<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SlashGear &#187; Search Results  &#187;  nvidia geforce gtx 470</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/search/nvidia+geforce+gtx+470/feed/rss2/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 20:45:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470/480 Graphics Cards Break Cover</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-geforce-gtx-470480-graphics-cards-break-cover-2679365/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-geforce-gtx-470480-graphics-cards-break-cover-2679365/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Evan Selleck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=79365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The <b>NVIDIA</b> <b>GeForce</b> <b>GTX</b> <b>470</b> and 480 graphics cards have had... telling us that, even if <b>NVIDIA</b> officially announced the cards on... to stem the initial demand.





<b>NVIDIA</b>, right out of the gate... got our fingers crossed that <b>NVIDIA</b> comes through on their end...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <b>NVIDIA</b> <b>GeForce</b> <b>GTX</b> <b>470</b> and 480 graphics cards have had&#8230; telling us that, even if <b>NVIDIA</b> officially announced the cards on&#8230; to stem the initial demand.</p>
<p><b>NVIDIA</b>, right out of the gate&#8230; got our fingers crossed that <b>NVIDIA</b> comes through on their end&#8230;</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-geforce-gtx-470480-graphics-cards-break-cover-2679365/" title="<u>NVIDIA</u> <u>GeForce</u> <u>GTX</u> <u>470</u>/480 Graphics Cards Break Cover"><u>NVIDIA</u> <u>GeForce</u> <u>GTX</u> <u>470</u>/480 Graphics Cards Break Cover</a> is written by <a href="" >Evan Selleck</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-geforce-gtx-470480-graphics-cards-break-cover-2679365/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 axed after just two months?</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-geforce-gtx-470-axed-after-just-two-months-2586974/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-geforce-gtx-470-axed-after-just-two-months-2586974/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 12:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fermi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GeForce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Card]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=86974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>NVIDIA</b>'s <b>GeForce</b> <b>GTX</b> <b>470</b> certainly fell into the shadow of its more-capable <b>GTX</b> 480 sibling, but are the ... heard from sources in Taiwan that <b>NVIDIA</b> are no longer taking orders ... move - which is still unconfirmed by <b>NVIDIA</b> themselves - there are two main ...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>NVIDIA</b>&#8216;s <b>GeForce</b> <b>GTX</b> <b>470</b> certainly fell into the shadow of its more-capable <b>GTX</b> 480 sibling, but are the &#8230; heard from sources in Taiwan that <b>NVIDIA</b> are no longer taking orders &#8230; move &#8211; which is still unconfirmed by <b>NVIDIA</b> themselves &#8211; there are two main &#8230;</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-geforce-gtx-470-axed-after-just-two-months-2586974/" title="<u>NVIDIA</u> <u>GeForce</u> <u>GTX</u> <u>470</u> axed after just two months?"><u>NVIDIA</u> <u>GeForce</u> <u>GTX</u> <u>470</u> axed after just two months?</a> is written by <a href="http://twitter.com/c_davies" >Chris Davies</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-geforce-gtx-470-axed-after-just-two-months-2586974/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480/470 to lose cores over poor GPU yield?</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-geforce-gtx-480470-to-lose-cores-over-poor-gpu-yield-2278420/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-geforce-gtx-480470-to-lose-cores-over-poor-gpu-yield-2278420/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fermi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GeForce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Card]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=78420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... picking up one of <b>NVIDIA</b>'s new Fermi-based <b>GeForce</b> <b>GTX</b> 480 or <b>GTX</b> <b>470</b> graphics ... 480 priced at $499 and the <b>GeForce</b> <b>GTX</b> <b>470</b> at $349.  However volume shipments ... until April 6th; previous leaks had suggested <b>NVIDIA</b>'s shortage of reference boards had ...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; picking up one of <b>NVIDIA</b>&#8216;s new Fermi-based <b>GeForce</b> <b>GTX</b> 480 or <b>GTX</b> <b>470</b> graphics &#8230; 480 priced at $499 and the <b>GeForce</b> <b>GTX</b> <b>470</b> at $349.  However volume shipments &#8230; until April 6th; previous leaks had suggested <b>NVIDIA</b>&#8216;s shortage of reference boards had &#8230;</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-geforce-gtx-480470-to-lose-cores-over-poor-gpu-yield-2278420/" title="<u>NVIDIA</u> <u>GeForce</u> <u>GTX</u> 480/<u>470</u> to lose cores over poor GPU yield?"><u>NVIDIA</u> <u>GeForce</u> <u>GTX</u> 480/<u>470</u> to lose cores over poor GPU yield?</a> is written by <a href="http://twitter.com/c_davies" >Chris Davies</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-geforce-gtx-480470-to-lose-cores-over-poor-gpu-yield-2278420/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NVIDIA deny GTX 470 axe; hint at incoming GTX 465</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-deny-gtx-470-axe-hint-at-incoming-gtx-465-2687167/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-deny-gtx-470-axe-hint-at-incoming-gtx-465-2687167/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 15:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fermi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GeForce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Card]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=87167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...this week that <b>NVIDIA</b> had axed their <b>GeForce</b> <b>GTX</b> <b>470</b> graphics card... in the enthusiast line," the <b>NVIDIA</b> statement also hints that a... next on the cards.




