<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SlashGear &#187; Search Results  &#187;  apple samsung legal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/search/apple%2Bsamsung%2Blegal/feed/rss2/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 09:50:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Apple demanding Android source code in Samsung lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-demanding-android-source-code-in-samsung-lawsuit-08281035/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-demanding-android-source-code-in-samsung-lawsuit-08281035/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 15:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Lloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=281035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ongoing <b>legal</b> battle between <b>Apple</b> and <b>Samsung</b> is heating up yet ...hand over various Android source code documents. <b>Apple</b> claims that Google is withholding information ... hand over the source code documents, <b>Apple</b> may discover other information that Google...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-demanding-android-source-code-in-samsung-lawsuit-08281035/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple to add Samsung Galaxy S 4 to upcoming patent trial</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-to-add-samsung-galaxy-s-4-to-upcoming-patent-trial-14281937/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-to-add-samsung-galaxy-s-4-to-upcoming-patent-trial-14281937/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 13:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Lloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GALAXY S 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[galaxy S IV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[galaxy s4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent suit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung GALAXY S 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung galaxy s4]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=281937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... established that <b>Apple</b> and <b>Samsung</b> have been in a <b>legal</b> cat ... mix.





As a part of <b>Apple</b>'s statement recently filed with ... million. However, while it seemed <b>Apple</b> was fine with that for ... the two companies. Of course, <b>Apple</b> wants to develop their own...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-to-add-samsung-galaxy-s-4-to-upcoming-patent-trial-14281937/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>T-Mobile MetroPCS merger confirmation allows final close by month&#039;s end</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/t-mobile-metropcs-merger-confirmation-allows-final-close-by-months-end-24279211/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/t-mobile-metropcs-merger-confirmation-allows-final-close-by-months-end-24279211/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metropcs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=279211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... the newly-formed company Timotheus Höttges mention <b>Apple</b> and/or specific devices they're ... powerful sales model and top devices like the <b>Apple</b> iPhone 5 and the <b>Samsung</b> Galaxy S4." -... into the Deutche Telekom Group.

The <b>legal</b> name of the company, and the ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/t-mobile-metropcs-merger-confirmation-allows-final-close-by-months-end-24279211/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple gets greenlight for Siri patent lawsuit against Samsung</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-gets-greenlight-for-siri-patent-lawsuit-against-samsung-08273155/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-gets-greenlight-for-siri-patent-lawsuit-against-samsung-08273155/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 04:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brittany Hillen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=273155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... familiar name to those who have been keeping up on the <b>Apple</b>/<b>Samsung</b> patent war, has just ruled...both the number of expert witnesses and <b>legal</b> claims involved in the ...new trial over the damages, something <b>Apple</b> has already appealed.

[timeline]
[via ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-gets-greenlight-for-siri-patent-lawsuit-against-samsung-08273155/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung hires ex-Judge who demanded public Apple shaming</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-hires-ex-judge-who-demanded-public-apple-shaming-28271886/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-hires-ex-judge-who-demanded-public-apple-shaming-28271886/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 13:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=271886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...judge that ruled in its favor against <b>Apple</b> and forced the Cupertino firm to ... industry observers are questioning whether <b>Samsung</b>'s perfectly <b>legal</b> decision to retain the ...- and the court - took issue with <b>Apple</b>'s initial phrasing, which included references ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-hires-ex-judge-who-demanded-public-apple-shaming-28271886/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge cuts Apple&#039;s award down to $600m in Samsung trial</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/judge-cuts-apples-award-down-to-600m-in-samsung-trial-01272078/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/judge-cuts-apples-award-down-to-600m-in-samsung-trial-01272078/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 21:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Lloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent suit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=272078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... for the products affected by the "impermissible <b>legal</b> theory" of the judgment, which include ..., and Transform.

However, Koh believes that <b>Apple</b> may be affected with damages for .... While we thought that the <b>Apple</b> vs. <b>Samsung</b> court battle might have been ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/judge-cuts-apples-award-down-to-600m-in-samsung-trial-01272078/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple claims Samsung damages verdict is off by $85 million</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-claims-samsung-damages-verdict-is-off-by-85-million-27275559/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-claims-samsung-damages-verdict-is-off-by-85-million-27275559/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 20:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Lloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=275559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... involved in a <b>legal</b> cat fight. Back in August, <b>Samsung</b> was given a... they would have to pay to <b>Apple</b>. That figure has since been ...'s off by $85 million because <b>Apple</b> claims she overlooked two more ...AT&#038;T and the Infuse 4G.

<b>Apple</b> says that these two devices ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-claims-samsung-damages-verdict-is-off-by-85-million-27275559/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple reportedly boots Samsung from chip development</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-reportedly-boots-samsung-from-chip-development-10277258/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-reportedly-boots-samsung-from-chip-development-10277258/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 13:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Lloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chipset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=277258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... for a while now that <b>Apple</b>'s been planning on moving ....





According to the Korea Times, <b>Apple</b> will launch its A7 processor .... The discontinuation of <b>Samsung</b>'s services by <b>Apple</b> is said to ... involved in a series of <b>legal</b> cat fights with one another ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-reportedly-boots-samsung-from-chip-development-10277258/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung denies any involvement in UK judge recruitment</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-denies-any-involvement-in-uk-judge-recruitment-28271941/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-denies-any-involvement-in-uk-judge-recruitment-28271941/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 19:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Lloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=271941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... the UK judge that forced <b>Apple</b> to publicly apologize over patent... Jacob is not a <b>legal</b> representative of <b>Samsung</b> Electronics," but he... Jacob is one as far as the battle between <b>Apple</b> and... few feathers from competitors, including <b>Apple</b>. However, we'll have to...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-denies-any-involvement-in-uk-judge-recruitment-28271941/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple&#039;s stock drops to a new low</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apples-stock-drops-to-a-new-low-02272205/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/apples-stock-drops-to-a-new-low-02272205/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 18:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Sin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=272205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... were a bit upset when <b>Apple</b>'s stocks dropped all the.... They voiced their opinions at <b>Apple</b>'s annual shareholders meeting and... year-over-year, and unless <b>Apple</b> introduces something new and exciting... 14 of <b>Samsung</b>'s devices due to an impermissible <b>legal</b> theory...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/apples-stock-drops-to-a-new-low-02272205/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Samsung jury speed doubts raised after &quot;punishment&quot; ruling</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-samsung-jury-speed-doubts-raised-after-punishment-ruling-26243946/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-samsung-jury-speed-doubts-raised-after-punishment-ruling-26243946/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 22:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=243946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... obvious discrepancies in calculating damages - where <b>Samsung</b> had been charged for infringing with... the initial decision was revealed, with <b>Samsung</b> spotting - among other things - that ... measured view of <b>Apple</b>'s <b>legal</b> case, of course.

<b>Samsung</b> has already ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-samsung-jury-speed-doubts-raised-after-punishment-ruling-26243946/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung demands Apple legal team be disqualified over insider knowledge fears</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-demands-apple-legal-team-be-disqualified-over-insider-knowledge-fears-12164459/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-demands-apple-legal-team-be-disqualified-over-insider-knowledge-fears-12164459/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 11:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must Read Bits & Bytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=164459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... could well use in shaping <b>Apple</b>'s <b>legal</b> case.





While the Bridges &#038; ... since included in its countersuit against <b>Apple</b>.
"<b>Samsung</b> is confronted with the ... non-discriminatory term ('FRAND') arguments, analyzing <b>Samsung</b>'s patent portfolio relating to ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-demands-apple-legal-team-be-disqualified-over-insider-knowledge-fears-12164459/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
