Comments on: Samsung Galaxy Player 5.8 photo and specs leak http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-galaxy-player-5-8-photo-and-specs-leak-20243322/ Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions Sun, 16 Sep 2012 22:29:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: jgm http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-galaxy-player-5-8-photo-and-specs-leak-20243322/#comment-232666 jgm Thu, 23 Aug 2012 01:01:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=243322#comment-232666 And I just bought a Galaxy Player 5 yesterday. :-( But I don’t see why they’d want to make the screen any bigger given it’s stretching pocket size now (5.8″ is practically competing with the Fire & Nexus).

]]> By: Samsung Fanboy http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-galaxy-player-5-8-photo-and-specs-leak-20243322/#comment-232408 Samsung Fanboy Tue, 21 Aug 2012 10:59:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=243322#comment-232408 first off, if you’re gonna troll at least use correct grammar. second, if nobody cared about Samsung products, why do they sell more than twice as many smart phones as apple and over 4 times as many phones overall?

]]> By: siddharthbandhu http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-galaxy-player-5-8-photo-and-specs-leak-20243322/#comment-232275 siddharthbandhu Mon, 20 Aug 2012 17:31:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=243322#comment-232275 5.8 inch?
Damn there goes the new iPhone.

]]> By: n900mixalot http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-galaxy-player-5-8-photo-and-specs-leak-20243322/#comment-232235 n900mixalot Mon, 20 Aug 2012 16:12:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=243322#comment-232235 Yes digitizers are expensive but PLEASE release one with pen capability! Oy vey!

]]> By: Tyler Andrews http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-galaxy-player-5-8-photo-and-specs-leak-20243322/#comment-232226 Tyler Andrews Mon, 20 Aug 2012 15:09:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=243322#comment-232226 5.8 inch qHD? The pixel density is probably abysmal – if it were real.

]]> By: companyemails http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-galaxy-player-5-8-photo-and-specs-leak-20243322/#comment-232214 companyemails Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:57:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=243322#comment-232214 So no word on price? Seeing that the current Galaxy Player costs as much as a Nexus 7, I wonder hoe they are going to price these.

]]> By: jethro_static http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-galaxy-player-5-8-photo-and-specs-leak-20243322/#comment-232213 jethro_static Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:47:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=243322#comment-232213 am I seeing the galaxy note 2 layout as well? 5.8″ for a phablet will be great!

]]> By: digi_owl http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-galaxy-player-5-8-photo-and-specs-leak-20243322/#comment-232211 digi_owl Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:32:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=243322#comment-232211 i’ll wait for the 4″ variant. Oh and make sure to check this for MHL support when a review is done!

]]> By: Me http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-galaxy-player-5-8-photo-and-specs-leak-20243322/#comment-232208 Me Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:24:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=243322#comment-232208 Go back to Starbucks and work your novel with all the other pretentious apple d-bags.

See.. I can generalize too!

]]> By: stoney1973 http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-galaxy-player-5-8-photo-and-specs-leak-20243322/#comment-232207 stoney1973 Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:16:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=243322#comment-232207 Oh look, its a fanboy of some description., Did mommy not give you your meds today?

]]> By: Nick Powers http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-galaxy-player-5-8-photo-and-specs-leak-20243322/#comment-232205 Nick Powers Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:09:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=243322#comment-232205 Fake. Spelling error in the ICS name. “Sandwitch”? Please…

]]> By: John Bopoteyooty http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-galaxy-player-5-8-photo-and-specs-leak-20243322/#comment-232204 John Bopoteyooty Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:03:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=243322#comment-232204 Leaked specs from samsung? Know one cares. Not only will samsung copy everything apple makes, they even try to act like people care about they’re products enought to “leak specs”. LOL

]]>