<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Samsung signs Microsoft patent licensing deal over Android</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-signs-microsoft-patent-licensing-deal-over-android-28183578/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-signs-microsoft-patent-licensing-deal-over-android-28183578/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 04:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-signs-microsoft-patent-licensing-deal-over-android-28183578/#comment-171042</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=183578#comment-171042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I may challenge that getting email from an email server even a special Microsoft one is patentable since the server does handle POP and IMAP email protocols... Outlook Web Services (OWS) may be different.

If that is true, why can&#039;t they remove the feature as a standard component and simply make it an add-on Android Market OWS app/plugin?  Maybe only sell the IMAP email component as a standard feature of the Android OS Email Client.  I&#039;ll happily abandon using it if Microsoft wants to play that game.  Most people don&#039;t even use Microsoft Exchange for email.  It&#039;s for business users only.  
Consequences of that are the consumer market potentially gets fractured between business users and non-business users.  That only limits innovation and returns us to an environment we had when RIM blackberry reigned.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I may challenge that getting email from an email server even a special Microsoft one is patentable since the server does handle POP and IMAP email protocols&#8230; Outlook Web Services (OWS) may be different.</p>
<p>If that is true, why can&#8217;t they remove the feature as a standard component and simply make it an add-on Android Market OWS app/plugin?  Maybe only sell the IMAP email component as a standard feature of the Android OS Email Client.  I&#8217;ll happily abandon using it if Microsoft wants to play that game.  Most people don&#8217;t even use Microsoft Exchange for email.  It&#8217;s for business users only.  <br />
Consequences of that are the consumer market potentially gets fractured between business users and non-business users.  That only limits innovation and returns us to an environment we had when RIM blackberry reigned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-signs-microsoft-patent-licensing-deal-over-android-28183578/#comment-140172</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 19:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=183578#comment-140172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Without pattern companies have no incentive to innovate.. why spend billions on innovations when tomorrow someone can just commoditize it and sell that very product $100 dollar cheaper?

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without pattern companies have no incentive to innovate.. why spend billions on innovations when tomorrow someone can just commoditize it and sell that very product $100 dollar cheaper?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-signs-microsoft-patent-licensing-deal-over-android-28183578/#comment-140171</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=183578#comment-140171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So let me make this straight... Microsoft makes money for every Google Android?... bwahahaha... you are a loser Google...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So let me make this straight&#8230; Microsoft makes money for every Google Android?&#8230; bwahahaha&#8230; you are a loser Google&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casey Comisky</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-signs-microsoft-patent-licensing-deal-over-android-28183578/#comment-139110</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey Comisky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=183578#comment-139110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You make the assumption most patents given are legitimate.

That, time and time again, has not been the case. Licensing does not hurt consumers - unless the patents being pursued are something like Syncing to a MS Exchange Server from a mobile device (which, by the way, has been deemed fundamentally different (at least in terms of patents awarded) than syncing to other types of servers from mobile devices).

This is just a shift of perceived benefit away from people making &amp; selling the products (adding value to consumers) to those litigating over the products (adding value to businesses).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make the assumption most patents given are legitimate.</p>
<p>That, time and time again, has not been the case. Licensing does not hurt consumers &#8211; unless the patents being pursued are something like Syncing to a MS Exchange Server from a mobile device (which, by the way, has been deemed fundamentally different (at least in terms of patents awarded) than syncing to other types of servers from mobile devices).</p>
<p>This is just a shift of perceived benefit away from people making &amp; selling the products (adding value to consumers) to those litigating over the products (adding value to businesses).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-signs-microsoft-patent-licensing-deal-over-android-28183578/#comment-139106</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=183578#comment-139106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[google fanbois of the World UNITE to defeat this evil plot!! hold hands and lock loins to protect google from this evil plot!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>google fanbois of the World UNITE to defeat this evil plot!! hold hands and lock loins to protect google from this evil plot!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adas Weber</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-signs-microsoft-patent-licensing-deal-over-android-28183578/#comment-139086</link>
		<dc:creator>Adas Weber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=183578#comment-139086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Licensing does not punish consumers, nor does it hinder innovation. Think about it...

