<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RIM To Consider Splitting Co-CEOs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/rim-to-consider-splitting-co-ceos-30162555/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/rim-to-consider-splitting-co-ceos-30162555/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:19:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maxmz02</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/rim-to-consider-splitting-co-ceos-30162555/#comment-165797</link>
		<dc:creator>Maxmz02</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 18:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=162555#comment-165797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t blame CEO, they want RIM win.
 
RIM has strange culture and self distruct political environment.
 
In RIM if a new hired person figure out major problem and introduce efficient approach, both manager and his buddy group member will proof their wrong approach works. just like someone point out driving a car is right way, pushing a car is wrong way, then both manager and his buddy group member will hate you, and proof that 3 person can also move the car by pushing it. cheating email will be sent to some vice president, saying like: see, the car moving, pushing a car is a natural part of the process, in order to deny new hired contribution of introducing skill of drive a car, they have to deny merit of driving a car.
 
It is very strange company culture and strange company political environment, it promote stealing and cheating skill. RIM’s management may be a typical instance in MBA course.
 
This culture deny or steal hardworking team members’ contribution/innovation, generate strange political environment, destroy RIM.
 
So don&#039;t blame CEO, some of their VPs and VPs&#039; expert generate terrible culture and self destruct political environment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t blame CEO, they want RIM win.<br />
 <br />
RIM has strange culture and self distruct political environment.<br />
 <br />
In RIM if a new hired person figure out major problem and introduce efficient approach, both manager and his buddy group member will proof their wrong approach works. just like someone point out driving a car is right way, pushing a car is wrong way, then both manager and his buddy group member will hate you, and proof that 3 person can also move the car by pushing it. cheating email will be sent to some vice president, saying like: see, the car moving, pushing a car is a natural part of the process, in order to deny new hired contribution of introducing skill of drive a car, they have to deny merit of driving a car.<br />
 <br />
It is very strange company culture and strange company political environment, it promote stealing and cheating skill. RIM’s management may be a typical instance in MBA course.<br />
 <br />
This culture deny or steal hardworking team members’ contribution/innovation, generate strange political environment, destroy RIM.<br />
 <br />
So don&#8217;t blame CEO, some of their VPs and VPs&#8217; expert generate terrible culture and self destruct political environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FirefighterGeek</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/rim-to-consider-splitting-co-ceos-30162555/#comment-120888</link>
		<dc:creator>FirefighterGeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 02:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=162555#comment-120888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pretty much everywhere I&#039;ve seen CxO positions tried as a committee or a partnership with &quot;shared responsibility&quot; it has been a disaster.   At some point, in that position the hard truth is you need someone with the ability to quickly make a decision and execute on it -- and hopefully be willing to change that decision and execute on a new one when the first one doesn&#039;t work.  The position doesn&#039;t lend it self to a deliberative process.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty much everywhere I&#8217;ve seen CxO positions tried as a committee or a partnership with &#8220;shared responsibility&#8221; it has been a disaster.   At some point, in that position the hard truth is you need someone with the ability to quickly make a decision and execute on it &#8212; and hopefully be willing to change that decision and execute on a new one when the first one doesn&#8217;t work.  The position doesn&#8217;t lend it self to a deliberative process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
