big carriers plan to roll out text-to-911 by 2014</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/four-big-carriers-plan-to-roll-out-text-to-911-by-2014-07259963/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/four-big-carriers-plan-to-roll-out-text-to-911-by-2014-07259963/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 06:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brittany Hillen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=259963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The big four wireless carriers, Verizon, AT&#38;T, Sprint, and T-Mobile, have reached an agreement to enable text-to-911 service in 2014. The agreement has been shipped off to the FCC, which will discuss the matter on December 12. While the agreement won&#8217;t bring the ability to text emergency services to all wireless users by 2014, it  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/four-big-carriers-plan-to-roll-out-text-to-911-by-2014-07259963/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The big four wireless carriers, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/verizon/" target="_blank">Verizon</a>, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/att/" target="_blank">AT&amp;T</a>, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/sprint/" target="_blank">Sprint</a>, and <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/t-mobile/" target="_blank">T-Mobile</a>, have reached an agreement to enable text-to-911 service in 2014. The agreement has been shipped off to the FCC, which will discuss the matter on December 12. While the agreement won&#8217;t bring the ability to text emergency services to all wireless users by 2014, it will give the service a large boost in that direction.</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/NENA_Logo-440x500.jpg" alt="" width="440" height="500" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-259966" /></p>
<p><span id="more-259963"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/verizon-pioneering-911-texting-service-04226348/" target="_blank">We reported </a>back in May that Verizon was looking at allowing consumers to text 911, something that pleased both the FCC and consumers. Now the big four, in partnership with the NENA 911 Association and the Association for Public Safety Communications Officials International, are seeking to make this a reality over the next year. </p>
<p>NENA&#8217;s President Barbara Jaeger offered this statement. &#8220;As the public becomes more mobile and embraces new methods for communicating, 9-1-1 has to be ready to answer non-voice requests for assistance. This historic agreement demonstrates the shared commitment of parties to serve the evolving needs of citizens in the digital age.&#8221;</p>
<p>The platform needed to enable text-to-911 will be launched in May 2014, with a bounce-back service for those who try to text emergency services in an unsupported area implemented by June 30th of the 2013. The service will allow the deaf and mute to get emergency help, as well as those in a situation where it is dangerous to speak. However, it is being stressed that placing a voice call is still the ideal way to get emergency help and should be used when possible.</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/four-big-carriers-plan-to-roll-out-text-to-911-by-2014-07259963/" title="Four big carriers plan to roll out text-to-911 by 2014">Four big carriers plan to roll out text-to-911 by 2014</a> is written by <a href="" >Brittany Hillen</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/four-big-carriers-plan-to-roll-out-text-to-911-by-2014-07259963/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal court slaps Verizon: Upholds FCC data roaming regulations</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/federal-appeals-court-upholds-fcc-data-roaming-regulations-05259554/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/federal-appeals-court-upholds-fcc-data-roaming-regulations-05259554/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 10:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shane McGlaun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=259554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wireless carrier Verizon Wireless had previously argued that FCC regulations on data roaming imposed traditional landline telephone obligations on data services illegally. The FCC regulations stipulated that Verizon and its competitors had to offer data roaming to their competitors on a nondiscriminatory basis. Verizon Wireless took the FCC to a federal appeals court trying to  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/federal-appeals-court-upholds-fcc-data-roaming-regulations-05259554/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wireless carrier Verizon Wireless had previously argued that FCC regulations on data roaming imposed traditional landline telephone obligations on data services illegally. The FCC regulations stipulated that Verizon and its competitors had to offer data roaming to their competitors on a nondiscriminatory basis. Verizon Wireless took the FCC to a federal appeals court trying to have the regulations overturned.</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/verizon1.jpeg" alt="" title="verizon" width="580" height="395" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-259611" /></p>
<p><span id="more-259554"></span></p>