"The <b>GTX</b> <b>470</b> is really important for... version of our GF100 [GPU]" <b>NVIDIA</b>
That GF100-based card is...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;this week that <b>NVIDIA</b> had axed their <b>GeForce</b> <b>GTX</b> <b>470</b> graphics card&#8230; in the enthusiast line,&#8221; the <b>NVIDIA</b> statement also hints that a&#8230; next on the cards.</p>
<p>&#8220;The <b>GTX</b> <b>470</b> is really important for&#8230; version of our GF100 [GPU]&#8221; <b>NVIDIA</b><br />
That GF100-based card is&#8230;</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-deny-gtx-470-axe-hint-at-incoming-gtx-465-2687167/" title="<u>NVIDIA</u> deny <u>GTX</u> <u>470</u> axe; hint at incoming <u>GTX</u> 465"><u>NVIDIA</u> deny <u>GTX</u> <u>470</u> axe; hint at incoming <u>GTX</u> 465</a> is written by <a href="http://twitter.com/c_davies" >Chris Davies</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-deny-gtx-470-axe-hint-at-incoming-gtx-465-2687167/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 leaks, gets benchmarked</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-leaks-gets-benchmarked-1385534/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-leaks-gets-benchmarked-1385534/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 17:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fermi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GeForce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Card]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=85534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...card - until now known as the <b>GeForce</b> <b>GTX</b> 460 - have leaked, with... show up in the <b>NVIDIA</b> <b>GeForce</b> <b>GTX</b> 465 on June 2nd... been testing it, discovering that <b>NVIDIA</b> have disabled several elements of... RAM.  In contrast, the <b>GeForce</b> <b>GTX</b> <b>470</b> launched earlier this year...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;card &#8211; until now known as the <b>GeForce</b> <b>GTX</b> 460 &#8211; have leaked, with&#8230; show up in the <b>NVIDIA</b> <b>GeForce</b> <b>GTX</b> 465 on June 2nd&#8230; been testing it, discovering that <b>NVIDIA</b> have disabled several elements of&#8230; RAM.  In contrast, the <b>GeForce</b> <b>GTX</b> <b>470</b> launched earlier this year&#8230;</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-leaks-gets-benchmarked-1385534/" title="<u>NVIDIA</u> <u>GeForce</u> <u>GTX</u> 465 leaks, gets benchmarked"><u>NVIDIA</u> <u>GeForce</u> <u>GTX</u> 465 leaks, gets benchmarked</a> is written by <a href="http://twitter.com/c_davies" >Chris Davies</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-leaks-gets-benchmarked-1385534/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NVIDIA Fermi GeForce GTX 470/480 cards scarce at launch?</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-fermi-geforce-gtx-470480-cards-scarce-at-launch-2575561/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-fermi-geforce-gtx-470480-cards-scarce-at-launch-2575561/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GeForce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Card]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=75561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... so ship-shape over at <b>NVIDIA</b>.  According to DigiTimes' sources, despite <b>NVIDIA</b>'s intent to announce their Fermi-based <b>GeForce</b> <b>GTX</b> <b>470</b>/780 GPUs on March 26th, there'll be a limited ...at second-tier graphics card manufacturers, <b>NVIDIA</b> is still yet to provide ...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; so ship-shape over at <b>NVIDIA</b>.  According to DigiTimes&#8217; sources, despite <b>NVIDIA</b>&#8216;s intent to announce their Fermi-based <b>GeForce</b> <b>GTX</b> <b>470</b>/780 GPUs on March 26th, there&#8217;ll be a limited &#8230;at second-tier graphics card manufacturers, <b>NVIDIA</b> is still yet to provide &#8230;</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-fermi-geforce-gtx-470480-cards-scarce-at-launch-2575561/" title="<u>NVIDIA</u> Fermi <u>GeForce</u> <u>GTX</u> <u>470</u>/480 cards scarce at launch?"><u>NVIDIA</u> Fermi <u>GeForce</u> <u>GTX</u> <u>470</u>/480 cards scarce at launch?