<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SlashGear &#187; Search Results  &#187;  sunspider</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/search/sunspider/feed/rss2/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 04:38:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>AT&amp;T HTC One Review</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-htc-one-review-08276843/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/att-htc-one-review-08276843/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 16:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Nguyen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must Read Bits & Bytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SlashGear Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor Choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[htc one]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTC Sense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phone Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=276843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... initial concerns, performance actually improved over the stock phone. In <b>SunSpider</b>, the test of JavaScript performance, the European One scored 1...versus the 1,035.1ms of the AT&#038;T version (in <b>SunSpider</b>, faster is better). Overall, we had no issues with the ...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; initial concerns, performance actually improved over the stock phone. In <b>SunSpider</b>, the test of JavaScript performance, the European One scored 1&#8230;versus the 1,035.1ms of the AT&#038;T version (in <b>SunSpider</b>, faster is better). Overall, we had no issues with the &#8230;</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/att-htc-one-review-08276843/" title="AT&T HTC One Review">AT&T HTC One Review</a> is written by <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" >Vincent Nguyen</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/att-htc-one-review-08276843/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 benchmarked: Tiny tablet packs a punch</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-galaxy-note-8-0-benchmarked-tiny-tablet-packs-a-punch-26271574/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-galaxy-note-8-0-benchmarked-tiny-tablet-packs-a-punch-26271574/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hands On]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MWC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MWC 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=271574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... to get a last-minute polish before it ships.



Turning to <b>SunSpider</b>, the JavaScript benchmark of browser performance, the new Galaxy Note...completed the test in 1,021.7ms. Faster is better in <b>SunSpider</b>; in contrast, the iPad mini completed it in 1,698....]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; to get a last-minute polish before it ships.</p>
<p>Turning to <b>SunSpider</b>, the JavaScript benchmark of browser performance, the new Galaxy Note&#8230;completed the test in 1,021.7ms. Faster is better in <b>SunSpider</b>; in contrast, the iPad mini completed it in 1,698&#8230;.</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-galaxy-note-8-0-benchmarked-tiny-tablet-packs-a-punch-26271574/" title="Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 benchmarked: Tiny tablet packs a punch">Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 benchmarked: Tiny tablet packs a punch</a> is written by <a href="http://twitter.com/c_davies" >Chris Davies</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-galaxy-note-8-0-benchmarked-tiny-tablet-packs-a-punch-26271574/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HTC First Review</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-first-review-09277062/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-first-review-09277062/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 01:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Nguyen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SlashGear Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTC first]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phone Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=277062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... to see how it held up. In Quadrant, it scored 6,346, putting it comfortably ahead of last year's One X, while a <b>SunSpider</b> browser test score of 1,567.8ms (lower is better) brings the First surprisingly close to where the One scored, with only around 400ms...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; to see how it held up. In Quadrant, it scored 6,346, putting it comfortably ahead of last year&#8217;s One X, while a <b>SunSpider</b> browser test score of 1,567.8ms (lower is better) brings the First surprisingly close to where the One scored, with only around 400ms&#8230;</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/htc-first-review-09277062/" title="HTC First Review">HTC First Review</a> is written by <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" >Vincent Nguyen</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-first-review-09277062/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HTC One Review [2013]</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-one-review-2013-13273560/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-one-review-2013-13273560/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Nguyen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must Read Bits & Bytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SlashGear Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor Choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[htc blinkfeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[htc one]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTC Sense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phone Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=273560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...245 of the One X+. In Qualcomm's Vellamo test, it scored 2,398 in the HTML5 category and 779 in the Metal category. In <b>SunSpider</b>, the browser test of JavaScript performance, the One scored 1118.9ms (faster is better. Overall, then, it's clear that the One ...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;245 of the One X+. In Qualcomm&#8217;s Vellamo test, it scored 2,398 in the HTML5 category and 779 in the Metal category. In <b>SunSpider</b>, the browser test of JavaScript performance, the One scored 1118.9ms (faster is better. Overall, then, it&#8217;s clear that the One &#8230;</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/htc-one-review-2013-13273560/" title="HTC One Review [2013]">HTC One Review [2013]</a> is written by <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" >Vincent Nguyen</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-one-review-2013-13273560/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sony Xperia Z Review</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/sony-xperia-z-review-24270827/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/sony-xperia-z-review-24270827/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 17:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SlashGear Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phone Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Xperia Z]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=270827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... Nexus 4 and DROID DNA by HTC, no great surprise given the core hardware is the same across the three devices, in all but <b>SunSpider</b>, the test of browser performance. There, it put in a particularly poor showing, taking more than 50-percent longer than its ...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; Nexus 4 and DROID DNA by HTC, no great surprise given the core hardware is the same across the three devices, in all but <b>SunSpider</b>, the test of browser performance. There, it put in a particularly poor showing, taking more than 50-percent longer than its &#8230;</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/sony-xperia-z-review-24270827/" title="Sony Xperia Z Review">Sony Xperia Z Review</a> is written by <a href="http://twitter.com/c_davies" >Chris Davies</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/sony-xperia-z-review-24270827/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HTC One benchmarks: off the charts</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-one-benchmarks-off-the-charts-19270000/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-one-benchmarks-off-the-charts-19270000/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must Read Bits & Bytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hands On]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[htc one]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qualcomm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snapdragon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=270000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... Pro, this will very likely be the most impressive smartphone processor-wise you'll have ever experienced.



