<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SlashGear &#187; Search Results  &#187;  Quadrant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/search/Quadrant/feed/rss2/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 12:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Xbox One vs Xbox 360: What&#039;s Changed?</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/xbox-one-vs-xbox-360-whats-changed-21283010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/xbox-one-vs-xbox-360-whats-changed-21283010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 19:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloud Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Game Console]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xbox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xbox 360]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xbox 720]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xbox One]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=283010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... offered in matte or gloss black. The most noticeable illumination is the the "ring of light" on the front, with four lit <b>quadrants</b> that show processing or error status. 



Above: Xbox 360 in Black and White. Below: Xbox One.



The new Xbox One ...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; offered in matte or gloss black. The most noticeable illumination is the the &#8220;ring of light&#8221; on the front, with four lit <b>quadrants</b> that show processing or error status. </p>
<p>Above: Xbox 360 in Black and White. Below: Xbox One.</p>
<p>The new Xbox One &#8230;</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/xbox-one-vs-xbox-360-whats-changed-21283010/" title="Xbox One vs Xbox 360: What's Changed?">Xbox One vs Xbox 360: What's Changed?</a> is written by <a href="http://twitter.com/c_davies" >Chris Davies</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/xbox-one-vs-xbox-360-whats-changed-21283010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pantech Perception Review</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/pantech-perception-review-01280141/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/pantech-perception-review-01280141/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 19:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SlashGear Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4G LTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gesture control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pantech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phone Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=280141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... generations of devices and in others failing miserably. While this device appears to win over a device like the HTC One X in <b>Quadrant</b> with overall score, a significant amount of this comes from memory and I/O while basic CPU power lacks in a large way. ...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; generations of devices and in others failing miserably. While this device appears to win over a device like the HTC One X in <b>Quadrant</b> with overall score, a significant amount of this comes from memory and I/O while basic CPU power lacks in a large way. &#8230;</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/pantech-perception-review-01280141/" title="Pantech Perception Review">Pantech Perception Review</a> is written by <a href="" >Chris Burns</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/pantech-perception-review-01280141/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kyocera Torque Review</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/kyocera-torque-review-13273727/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/kyocera-torque-review-13273727/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 20:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Lloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SlashGear Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor Choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyocera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phone Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rugged]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=273727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...Battery Life
We ran the Torque through our go-to benchmarking apps, <b>Quadrant</b> and AnTuTu, and the results were a bit better than we ... just lagging behind a bit from the ASUS Transformer Prime. In <b>Quadrant</b>, the Torque scored just under a 4,200, which puts it...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;Battery Life<br />
We ran the Torque through our go-to benchmarking apps, <b>Quadrant</b> and AnTuTu, and the results were a bit better than we &#8230; just lagging behind a bit from the ASUS Transformer Prime. In <b>Quadrant</b>, the Torque scored just under a 4,200, which puts it&#8230;</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/kyocera-torque-review-13273727/" title="Kyocera Torque Review">Kyocera Torque Review</a> is written by <a href="" >Craig Lloyd</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/kyocera-torque-review-13273727/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung Galaxy S 4 Review</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-galaxy-s-4-review-23278981/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-galaxy-s-4-review-23278981/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 04:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Nguyen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must Read Bits & Bytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SlashGear Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phone Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung GALAXY S 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=278981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... 



Happily, whether you're running Samsung's apps or third-party software, we've got no complaints as to how fast they run. In <b>Quadrant</b>, the GALAXY S 4 scored 12,593 overall - just slightly ahead of the HTC One - while in Linpack for Android it also ...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; </p>
<p>Happily, whether you&#8217;re running Samsung&#8217;s apps or third-party software, we&#8217;ve got no complaints as to how fast they run. In <b>Quadrant</b>, the GALAXY S 4 scored 12,593 overall &#8211; just slightly ahead of the HTC One &#8211; while in Linpack for Android it also &#8230;</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-galaxy-s-4-review-23278981/" title="Samsung Galaxy S 4 Review">Samsung Galaxy S 4 Review</a> is written by <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" >Vincent Nguyen</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-galaxy-s-4-review-23278981/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Home vs Homeless: should you go blue for Android?</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/facebook-home-vs-homeless-should-you-go-blue-for-android-12277663/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/facebook-home-vs-homeless-should-you-go-blue-for-android-12277663/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 21:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must Read Bits & Bytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hands On]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung Galaxy S III]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=277663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... Home and let us know what you think!



