<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SlashGear Weekly Roundup Video: February 27, 2011</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 14:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Issindhu</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/#comment-120111</link>
		<dc:creator>Issindhu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136349#comment-120111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hate when these girls mix professionalism with these unprofessional behaviour like Rue Liu. if she wants the user to pay attention to her, she should try to cover her shoulders with a decent clothing]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate when these girls mix professionalism with these unprofessional behaviour like Rue Liu. if she wants the user to pay attention to her, she should try to cover her shoulders with a decent clothing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chinot66</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/#comment-97481</link>
		<dc:creator>Chinot66</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 20:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136349#comment-97481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[She make Tech Gear instresting and sexy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She make Tech Gear instresting and sexy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/#comment-97341</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136349#comment-97341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[nice surprise in the rss feed for a groggy geek.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice surprise in the rss feed for a groggy geek.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MKY</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/#comment-97336</link>
		<dc:creator>MKY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136349#comment-97336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh! iPad 2 is coming next week? Looking forward to it! 
&gt;_&lt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh! iPad 2 is coming next week? Looking forward to it!<br />
&gt;_&lt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MKY</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/#comment-97337</link>
		<dc:creator>MKY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136349#comment-97337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh! iPad 2 is coming next week? Looking forward to it! 
&gt;_&lt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh! iPad 2 is coming next week? Looking forward to it!<br />
&gt;_&lt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Davies</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/#comment-97302</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 15:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136349#comment-97302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yep, that&#039;s definitely going to be tweaked for next week&#039;s episode :) Glad you enjoyed it!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, that&#8217;s definitely going to be tweaked for next week&#8217;s episode :) Glad you enjoyed it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UnderDoc</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/#comment-97297</link>
		<dc:creator>UnderDoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 14:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136349#comment-97297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So this is SlashGear&#039;s secret weapon! Very nice to see!

Now bring the audio on par with the CGA, and you&#039;re golden!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So this is SlashGear&#8217;s secret weapon! Very nice to see!</p>
<p>Now bring the audio on par with the CGA, and you&#8217;re golden!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UnderDoc</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/#comment-97298</link>
		<dc:creator>UnderDoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 14:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136349#comment-97298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So this is SlashGear&#039;s secret weapon! Very nice to see!

Now bring the audio on par with the CGA, and you&#039;re golden!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So this is SlashGear&#8217;s secret weapon! Very nice to see!</p>
<p>Now bring the audio on par with the CGA, and you&#8217;re golden!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UnderDoc</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/#comment-97299</link>
		<dc:creator>UnderDoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 14:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136349#comment-97299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So this is SlashGear&#039;s secret weapon! Very nice to see!

Now bring the audio on par with the CGA, and you&#039;re golden!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So this is SlashGear&#8217;s secret weapon! Very nice to see!</p>
<p>Now bring the audio on par with the CGA, and you&#8217;re golden!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Davies</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/#comment-97266</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136349#comment-97266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for all the positive feedback guys! We had some audio issues, which will hopefully be ironed out in the next video. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for all the positive feedback guys! We had some audio issues, which will hopefully be ironed out in the next video. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Davies</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/#comment-97267</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136349#comment-97267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for all the positive feedback guys! We had some audio issues, which will hopefully be ironed out in the next video. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for all the positive feedback guys! We had some audio issues, which will hopefully be ironed out in the next video. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/#comment-97217</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136349#comment-97217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#039;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.

Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&quot;Next up at number&quot; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.

Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#039;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.

WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#8217;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.</p>
<p>Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&#8220;Next up at number&#8221; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.</p>
<p>Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#8217;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.</p>
<p>WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/#comment-97218</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136349#comment-97218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#039;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.

Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&quot;Next up at number&quot; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.

Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#039;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.

WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#8217;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.</p>
<p>Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&#8220;Next up at number&#8221; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.</p>
<p>Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#8217;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.</p>
<p>WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/#comment-97219</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136349#comment-97219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#039;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.

Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&quot;Next up at number&quot; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.

Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#039;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.

WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#8217;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.</p>
<p>Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&#8220;Next up at number&#8221; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.</p>
<p>Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#8217;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.</p>
<p>WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/#comment-97220</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136349#comment-97220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#039;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.

Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&quot;Next up at number&quot; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.

Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#039;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.

WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#8217;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.</p>
<p>Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&#8220;Next up at number&#8221; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.</p>
<p>Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#8217;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.</p>
<p>WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/#comment-97221</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136349#comment-97221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#039;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.

Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&quot;Next up at number&quot; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.

Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#039;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.

WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#8217;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.</p>
<p>Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&#8220;Next up at number&#8221; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.</p>
<p>Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#8217;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.</p>
<p>WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/#comment-97222</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136349#comment-97222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#039;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.

Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&quot;Next up at number&quot; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.

Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#039;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.

WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#8217;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.</p>
<p>Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&#8220;Next up at number&#8221; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.</p>
<p>Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#8217;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.</p>
<p>WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/#comment-97223</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136349#comment-97223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#039;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.

Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&quot;Next up at number&quot; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.

Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#039;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.

WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#8217;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.</p>
<p>Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&#8220;Next up at number&#8221; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.</p>
<p>Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#8217;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.</p>
<p>WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/#comment-97224</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136349#comment-97224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#039;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.

Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&quot;Next up at number&quot; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.

Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#039;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.

WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#8217;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.</p>
<p>Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&#8220;Next up at number&#8221; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.</p>
<p>Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#8217;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.</p>
<p>WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/#comment-97225</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136349#comment-97225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#039;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.

Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&quot;Next up at number&quot; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.

Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#039;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.

WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#8217;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.</p>
<p>Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&#8220;Next up at number&#8221; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.</p>
<p>Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#8217;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.</p>
<p>WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/#comment-97226</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136349#comment-97226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#039;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.

Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&quot;Next up at number&quot; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.

Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#039;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.

WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#8217;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.</p>
<p>Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&#8220;Next up at number&#8221; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.</p>
<p>Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#8217;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.</p>
<p>WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/#comment-97227</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136349#comment-97227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#039;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.

Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&quot;Next up at number&quot; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.

Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#039;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.

WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#8217;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.</p>
<p>Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&#8220;Next up at number&#8221; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.</p>
<p>Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#8217;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.</p>
<p>WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/#comment-97228</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136349#comment-97228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#039;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.

Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&quot;Next up at number&quot; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.

Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#039;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.

WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#8217;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.</p>
<p>Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&#8220;Next up at number&#8221; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.</p>
<p>Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#8217;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.</p>
<p>WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/#comment-97229</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136349#comment-97229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#039;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.

Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&quot;Next up at number&quot; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.

Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#039;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.

WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#8217;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.</p>
<p>Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&#8220;Next up at number&#8221; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.</p>
<p>Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#8217;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.</p>
<p>WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/#comment-97230</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136349#comment-97230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#039;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.

Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&quot;Next up at number&quot; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.

Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#039;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.

WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#8217;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.</p>
<p>Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&#8220;Next up at number&#8221; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.</p>
<p>Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#8217;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.</p>
<p>WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/#comment-97231</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136349#comment-97231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#039;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.

Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&quot;Next up at number&quot; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.

Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#039;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.

WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#8217;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.</p>
<p>Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&#8220;Next up at number&#8221; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.</p>
<p>Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#8217;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.</p>
<p>WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/#comment-97232</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136349#comment-97232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#039;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.

Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&quot;Next up at number&quot; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.

Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#039;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.

WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#8217;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.</p>
<p>Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&#8220;Next up at number&#8221; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.</p>
<p>Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#8217;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.</p>
<p>WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/#comment-97233</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136349#comment-97233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#039;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.

Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&quot;Next up at number&quot; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.

Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#039;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.

WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#8217;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.</p>
<p>Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&#8220;Next up at number&#8221; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.</p>
<p>Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#8217;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.</p>
<p>WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/#comment-97234</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136349#comment-97234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#039;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.

Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&quot;Next up at number&quot; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.

Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#039;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.

WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#8217;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.</p>
<p>Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&#8220;Next up at number&#8221; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.</p>
<p>Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#8217;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.</p>
<p>WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/#comment-97235</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136349#comment-97235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#039;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.

Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&quot;Next up at number&quot; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.

Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#039;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.

WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#8217;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.</p>
<p>Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&#8220;Next up at number&#8221; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.</p>
<p>Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#8217;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.</p>
<p>WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/#comment-97236</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136349#comment-97236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#039;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.

Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&quot;Next up at number&quot; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.

Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#039;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.

WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#8217;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.</p>
<p>Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&#8220;Next up at number&#8221; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.</p>
<p>Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#8217;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.</p>
<p>WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/#comment-97237</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136349#comment-97237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#039;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.

Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&quot;Next up at number&quot; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.

Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#039;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.

WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#8217;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.</p>
<p>Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&#8220;Next up at number&#8221; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.</p>
<p>Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#8217;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.</p>
<p>WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/#comment-97238</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136349#comment-97238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#039;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.

Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&quot;Next up at number&quot; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.

Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#039;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.

WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#8217;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.</p>
<p>Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&#8220;Next up at number&#8221; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.</p>
<p>Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#8217;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.</p>
<p>WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/#comment-97239</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136349#comment-97239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#039;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.

Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&quot;Next up at number&quot; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.

Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#039;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.

WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#8217;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.</p>
<p>Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&#8220;Next up at number&#8221; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.</p>
<p>Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#8217;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.</p>
<p>WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/#comment-97240</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136349#comment-97240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#039;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.

Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&quot;Next up at number&quot; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.

Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#039;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.

WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#8217;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.</p>
<p>Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&#8220;Next up at number&#8221; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.</p>
<p>Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#8217;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.</p>
<p>WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/#comment-97241</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136349#comment-97241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#039;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.

Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&quot;Next up at number&quot; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.

Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#039;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.

WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#8217;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.</p>
<p>Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&#8220;Next up at number&#8221; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.</p>
<p>Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#8217;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.</p>
<p>WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/#comment-97242</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136349#comment-97242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#039;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.

Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&quot;Next up at number&quot; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.

Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#039;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.

WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#8217;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.</p>
<p>Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&#8220;Next up at number&#8221; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.</p>
<p>Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#8217;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.</p>
<p>WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/#comment-97243</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136349#comment-97243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#039;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.

Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&quot;Next up at number&quot; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.

Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#039;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.

WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#8217;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.</p>
<p>Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&#8220;Next up at number&#8221; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.</p>
<p>Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#8217;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.</p>
<p>WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/#comment-97244</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136349#comment-97244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#039;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.

Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&quot;Next up at number&quot; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.

Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#039;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.

WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#8217;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.</p>
<p>Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&#8220;Next up at number&#8221; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.</p>
<p>Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#8217;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.</p>
<p>WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/slashgear-weekly-roundup-video-february-27-2011-27136349/#comment-97245</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136349#comment-97245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#039;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.

Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&quot;Next up at number&quot; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.

Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#039;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.

WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was really good!  As everyone else says, you&#8217;re very pretty which is certainly an attention drawer.</p>
<p>Rather than cutting between each item how about transition script (&#8220;Next up at number&#8221; perhaps)?  The end part also seemed much more natural, the actual items seemed like there was no emotion or excitement in them (probably because you were concentrating on getting it right to the script), but a little emotion like the ending would make it better.</p>
<p>Also less of a rush would be nice, I&#8217;d rather it was more natural and goes over its exact time than was quite so clipped.</p>
<p>WELL DONE!!!  It was good to watch :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
