<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Samsung Series 5 Chromebook Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-series-5-chromebook-review-23182273/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-series-5-chromebook-review-23182273/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 17:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edna Garrett</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-series-5-chromebook-review-23182273/#comment-192807</link>
		<dc:creator>Edna Garrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 01:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=182273#comment-192807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In all the reviews I&#039;ve seen, there&#039;s usually some reference to a netbook, a tablet, or even a smartphone being better. I get the drawbacks, but what I see is a 12 INCH SCREEN that I don&#039;t need a bloated OS for. I don&#039;t want Windows. I don&#039;t want to pay for a Mac. I want a keyboard that I don&#039;t have to carry around with me to dock it. I don&#039;t want to surf the web on 4 inches or 7 inches of 8 inches. 

It seems like the biggest drawback is that processor. Stick a better one in there, and give me a Chromebook.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In all the reviews I&#8217;ve seen, there&#8217;s usually some reference to a netbook, a tablet, or even a smartphone being better. I get the drawbacks, but what I see is a 12 INCH SCREEN that I don&#8217;t need a bloated OS for. I don&#8217;t want Windows. I don&#8217;t want to pay for a Mac. I want a keyboard that I don&#8217;t have to carry around with me to dock it. I don&#8217;t want to surf the web on 4 inches or 7 inches of 8 inches. </p>
<p>It seems like the biggest drawback is that processor. Stick a better one in there, and give me a Chromebook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edna Garrett</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-series-5-chromebook-review-23182273/#comment-192808</link>
		<dc:creator>Edna Garrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 01:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=182273#comment-192808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In all the reviews I&#039;ve seen, there&#039;s usually some reference to a netbook, a tablet, or even a smartphone being better. I get the drawbacks, but what I see is a 12 INCH SCREEN that I don&#039;t need a bloated OS for. I don&#039;t want Windows. I don&#039;t want to pay for a Mac. I want a keyboard that I don&#039;t have to carry around with me to dock it. I don&#039;t want to surf the web on 4 inches or 7 inches of 8 inches. 

