<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Qualcomm acquires Pixtronix for future Mirasol display tech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/qualcomm-acquires-pixtronix-for-future-mirasol-display-tech-26210866/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/qualcomm-acquires-pixtronix-for-future-mirasol-display-tech-26210866/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 18:31:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PacoBell</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/qualcomm-acquires-pixtronix-for-future-mirasol-display-tech-26210866/#comment-176918</link>
		<dc:creator>PacoBell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 02:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210866#comment-176918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, Chris doesn&#039;t know what the heck he&#039;s talking about. Totally different approaches to display tech. Personally, I&#039;m more stoked about Mirasol as it&#039;s bi-stable and needs no backlight in bright light and needs even less light to illuminate the display in dark environments than most LCD backlights. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Chris doesn&#8217;t know what the heck he&#8217;s talking about. Totally different approaches to display tech. Personally, I&#8217;m more stoked about Mirasol as it&#8217;s bi-stable and needs no backlight in bright light and needs even less light to illuminate the display in dark environments than most LCD backlights. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PacoBell</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/qualcomm-acquires-pixtronix-for-future-mirasol-display-tech-26210866/#comment-176919</link>
		<dc:creator>PacoBell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 02:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210866#comment-176919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, Chris doesn&#039;t know what the heck he&#039;s talking about. Totally different approaches to display tech. Personally, I&#039;m more stoked about Mirasol as it&#039;s bi-stable and needs no backlight in bright light and needs even less light to illuminate the display in dark environments than most LCD backlights. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Chris doesn&#8217;t know what the heck he&#8217;s talking about. Totally different approaches to display tech. Personally, I&#8217;m more stoked about Mirasol as it&#8217;s bi-stable and needs no backlight in bright light and needs even less light to illuminate the display in dark environments than most LCD backlights. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BostonBizPerson</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/qualcomm-acquires-pixtronix-for-future-mirasol-display-tech-26210866/#comment-176603</link>
		<dc:creator>BostonBizPerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210866#comment-176603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pixtronix is completely different techmology from Mirasol.  I am surprised the press has not picked up on that.  Qualcomm spent big money on Mirasol, but it slipped for years and has little market traction.  The $$$ Pixtronix deal suggests that they are getting ready to dump Mirasol and try something new.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pixtronix is completely different techmology from Mirasol.  I am surprised the press has not picked up on that.  Qualcomm spent big money on Mirasol, but it slipped for years and has little market traction.  The $$$ Pixtronix deal suggests that they are getting ready to dump Mirasol and try something new.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
