<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Samsung Electronics weighing in-house OLED display grab</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-electronics-weighing-in-house-oled-display-grab-07212351/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-electronics-weighing-in-house-oled-display-grab-07212351/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 17:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Rosenberg</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-electronics-weighing-in-house-oled-display-grab-07212351/#comment-186859</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Rosenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 08:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=212351#comment-186859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[actually, who the hell cares about oled for mobile phones. AH-IPS is way better than current AMOLED screens. And where do you get that Samsung is the most advanced manufacturer of cell phones? Most advanced? you have got to be kidding me. They sell phones with parts made by other companies. The only part of the actual phone samsung makes is probably the display, memory, and the plastic case. Sure samsung sold the most phones however the Galaxy Nexus is hardly the best smart phone out right now. There are many phones that smoke it in terms of benchmarks/ display/ price/ battery duration. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually, who the hell cares about oled for mobile phones. AH-IPS is way better than current AMOLED screens. And where do you get that Samsung is the most advanced manufacturer of cell phones? Most advanced? you have got to be kidding me. They sell phones with parts made by other companies. The only part of the actual phone samsung makes is probably the display, memory, and the plastic case. Sure samsung sold the most phones however the Galaxy Nexus is hardly the best smart phone out right now. There are many phones that smoke it in terms of benchmarks/ display/ price/ battery duration. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Rosenberg</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-electronics-weighing-in-house-oled-display-grab-07212351/#comment-186415</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Rosenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 08:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=212351#comment-186415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ What I DO know is LG is able to produce 55-inch OLED panels at a much cheaper cost than Samsung. Also the Low Temperature poly silicon backplane Samsung uses is only efficient on amoled displays and very very hard to make @ 55inches. Samsung being the world&#039;s biggest producer of OLED displays? You are seriously misinformed my friend, unless you cater to specify the type of OLED display. For mobile phones yes (since Amoled is considered OLED). Anything else no. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> What I DO know is LG is able to produce 55-inch OLED panels at a much cheaper cost than Samsung. Also the Low Temperature poly silicon backplane Samsung uses is only efficient on amoled displays and very very hard to make @ 55inches. Samsung being the world&#8217;s biggest producer of OLED displays? You are seriously misinformed my friend, unless you cater to specify the type of OLED display. For mobile phones yes (since Amoled is considered OLED). Anything else no. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: companyemails</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-electronics-weighing-in-house-oled-display-grab-07212351/#comment-186212</link>
		<dc:creator>companyemails</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 15:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=212351#comment-186212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vivian, I think you need to research your information a bit.  First the word &quot;retina&quot; as used in the description of apple&#039;s displays is nothing more than a marketing name and has ZERO technical meaning.  &quot;All it is is a reference to super high pixel density within a specific area.  the display itself can be an LED lit LCD (like apple uses), or an organic light-emitting diode of different types.  You can have a &quot;retina&quot; LCD as well as a OLED provided the pixel density is the same.

Now that we&#039;ve understood that, Until very recently Samsung was apple&#039;s principal screen supplier, and continues to provide large numbers of screens to them for their current generation of products.  What has changed is display sources for upcoming products, where apple has dropped Samsung and has sought out other suppliers - most notably japan&#039;s Sharp.  

What is important about OLEDs is that  they are very thin, use very low power and  are very, VERY, tough.  They can also be made to be flexible or permanently curved, as well as have brighter more vivid colors.  However those colores are made using different processes, and making the full range of basic colors necessary to be able to combine on a display to make all other colors has not been easy.  This is especially true as it pertains to the color blue.  Making blue has been expensive and blue LED&#039;s even today are not as long lived as other colors, so there are questions over the overall longevity of LED displays that are not replaced frequently (such as TVs).  Today, Samsung is by far the world&#039;s biggest producer of OLED displays, annd few companies are as far ahead in LED display development as they are.  By apple being excluded from this market this means that other companies can potentially gain access to key display technology prior to apple, thus making their products more attractive to consumers (I know i would want a more vibrant, tougher screen that used less power).  This is especially true of Samsung branded products seeing that Samsung is quite possible the most advanced manufacturer of mobile phones as well.

