Comments on: Sharp LC-80LE632U 80-inch LED LCD HDTV debuts at under $5,500

By: mary slick

mary slick — Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:47:00 +0000

Who EVER WROTE this is an IDIOT…2 Feet Deep..THAT is as deep as a Projection..it should be only a FEW INCHES..my 60″ AQuas is….NOT a GOOD DEAL..my 60″ is VERY Nice.just $1,700, has the R,G B and Y..B and W looks almost LIVE ..BUT..at THAT price I can get a Mitsubishi 92″ w/3D and 240 Hz..What is Sharp doing…..NO THANKS….

By: mary slick

mary slick — Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:43:00 +0000

120HZ…thats BS..it,s 240 now a days and NO 3D…I love Sharp but NOT that 80″ stripped down Modle…hello Mitsubishi….

By: Past Tense

Past Tense — Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:00:00 +0000

I bought this tv 2 weeks ago. I replaced my 73″ dlp. If you want a big screen with ULTRA HD picture quality this is the tv. It’s amazing!!!

By: Rzmasli

Rzmasli — Mon, 17 Oct 2011 01:19:00 +0000

very nice picture. I am not sure it is worth $4999 when at Costco you can get the 70″ for $2400.

By: Edward Biot

Edward Biot — Wed, 28 Sep 2011 23:39:00 +0000

I don’t see how that makes any sense. I mean yeah, for the price it should have 3D. But 3D is really suck. Those glasses are expensive and wearing them is fucking annoying. That and not many devices even support 3D output.

By: noumenon

noumenon — Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:07:00 +0000

no 3d no money

By: Greg4422

Greg4422 — Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:59:00 +0000

It’s an error, should read something like “Sharp LC-80LE632U
has a depth of less than 4 inches a
stylish replacement for similar screen size rear-projection TVs which have a
depth of almost two feet.”

By: Jjanov79

Jjanov79 — Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:25:00 +0000

…”and the TV is almost 2 feet deep making it much thinner than projection TV’s”….. HUH??

By: Jjanov79

Jjanov79 — Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:25:00 +0000

…”and the TV is almost 2 feet deep making it much thinner than projection TV’s”….. HUH??