Comments on: Supreme Court rules GPS tracking now needs warrant http://www.slashgear.com/supreme-court-rules-gps-tracking-now-needs-warrant-23210383/ Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions Tue, 15 May 2012 01:28:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Anonymous http://www.slashgear.com/supreme-court-rules-gps-tracking-now-needs-warrant-23210383/#comment-175281 Anonymous Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:11:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210383#comment-175281 “normal” people are not allowed to put tracking devices on other peoples vehicles that was reserved for just law enforcement.

]]> By: Apropitiousday4u http://www.slashgear.com/supreme-court-rules-gps-tracking-now-needs-warrant-23210383/#comment-175231 Apropitiousday4u Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:04:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210383#comment-175231 Wow, the Supreme Court actually “works” for the common man on occasion.  Let’s see how this ruling plays out in the real world or whether law enforcement gets around this, somehow. 

]]> By: Counsel Dew http://www.slashgear.com/supreme-court-rules-gps-tracking-now-needs-warrant-23210383/#comment-174939 Counsel Dew Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:48:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210383#comment-174939 Most if these types of protections only relate to the government-federal, state, and/or local.

]]> By: Counsel Dew http://www.slashgear.com/supreme-court-rules-gps-tracking-now-needs-warrant-23210383/#comment-174940 Counsel Dew Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:48:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210383#comment-174940 Most if these types of protections only relate to the government-federal, state, and/or local.

]]> By: Counsel Dew http://www.slashgear.com/supreme-court-rules-gps-tracking-now-needs-warrant-23210383/#comment-174941 Counsel Dew Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:48:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210383#comment-174941 Most if these types of protections only relate to the government-federal, state, and/or local.

]]> By: Counsel Dew http://www.slashgear.com/supreme-court-rules-gps-tracking-now-needs-warrant-23210383/#comment-174942 Counsel Dew Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:48:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210383#comment-174942 Most if these types of protections only relate to the government-federal, state, and/or local.

]]> By: Counsel Dew http://www.slashgear.com/supreme-court-rules-gps-tracking-now-needs-warrant-23210383/#comment-174933 Counsel Dew Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:47:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210383#comment-174933 Heh…about time they got it right before realizing too much error!

Nice to know it was unanimous :) Reason and reasoning yet lives…

]]> By: Counsel Dew http://www.slashgear.com/supreme-court-rules-gps-tracking-now-needs-warrant-23210383/#comment-174934 Counsel Dew Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:47:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210383#comment-174934 Heh…about time they got it right before realizing too much error!

Nice to know it was unanimous :) Reason and reasoning yet lives…

]]> By: Counsel Dew http://www.slashgear.com/supreme-court-rules-gps-tracking-now-needs-warrant-23210383/#comment-174935 Counsel Dew Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:47:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210383#comment-174935 Heh…about time they got it right before realizing too much error!

Nice to know it was unanimous :) Reason and reasoning yet lives…

]]> By: Counsel Dew http://www.slashgear.com/supreme-court-rules-gps-tracking-now-needs-warrant-23210383/#comment-174936 Counsel Dew Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:47:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210383#comment-174936 Heh…about time they got it right before realizing too much error!

Nice to know it was unanimous :) Reason and reasoning yet lives…

]]> By: Rwlacidar http://www.slashgear.com/supreme-court-rules-gps-tracking-now-needs-warrant-23210383/#comment-174899 Rwlacidar Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:56:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210383#comment-174899 I’ve read the decision and no where does it make reference to a private entity; only to police, law enforcement and government.  Unless under the direction of police, law enforcement and government it appears the private parties, including Private Investigators, are not bound by this ruling. 

]]> By: Rwlacidar http://www.slashgear.com/supreme-court-rules-gps-tracking-now-needs-warrant-23210383/#comment-174900 Rwlacidar Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:56:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210383#comment-174900 I’ve read the decision and no where does it make reference to a private entity; only to police, law enforcement and government.  Unless under the direction of police, law enforcement and government it appears the private parties, including Private Investigators, are not bound by this ruling. 

]]> By: Rwlacidar http://www.slashgear.com/supreme-court-rules-gps-tracking-now-needs-warrant-23210383/#comment-174901 Rwlacidar Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:56:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210383#comment-174901 I’ve read the decision and no where does it make reference to a private entity; only to police, law enforcement and government.  Unless under the direction of police, law enforcement and government it appears the private parties, including Private Investigators, are not bound by this ruling. 

]]> By: Rwlacidar http://www.slashgear.com/supreme-court-rules-gps-tracking-now-needs-warrant-23210383/#comment-174902 Rwlacidar Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:56:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210383#comment-174902 I’ve read the decision and no where does it make reference to a private entity; only to police, law enforcement and government.  Unless under the direction of police, law enforcement and government it appears the private parties, including Private Investigators, are not bound by this ruling. 

]]>