<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pixel Qi details shipping products: teases screen improvements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/pixel-qi-details-shipping-products-teases-screen-improvements-02221061/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/pixel-qi-details-shipping-products-teases-screen-improvements-02221061/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 17:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dunesteronomy</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/pixel-qi-details-shipping-products-teases-screen-improvements-02221061/#comment-201339</link>
		<dc:creator>dunesteronomy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=221061#comment-201339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t believe they haven&#039;t progressed beyond the 1024 x 600 resolution.  The colour and contrast fidelity of the screen, as well as its viewing angles, need to improve hugely if it is to ever get mainstream adoption. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe they haven&#8217;t progressed beyond the 1024 x 600 resolution.  The colour and contrast fidelity of the screen, as well as its viewing angles, need to improve hugely if it is to ever get mainstream adoption. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slappy</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/pixel-qi-details-shipping-products-teases-screen-improvements-02221061/#comment-199588</link>
		<dc:creator>Slappy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 22:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=221061#comment-199588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Given how long it&#039;s taken Pixel Qi to turn out anything.. I would say later than sooner :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given how long it&#8217;s taken Pixel Qi to turn out anything.. I would say later than sooner :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