It seems like the biggest drawback is that processor. Stick a better one in there, and give me a Chromebook.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In all the reviews I&#8217;ve seen, there&#8217;s usually some reference to a netbook, a tablet, or even a smartphone being better. I get the drawbacks, but what I see is a 12 INCH SCREEN that I don&#8217;t need a bloated OS for. I don&#8217;t want Windows. I don&#8217;t want to pay for a Mac. I want a keyboard that I don&#8217;t have to carry around with me to dock it. I don&#8217;t want to surf the web on 4 inches or 7 inches of 8 inches. </p>
<p>It seems like the biggest drawback is that processor. Stick a better one in there, and give me a Chromebook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anprathore</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-series-5-chromebook-review-23182273/#comment-189182</link>
		<dc:creator>Anprathore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 08:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=182273#comment-189182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[sir i want to know about chromebook&#039;s ram, harddisk and is there a cd driver]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sir i want to know about chromebook&#8217;s ram, harddisk and is there a cd driver</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anprathore</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-series-5-chromebook-review-23182273/#comment-189183</link>
		<dc:creator>Anprathore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 08:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=182273#comment-189183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[sir i want to know about chromebook&#039;s ram, harddisk and is there a cd driver]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sir i want to know about chromebook&#8217;s ram, harddisk and is there a cd driver</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anup rathore</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-series-5-chromebook-review-23182273/#comment-189180</link>
		<dc:creator>Anup rathore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 08:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=182273#comment-189180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[sir i want to know about its ram and hard disk and also is taere is cd driver anoop]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sir i want to know about its ram and hard disk and also is taere is cd driver anoop</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anup rathore</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-series-5-chromebook-review-23182273/#comment-189181</link>
		<dc:creator>Anup rathore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 08:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=182273#comment-189181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[sir i want to know about its ram and hard disk and also is taere is cd driver anoop]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sir i want to know about its ram and hard disk and also is taere is cd driver anoop</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-series-5-chromebook-review-23182273/#comment-185418</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 22:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=182273#comment-185418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe that this is an excellent alternative to iPad without the big bucks associated with it.  I use an iPad, a laptop, and a full horsepower desktop.  Chromebook would not fit in the mix.  Had I had to dump the iPad, then Chromebook would make sense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that this is an excellent alternative to iPad without the big bucks associated with it.  I use an iPad, a laptop, and a full horsepower desktop.  Chromebook would not fit in the mix.  Had I had to dump the iPad, then Chromebook would make sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Postoronka</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-series-5-chromebook-review-23182273/#comment-183350</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Postoronka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=182273#comment-183350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[turtles]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>turtles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nope</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-series-5-chromebook-review-23182273/#comment-159846</link>
		<dc:creator>Nope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 17:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=182273#comment-159846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This thing is nothing but a cute toy at the moment. There&#039;s potential, but I spent less on my Gateway, it&#039;s got much more memory and processing power, and it doesn&#039;t look like a cheap macbook imitation. I love google, but this thing is a joke.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This thing is nothing but a cute toy at the moment. There&#8217;s potential, but I spent less on my Gateway, it&#8217;s got much more memory and processing power, and it doesn&#8217;t look like a cheap macbook imitation. I love google, but this thing is a joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tudorache Vlad</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-series-5-chromebook-review-23182273/#comment-155550</link>
		<dc:creator>Tudorache Vlad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 20:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=182273#comment-155550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are two real problems with the Chromebooks: the off-line (non)functionality and the speed for certain apps. Both could be resolved by using a very simple approach: allowing native applications, managed by or within Chrome tabs, verified by Google before reaching the WebStore. The management within tabs means independent process(es), while the native code means speed. I guess...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are two real problems with the Chromebooks: the off-line (non)functionality and the speed for certain apps. Both could be resolved by using a very simple approach: allowing native applications, managed by or within Chrome tabs, verified by Google before reaching the WebStore. The management within tabs means independent process(es), while the native code means speed. I guess&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Sites designers</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-series-5-chromebook-review-23182273/#comment-150862</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Sites designers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 22:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=182273#comment-150862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Its a best option to use Google Chorme book specially for Google Apps users. It works perfectly. As I am also a big fan of Google Sites (a core tool of Google Apps) and have designed many website in Google Sites. I was really looking and with full hoped that Chrome Book will offer a function or support for Sites as it is giving options and application to with with Docs, Mail etc. 

Wish to see Chrome Book with full support of Google Sites. Love to work on it. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its a best option to use Google Chorme book specially for Google Apps users. It works perfectly. As I am also a big fan of Google Sites (a core tool of Google Apps) and have designed many website in Google Sites. I was really looking and with full hoped that Chrome Book will offer a function or support for Sites as it is giving options and application to with with Docs, Mail etc. </p>
<p>Wish to see Chrome Book with full support of Google Sites. Love to work on it. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mihai Maceda</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-series-5-chromebook-review-23182273/#comment-150554</link>
		<dc:creator>Mihai Maceda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 02:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=182273#comment-150554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google&#039;s website interface is ugly. I get the need for a no nonsense, no frills business mode but seriously? It looks worse than excel 2003 and I have enough of that at work. In fairness to Facebook, it is rather plain but rather nicer to look at. Now with a chromebook I would be forced to look at the horrible Google interface every single time because this thing doesn&#039;t run anything else. No thanks! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google&#8217;s website interface is ugly. I get the need for a no nonsense, no frills business mode but seriously? It looks worse than excel 2003 and I have enough of that at work. In fairness to Facebook, it is rather plain but rather nicer to look at. Now with a chromebook I would be forced to look at the horrible Google interface every single time because this thing doesn&#8217;t run anything else. No thanks! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Elsdon</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-series-5-chromebook-review-23182273/#comment-142972</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Elsdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 13:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=182273#comment-142972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I dont understand the need to have it so big, why dont they go the Kindle Fire route, Google cloud on a dinky pad, push it out at 199 USD and voila the peoples pad, instead of the insanely priced Apple equivalent.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont understand the need to have it so big, why dont they go the Kindle Fire route, Google cloud on a dinky pad, push it out at 199 USD and voila the peoples pad, instead of the insanely priced Apple equivalent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Sandoval</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-series-5-chromebook-review-23182273/#comment-142908</link>
		<dc:creator>John Sandoval</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 00:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=182273#comment-142908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I purchased my SS5 3G Chromebook about a month ago, and I mostly agree with your unbiased and balanced review of the product. The key thing to keep in mind is that the Chromebook isn&#039;t for everyone, but I think many who are resistant to the idea would find they could live with a Chromebook with a very small adjustment to the way they use their computers. It&#039;s not super-fast, but quicker than most netbooks. You can&#039;t put Microsoft Office on it, but that means you don&#039;t have to buy Office either. You can&#039;t play &quot;serious&quot; computer games on it, but you can use it to buy a PS3 or Xbox online and play games on that. You can&#039;t install iTunes on it, but you can stream your music via Google Music Beta or listen to music online on Pandora.