Since Microsoft generares significant revenue from Android, it&#039;s in Microsoft&#039;s interest for the Android to remain successful.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Licensing does not punish consumers, nor does it hinder innovation. Think about it&#8230;</p>
<p>Since Microsoft generares significant revenue from Android, it&#8217;s in Microsoft&#8217;s interest for the Android to remain successful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spinchange</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-signs-microsoft-patent-licensing-deal-over-android-28183578/#comment-139068</link>
		<dc:creator>spinchange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=183578#comment-139068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since they are effectively getting away with licensing Android, why even bother making Windows phone of their own? The ROI from extortion HAS to be better than spending billions and years trying to make a product no one asked for that still may not even become a market success. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since they are effectively getting away with licensing Android, why even bother making Windows phone of their own? The ROI from extortion HAS to be better than spending billions and years trying to make a product no one asked for that still may not even become a market success. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spinchange</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-signs-microsoft-patent-licensing-deal-over-android-28183578/#comment-139069</link>
		<dc:creator>spinchange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=183578#comment-139069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since they are effectively getting away with licensing Android, why even bother making Windows phone of their own? The ROI from extortion HAS to be better than spending billions and years trying to make a product no one asked for that still may not even become a market success. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since they are effectively getting away with licensing Android, why even bother making Windows phone of their own? The ROI from extortion HAS to be better than spending billions and years trying to make a product no one asked for that still may not even become a market success. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spinchange</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-signs-microsoft-patent-licensing-deal-over-android-28183578/#comment-139070</link>
		<dc:creator>spinchange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=183578#comment-139070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since they are effectively getting away with licensing Android, why even bother making Windows phone of their own? The ROI from extortion HAS to be better than spending billions and years trying to make a product no one asked for that still may not even become a market success. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since they are effectively getting away with licensing Android, why even bother making Windows phone of their own? The ROI from extortion HAS to be better than spending billions and years trying to make a product no one asked for that still may not even become a market success. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian Manoftheyear</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-signs-microsoft-patent-licensing-deal-over-android-28183578/#comment-139056</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Manoftheyear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 13:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=183578#comment-139056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Time for patent law reform?    Patents  are mere weapons for marketing via legal harassment.  How big would these patent portfolios be if we weeded out all the trivialities and prior art?  Ultimately, it punishes US consumers hindering innovation.  How can these mafia style cross-licencing agreements escape ant-trust legislation?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time for patent law reform?    Patents  are mere weapons for marketing via legal harassment.  How big would these patent portfolios be if we weeded out all the trivialities and prior art?  Ultimately, it punishes US consumers hindering innovation.  How can these mafia style cross-licencing agreements escape ant-trust legislation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian Manoftheyear</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-signs-microsoft-patent-licensing-deal-over-android-28183578/#comment-139057</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Manoftheyear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 13:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=183578#comment-139057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Time for patent law reform?    Patents  are mere weapons for marketing via legal harassment.  How big would these patent portfolios be if we weeded out all the trivialities and prior art?  Ultimately, it punishes US consumers hindering innovation.  How can these mafia style cross-licencing agreements escape ant-trust legislation?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time for patent law reform?    Patents  are mere weapons for marketing via legal harassment.  How big would these patent portfolios be if we weeded out all the trivialities and prior art?  Ultimately, it punishes US consumers hindering innovation.  How can these mafia style cross-licencing agreements escape ant-trust legislation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian Manoftheyear</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-signs-microsoft-patent-licensing-deal-over-android-28183578/#comment-139058</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Manoftheyear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 13:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=183578#comment-139058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Time for patent law reform?    Patents  are mere weapons for marketing via legal harassment.  How big would these patent portfolios be if we weeded out all the trivialities and prior art?  Ultimately, it punishes US consumers hindering innovation.  How can these mafia style cross-licencing agreements escape ant-trust legislation?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time for patent law reform?    Patents  are mere weapons for marketing via legal harassment.  How big would these patent portfolios be if we weeded out all the trivialities and prior art?  Ultimately, it punishes US consumers hindering innovation.  How can these mafia style cross-licencing agreements escape ant-trust legislation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austria</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-signs-microsoft-patent-licensing-deal-over-android-28183578/#comment-139059</link>
		<dc:creator>Austria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 13:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=183578#comment-139059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sync with MS Exchanges server. Apple worked with MS to license it. Google just implemented it new and added it to Android. Did not make MS happy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sync with MS Exchanges server. Apple worked with MS to license it. Google just implemented it new and added it to Android. Did not make MS happy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austria</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-signs-microsoft-patent-licensing-deal-over-android-28183578/#comment-139060</link>
		<dc:creator>Austria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 13:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=183578#comment-139060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sync with MS Exchanges server. Apple worked with MS to license it. Google just implemented it new and added it to Android. Did not make MS happy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sync with MS Exchanges server. Apple worked with MS to license it. Google just implemented it new and added it to Android. Did not make MS happy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austria</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-signs-microsoft-patent-licensing-deal-over-android-28183578/#comment-139061</link>
		<dc:creator>Austria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 13:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=183578#comment-139061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sync with MS Exchanges server. Apple worked with MS to license it. Google just implemented it new and added it to Android. Did not make MS happy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sync with MS Exchanges server. Apple worked with MS to license it. Google just implemented it new and added it to Android. Did not make MS happy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Strain</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-signs-microsoft-patent-licensing-deal-over-android-28183578/#comment-139047</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Strain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 13:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=183578#comment-139047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What are the infringements in question with these deals? I&#039;ve never found a clear answer on what MS is holding over their heads. They say the entire Android platform infringes, same thing they claim about Linux - but...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are the infringements in question with these deals? I&#8217;ve never found a clear answer on what MS is holding over their heads. They say the entire Android platform infringes, same thing they claim about Linux &#8211; but&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Strain</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-signs-microsoft-patent-licensing-deal-over-android-28183578/#comment-139048</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Strain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 13:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=183578#comment-139048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What are the infringements in question with these deals? I&#039;ve never found a clear answer on what MS is holding over their heads. They say the entire Android platform infringes, same thing they claim about Linux - but...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are the infringements in question with these deals? I&#8217;ve never found a clear answer on what MS is holding over their heads. They say the entire Android platform infringes, same thing they claim about Linux &#8211; but&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Strain</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-signs-microsoft-patent-licensing-deal-over-android-28183578/#comment-139049</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Strain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 13:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=183578#comment-139049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What are the infringements in question with these deals? I&#039;ve never found a clear answer on what MS is holding over their heads. They say the entire Android platform infringes, same thing they claim about Linux - but...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are the infringements in question with these deals? I&#8217;ve never found a clear answer on what MS is holding over their heads. They say the entire Android platform infringes, same thing they claim about Linux &#8211; but&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