THAT, is the issue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vivian, I think you need to research your information a bit.  First the word &#8220;retina&#8221; as used in the description of apple&#8217;s displays is nothing more than a marketing name and has ZERO technical meaning.  &#8220;All it is is a reference to super high pixel density within a specific area.  the display itself can be an LED lit LCD (like apple uses), or an organic light-emitting diode of different types.  You can have a &#8220;retina&#8221; LCD as well as a OLED provided the pixel density is the same.</p>
<p>Now that we&#8217;ve understood that, Until very recently Samsung was apple&#8217;s principal screen supplier, and continues to provide large numbers of screens to them for their current generation of products.  What has changed is display sources for upcoming products, where apple has dropped Samsung and has sought out other suppliers &#8211; most notably japan&#8217;s Sharp.  </p>
<p>What is important about OLEDs is that  they are very thin, use very low power and  are very, VERY, tough.  They can also be made to be flexible or permanently curved, as well as have brighter more vivid colors.  However those colores are made using different processes, and making the full range of basic colors necessary to be able to combine on a display to make all other colors has not been easy.  This is especially true as it pertains to the color blue.  Making blue has been expensive and blue LED&#8217;s even today are not as long lived as other colors, so there are questions over the overall longevity of LED displays that are not replaced frequently (such as TVs).  Today, Samsung is by far the world&#8217;s biggest producer of OLED displays, annd few companies are as far ahead in LED display development as they are.  By apple being excluded from this market this means that other companies can potentially gain access to key display technology prior to apple, thus making their products more attractive to consumers (I know i would want a more vibrant, tougher screen that used less power).  This is especially true of Samsung branded products seeing that Samsung is quite possible the most advanced manufacturer of mobile phones as well.</p>
<p>THAT, is the issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vivian Mendez</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-electronics-weighing-in-house-oled-display-grab-07212351/#comment-186130</link>
		<dc:creator>Vivian Mendez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=212351#comment-186130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ No, they can&#039;t cuz all the displays of apple products are not amoled, it&#039;s retina display by LG display. I guess samsung is trying hard to make up for the loss from their LCD department by bringing in oled display and spin off of lcd display division. I have a galaxy s2 with samsung&#039;s super amoled display. The picture quality is ok but i can&#039;t stand the red/green pixels on white background. I&#039;m curious if they fix this issue with their amoled tv to release this year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> No, they can&#8217;t cuz all the displays of apple products are not amoled, it&#8217;s retina display by LG display. I guess samsung is trying hard to make up for the loss from their LCD department by bringing in oled display and spin off of lcd display division. I have a galaxy s2 with samsung&#8217;s super amoled display. The picture quality is ok but i can&#8217;t stand the red/green pixels on white background. I&#8217;m curious if they fix this issue with their amoled tv to release this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: companyemails</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-electronics-weighing-in-house-oled-display-grab-07212351/#comment-181134</link>
		<dc:creator>companyemails</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=212351#comment-181134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The question is then what other alternatives do other OEMs have for super Amoled displays?  If this is a market Samsung dominates, they could effectively hold supply as a cudgel over apple&#039;s head in order to get them to back off.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question is then what other alternatives do other OEMs have for super Amoled displays?  If this is a market Samsung dominates, they could effectively hold supply as a cudgel over apple&#8217;s head in order to get them to back off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: companyemails</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-electronics-weighing-in-house-oled-display-grab-07212351/#comment-181135</link>
		<dc:creator>companyemails</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=212351#comment-181135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The question is then what other alternatives do other OEMs have for super Amoled displays?  If this is a market Samsung dominates, they could effectively hold supply as a cudgel over apple&#039;s head in order to get them to back off.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question is then what other alternatives do other OEMs have for super Amoled displays?  If this is a market Samsung dominates, they could effectively hold supply as a cudgel over apple&#8217;s head in order to get them to back off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
