Comments on: Samsung Galaxy S Advance hits pre-order

By: Jeff

Jeff — Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:40:00 +0000

Oh well, maybe it’s time for other Android makers like Motorola and HTC to get higher market share.

By: Mohamed Tair

Mohamed Tair — Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:15:00 +0000

Thanks for this interesting post about Galaxy S Advance ^^

By: geolemon

geolemon — Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:13:00 +0000

So the Galaxy S Advance model is a step BACKWARDS from the Galaxy SII, yet costs about the same.

My Epic 4G Touch (Sprint’s version of the Galaxy SII) has the Exenyos processor at dual 1.2 (which is good enough to outperform TI’s dual-core 1.5ghz), has a 4.3″ screen, has 1 gig of ram, has 16 gig of onboard storage, and a highly acclaimed 8 megapixel camera…
…and costs $499 off contract.

WTF, Samsung.
Do they think a $30 cheaper price justifies a slower processor, smaller screen, less memory, half the onboard storage, and a far inferior camera? Who would buy that?

By: geolemon

geolemon — Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:13:00 +0000

So the Galaxy S Advance model is a step BACKWARDS from the Galaxy SII, yet costs about the same.

WTF, Samsung.
Do they think a $30 cheaper price justifies a slower processor, smaller screen, less memory, half the onboard storage, and a far inferior camera? Who would buy that?

By: geolemon

geolemon — Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:13:00 +0000

So the Galaxy S Advance model is a step BACKWARDS from the Galaxy SII, yet costs about the same.

WTF, Samsung.
Do they think a $30 cheaper price justifies a slower processor, smaller screen, less memory, half the onboard storage, and a far inferior camera? Who would buy that?

By: sn0wbaLL

sn0wbaLL — Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:57:00 +0000

what a waste

By: sn0wbaLL

sn0wbaLL — Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:57:00 +0000

what a waste

By: sn0wbaLL

sn0wbaLL — Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:57:00 +0000

what a waste