</a> is written by <a href="http://twitter.com/c_davies" >Chris Davies</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-fermi-geforce-gtx-470480-cards-scarce-at-launch-2575561/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 due June; mainstream versions shortly after</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-geforce-gtx-460-due-june-mainstream-versions-shortly-after-0484165/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-geforce-gtx-460-due-june-mainstream-versions-shortly-after-0484165/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 10:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fermi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Card]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=84165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>NVIDIA</b>'s mainstream and entry-level versions of the Fermi-based <b>GeForce</b> <b>GTX</b> <b>470</b>/480 will arrive in July... 2010.  The mainstream model will use <b>NVIDIA</b>'s GF106 core and the entry...to be priced at around $299.  <b>NVIDIA</b> themselves have declined to comment ...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>NVIDIA</b>&#8216;s mainstream and entry-level versions of the Fermi-based <b>GeForce</b> <b>GTX</b> <b>470</b>/480 will arrive in July&#8230; 2010.  The mainstream model will use <b>NVIDIA</b>&#8216;s GF106 core and the entry&#8230;to be priced at around $299.  <b>NVIDIA</b> themselves have declined to comment &#8230;</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-geforce-gtx-460-due-june-mainstream-versions-shortly-after-0484165/" title="<u>NVIDIA</u> <u>GeForce</u> <u>GTX</u> 460 due June; mainstream versions shortly after"><u>NVIDIA</u> <u>GeForce</u> <u>GTX</u> 460 due June; mainstream versions shortly after</a> is written by <a href="http://twitter.com/c_davies" >Chris Davies</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-geforce-gtx-460-due-june-mainstream-versions-shortly-after-0484165/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nvidia Geforce GTX 480/470 official launch date in March  </title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-geforce-gtx-480470-official-launch-date-in-march-2275206/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-geforce-gtx-480470-official-launch-date-in-march-2275206/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 03:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Fang</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GeForce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=75206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>Nvidia</b> has just moments ago announced the official launch date of its Fermi-based <b>Geforce</b> <b>GTX</b> 480 and <b>GTX</b> <b>470</b> graphics cards;... be introduced on March 26th.  <b>Nvidia</b> again broadcasted the launch date... opening will also coincide with <b>Nvidia</b>’s PAX 2010 LAN event...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Nvidia</b> has just moments ago announced the official launch date of its Fermi-based <b>Geforce</b> <b>GTX</b> 480 and <b>GTX</b> <b>470</b> graphics cards;&#8230; be introduced on March 26th.  <b>Nvidia</b> again broadcasted the launch date&#8230; opening will also coincide with <b>Nvidia</b>’s PAX 2010 LAN event&#8230;</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-geforce-gtx-480470-official-launch-date-in-march-2275206/" title="<u>Nvidia</u> <u>Geforce</u> <u>GTX</u> 480/<u>470</u> official launch date in March  "><u>Nvidia</u> <u>Geforce</u> <u>GTX</u> 480/<u>470</u> official launch date in March  </a> is written by <a href="" >Paul Fang</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-geforce-gtx-480470-official-launch-date-in-march-2275206/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ASUS GeForce GTX 480/GTX 470 tipped ahead of NVIDIA launch</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/asus-geforce-gtx-480gtx-470-tipped-ahead-of-nvidia-launch-2378716/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/asus-geforce-gtx-480gtx-470-tipped-ahead-of-nvidia-launch-2378716/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fermi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GeForce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Card]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=78716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... it's the box-art for <b>NVIDIA</b>'s upcoming Fermi-based video ... <b>GTX</b> 480 and ASUS <b>GeForce</b> <b>GTX</b> <b>470</b> - we can, yes.





