<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Proview threatens Chinese vendors over iPad trademark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/proview-threatens-chinese-vendors-over-ipad-trademark-08217517/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/proview-threatens-chinese-vendors-over-ipad-trademark-08217517/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 08:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eleeflyguy43</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/proview-threatens-chinese-vendors-over-ipad-trademark-08217517/#comment-192067</link>
		<dc:creator>Eleeflyguy43</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 15:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=217517#comment-192067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[they should go after ipad knock offs too.  Apple should just Proview and use them to go after counterfeits.  their diligince is admirable, but misguided.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they should go after ipad knock offs too.  Apple should just Proview and use them to go after counterfeits.  their diligince is admirable, but misguided.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zillady</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/proview-threatens-chinese-vendors-over-ipad-trademark-08217517/#comment-191916</link>
		<dc:creator>Zillady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 03:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=217517#comment-191916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s obvious who&#039;s the loser here - Proview!  They got the name (IPAD not iPad) so that&#039;s why Apple don&#039;t even need counter this law suite.  If the Chinese court wants to favor their renegade province, they will lose even bigger if Foxcon move some of its mfg elsewhere either within or outside China.  Proview got the name, but they don&#039;t have the brain!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s obvious who&#8217;s the loser here &#8211; Proview!  They got the name (IPAD not iPad) so that&#8217;s why Apple don&#8217;t even need counter this law suite.  If the Chinese court wants to favor their renegade province, they will lose even bigger if Foxcon move some of its mfg elsewhere either within or outside China.  Proview got the name, but they don&#8217;t have the brain!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zillady</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/proview-threatens-chinese-vendors-over-ipad-trademark-08217517/#comment-191917</link>
		<dc:creator>Zillady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 03:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=217517#comment-191917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s obvious who&#039;s the loser here - Proview!  They got the name (IPAD not iPad) so that&#039;s why Apple don&#039;t even need counter this law suite.  If the Chinese court wants to favor their renegade province, they will lose even bigger if Foxcon move some of its mfg elsewhere either within or outside China.  Proview got the name, but they don&#039;t have the brain!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s obvious who&#8217;s the loser here &#8211; Proview!  They got the name (IPAD not iPad) so that&#8217;s why Apple don&#8217;t even need counter this law suite.  If the Chinese court wants to favor their renegade province, they will lose even bigger if Foxcon move some of its mfg elsewhere either within or outside China.  Proview got the name, but they don&#8217;t have the brain!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