BONUS: What you're seeing above is the Samsung Galaxy S III running the <b>Quadrant</b> benchmark test with Facebook Home running, then without Facebook Home installed at all. The differences can be seen two ways - ...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; Home and let us know what you think!</p>
<p>BONUS: What you&#8217;re seeing above is the Samsung Galaxy S III running the <b>Quadrant</b> benchmark test with Facebook Home running, then without Facebook Home installed at all. The differences can be seen two ways &#8211; &#8230;</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/facebook-home-vs-homeless-should-you-go-blue-for-android-12277663/" title="Facebook Home vs Homeless: should you go blue for Android?">Facebook Home vs Homeless: should you go blue for Android?</a> is written by <a href="" >Chris Burns</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/facebook-home-vs-homeless-should-you-go-blue-for-android-12277663/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HTC First Review</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-first-review-09277062/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-first-review-09277062/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 01:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Nguyen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SlashGear Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTC first]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phone Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=277062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... course, not everything happens in Home, and so we put the First through the usual benchmarking trials to see how it held up. In <b>Quadrant</b>, it scored 6,346, putting it comfortably ahead of last year's One X, while a SunSpider browser test score of 1,567.8ms...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; course, not everything happens in Home, and so we put the First through the usual benchmarking trials to see how it held up. In <b>Quadrant</b>, it scored 6,346, putting it comfortably ahead of last year&#8217;s One X, while a SunSpider browser test score of 1,567.8ms&#8230;</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/htc-first-review-09277062/" title="HTC First Review">HTC First Review</a> is written by <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" >Vincent Nguyen</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-first-review-09277062/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HTC One Review [2013]</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-one-review-2013-13273560/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-one-review-2013-13273560/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Nguyen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must Read Bits & Bytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SlashGear Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor Choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[htc blinkfeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[htc one]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTC Sense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phone Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=273560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... can't complain about the One's overall performance, the Snapdragon 600 putting in a convincing show both in everyday use and in benchmarks. In <b>Quadrant</b>, the HTC scored 12,127, a huge step up from the 7,400 of the One X+, while in AnTuTu it managed 24,283,...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; can&#8217;t complain about the One&#8217;s overall performance, the Snapdragon 600 putting in a convincing show both in everyday use and in benchmarks. In <b>Quadrant</b>, the HTC scored 12,127, a huge step up from the 7,400 of the One X+, while in AnTuTu it managed 24,283,&#8230;</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/htc-one-review-2013-13273560/" title="HTC One Review [2013]">HTC One Review [2013]</a> is written by <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" >Vincent Nguyen</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-one-review-2013-13273560/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 benchmarked: Tiny tablet packs a punch</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-galaxy-note-8-0-benchmarked-tiny-tablet-packs-a-punch-26271574/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-galaxy-note-8-0-benchmarked-tiny-tablet-packs-a-punch-26271574/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hands On]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MWC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MWC 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=271574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... of RAM, and so we had high hopes for Android 4.1.2 Jelly Bean. Sure enough, the iPad mini rival put in a decent showing.





In <b>Quadrant</b>, the Galaxy Note 8.0 scored 6,848 overall, with a CPU score of 14,608, memory score of 5,386, I/O of 11,035, ...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; of RAM, and so we had high hopes for Android 4.1.2 Jelly Bean. Sure enough, the iPad mini rival put in a decent showing.</p>
<p>In <b>Quadrant</b>, the Galaxy Note 8.0 scored 6,848 overall, with a CPU score of 14,608, memory score of 5,386, I/O of 11,035, &#8230;</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-galaxy-note-8-0-benchmarked-tiny-tablet-packs-a-punch-26271574/" title="Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 benchmarked: Tiny tablet packs a punch">Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 benchmarked: Tiny tablet packs a punch</a> is written by <a href="http://twitter.com/c_davies" >Chris Davies</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-galaxy-note-8-0-benchmarked-tiny-tablet-packs-a-punch-26271574/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Glass Part 2 will have dual-eye displays</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-glass-part-2-will-have-dual-eye-displays-24271177/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/google-glass-part-2-will-have-dual-eye-displays-24271177/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 23:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Sin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glasses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project Glass]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=271177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... be alterations to the frames 105A &#038; 105B themselves in order to make them more rigid. Google has also implemented a <b>quadrant</b> photo-detector that will measure any misalignment between the right and left displays of the HMD.