Chromebooks, like most things in life, are about compromises. If you want all out power and ultra-portability, you spend another $1000 US on a MacBook Air and use it for 4 hours or so before you have to charge it again. If you don&#039;t need local apps, or super-fast processors, or an aluminum enclosure, than you can buy a Chromebook. I&#039;m one of the few that actually feel like my Chromebook is a good value at $499 (I got mine on sale for $450). For that price I got a stylish notebook that has extraordinary battery life, extraordinary boot/wake times, requires zero maintenance, requires no anti-virus software, requires no data backups, that is easy to use and easy to take anywhere with me. It&#039;s not for everyone, but I think if more people could get their hands on one and try it, they would be much more successful.

I also feel that it&#039;s only a matter of time before more people in education and business learn about Chromebooks and how much easier it is to manage them from an IT department standpoint. I think we will see more manufacturers producing Chromebooks in the near future.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I purchased my SS5 3G Chromebook about a month ago, and I mostly agree with your unbiased and balanced review of the product. The key thing to keep in mind is that the Chromebook isn&#8217;t for everyone, but I think many who are resistant to the idea would find they could live with a Chromebook with a very small adjustment to the way they use their computers. It&#8217;s not super-fast, but quicker than most netbooks. You can&#8217;t put Microsoft Office on it, but that means you don&#8217;t have to buy Office either. You can&#8217;t play &#8220;serious&#8221; computer games on it, but you can use it to buy a PS3 or Xbox online and play games on that. You can&#8217;t install iTunes on it, but you can stream your music via Google Music Beta or listen to music online on Pandora.</p>
<p>Chromebooks, like most things in life, are about compromises. If you want all out power and ultra-portability, you spend another $1000 US on a MacBook Air and use it for 4 hours or so before you have to charge it again. If you don&#8217;t need local apps, or super-fast processors, or an aluminum enclosure, than you can buy a Chromebook. I&#8217;m one of the few that actually feel like my Chromebook is a good value at $499 (I got mine on sale for $450). For that price I got a stylish notebook that has extraordinary battery life, extraordinary boot/wake times, requires zero maintenance, requires no anti-virus software, requires no data backups, that is easy to use and easy to take anywhere with me. It&#8217;s not for everyone, but I think if more people could get their hands on one and try it, they would be much more successful.</p>
<p>I also feel that it&#8217;s only a matter of time before more people in education and business learn about Chromebooks and how much easier it is to manage them from an IT department standpoint. I think we will see more manufacturers producing Chromebooks in the near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-series-5-chromebook-review-23182273/#comment-137931</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 13:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=182273#comment-137931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to the author for a thorough, balanced review, and to most of the commenters for civilized and useful observations, lacking the hysteria of many that I have seen from readers of many Chromebook reviews. 