We've also had a look at <b>Sunspider</b> working with the standard web browser on the device. Here we get a lovely 1195.2ms as a final result, this ...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; Pro, this will very likely be the most impressive smartphone processor-wise you&#8217;ll have ever experienced.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve also had a look at <b>Sunspider</b> working with the standard web browser on the device. Here we get a lovely 1195.2ms as a final result, this &#8230;</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/htc-one-benchmarks-off-the-charts-19270000/" title="HTC One benchmarks: off the charts">HTC One benchmarks: off the charts</a> is written by <a href="" >Chris Burns</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-one-benchmarks-off-the-charts-19270000/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HTC Sensation Benchmarks with SunSpider and Quadrant</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-sensation-benchmarks-with-sunspider-and-quadrant-12145810/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-sensation-benchmarks-with-sunspider-and-quadrant-12145810/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 15:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTC Sensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTC Sense]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=145810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... we've got here is both Quadrant and <b>SunSpider</b>, giving us a generally decent look at ... further benchmarks we've done, search for either <b>SunSpider</b> or Quadrant in your search box to ..., the one that goes by the name <b>SunSpider</b>, and if you've been following our ...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; we&#8217;ve got here is both Quadrant and <b>SunSpider</b>, giving us a generally decent look at &#8230; further benchmarks we&#8217;ve done, search for either <b>SunSpider</b> or Quadrant in your search box to &#8230;, the one that goes by the name <b>SunSpider</b>, and if you&#8217;ve been following our &#8230;</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/htc-sensation-benchmarks-with-sunspider-and-quadrant-12145810/" title="HTC Sensation Benchmarks with <u>SunSpider</u> and Quadrant">HTC Sensation Benchmarks with <u>SunSpider</u> and Quadrant</a> is written by <a href="" >Chris Burns</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-sensation-benchmarks-with-sunspider-and-quadrant-12145810/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IE9 SunSpider oddness prompts Microsoft benchmark-gaming rumors</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ie9-sunspider-oddness-prompts-microsoft-benchmark-gaming-rumors-17114653/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/ie9-sunspider-oddness-prompts-microsoft-benchmark-gaming-rumors-17114653/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 15:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=114653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... 10x faster than every other browser on <b>SunSpider</b>'s math-cordic test; he tweaked a... boon only applied in the default <b>SunSpider</b> benchmarking.



In fact, where IE9 managed ... has either optimized IE9 to return strong <b>SunSpider</b> results - which they say is "...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; 10x faster than every other browser on <b>SunSpider</b>&#8216;s math-cordic test; he tweaked a&#8230; boon only applied in the default <b>SunSpider</b> benchmarking.</p>
<p>In fact, where IE9 managed &#8230; has either optimized IE9 to return strong <b>SunSpider</b> results &#8211; which they say is &#8220;&#8230;</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/ie9-sunspider-oddness-prompts-microsoft-benchmark-gaming-rumors-17114653/" title="IE9 <u>SunSpider</u> oddness prompts Microsoft benchmark-gaming rumors">IE9 <u>SunSpider</u> oddness prompts Microsoft benchmark-gaming rumors</a> is written by <a href="http://twitter.com/c_davies" >Chris Davies</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/ie9-sunspider-oddness-prompts-microsoft-benchmark-gaming-rumors-17114653/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ASUS Transformer Prime vs iPad 2, benchmark tests</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/asus-transformer-prime-vs-ipad-2-benchmark-tests-01199285/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/asus-transformer-prime-vs-ipad-2-benchmark-tests-01199285/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 20:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASUS Eee Pad Transformer Prime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honeycomb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tegra 3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=199285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... tests lined up here, first of all <b>SunSpider</b>, an internet browser-based JavaScript benchmark ...on other devices by heading to our <b>SunSpider</b> search portal, BrowserMark is one we'.... That said, lower is better in <b>SunSpider</b>, while higher is better in BrowserMark....]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; tests lined up here, first of all <b>SunSpider</b>, an internet browser-based JavaScript benchmark &#8230;on other devices by heading to our <b>SunSpider</b> search portal, BrowserMark is one we&#8217;&#8230;. That said, lower is better in <b>SunSpider</b>, while higher is better in BrowserMark&#8230;.</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/asus-transformer-prime-vs-ipad-2-benchmark-tests-01199285/" title="ASUS Transformer Prime vs iPad 2, benchmark tests">ASUS Transformer Prime vs iPad 2, benchmark tests</a> is written by <a href="" >Chris Burns</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/asus-transformer-prime-vs-ipad-2-benchmark-tests-01199285/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>111</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iOS 4.3 Benchmarks on iPad</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ios-4-3-benchmarks-on-ipad-09138865/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/ios-4-3-benchmarks-on-ipad-09138865/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 19:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS 4.3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod Touch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=138865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...: benchmarks! Thustly we whipped out our <b>SunSpider</b> Browser Benchmarking webpages and our cool ... along. Geekbench is the opposite of <b>SunSpider</b> in that the resulting number is ...over to the Geekbench app or the <b>SunSpider</b> JavaScript Benchmark webpage and tell us...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;: benchmarks! Thustly we whipped out our <b>SunSpider</b> Browser Benchmarking webpages and our cool &#8230; along. Geekbench is the opposite of <b>SunSpider</b> in that the resulting number is &#8230;over to the Geekbench app or the <b>SunSpider</b> JavaScript Benchmark webpage and tell us&#8230;</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/ios-4-3-benchmarks-on-ipad-09138865/" title="iOS 4.3 Benchmarks on iPad">iOS 4.3 Benchmarks on iPad</a> is written by <a href="" >Chris Burns</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/ios-4-3-benchmarks-on-ipad-09138865/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HTC One X+ benchmarked vs Jelly Bean Galaxy S III: Fight!</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-one-x-benchmarked-vs-jelly-bean-galaxy-s-iii-fight-24253882/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-one-x-benchmarked-vs-jelly-bean-galaxy-s-iii-fight-24253882/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 22:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hands On]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTC One X Plus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jelly Bean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung Galaxy S III]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=253882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[.../O, and 3D graphics performance; next <b>SunSpider</b>, a test of browser JavaScript performance... put in a better showing in <b>SunSpider</b>, too, scoring 1082.2ms (lower is... score of 914.7ms.

