<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sony unveils tiny 0.7-inch display with 720p resolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/sony-unveils-tiny-0-7-inch-display-with-720p-resolution-04193024/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/sony-unveils-tiny-0-7-inch-display-with-720p-resolution-04193024/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 20:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/sony-unveils-tiny-0-7-inch-display-with-720p-resolution-04193024/#comment-151007</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 15:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=193024#comment-151007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sounds more like burn out then burn in where a old CTR screen may show the spreadsheet, worked on for hours, after the computer was turned off.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds more like burn out then burn in where a old CTR screen may show the spreadsheet, worked on for hours, after the computer was turned off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jjrobotek</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/sony-unveils-tiny-0-7-inch-display-with-720p-resolution-04193024/#comment-150980</link>
		<dc:creator>jjrobotek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 14:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=193024#comment-150980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OLED Pixel lifespan varies, my old OLED headset has a few dead spots from static image cross hair, and the manual for sonys new headset makes mention of similar spots!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OLED Pixel lifespan varies, my old OLED headset has a few dead spots from static image cross hair, and the manual for sonys new headset makes mention of similar spots!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/sony-unveils-tiny-0-7-inch-display-with-720p-resolution-04193024/#comment-150615</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=193024#comment-150615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Static image burn? Have that been any kind of issue for the last decade or so?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Static image burn? Have that been any kind of issue for the last decade or so?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valleymann</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/sony-unveils-tiny-0-7-inch-display-with-720p-resolution-04193024/#comment-150430</link>
		<dc:creator>Valleymann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 18:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=193024#comment-150430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[this tech.. as hud in eyewear... = awesome...!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this tech.. as hud in eyewear&#8230; = awesome&#8230;!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/sony-unveils-tiny-0-7-inch-display-with-720p-resolution-04193024/#comment-150356</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 15:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=193024#comment-150356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: byraaaaaan</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/sony-unveils-tiny-0-7-inch-display-with-720p-resolution-04193024/#comment-150353</link>
		<dc:creator>byraaaaaan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 15:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=193024#comment-150353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[what 2098.01ppi!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what 2098.01ppi!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Fluet</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/sony-unveils-tiny-0-7-inch-display-with-720p-resolution-04193024/#comment-150349</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Fluet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 14:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=193024#comment-150349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just know someone is going to hack this to allow them to watch movies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just know someone is going to hack this to allow them to watch movies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/sony-unveils-tiny-0-7-inch-display-with-720p-resolution-04193024/#comment-150335</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 13:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=193024#comment-150335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They eye can only see 300 PPi at a certain distance, which is something like 10 or 12 inches, I forget. These viewfinders are literally no more than a CM from your eye, and 300PPI would actually be blurry. It&#039;s like those glasses-video players you see in magazines that say it&#039;s like looking at a big screen. Basically, the pixels are so extremely small, you can make it seem like it is a regular optical viewfinder. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They eye can only see 300 PPi at a certain distance, which is something like 10 or 12 inches, I forget. These viewfinders are literally no more than a CM from your eye, and 300PPI would actually be blurry. It&#8217;s like those glasses-video players you see in magazines that say it&#8217;s like looking at a big screen. Basically, the pixels are so extremely small, you can make it seem like it is a regular optical viewfinder. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jjrobotek</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/sony-unveils-tiny-0-7-inch-display-with-720p-resolution-04193024/#comment-150331</link>
		<dc:creator>jjrobotek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 13:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=193024#comment-150331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Optics make the image appear much larger... These screens will be in the HMZ-T1 headset and Sony&#039;s digital binoculars. I hope they resolved the static image burn in with this technology. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Optics make the image appear much larger&#8230; These screens will be in the HMZ-T1 headset and Sony&#8217;s digital binoculars. I hope they resolved the static image burn in with this technology. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/sony-unveils-tiny-0-7-inch-display-with-720p-resolution-04193024/#comment-150321</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 12:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=193024#comment-150321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It gives 2100 pixels per inch. Human eye can only see 300 PPI. That kind of screen just requires additional performance to handle with HD resolution. What&#039;s the point?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It gives 2100 pixels per inch. Human eye can only see 300 PPI. That kind of screen just requires additional performance to handle with HD resolution. What&#8217;s the point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