I can offer only two additions: First, unless the UK-spec SS5 differs from those sold in the rest of the world, it comes not with a 8,280 mAh, but with a 6100 mAh battery, which I confirmed from multiple sources. While I would have preferred a design with a user-accessible battery (as in the Cr-48 reference design, and the Acer), user reports suggest that even with the smaller battery, the SS5 provides very good battery life.

Second, as a cheap Cr-48 user who travels a lot, and occasionally has to resort to the 3G network, although I am browsing the full internet, I make use of cut-down mobile versions of many apps (mail, calendar, weather), I don&#039;t consume as many MB than you might expect. As a consequence, these cut-down mobile versions are also far more responsive, since they are pushing fewer bytes around. But, I don&#039;t stream my Google Music library, or watch Youtube videos while on 3G. With a little bit of common sense, I&#039;ve never used up all of the 100 MB monthly quota. Also, the current version of Scratchpad is a quite competent writing tool, on a par with Apple&#039;s Text Edit. 

As solomon_rex observes, a Chromebook makes a good second or third computer, especially if one travels a lot, where its size, weight, and battery life are just about optimal for 2011. Prior to the Cr-48, a 10.1&quot; netbook running Linux was my travelling companion; the Cr-48 beat it out because of its more usable screen and keyboard, as well as the ability to connect almost anywhere. Since I already have a Cr-48, I have little incentive to buy either of the two Chromebooks that are currently available, but with continued development of CrOS functionality, I can imagine buying a second generation Chromebook, when they become available.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to the author for a thorough, balanced review, and to most of the commenters for civilized and useful observations, lacking the hysteria of many that I have seen from readers of many Chromebook reviews. </p>
<p>I can offer only two additions: First, unless the UK-spec SS5 differs from those sold in the rest of the world, it comes not with a 8,280 mAh, but with a 6100 mAh battery, which I confirmed from multiple sources. While I would have preferred a design with a user-accessible battery (as in the Cr-48 reference design, and the Acer), user reports suggest that even with the smaller battery, the SS5 provides very good battery life.</p>
<p>Second, as a cheap Cr-48 user who travels a lot, and occasionally has to resort to the 3G network, although I am browsing the full internet, I make use of cut-down mobile versions of many apps (mail, calendar, weather), I don&#8217;t consume as many MB than you might expect. As a consequence, these cut-down mobile versions are also far more responsive, since they are pushing fewer bytes around. But, I don&#8217;t stream my Google Music library, or watch Youtube videos while on 3G. With a little bit of common sense, I&#8217;ve never used up all of the 100 MB monthly quota. Also, the current version of Scratchpad is a quite competent writing tool, on a par with Apple&#8217;s Text Edit. </p>
<p>As solomon_rex observes, a Chromebook makes a good second or third computer, especially if one travels a lot, where its size, weight, and battery life are just about optimal for 2011. Prior to the Cr-48, a 10.1&#8243; netbook running Linux was my travelling companion; the Cr-48 beat it out because of its more usable screen and keyboard, as well as the ability to connect almost anywhere. Since I already have a Cr-48, I have little incentive to buy either of the two Chromebooks that are currently available, but with continued development of CrOS functionality, I can imagine buying a second generation Chromebook, when they become available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-series-5-chromebook-review-23182273/#comment-137932</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 13:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=182273#comment-137932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to the author for a thorough, balanced review, and to most of the commenters for civilized and useful observations, lacking the hysteria of many that I have seen from readers of many Chromebook reviews. 

I can offer only two additions: First, unless the UK-spec SS5 differs from those sold in the rest of the world, it comes not with a 8,280 mAh, but with a 6100 mAh battery, which I confirmed from multiple sources. While I would have preferred a design with a user-accessible battery (as in the Cr-48 reference design, and the Acer), user reports suggest that even with the smaller battery, the SS5 provides very good battery life.

