<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Retina MacBook Pro benchmarks show minor improvements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/retina-macbook-pro-benchmarks-show-minor-improvements-23270820/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/retina-macbook-pro-benchmarks-show-minor-improvements-23270820/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lionsgate</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/retina-macbook-pro-benchmarks-show-minor-improvements-23270820/#comment-275781</link>
		<dc:creator>Lionsgate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 07:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=270820#comment-275781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well this really apple to blame for small percentage increase but intel part for wanting to put all their effort into their 22nm IB. Hd4000 same will go for their next CPU which will likley be a mere MHz increase with tweak power consumption.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well this really apple to blame for small percentage increase but intel part for wanting to put all their effort into their 22nm IB. Hd4000 same will go for their next CPU which will likley be a mere MHz increase with tweak power consumption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