Quadrant and <b>SunSpider</b> benchmarks:

[gallery include="253885,253886"]

...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;/O, and 3D graphics performance; next <b>SunSpider</b>, a test of browser JavaScript performance&#8230; put in a better showing in <b>SunSpider</b>, too, scoring 1082.2ms (lower is&#8230; score of 914.7ms.</p>
<p>Quadrant and <b>SunSpider</b> benchmarks:</p>

<a href='http://www.slashgear.com/htc-one-x-benchmarked-vs-jelly-bean-galaxy-s-iii-fight-24253882/htc_one_x-plus_quadrant_sunspider/' title='htc_one_x-plus_quadrant_sunspider'><img width="150" height="100" src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/htc_one_x-plus_quadrant_sunspider-150x100.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="htc_one_x-plus_quadrant_sunspider" /></a>
<a href='http://www.slashgear.com/htc-one-x-benchmarked-vs-jelly-bean-galaxy-s-iii-fight-24253882/samsung_gs3_jb_quadrant_sunspider/' title='samsung_gs3_jb_quadrant_sunspider'><img width="150" height="100" src="http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/samsung_gs3_jb_quadrant_sunspider-150x100.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="samsung_gs3_jb_quadrant_sunspider" /></a>

<p>&#8230;</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/htc-one-x-benchmarked-vs-jelly-bean-galaxy-s-iii-fight-24253882/" title="HTC One X+ benchmarked vs Jelly Bean Galaxy S III: Fight!">HTC One X+ benchmarked vs Jelly Bean Galaxy S III: Fight!</a> is written by <a href="http://twitter.com/c_davies" >Chris Davies</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-one-x-benchmarked-vs-jelly-bean-galaxy-s-iii-fight-24253882/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPhone 4S and iPhone 4 both beat Nokia Lumia 800 in browser benchmarks</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/iphone-4s-and-iphone-4-both-beat-nokia-lumia-800-in-browser-benchmarks-02205459/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/iphone-4s-and-iphone-4-both-beat-nokia-lumia-800-in-browser-benchmarks-02205459/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 21:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rue Liu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 4S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mango]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nokia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nokia Lumia 800]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows phone 7.5]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=205459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[..., which include Browsermark tests, Speed Reading test, <b>Sunspider</b>, Acid3, and HTML5. The iPhone 4 also ... most of the tests, except for the <b>Sunspider</b> Test where a lower number is ... fps
iPhone 4S (iOS 5) – 60 fps

<b>Sunspider</b> Test: Lower is better
iPhone 4 (...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;, which include Browsermark tests, Speed Reading test, <b>Sunspider</b>, Acid3, and HTML5. The iPhone 4 also &#8230; most of the tests, except for the <b>Sunspider</b> Test where a lower number is &#8230; fps<br />
iPhone 4S (iOS 5) – 60 fps</p>
<p><b>Sunspider</b> Test: Lower is better<br />
iPhone 4 (&#8230;</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/iphone-4s-and-iphone-4-both-beat-nokia-lumia-800-in-browser-benchmarks-02205459/" title="iPhone 4S and iPhone 4 both beat Nokia Lumia 800 in browser benchmarks">iPhone 4S and iPhone 4 both beat Nokia Lumia 800 in browser benchmarks</a> is written by <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" >Rue Liu</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/iphone-4s-and-iphone-4-both-beat-nokia-lumia-800-in-browser-benchmarks-02205459/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