Second, as a cheap Cr-48 user who travels a lot, and occasionally has to resort to the 3G network, although I am browsing the full internet, I make use of cut-down mobile versions of many apps (mail, calendar, weather), I don&#039;t consume as many MB than you might expect. As a consequence, these cut-down mobile versions are also far more responsive, since they are pushing fewer bytes around. But, I don&#039;t stream my Google Music library, or watch Youtube videos while on 3G. With a little bit of common sense, I&#039;ve never used up all of the 100 MB monthly quota. Also, the current version of Scratchpad is a quite competent writing tool, on a par with Apple&#039;s Text Edit. 

As solomon_rex observes, a Chromebook makes a good second or third computer, especially if one travels a lot, where its size, weight, and battery life are just about optimal for 2011. Prior to the Cr-48, a 10.1&quot; netbook running Linux was my travelling companion; the Cr-48 beat it out because of its more usable screen and keyboard, as well as the ability to connect almost anywhere. Since I already have a Cr-48, I have little incentive to buy either of the two Chromebooks that are currently available, but with continued development of CrOS functionality, I can imagine buying a second generation Chromebook, when they become available.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to the author for a thorough, balanced review, and to most of the commenters for civilized and useful observations, lacking the hysteria of many that I have seen from readers of many Chromebook reviews. </p>
<p>I can offer only two additions: First, unless the UK-spec SS5 differs from those sold in the rest of the world, it comes not with a 8,280 mAh, but with a 6100 mAh battery, which I confirmed from multiple sources. While I would have preferred a design with a user-accessible battery (as in the Cr-48 reference design, and the Acer), user reports suggest that even with the smaller battery, the SS5 provides very good battery life.</p>
<p>Second, as a cheap Cr-48 user who travels a lot, and occasionally has to resort to the 3G network, although I am browsing the full internet, I make use of cut-down mobile versions of many apps (mail, calendar, weather), I don&#8217;t consume as many MB than you might expect. As a consequence, these cut-down mobile versions are also far more responsive, since they are pushing fewer bytes around. But, I don&#8217;t stream my Google Music library, or watch Youtube videos while on 3G. With a little bit of common sense, I&#8217;ve never used up all of the 100 MB monthly quota. Also, the current version of Scratchpad is a quite competent writing tool, on a par with Apple&#8217;s Text Edit. </p>
<p>As solomon_rex observes, a Chromebook makes a good second or third computer, especially if one travels a lot, where its size, weight, and battery life are just about optimal for 2011. Prior to the Cr-48, a 10.1&#8243; netbook running Linux was my travelling companion; the Cr-48 beat it out because of its more usable screen and keyboard, as well as the ability to connect almost anywhere. Since I already have a Cr-48, I have little incentive to buy either of the two Chromebooks that are currently available, but with continued development of CrOS functionality, I can imagine buying a second generation Chromebook, when they become available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Davies</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-series-5-chromebook-review-23182273/#comment-137909</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 08:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=182273#comment-137909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wish I could say that was the case - would love some fries right now! Unfortunately the Series 5 is a real fingerprint magnet, even with clean hands, and it&#039;s very tricky to get those prints to wipe off. Even with a microfiber cloth and some vigorous scrubbing!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wish I could say that was the case &#8211; would love some fries right now! Unfortunately the Series 5 is a real fingerprint magnet, even with clean hands, and it&#8217;s very tricky to get those prints to wipe off. Even with a microfiber cloth and some vigorous scrubbing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin 1</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-series-5-chromebook-review-23182273/#comment-137884</link>
		<dc:creator>admin 1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 00:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=182273#comment-137884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is virtually impossible to infect a Chromebook since it doesn&#039;t allow you to install anything on it, and it checks the OS for corruption every time you boot up and re-installs a clean copy if it has been corrupted. So the comment about the keylogger being installed thing is nonsense - that sort of thing happens on Windows not on Chromebooks.

