<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SlashGear &#187; Search Results  &#187;  google ftc antitrust</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/search/google+ftc+antitrust/feed/rss2/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:01:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>FTC may not have enough evidence to hit Google with antitrust charges</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ftc-may-not-have-enough-evidence-to-hit-google-with-antitrust-charges-20257846/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/ftc-may-not-have-enough-evidence-to-hit-google-with-antitrust-charges-20257846/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Abent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=257846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...be believed, however, the <b>FTC</b> may have a problem actually hitting <b>Google</b> with <b>antitrust</b> charges due to... thing without ending up in court.




The <b>FTC</b> investigation stems from anti-competitive claims from <b>Google</b>'s competitors. According to them, <b>Google</b> ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/ftc-may-not-have-enough-evidence-to-hit-google-with-antitrust-charges-20257846/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google EU antitrust end in sight says competition chief</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-eu-antitrust-end-in-sight-says-competition-chief-19261583/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/google-eu-antitrust-end-in-sight-says-competition-chief-19261583/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 12:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=261583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>Google</b>'s <b>antitrust</b> spat with the European Commission could reach preliminary settlement as early as ... with that of other campaign providers. Although not officially confirmed by either the <b>FTC</b> or <b>Google</b>, the prospect of the search company escaping without ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/google-eu-antitrust-end-in-sight-says-competition-chief-19261583/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Was Google&#039;s FTC antitrust escape scuttled by Euro stringency?</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/was-googles-ftc-antitrust-escape-scuttled-by-euro-stringency-20261772/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/was-googles-ftc-antitrust-escape-scuttled-by-euro-stringency-20261772/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 12:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must Read Bits & Bytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=261772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... with a prospective "verbal promise" to the <b>FTC</b> suddenly deemed insufficient. The search giant ...the EU is expected to find <b>Google</b> guilty of <b>antitrust</b>, but the fashion in ...delivered has observers concerned. While initially the <b>FTC</b> looked to be readying a far ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/was-googles-ftc-antitrust-escape-scuttled-by-euro-stringency-20261772/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google settles FTC antitrust with patent and advert limits</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-settles-ftc-antitrust-with-patent-and-advert-limits-03262946/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/google-settles-ftc-antitrust-with-patent-and-advert-limits-03262946/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 18:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must Read Bits & Bytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=262946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>Google</b> has settled with the <b>FTC</b>, avoiding <b>antitrust</b> penalties by agreeing to ... to visit their sites specifically. "Some <b>FTC</b> Commissioners were concerned that this conduct ... other authorities that have looked at <b>Google</b>'s business practices ... have concluded ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/google-settles-ftc-antitrust-with-patent-and-advert-limits-03262946/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google FTC inquiry demanded by antitrust senators</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-ftc-inquiry-demanded-by-antitrust-senators-20203529/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/google-ftc-inquiry-demanded-by-antitrust-senators-20203529/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 16:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=203529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...member Senator Herb Kohl wrote to the <b>FTC</b> today, Bloomberg reports, with the company'... "warrant a thorough investigation by the <b>FTC</b>."





The fresh attention will come as... careful to downplay <b>Google</b>'s role as a potential <b>antitrust</b> threat, pointing out...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/google-ftc-inquiry-demanded-by-antitrust-senators-20203529/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google To Face Subpoenas in FTC Antitrust Probe</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-to-face-subpoenas-in-ftc-antitrust-probe-23161189/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/google-to-face-subpoenas-in-ftc-antitrust-probe-23161189/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 22:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rue Liu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=161189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... tipped that the five-member <b>FTC</b> panel is preparing to send ... have dealt with <b>Google</b>. 





<b>Google</b> has faced <b>antitrust</b> probes in the ... a major chunk of <b>Google</b>'s revenues. <b>Google</b> has a growing... them to <b>Google</b>'s own competing services.

