<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Police Get iPhone Facial-Recognition Add-On, Ignites Privacy Concerns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/police-get-iphone-facial-recognition-add-on-ignites-privacy-concerns-13164831/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/police-get-iphone-facial-recognition-add-on-ignites-privacy-concerns-13164831/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 18:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/police-get-iphone-facial-recognition-add-on-ignites-privacy-concerns-13164831/#comment-128650</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 17:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=164831#comment-128650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This seems like a violation of privacy to me. I don&#039;t see any reason why I, as I&#039;m walking down the street, should be able to be photographed by this new tool, and subjected to a facial recognition search. To me, this seems invasive, unless I&#039;ve done something wrong already.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems like a violation of privacy to me. I don&#8217;t see any reason why I, as I&#8217;m walking down the street, should be able to be photographed by this new tool, and subjected to a facial recognition search. To me, this seems invasive, unless I&#8217;ve done something wrong already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john charles webb jr.</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/police-get-iphone-facial-recognition-add-on-ignites-privacy-concerns-13164831/#comment-123566</link>
		<dc:creator>john charles webb jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2011 05:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=164831#comment-123566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[95% of &#039;law enforcement&#039; is paranoia . 
The other 5% is shop=keepers arresting shop lifters .
snap away .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>95% of &#8216;law enforcement&#8217; is paranoia . <br />
The other 5% is shop=keepers arresting shop lifters .<br />
snap away .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurence</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/police-get-iphone-facial-recognition-add-on-ignites-privacy-concerns-13164831/#comment-123270</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=164831#comment-123270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I see the benefit in actually having a device like this available to law enforcement. I&#039;d question the actual efficiency though. How long would someone have to wait while it cross checks all the faces in the database (national and or local) looking for a match? That&#039;s if the person is even in the database at all - ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see the benefit in actually having a device like this available to law enforcement. I&#8217;d question the actual efficiency though. How long would someone have to wait while it cross checks all the faces in the database (national and or local) looking for a match? That&#8217;s if the person is even in the database at all &#8211; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leonard Molina</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/police-get-iphone-facial-recognition-add-on-ignites-privacy-concerns-13164831/#comment-123090</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonard Molina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 21:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=164831#comment-123090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I paid $32.67 for a XBOX 360 and my mom got a 17 inch Toshiba laptop for $94.83 being delivered to our house tomorrow by FedEX. I will never again pay expensive retail prices at stores. I even sold a 46 inch HDTV to my boss for $650 and it only cost me $52.78 to get. Here is the website we using to get all this stuff, LiveCent.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I paid $32.67 for a XBOX 360 and my mom got a 17 inch Toshiba laptop for $94.83 being delivered to our house tomorrow by FedEX. I will never again pay expensive retail prices at stores. I even sold a 46 inch HDTV to my boss for $650 and it only cost me $52.78 to get. Here is the website we using to get all this stuff, LiveCent.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobox86</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/police-get-iphone-facial-recognition-add-on-ignites-privacy-concerns-13164831/#comment-123084</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobox86</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 21:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=164831#comment-123084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[if it works and doesn&#039;t produce many false positives it could reduce profiling issues and make it harder for officers to justify harassment]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if it works and doesn&#8217;t produce many false positives it could reduce profiling issues and make it harder for officers to justify harassment</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/police-get-iphone-facial-recognition-add-on-ignites-privacy-concerns-13164831/#comment-123078</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 20:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=164831#comment-123078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Incredible 4-minute youtube surveillance video on Smart meters:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&amp;v=8JNFr_j6kdI]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incredible 4-minute youtube surveillance video on Smart meters:<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&#038;v=8JNFr_j6kdI" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&#038;v=8JNFr_j6kdI</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/police-get-iphone-facial-recognition-add-on-ignites-privacy-concerns-13164831/#comment-123064</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 20:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=164831#comment-123064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Personally I&#039;m for it. If officers could determine if a person was on the wanted list in moments at every stop they could clean up a ton of outstanding warrants. My primary concern is about a false positive more than privacy. We already surrendered privacy when we gave the police computers and the right to demand identification. With the the access they have and your id they could find out everything in the legal system if they wanted. This will just allow them to find the fake ID&#039;s easier.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I&#8217;m for it. If officers could determine if a person was on the wanted list in moments at every stop they could clean up a ton of outstanding warrants. My primary concern is about a false positive more than privacy. We already surrendered privacy when we gave the police computers and the right to demand identification. With the the access they have and your id they could find out everything in the legal system if they wanted. This will just allow them to find the fake ID&#8217;s easier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet Dude</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/police-get-iphone-facial-recognition-add-on-ignites-privacy-concerns-13164831/#comment-123059</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 20:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=164831#comment-123059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mmmm,  doesn&#039;t sound to good.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mmmm,  doesn&#8217;t sound to good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slightlysublim3</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/police-get-iphone-facial-recognition-add-on-ignites-privacy-concerns-13164831/#comment-123057</link>
		<dc:creator>Slightlysublim3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=164831#comment-123057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eff the police]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eff the police</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