However, there is nothing to stop you (intentionally) installing an malicious extension which sends your passwords out to sites it may not tell you it is sending it to, just like there is nothing to stop you (intentionally) installing a malicious keylogger or rootkit application in Window.  Of course this problem can be avoided if you only install trusted extensions and plug-ins like you only install trusted applications on Windows. The difference is that the unintentional installation of viruses and malware that takes place on Windows won&#039;t happen on a Chromebook.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is virtually impossible to infect a Chromebook since it doesn&#8217;t allow you to install anything on it, and it checks the OS for corruption every time you boot up and re-installs a clean copy if it has been corrupted. So the comment about the keylogger being installed thing is nonsense &#8211; that sort of thing happens on Windows not on Chromebooks.</p>
<p>However, there is nothing to stop you (intentionally) installing an malicious extension which sends your passwords out to sites it may not tell you it is sending it to, just like there is nothing to stop you (intentionally) installing a malicious keylogger or rootkit application in Window.  Of course this problem can be avoided if you only install trusted extensions and plug-ins like you only install trusted applications on Windows. The difference is that the unintentional installation of viruses and malware that takes place on Windows won&#8217;t happen on a Chromebook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-series-5-chromebook-review-23182273/#comment-137870</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 21:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=182273#comment-137870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chrome is very resistant to traditional desktop OS vulnerabilities but it&#039;s not exactly immune to threats either.

Putting everything in the cloud for example makes you more vulnerable to credential theft, which can then give the hackers full access to your account and all the financial and data information you put on it. 

While even without your credentials, the data is only as safe as the server security and that gives hackers a single target they can reach 24/7 and no security is 100% fool proof.  Something to consider with the rise on Internet based attacks lately and how even big name companies are getting hacked. 

Visiting malicious sites can also still infect your system for a variety of different types of attacks.  Like installing a keylogger, etc.  Hard to infect is not the same as impossible.  While previously this usually cleared up after closing and opening the system and it cleared everything but Chrome now supports native apps and that&#039;s a different story.

You&#039;ll also have to watch out for systems used by other people as well, since nothing stops them using hardware hacks and doing something like putting in a physical key logger into the hardware of the system, which could be a potential problem for Chromebooks used at some libraries for example.

On hardware though, we may see better graphical performance thanks to a combination of Native Client for native app like performance and updates to the hardware to either Cedar Trail ATOM or ARM, which in either case will allow support for hardware acceleration.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chrome is very resistant to traditional desktop OS vulnerabilities but it&#8217;s not exactly immune to threats either.</p>
<p>Putting everything in the cloud for example makes you more vulnerable to credential theft, which can then give the hackers full access to your account and all the financial and data information you put on it. </p>
<p>While even without your credentials, the data is only as safe as the server security and that gives hackers a single target they can reach 24/7 and no security is 100% fool proof.  Something to consider with the rise on Internet based attacks lately and how even big name companies are getting hacked. </p>
<p>Visiting malicious sites can also still infect your system for a variety of different types of attacks.  Like installing a keylogger, etc.  Hard to infect is not the same as impossible.  While previously this usually cleared up after closing and opening the system and it cleared everything but Chrome now supports native apps and that&#8217;s a different story.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll also have to watch out for systems used by other people as well, since nothing stops them using hardware hacks and doing something like putting in a physical key logger into the hardware of the system, which could be a potential problem for Chromebooks used at some libraries for example.</p>
<p>On hardware though, we may see better graphical performance thanks to a combination of Native Client for native app like performance and updates to the hardware to either Cedar Trail ATOM or ARM, which in either case will allow support for hardware acceleration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-series-5-chromebook-review-23182273/#comment-137863</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 20:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=182273#comment-137863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ps, is it me or does it look like the reviewer ate a handful of greasy French fries before handling the unit?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ps, is it me or does it look like the reviewer ate a handful of greasy French fries before handling the unit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-series-5-chromebook-review-23182273/#comment-137860</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 20:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=182273#comment-137860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like a black macbook with the big buttonless touchpad and chiclet keyboard.. 

