Comments on: Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 delayed for quad-core upgrade [UPDATE: Samsung denies]

By: Guest

Guest — Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:09:00 +0000

Will this still be $400?

By: thereasoner

thereasoner — Tue, 17 Apr 2012 21:59:00 +0000

This is only good news if they can produce really good battery life to go along with those extra cores otherwise just keep it dualcore.

By: Martin Lane

Martin Lane — Tue, 17 Apr 2012 21:20:00 +0000

Agreed, the A15 would destroy quad core A9′s but I doubt it will be ready in time.

By: Martin Lane

Martin Lane — Tue, 17 Apr 2012 21:18:00 +0000

I’d be happy with 1920*1200 or simalar, I hope Android manufactures don’t compete with the resolution of the iPad because frankly it’s pointless on a 10″ screen.

By: challenge_accepted

challenge_accepted — Tue, 17 Apr 2012 20:20:00 +0000

I’d rather have a15 dual core than a9 quad. I don’t know why people think just cause its quad core its better.

By: Max

Max — Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:40:00 +0000

If they can get the resolution the same as the latest iPad, they might have something.

By: Matthew Merrick

Matthew Merrick — Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:29:00 +0000

first a delay for ICS, now a delay for quad core? if this is what the delays mean keep em coming!

at this rate, the Gtab 101 2 and gnote 101 may even beat out the Transformer infinity when they both come out :)

By: Jordan Dietrich

Jordan Dietrich — Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:14:00 +0000

When it comes to a tablet, I hate to say it, but I don’t care much about services, apps, or much of anything software related. With Android or iOS, you can get any app solution you could possibly want in their respective markets. It all boils down to the hardware, and a 1Ghz Dual-core just doesn’t cut it. The 10.1″ sounds a little better, now that it’s getting a quad-core, but the price needs to come down some before it will be truly successful.