Wednesday, Feb 21st 2007 by Abby McVay


Worth Reading?


NoYes


+15 [29 votes]

Do you as a parent feel the need to put novelty things on your child’s skin before they even know what they are? Now you can buy Tattoos for Babies, and no I’m not kidding. The FDA actually approved this too.

baby tatts


You can even put a heart tattoo that says Mom just to remind him that he loves you; except, you’ll have to tell him because he can’t actually read what it says. You can buy a pack of 49 individual tattoos, and you’d better get on this one quick, I’m sure your baby would be crushed if you didn’t.

I’m curious what the motivation for creating such an item would be or the thought process that made this seem ok? The little pictures that make up the tattoos are cute, I just don’t think I’d ever put one on my baby. Maybe once they learn to walk they can have one. These are only priced at $4.99 a piece.

Tattoos For Babies [via Oh Gizmo!]

Subscribe via RSS or Email | Read 3,999 times


  1.  Chuck   View all comments by Chuck  +7  Add karma Subtract karma 

    The idea seems cute , you have to keep in mind though that beyond food and diapers , anything else is for the parents when it comes to things for babies . Seems like it would be much better for a slightly older child though, 1 or 2 maybe , infant is a bit much , but I can see how it would be cute when the parents are heavily tattooed like myself , and a lot cooler then a dad and lad matching outfit picture at least.

  2.  NyK_SyN   View all comments by NyK_SyN  -9  Add karma Subtract karma 

    The author of this article (if talking negatively about this product) is a ******* deuschbag. It would be cute. I hate conservative people with a passion. Obviously this item is not for the baby’s self expression. I’m sure psychologically, later in the childs life, having been exposed to this would make them a little more open-minded to the modified and tattooed like myself, and not cry like a little ***** when exposed to this sort of thing later in life. I hate when people are literally scared of things like ear stretching. YEAH ITS REAL!

  3.  Jalen   View all comments by Jalen  +5  Add karma Subtract karma 

    The author of this article (if talking negatively about this product) is a ******* deuschbag. It would be cute. I hate conservative people with a passion. Obviously this item is not for the baby’s self expression. I’m sure psychologically, later in the childs life, having been exposed to this would make them a little more open-minded to the modified and tattooed like myself, and not cry like a little ***** when exposed to this sort of thing later in life. I hate when people are literally scared of things like ear stretching. YEAH ITS REAL!

    she only said she wouldn’t put one on her baby, she did not say you SHOULDN’T put one on your baby!

  4.  Abby McVay   View all comments by Abby McVay  +7  Add karma Subtract karma 

    Chuck I agree, 1 or 2 would be more logical. That way at least they are old enough to get excited about it. Jan I did in fact mean that I wouldn’t do it, not that you shouldn’t and thank you for pointing that out. I believe in each person’s right to express themselves however they wish, I honestly don’t care if you stretch your ears. However, I would be concerned if you started considering doing it to your infant. Oh and by the way it’s spelled douche bag, not deuschbag.

  5.  em   View all comments by em  +6  Add karma Subtract karma 

    ha, too cute.

    putting a temperary tattoo on a baby is no more ridiculous then dressing one up in silly clothing because the style looks amusing when its on a baby.

    obviously it is not being done for the babys sake, and as its being done to an infant, it seems it would have little influence to future tolerance towards tattoos one way or the other.

    anywho, it made me smile, and giggle a little on the inside :)

  6.  Beth   View all comments by Beth  Neutral  Add karma Subtract karma 

    Haha, my 2 year old brother would LOVE these. He’s always lifting the leg of his pants or lifting the sleeve of his arm and pointing and saying ‘tattoo? tattoo?’ However…I could just go to any old store and buy the same exact thing and not have to order them online.

  7.  Laura   View all comments by Laura  +3  Add karma Subtract karma 

    I think it’s cute. It’s not any more ridiculous than dressing a baby in cute things, piercing it’s ears, or giving it cute haircuts and accessories. I’m pretty sure babies don’t actually care about any of these things, so it seems silly to emphasize, for the sake of the con side of the argument, the fact that a baby wouldn’t care about temporary tattoos.

  8.  Molly   View all comments by Molly  +3  Add karma Subtract karma 

    Temporary baby tattoos are a heck of a lot better than all those parents who take their infant to Claire’s for an ear piercing. Just my two cents.