Sounds like a half-baked experience to me... That&#039;s the problem with Google all the way.around... Lack of focus. The old jack of all trades, expert at none saying comes to mind.. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a black macbook with the big buttonless touchpad and chiclet keyboard.. </p>
<p>Sounds like a half-baked experience to me&#8230; That&#8217;s the problem with Google all the way.around&#8230; Lack of focus. The old jack of all trades, expert at none saying comes to mind.. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: solomon_rex</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-series-5-chromebook-review-23182273/#comment-137844</link>
		<dc:creator>solomon_rex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 19:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=182273#comment-137844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got one.  It IS a bit pokey.  I don&#039;t regret it as a 3rd pc.  I was much happier about my purchase after spending the weekend fixing my friend&#039;s Vista PC!  AUGH!  Chromebook is maintenance free, and that&#039;s the top selling point, really.  I only use the web on my living room pc, so this was perfect.

But also, laptops came down in price after these were released.  AMZ has a sale on these, now, too, btw.  I&#039;m thinking about one for my parents, just for security and maintenance free reasons.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got one.  It IS a bit pokey.  I don&#8217;t regret it as a 3rd pc.  I was much happier about my purchase after spending the weekend fixing my friend&#8217;s Vista PC!  AUGH!  Chromebook is maintenance free, and that&#8217;s the top selling point, really.  I only use the web on my living room pc, so this was perfect.</p>
<p>But also, laptops came down in price after these were released.  AMZ has a sale on these, now, too, btw.  I&#8217;m thinking about one for my parents, just for security and maintenance free reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddie Yasi</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-series-5-chromebook-review-23182273/#comment-137841</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie Yasi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=182273#comment-137841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As an owner of a Samsung Chromebook I think you hit the key point snovguy: you really have to ALWAYS be connected for it to be useful.  I have mobile hotspot on my HTC Thunderbolt so am very rarely disconnected.  It&#039;s been a good choice for me, and I&#039;m enjoying it, but someone who needed offline functionality would dislike it. It cold boots faster than some notebooks do their resume, and not being bugged by constant OS (or Adobe Flash!) updates is great.

For me the biggest drawback was the CPU as mentioned in the review: things get choppy too often, and when you live in the browser you tend to leave several tabs open at once, and that to me is the biggest annoyance.  (Although still workable).

One advantage I&#039;m looking forward to: assuming a better Chromebook comes out one day, I can log out of my current one, log in to the new one and pick up  where I left off with no worries about file transfers, app installations etc, and can sell the old one without worrying about getting anything personal off of it first]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an owner of a Samsung Chromebook I think you hit the key point snovguy: you really have to ALWAYS be connected for it to be useful.  I have mobile hotspot on my HTC Thunderbolt so am very rarely disconnected.  It&#8217;s been a good choice for me, and I&#8217;m enjoying it, but someone who needed offline functionality would dislike it. It cold boots faster than some notebooks do their resume, and not being bugged by constant OS (or Adobe Flash!) updates is great.</p>
<p>For me the biggest drawback was the CPU as mentioned in the review: things get choppy too often, and when you live in the browser you tend to leave several tabs open at once, and that to me is the biggest annoyance.  (Although still workable).</p>
<p>One advantage I&#8217;m looking forward to: assuming a better Chromebook comes out one day, I can log out of my current one, log in to the new one and pick up  where I left off with no worries about file transfers, app installations etc, and can sell the old one without worrying about getting anything personal off of it first</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-series-5-chromebook-review-23182273/#comment-137839</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 18:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=182273#comment-137839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Got one for my mom who had an aging and ever slower laptop. She does nothing but email, browse and Facebook. She didn&#039;t miss a beat and is happy with the speed improvement. And hopefully the calls to trouble shoot will decrease.