<p>That federal appeals court has now upheld the FCC&#8217;s data roaming regulations and denied Verizon&#8217;s claims. The opinion of the three-judge panel at the US Court of Appeals for the DC circuit was unanimous and upheld the FCC decision to extend &#8220;voice roaming&#8221; requirements to wireless firms did not violate the rights of the carriers. Verizon had argued that the FCC lacked the legal authority to make such a decision.</p>
<p>The appeals court judges noted that the FCC regulations bared some &#8220;marks of common carriage&#8221; but the appeals judges also noted that &#8220;we deferred to the commission&#8217;s determination the rule imposes no common carrier obligations on mobile Internet providers.&#8221; The court also noted that the FCC regulations were not unconstitutional, arbitrary, or capricious. The judges on the appeals court also found no validity in arguments made by Verizon that the FCC lacked the legal authority to impose these regulations.</p>
<p>Verizon wireless argued that the new FCC regulations on data roaming were prohibited by the Communications Act. All three Appeals Court judges disagreed with Verizon&#8217;s claims. What Verizon was fighting was FCC regulations forcing the nation&#8217;s largest carrier to open its network to smaller regional carriers to allow them to compete on a national marketplace.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2012/12/court-rejects-verizon-backs-fcc-on-roaming-rule-84590.html">via</a> Politico]</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/federal-appeals-court-upholds-fcc-data-roaming-regulations-05259554/" title="Federal court slaps Verizon: Upholds FCC data roaming regulations">Federal court slaps Verizon: Upholds FCC data roaming regulations</a> is written by <a href="" >Shane McGlaun</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/federal-appeals-court-upholds-fcc-data-roaming-regulations-05259554/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Netgear NeoTV Prime Google TV box leaks</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/netgear-neotv-prime-google-tv-box-leaks-03259268/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/netgear-neotv-prime-google-tv-box-leaks-03259268/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netgear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Streaming media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=259268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The surreptitious rise of next-gen Google TV boxes continues, with the Netgear NeoTV Prime GTV100 following ASUS&#8217; Qube in slipping through the FCC and then into the wild courtesy of some leaked prototype shots. The NeoTV Prime is a compact STB with a dual-sided remote, offering a touchpad and streaming media shortcuts on one side, and a QWERTY thumb-board  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/netgear-neotv-prime-google-tv-box-leaks-03259268/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The surreptitious rise of next-gen <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/google-tv" target="_blank">Google TV</a> boxes continues, with the Netgear NeoTV Prime GTV100 following <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/asus-qube-arrives-at-the-fcc-offers-google-tv-30259168/" target="_blank">ASUS&#8217; Qube</a> in slipping through the FCC and then into the wild courtesy of some leaked prototype shots. The NeoTV Prime is a compact STB with a dual-sided remote, offering a touchpad and streaming media shortcuts on one side, and a QWERTY thumb-board on the reverse.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-259271" title="netgear_neotv_prime_gtv100_leak" src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/netgear_neotv_prime_gtv100_leak-580x363.jpg" alt="" width="580" height="363" /></p>
<p><span id="more-259268"></span></p>
<p>Shortcuts include Netflix, Amazon Video, YouTube, Vudu, HBO Go, and Crackle, though there are also keys for search and for live TV. Inside the main box there&#8217;s WiFi 802.11n along with Bluetooth 3.0; it&#8217;s not clear what processor is doing main duties, but an ARM-based chip pretty much a lock-in.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-259273" title="netgear_neotv_prime_gtv100_remote" src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/netgear_neotv_prime_gtv100_remote-580x410.jpg" alt="" width="580" height="410" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/12/02/netgear-neotv-prime-gtv100-googletv-fcc/" target="_blank">Engadget</a> scored a few shots of a prototype unit, along with some feedback from beta testers. According to the tipsters, the shortcut keys are locked to the labeled services, and there have been some issues with the STB as a whole overheating. There&#8217;s also the possibility of an aesthetic redesign before release.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-259275" title="netgear_neotv_prime_gtv100_remote_3" src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/netgear_neotv_prime_gtv100_remote_3-580x417.jpg" alt="" width="580" height="417" /></p>
<p>Netgear has already used the NeoTV name for a range of non-Google TV media streamers, updating the line <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/new-netgear-neotv-streaming-players-aim-to-wreck-roku-20248645/" target="_blank">as recently as September</a> with three new models. Priced from $49.99, they use an HTML5 interface allowing Netgear to easily change the service on offer, introduce new features, or iron out bugs; the included remote with the $69.99 NeoTV Max also has a QWERTY keyboard on one side, though it lacks the touchpad of this Google TV model.</p>
