Comments on: Samsung insists Galaxy Tab 10.1 on schedule: No changes over iPad 2

By: xtlclrptyice

xtlclrptyice — Thu, 10 Mar 2011 21:55:00 +0000

“don’t understand why someone at VP post would make such a statement to make their own product inferior.”

Confucianism, perhaps.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 08 Mar 2011 03:29:00 +0000

If the people at the company have no confidence in the product how do you expect the public to have any confidence (keep in mind this product is well over $500).

By: Simon Stewart

Simon Stewart — Mon, 07 Mar 2011 19:24:00 +0000

So basically, what you are saying is that you are easily led and need a CEO of a company to tell you what to buy.

Nice product, but some other company said it was shit, then a translation of what someone said said it was shit, so I’ll say the same.

By: UrElitistF4G

UrElitistF4G — Mon, 07 Mar 2011 19:03:00 +0000

What’s not impressive? The iPad is an iphone with a larger screen and crappier cameras. You are getting significantly more advanced hardware with galaxy or even xoom, which justifies the cost. Get off of Jobs’ nuts. Apple does not support blu-ray or even 16:9 HD screens in their mobile devices.

By: DigitalRed

DigitalRed — Mon, 07 Mar 2011 16:36:00 +0000

I had honestly hoped that they would make their tablet more competitive in light of the iPad 2′s release. It could really use it. Right now it doesn’t seem all that impressive, an impression that isn’t helped by the device’s styling. (And you don’t have to knock your device to go back to the drawing board.)

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 07 Mar 2011 11:42:00 +0000

I really beginning to think that a lot of these “quotes” that have been attributed to Samsung execs lately have either been misquotes or misinterpretations. It’s very interesting given that the Galaxy Tab has been the iPad’s main big name competition up until now and managed to sell a couple million units in the first 90 days…

By: Doris Guzman

Doris Guzman — Mon, 07 Mar 2011 11:20:00 +0000

Samsung needs to work on their PR and marketing team;Seriously.Nice products but marketing sucks.I really don’t understand why someone at VP post would make such a statement to make their own product inferior. All I can say is, learn from Apple. They effectively handled even when their product had (has) major issues (line drop, less features etc)

The only time CEO open his mouth is to praise his own product and demote all other competing products.