  9.  sam   View all comments by sam  +1  Add karma Subtract karma 

    i have a baby and i recently took it to a tattoo parlor and god i swastica on his chest there is nothing wrong with that i think it is cool and it seems like everyone else takes a liking in it to

  10.  Shubniggurath   View all comments by Shubniggurath  +4  Add karma Subtract karma 

    Maybe they meant to type, “deutschbag”? But I have no idea what a German bag would have to do with this discussion item.

  11.  glowgizmo   View all comments by glowgizmo  Neutral  Add karma Subtract karma 

    Therse are pretty cute, but think of what sorts of chemicals you’re going to have to rub on your baby to get them to come off. When I was little there was nothing grosser than having a nasty, dirty, old temporary tattoo. The only way my mother could get them off was to use rubbing alcohol. I don’t thing the problem with these (if there was one to begin with) is necessarily a body modification issue so much as it might end up just plain messy. Blech.

  12.  boriqua   View all comments by boriqua  -1  Add karma Subtract karma 

    ive been putting temporary tatoos on my 4 year old brother since he was 2. he loves them because he sees other people with tatoos (mom, dad and other family) and wants to copy. now he always asks me to buy some for him.

  13.  antares   View all comments by antares  +3  Add karma Subtract karma 

    Therse are pretty cute, but think of what sorts of chemicals you’re going to have to rub on your baby to get them to come off. When I was little there was nothing grosser than having a nasty, dirty, old temporary tattoo. The only way my mother could get them off was to use rubbing alcohol. I don’t thing the problem with these (if there was one to begin with) is necessarily a body modification issue so much as it might end up just plain messy. Blech.

    Actually, BABY OIL is one of the things you can use to get temporary tattoos off.

  14.  ben sp   View all comments by ben sp  -2  Add karma Subtract karma 

    hell yeah this is so cool
    i wish my parents had put them on me

    why create controversy against somthing so simply awsome

    its not permanent and your little fellas(or sheilas) get to have tattoos with no regrets

    way cool

    shut up all the haters if you dont like it put a diaper in your mouth and shut up

    shut up

    seriously

  15.  NyK_SyN   View all comments by NyK_SyN  Neutral  Add karma Subtract karma 

    Uhh, did I say anything about stretching my own ears? While I do partake in this, I didn’t say anything about it. Thanks for the spelling correction too. Did it help you understand the point better? :D

  16.  Babe*love   View all comments by Babe*love  Neutral  Add karma Subtract karma 

    i think its anawesome thing. kids and babies always want to have tatoos and now there is a way that they can. its great keep doing the whole tatoo idea. my nephew love them and so does his mom because they can wash off.

  17.  Babe*Love   View all comments by Babe*Love  Neutral  Add karma Subtract karma 

    P.S. All my totally hip friends wear matching tatoos like their babys. It looks soawesome all women and their children should wear matching tatoos. Its in fashion now.

  18.  Ty   View all comments by Ty  Neutral  Add karma Subtract karma 

    It seems like a nice idea if the comprehended the excitement of it but it does sound somewhat pricy per individual one but I would think it would be used for an older age maybe like 2-3 years. Like you said when they begin to walk even though that is younger than that.

  19.  Victoria   View all comments by Victoria  Neutral  Add karma Subtract karma 

    A nurse first came up with the idea of temporary tattoos for babies as a way to help prevent baby mix ups in the hospital, also so that no one could handle a baby that wasn’t supposed to. The baby, mom and dad would each wear a matching tattoo. The idea was to prevent someone from taking home the wrong baby.

  20.  I LUV THAT GIRL   View all comments by I LUV THAT GIRL  Neutral  Add karma Subtract karma 

    it’s a great idea to have tattos for babies…I have a nine month old and would luv to get her one…she’s not your average nine month old very advance for her age besides her father and I are really into tattos…..


Add your comments

Please login to leave a comment. If you haven't signed up, you can do so free here. Lost your password? Reset it. With SlashGear account, you will be able to participate on SlashGear Forums.





Close
About / Advertise / Contact / Archives / Privacy Policy / Terms of Use
Copyright © 2006-2009 SlashGear, All Rights Reserved.