<p>No word on when we could see an official launch of the NeoTV Prime, but a <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/ces-2013" target="_blank">CES 2013</a> debut seems likely.</p>

<a href='http://www.slashgear.com/netgear-neotv-prime-google-tv-box-leaks-03259268/netgear_neotv_prime_gtv100_leak/' title='netgear_neotv_prime_gtv100_leak'><img width="150" height="100" src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/netgear_neotv_prime_gtv100_leak-150x100.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="netgear_neotv_prime_gtv100_leak" /></a>
<a href='http://www.slashgear.com/netgear-neotv-prime-google-tv-box-leaks-03259268/netgear_neotv_prime_gtv100_remote/' title='netgear_neotv_prime_gtv100_remote'><img width="150" height="100" src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/netgear_neotv_prime_gtv100_remote-150x100.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="netgear_neotv_prime_gtv100_remote" /></a>
<a href='http://www.slashgear.com/netgear-neotv-prime-google-tv-box-leaks-03259268/netgear_neotv_prime_gtv100_remote_3/' title='netgear_neotv_prime_gtv100_remote_3'><img width="150" height="100" src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/netgear_neotv_prime_gtv100_remote_3-150x100.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="netgear_neotv_prime_gtv100_remote_3" /></a>

<p>[<a href="http://blog.gtvhacker.com/2012/the-netgear-neotv-prime-gtv100-and-asus-qube-info-on-the-next-google-tv-boxes/" target="_blank">via</a> GTV Hacker]</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/netgear-neotv-prime-google-tv-box-leaks-03259268/" title="Netgear NeoTV Prime Google TV box leaks">Netgear NeoTV Prime Google TV box leaks</a> is written by <a href="http://twitter.com/c_davies" >Chris Davies</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/netgear-neotv-prime-google-tv-box-leaks-03259268/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ASUS Qube arrives at the FCC, offers Google TV</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/asus-qube-arrives-at-the-fcc-offers-google-tv-30259168/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/asus-qube-arrives-at-the-fcc-offers-google-tv-30259168/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 03:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brittany Hillen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=259168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It looks like ASUS is getting into the Google TV market with the ASUS Qube, which has popped up over at the FCC. The Qube with be a dongle that can be plugged into a device via USB to offer Google TV functionality. While details are sparse at the moment, some Google Play apps hint  <p><a href="http://www.slashgear.com/asus-qube-arrives-at-the-fcc-offers-google-tv-30259168/" class="more-link">Read The Full Story</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/asus/" target="_blank">ASUS </a>is getting into the <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/tags/google-tv/" target="_blank">Google TV</a> market with the ASUS Qube, which has popped up over at the FCC. The Qube with be a dongle that can be plugged into a device via USB to offer Google TV functionality. While details are sparse at the moment, some Google Play apps hint at how the Qube will work.</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/asus-qube-580x420.jpg" alt="" width="580" height="420" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-259169" /></p>
<p><span id="more-259168"></span></p>
<p>As notes Engadget, the O!Mobile Control Center and Remote mobile app listings on Google Play indicate a few things about the Qube. One, it may utilize Marvell Armada processors, which are used in current Google TV settops. And two, it may offer more extensive remote control via mobile devices than the remote app from Google.</p>
<p>Google TV has more than its share of critics, but it has been plugging along, and seems to be picking up momentum. Google <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/google-tv-updates-with-voice-search-introduces-rebranded-primetime-guide-14257049/" target="_blank">recently rolled out</a> an update for the service that added voice search, as well as the new section PrimeTime that is the movies and TV shows category. LG&#8217;s G2 TVs, which are Google TV-equipped, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/lg-updates-smart-tv-line-to-google-tv-3-0-15257197/" target="_blank">were the first </a>to see the new update. </p>
<p>Google TV provides users with access to all sorts of video content, including Netflix, Hulu, YouTube, and, of course, the Google Play Store, where users can choose from thousands of TV shows and flicks. As for the ASUS Qube, we&#8217;ll have to wait for more details to pop up. When, where, and how the device will be made available is yet to be seen.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/30/asus-qube-dongle-for-google-tv-pops-up-at-the-fcc/?a_dgi=aolshare_twitter" target="_blank">via</a> Engadget]</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/asus-qube-arrives-at-the-fcc-offers-google-tv-30259168/" title="ASUS Qube arrives at the FCC, offers Google TV">ASUS Qube arrives at the FCC, offers Google TV</a> is written by <a href="" >Brittany Hillen</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/asus-qube-arrives-at-the-fcc-offers-google-tv-30259168/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