I don&#039;t think I&#039;m much off the mark when I say that most of my family (who lives in a small town in the midwest) would find it perfect for them. Sure there are still issues, like printing, but my sister bought a printer with her computer because it was $50. Far as I know she&#039;s never used it. One of those things she thought she should have. I doubt any of them do anything but web stuff. With no updates and no virus&#039; and no hard drive to fail I think it has it&#039;s place.

And it should get better no? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got one for my mom who had an aging and ever slower laptop. She does nothing but email, browse and Facebook. She didn&#8217;t miss a beat and is happy with the speed improvement. And hopefully the calls to trouble shoot will decrease.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m much off the mark when I say that most of my family (who lives in a small town in the midwest) would find it perfect for them. Sure there are still issues, like printing, but my sister bought a printer with her computer because it was $50. Far as I know she&#8217;s never used it. One of those things she thought she should have. I doubt any of them do anything but web stuff. With no updates and no virus&#8217; and no hard drive to fail I think it has it&#8217;s place.</p>
<p>And it should get better no? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-series-5-chromebook-review-23182273/#comment-137834</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 17:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=182273#comment-137834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have one of the CR48 and I love it. The battery life is WOW! The released products must be that much better with the daul core.

Chrome OS is &#039;more&#039; secure than a PC with chrome. It has a check sum on boot. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have one of the CR48 and I love it. The battery life is WOW! The released products must be that much better with the daul core.</p>
<p>Chrome OS is &#8216;more&#8217; secure than a PC with chrome. It has a check sum on boot. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SC</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-series-5-chromebook-review-23182273/#comment-137815</link>
		<dc:creator>SC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=182273#comment-137815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This thing is ahead of its time if you ask me (or just destined to become a defunct product.) Unfortunately, much of it DOES rely on the internet and you simply can&#039;t get internet everywhere. Sometimes you&#039;ll just be out of range. I understand it&#039;s built with offline support but it only gets you so far.

At this point, I&#039;d MUCH rather just throw any kind of Linux distro on a different laptop/netbook and have a full fledged system that can do pretty much anything. If you really think Chrome OS is all that great, download Chrome and use nothing but.
I have yet to see anything state how this is at all better than any other PC with Chrome.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This thing is ahead of its time if you ask me (or just destined to become a defunct product.) Unfortunately, much of it DOES rely on the internet and you simply can&#8217;t get internet everywhere. Sometimes you&#8217;ll just be out of range. I understand it&#8217;s built with offline support but it only gets you so far.</p>
<p>At this point, I&#8217;d MUCH rather just throw any kind of Linux distro on a different laptop/netbook and have a full fledged system that can do pretty much anything. If you really think Chrome OS is all that great, download Chrome and use nothing but.<br />
I have yet to see anything state how this is at all better than any other PC with Chrome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-series-5-chromebook-review-23182273/#comment-137813</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 15:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=182273#comment-137813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good balanced review. This is at this stage really only for early adopters or pioneers in the &quot;life in the cloud&quot; ethos.

If you can live with webmail/gmail, salesforce and pandora and ALWAYS have a connection you are good to go. 

Otherwise if you are like most users that use your pc for a variety of tasks like media consumption and games as well as productivity ,a $300 netbook is a better fit.

The instant on and long battery life are a plus though]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good balanced review. This is at this stage really only for early adopters or pioneers in the &#8220;life in the cloud&#8221; ethos.</p>
<p>If you can live with webmail/gmail, salesforce and pandora and ALWAYS have a connection you are good to go. </p>
<p>Otherwise if you are like most users that use your pc for a variety of tasks like media consumption and games as well as productivity ,a $300 netbook is a better fit.</p>
<p>The instant on and long battery life are a plus though</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