Google Glass has definitely ...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; be alterations to the frames 105A &#038; 105B themselves in order to make them more rigid. Google has also implemented a <b>quadrant</b> photo-detector that will measure any misalignment between the right and left displays of the HMD.</p>
<p>Google Glass has definitely &#8230;</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/google-glass-part-2-will-have-dual-eye-displays-24271177/" title="Google Glass Part 2 will have dual-eye displays">Google Glass Part 2 will have dual-eye displays</a> is written by <a href="" >Brian Sin</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/google-glass-part-2-will-have-dual-eye-displays-24271177/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HTC Sensation Benchmarks with SunSpider and Quadrant</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-sensation-benchmarks-with-sunspider-and-quadrant-12145810/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-sensation-benchmarks-with-sunspider-and-quadrant-12145810/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 15:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTC Sensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTC Sense]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=145810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... browsing capabilities of the unit.





What the <b>Quadrant</b> benchmarking system does is test the ... up a device, we've basically got <b>Quadrant</b> downloading before we open much of ...ve done, search for either SunSpider or <b>Quadrant</b> in your search box to your ...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; browsing capabilities of the unit.</p>
<p>What the <b>Quadrant</b> benchmarking system does is test the &#8230; up a device, we&#8217;ve basically got <b>Quadrant</b> downloading before we open much of &#8230;ve done, search for either SunSpider or <b>Quadrant</b> in your search box to your &#8230;</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/htc-sensation-benchmarks-with-sunspider-and-quadrant-12145810/" title="HTC Sensation Benchmarks with SunSpider and <u>Quadrant</u>">HTC Sensation Benchmarks with SunSpider and <u>Quadrant</u></a> is written by <a href="" >Chris Burns</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-sensation-benchmarks-with-sunspider-and-quadrant-12145810/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Benchmarking Part 1</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/qualcomm-snapdragon-s4-benchmarking-part-1-29216187/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/qualcomm-snapdragon-s4-benchmarking-part-1-29216187/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MWC Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MWC 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qualcomm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snapdragon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SoC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=216187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... their magic quite well.

Next we've got <b>Quadrant</b> Benchmarks, both ... as 2D and 3D graphics. <b>Quadrant</b> is one of the few... the hardware its running on. <b>Quadrant</b> Professional is similar, made instead... the MDP, one time running on <b>Quadrant</b> Advanced, the other on...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; their magic quite well.</p>
<p>Next we&#8217;ve got <b>Quadrant</b> Benchmarks, both &#8230; as 2D and 3D graphics. <b>Quadrant</b> is one of the few&#8230; the hardware its running on. <b>Quadrant</b> Professional is similar, made instead&#8230; the MDP, one time running on <b>Quadrant</b> Advanced, the other on&#8230;</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/qualcomm-snapdragon-s4-benchmarking-part-1-29216187/" title="Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Benchmarking Part 1">Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Benchmarking Part 1</a> is written by <a href="" >Chris Burns</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/qualcomm-snapdragon-s4-benchmarking-part-1-29216187/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HTC One X+ benchmarked vs Jelly Bean Galaxy S III: Fight!</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-one-x-benchmarked-vs-jelly-bean-galaxy-s-iii-fight-24253882/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-one-x-benchmarked-vs-jelly-bean-galaxy-s-iii-fight-24253882/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 22:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hands On]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTC One X Plus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jelly Bean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung Galaxy S III]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=253882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...Android users are familiar with. First up, <b>Quadrant</b> Standard, which tests CPU, I/O,..., RAM, and I/O performance.

In <b>Quadrant</b>, the One X+ pulled ahead with ...boundary with a score of 914.7ms.

<b>Quadrant</b> and SunSpider benchmarks:

[gallery include="253885,...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;Android users are familiar with. First up, <b>Quadrant</b> Standard, which tests CPU, I/O,&#8230;, RAM, and I/O performance.</p>
<p>In <b>Quadrant</b>, the One X+ pulled ahead with &#8230;boundary with a score of 914.7ms.</p>
<p><b>Quadrant</b> and SunSpider benchmarks:</p>
<p>[gallery include=&#8221;253885,&#8230;</p>
<small><br />
<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/htc-one-x-benchmarked-vs-jelly-bean-galaxy-s-iii-fight-24253882/" title="HTC One X+ benchmarked vs Jelly Bean Galaxy S III: Fight!">HTC One X+ benchmarked vs Jelly Bean Galaxy S III: Fight!</a> is written by <a href="http://twitter.com/c_davies" >Chris Davies</a> & originally posted on <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. <br />© 2005 - 2012, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com" title="SlashGear">SlashGear</a>. All right reserved. </small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-one-x-benchmarked-vs-jelly-bean-galaxy-s-iii-fight-24253882/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