The <b>FTC</b> has been...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/google-to-face-subpoenas-in-ftc-antitrust-probe-23161189/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FTC Antitrust Probe On Google Focuses On Android And Search</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ftc-antitrust-probe-on-google-focuses-on-android-and-search-10170939/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/ftc-antitrust-probe-on-google-focuses-on-android-and-search-10170939/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 23:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rue Liu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=170939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... Senate in September. Unlike other <b>antitrust</b> probes that <b>Google</b> has experienced with mergers... probe say that the key areas the <b>FTC</b> intends to probe include <b>Google</b>... search related services. The <b>FTC</b> is questioning whether <b>Google</b> prevents manufacturers that use...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/ftc-antitrust-probe-on-google-focuses-on-android-and-search-10170939/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google enrages rivals with rumored FTC antitrust escape plan</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-enrages-rivals-with-rumored-ftc-antitrust-escape-plan-17261093/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/google-enrages-rivals-with-rumored-ftc-antitrust-escape-plan-17261093/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 09:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must Read Bits & Bytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=261093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>Google</b> is near a US <b>antitrust</b> settlement which would see the ...trial or any financial settlement. The <b>FTC</b> would still have to accept ... was true or if the <b>FTC</b> had communicated some willingness to ...of the rumored deal. "If the <b>FTC</b> fails to take meaningful action...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/google-enrages-rivals-with-rumored-ftc-antitrust-escape-plan-17261093/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google+ faces FTC investigation over search antitrust</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-faces-ftc-investigation-over-search-antitrust-14209311/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/google-faces-ftc-investigation-over-search-antitrust-14209311/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 11:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Plus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=209311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... network, <b>Google</b>+, will also come under investigation in a US <b>FTC</b> <b>antitrust</b> ...priority than status messages left in <b>Google</b>+, while the Electronic Privacy Information ...filtering technologies, arguing that artificially limiting <b>Google</b> as the dominant player in ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/google-faces-ftc-investigation-over-search-antitrust-14209311/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leaks in the Google antitrust probe brings the FTC under scrutiny</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/leaks-in-the-google-antitrust-probe-brings-the-ftc-under-scrutiny-09264438/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/leaks-in-the-google-antitrust-probe-brings-the-ftc-under-scrutiny-09264438/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 06:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brittany Hillen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=264438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>Google</b> has been in the news in increasing frequency over the ... or so months concerning an <b>FTC</b> <b>antitrust</b> probe into its business ... with the situation. Now the <b>FTC</b> is under scrutiny from Congress... press about the investigation of <b>Google</b>, I request the Office of...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/leaks-in-the-google-antitrust-probe-brings-the-ftc-under-scrutiny-09264438/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google and FTC close to settling patent case, sources say</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-and-ftc-close-to-settling-patent-case-sources-say-11260436/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/google-and-ftc-close-to-settling-patent-case-sources-say-11260436/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 02:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brittany Hillen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=260436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... which is patents. According to the <b>FTC</b>, <b>Google</b> breached <b>antitrust</b> law by trying to prevent... offer a comment on the claims, but <b>Google</b> spokesperson Adam Kovacevich had this to ...the <b>FTC</b> has also been poking around <b>Google</b> while trying to determine whether the ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/google-and-ftc-close-to-settling-patent-case-sources-say-11260436/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google AdMob deal approved by FTC; Apple iAd helped clinch it</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-admob-deal-approved-by-ftc-apple-iad-helped-clinch-it-2186577/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/google-admob-deal-approved-by-ftc-apple-iad-helped-clinch-it-2186577/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 16:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AdMob]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertisement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertisements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iAd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=86577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...new participation has "outweighed" the concerns.

<b>Google</b> paid $750m in back in ... important questions about the transaction. <b>Google</b> and AdMob have competed head-... be found at www.<b>ftc</b>.gov. The <b>FTC</b>’s Bureau of..., send an e-mail to <b>antitrust</b>@<b>ftc</b>.gov, or write to...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/google-admob-deal-approved-by-ftc-apple-iad-helped-clinch-it-2186577/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
