<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tablet Computer Spotted in 1968 Kubrick Classic, Cited in Samsung Case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/tablet-computer-spotted-in-1968-kubrick-classic-cited-in-samsung-case-23173802/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/tablet-computer-spotted-in-1968-kubrick-classic-cited-in-samsung-case-23173802/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 15:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CrappyScam</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/tablet-computer-spotted-in-1968-kubrick-classic-cited-in-samsung-case-23173802/#comment-139887</link>
		<dc:creator>CrappyScam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 00:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=173802#comment-139887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just paid....SHUT THE FKUC UP!

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just paid&#8230;.SHUT THE FKUC UP!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duh</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/tablet-computer-spotted-in-1968-kubrick-classic-cited-in-samsung-case-23173802/#comment-139885</link>
		<dc:creator>Duh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 00:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=173802#comment-139885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[fan boy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fan boy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duh</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/tablet-computer-spotted-in-1968-kubrick-classic-cited-in-samsung-case-23173802/#comment-139886</link>
		<dc:creator>Duh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 00:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=173802#comment-139886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[fan boy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fan boy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thirdsyphon</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/tablet-computer-spotted-in-1968-kubrick-classic-cited-in-samsung-case-23173802/#comment-132769</link>
		<dc:creator>Thirdsyphon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 22:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=173802#comment-132769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I saw the movie for the first time, in 1976, it didn&#039;t occur to me that they could be anything *but* cool-looking TV displays. 

The fact that they have a &quot;portrait orientation&quot; didn&#039;t even consciously cross my mind until just now. .and their placement on the table is close enough to symmetrical that I simply assumed that it *was* symmetrical, which is what one would expect to see if those were displays. 

Now, though, I&#039;m wondering if they might not be set just a little bit off-center and at slightly different angles to the near side of the table. . .and, come to think of it, there&#039;s no good design reason for a display to have a corner that protrudes over the edge of the table like both of these devices do, or to project upwards from the surface of the table; and, now that I *really* come to think of it, that table is just big enough to seat the mission&#039;s three-person science team. . .but only if those *aren&#039;t* fixed displays! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I saw the movie for the first time, in 1976, it didn&#8217;t occur to me that they could be anything *but* cool-looking TV displays. </p>
<p>The fact that they have a &#8220;portrait orientation&#8221; didn&#8217;t even consciously cross my mind until just now. .and their placement on the table is close enough to symmetrical that I simply assumed that it *was* symmetrical, which is what one would expect to see if those were displays. </p>
<p>Now, though, I&#8217;m wondering if they might not be set just a little bit off-center and at slightly different angles to the near side of the table. . .and, come to think of it, there&#8217;s no good design reason for a display to have a corner that protrudes over the edge of the table like both of these devices do, or to project upwards from the surface of the table; and, now that I *really* come to think of it, that table is just big enough to seat the mission&#8217;s three-person science team. . .but only if those *aren&#8217;t* fixed displays! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Synergi</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/tablet-computer-spotted-in-1968-kubrick-classic-cited-in-samsung-case-23173802/#comment-132718</link>
		<dc:creator>Synergi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 19:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=173802#comment-132718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It doesn&#039;t matter who leaked what first. They wait for Apple to release to see if its a hit..(poor man&#039;s R&amp;D) then they jump on the  copy bandwagon and pretend they don&#039;t know what your talking about. Samsung is more guilty of this then anyone. They were first out the door with the iPhone knock off.. Samsung Instinct, first out the door with the iPad knock off, and probably will be first out (next to Dell&#039;s failed attempt) with a MacBook Air knock off.. 

I unfortunately have the Samsung Fascinate and its nearly identical to my old iPhone except it works a lot crappier.. I still have to start GPS 10 minutes before I leave the house.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t matter who leaked what first. They wait for Apple to release to see if its a hit..(poor man&#8217;s R&amp;D) then they jump on the  copy bandwagon and pretend they don&#8217;t know what your talking about. Samsung is more guilty of this then anyone. They were first out the door with the iPhone knock off.. Samsung Instinct, first out the door with the iPad knock off, and probably will be first out (next to Dell&#8217;s failed attempt) with a MacBook Air knock off.. </p>
<p>I unfortunately have the Samsung Fascinate and its nearly identical to my old iPhone except it works a lot crappier.. I still have to start GPS 10 minutes before I leave the house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plunder</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/tablet-computer-spotted-in-1968-kubrick-classic-cited-in-samsung-case-23173802/#comment-132639</link>
		<dc:creator>plunder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=173802#comment-132639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was one of those who suggested that Samsung should look at this (2001 was a huge event in my childhood). But I am also sad that any legal action is being considered by Apple in this case, it is a  petty and weak act when they practically own the market.