ASUS are ..., however, poor GPU yields had left <b>NVIDIA</b> facing underperforming cards, with early examples of the <b>GTX</b> 480 expected to have 480 ...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; it&#8217;s the box-art for <b>NVIDIA</b>&#8216;s upcoming Fermi-based video &#8230; <b>GTX</b> 480 and ASUS <b>GeForce</b> <b>GTX</b> <b>470</b> &#8211; we can, yes.</p>
<p>ASUS are &#8230;, however, poor GPU yields had left <b>NVIDIA</b> facing underperforming cards, with early examples of the <b>GTX</b> 480 expected to have 480 &#8230;</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/asus-geforce-gtx-480gtx-470-tipped-ahead-of-nvidia-launch-2378716/" title="ASUS <u>GeForce</u> <u>GTX</u> 480/<u>GTX</u> <u>470</u> tipped ahead of <u>NVIDIA</u> launch">ASUS <u>GeForce</u> <u>GTX</u> 480/<u>GTX</u> <u>470</u> tipped ahead of <u>NVIDIA</u> launch</a> is written by <a href="http://twitter.com/c_davies" >Chris Davies</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/asus-geforce-gtx-480gtx-470-tipped-ahead-of-nvidia-launch-2378716/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NVIDIA GF104 Fermi update tipped to replace GTX 470</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-gf104-fermi-update-tipped-to-replace-gtx-470-22109748/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-gf104-fermi-update-tipped-to-replace-gtx-470-22109748/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 08:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fermi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GeForce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=109748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>NVIDIA</b> are tipped to be readying an updated version of their GF104 ...heels of price cuts to the <b>GeForce</b> <b>GTX</b> <b>470</b> range.  The new GF104 will apparently have eight Streaming Multiprocessors (SM... a further SM unlocked now that <b>NVIDIA</b> need the extra boost of power...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>NVIDIA</b> are tipped to be readying an updated version of their GF104 &#8230;heels of price cuts to the <b>GeForce</b> <b>GTX</b> <b>470</b> range.  The new GF104 will apparently have eight Streaming Multiprocessors (SM&#8230; a further SM unlocked now that <b>NVIDIA</b> need the extra boost of power&#8230;</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-gf104-fermi-update-tipped-to-replace-gtx-470-22109748/" title="<u>NVIDIA</u> GF104 Fermi update tipped to replace <u>GTX</u> <u>470</u>"><u>NVIDIA</u> GF104 Fermi update tipped to replace <u>GTX</u> <u>470</u></a> is written by <a href="http://twitter.com/c_davies" >Chris Davies</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-gf104-fermi-update-tipped-to-replace-gtx-470-22109748/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dire Fermi GPU yields will cost NVIDIA market share predict analysts</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/dire-fermi-gpu-yields-will-cost-nvidia-market-share-predict-analysts-2282755/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/dire-fermi-gpu-yields-will-cost-nvidia-market-share-predict-analysts-2282755/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 11:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fermi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GeForce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Card]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=82755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>NVIDIA</b>'s Fermi-based <b>GeForce</b> <b>GTX</b> <b>470</b>/480 cards are on sale now, but... on the market.  Financially, the analysts believe <b>NVIDIA</b> could "lose market share" from 2H 2010... after the first batch went on sale.  <b>NVIDIA</b> have apparently declined to comment on the...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>NVIDIA</b>&#8216;s Fermi-based <b>GeForce</b> <b>GTX</b> <b>470</b>/480 cards are on sale now, but&#8230; on the market.  Financially, the analysts believe <b>NVIDIA</b> could &#8220;lose market share&#8221; from 2H 2010&#8230; after the first batch went on sale.  <b>NVIDIA</b> have apparently declined to comment on the&#8230;</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/dire-fermi-gpu-yields-will-cost-nvidia-market-share-predict-analysts-2282755/" title="Dire Fermi GPU yields will cost <u>NVIDIA</u> market share predict analysts">Dire Fermi GPU yields will cost <u>NVIDIA</u> market share predict analysts</a> is written by <a href="http://twitter.com/c_davies" >Chris Davies</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/dire-fermi-gpu-yields-will-cost-nvidia-market-share-predict-analysts-2282755/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ASUS ENGTX480 &amp; ENGTX470 GeForce 480/470 video cards get official</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/asus-engtx480-engtx470-geforce-480470-video-cards-get-official-2979438/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/asus-engtx480-engtx470-geforce-480470-video-cards-get-official-2979438/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fermi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GeForce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Card]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=79438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... new video cards based on <b>NVIDIA</b>'s <b>GTX</b> 480/<b>470</b> GPU, it perhaps comes ... and ENGTX470 cards official.  Using the <b>GeForce</b> Fermi chips, the ENGTX480 uses the ...all the benefits of the debuting 40nm <b>NVIDIA</b> GPUs, possessing considerable power improvements compared ...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; new video cards based on <b>NVIDIA</b>&#8216;s <b>GTX</b> 480/<b>470</b> GPU, it perhaps comes &#8230; and ENGTX470 cards official.  Using the <b>GeForce</b> Fermi chips, the ENGTX480 uses the &#8230;all the benefits of the debuting 40nm <b>NVIDIA</b> GPUs, possessing considerable power improvements compared &#8230;</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/asus-engtx480-engtx470-geforce-480470-video-cards-get-official-2979438/" title="ASUS ENGTX480 & ENGTX470 <u>GeForce</u> 480/<u>470</u> video cards get official">ASUS ENGTX480 & ENGTX470 <u>GeForce</u> 480/<u>470</u> video cards get official</a> is written by <a href="http://twitter.com/c_davies" >Chris Davies</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/asus-engtx480-engtx470-geforce-480470-video-cards-get-official-2979438/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