One reason I bought a Samsung Galaxy S2 phone was specifically to avoid Apple and their greedy closed ecosystem attitude. If anything, these lawsuits have increased my desire to avoid Apple products in future. Terrible PR Apple, plain stupid.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was one of those who suggested that Samsung should look at this (2001 was a huge event in my childhood). But I am also sad that any legal action is being considered by Apple in this case, it is a  petty and weak act when they practically own the market.</p>
<p>One reason I bought a Samsung Galaxy S2 phone was specifically to avoid Apple and their greedy closed ecosystem attitude. If anything, these lawsuits have increased my desire to avoid Apple products in future. Terrible PR Apple, plain stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/tablet-computer-spotted-in-1968-kubrick-classic-cited-in-samsung-case-23173802/#comment-132630</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 11:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=173802#comment-132630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just paíd $20.82 for an íPad 2.64GB and my boyfriend loves his Panasoníc Lumíx GF 1 Cámera that we got for $38.79 there arriving tomorrow by UP S.I will never pay such expensive retail príces in stores again. Especially when I also sold a 40 inch LCD T V to my boss for $657 which only cost me $62.81 to buy.Here is the website we use to get it all from, &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/BIDFIRST&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://BídsFírst.Com &lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just paíd $20.82 for an íPad 2.64GB and my boyfriend loves his Panasoníc Lumíx GF 1 Cámera that we got for $38.79 there arriving tomorrow by UP S.I will never pay such expensive retail príces in stores again. Especially when I also sold a 40 inch LCD T V to my boss for $657 which only cost me $62.81 to buy.Here is the website we use to get it all from, <a href="http://bit.ly/BIDFIRST" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://BídsFírst.Com" rel="nofollow">http://BídsFírst.Com</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/tablet-computer-spotted-in-1968-kubrick-classic-cited-in-samsung-case-23173802/#comment-132612</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 08:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=173802#comment-132612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you trying to say that the Samsung Galaxy Tab, that has a widescreen form factor, looks a lot less like these tablets and a lot more like the Tech Crunch/Fusion Garage Crunchpad and the early Chrome Tablet prototype concept pics that were leaked well before the iPad 1 was ever released?  If so, you would be correct... ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you trying to say that the Samsung Galaxy Tab, that has a widescreen form factor, looks a lot less like these tablets and a lot more like the Tech Crunch/Fusion Garage Crunchpad and the early Chrome Tablet prototype concept pics that were leaked well before the iPad 1 was ever released?  If so, you would be correct&#8230; ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Javier Gil</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/tablet-computer-spotted-in-1968-kubrick-classic-cited-in-samsung-case-23173802/#comment-132608</link>
		<dc:creator>Javier Gil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 06:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=173802#comment-132608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s not just the tablets that apple is copying: you know the circular spaceship building that they&#039;re trying to build, it&#039;s like an exact copy from this movie also. And they go around saying that they invented the tablet and suing everyone. Shame on you apple!! Apple should get sued by Kubrik&#039;s family!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not just the tablets that apple is copying: you know the circular spaceship building that they&#8217;re trying to build, it&#8217;s like an exact copy from this movie also. And they go around saying that they invented the tablet and suing everyone. Shame on you apple!! Apple should get sued by Kubrik&#8217;s family!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heath Sias</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/tablet-computer-spotted-in-1968-kubrick-classic-cited-in-samsung-case-23173802/#comment-132585</link>
		<dc:creator>Heath Sias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 23:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=173802#comment-132585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ummm....in this clip, neither man manipulates their &quot;tablet&quot; in any way, neither pressing it&#039;s surface nor handling it. Why are these assumed to be tablets instead of simply displays?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ummm&#8230;.in this clip, neither man manipulates their &#8220;tablet&#8221; in any way, neither pressing it&#8217;s surface nor handling it. Why are these assumed to be tablets instead of simply displays?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/tablet-computer-spotted-in-1968-kubrick-classic-cited-in-samsung-case-23173802/#comment-132570</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 21:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=173802#comment-132570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Look a little closer, that doesn&#039;t even match Samsung&#039;s main point in the argument.   Those &quot;tablets&quot; have little to no bezel, very sharp corners, and many buttons (10 to be exact) laid out along one side.   It actually more closely resembles an IBM Design patent.   Oh, and guess what, those tablets in the movie have an IBM logo as well. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look a little closer, that doesn&#8217;t even match Samsung&#8217;s main point in the argument.   Those &#8220;tablets&#8221; have little to no bezel, very sharp corners, and many buttons (10 to be exact) laid out along one side.   It actually more closely resembles an IBM Design patent.   Oh, and guess what, those tablets in the movie have an IBM logo as well. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/tablet-computer-spotted-in-1968-kubrick-classic-cited-in-samsung-case-23173802/#comment-132557</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 20:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=173802#comment-132557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Take that Apple.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take that Apple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/tablet-computer-spotted-in-1968-kubrick-classic-cited-in-samsung-case-23173802/#comment-132554</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 19:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=173802#comment-132554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[..I  päid $21.41 for an íPad 2.64GB and my boyfriend loves his Panasoníc Lumíx GF 1 Cámera that we got for $38.79 there arriving tomorrow by UP S.I will never pay such expensive retail príces in stores again. Especially when I also sold a 40 inch LCD T V to my boss for $657 which only cost me $62.81 to buy.
Here is the website we use to get it all from, bit.ly/BidShop]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>..I  päid $21.41 for an íPad 2.64GB and my boyfriend loves his Panasoníc Lumíx GF 1 Cámera that we got for $38.79 there arriving tomorrow by UP S.I will never pay such expensive retail príces in stores again. Especially when I also sold a 40 inch LCD T V to my boss for $657 which only cost me $62.81 to buy.<br />
Here is the website we use to get it all from, bit.ly/BidShop</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
