<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pantech next to pay Microsoft over Android patents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/pantech-next-to-pay-microsoft-over-android-patents-16209491/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/pantech-next-to-pay-microsoft-over-android-patents-16209491/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 12:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/pantech-next-to-pay-microsoft-over-android-patents-16209491/#comment-172495</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=209491#comment-172495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If these are the patents in question and their is prior art to be found, why haven&#039;t the dozen or so companies just told MSFT to leave them alone?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If these are the patents in question and their is prior art to be found, why haven&#8217;t the dozen or so companies just told MSFT to leave them alone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Turfer</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/pantech-next-to-pay-microsoft-over-android-patents-16209491/#comment-172373</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Turfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 12:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=209491#comment-172373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever wonder why Microsoft legally gags their victims with tight non-disclosures to prevent their victims from going public with the details of these so-called &#039;patent violations&#039;? That&#039;s because Microsoft&#039;s claims are as follows:

1. &#039;372 Patent (Web browser background image loading).

2. &#039;522 Patent (Operating system provided tabs).

3. &#039;551 Patent (Electronic selection with handles).

4. &#039;233 Patent (Annotation of electronic documents).

5. &#039;780 Patent (Web browser loading status icons).

Anyone who has worked in the IT industry for the last 30 or so years will clearly be able to identify prior art in most of the above. The rest are quite trivial.

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever wonder why Microsoft legally gags their victims with tight non-disclosures to prevent their victims from going public with the details of these so-called &#8216;patent violations&#8217;? That&#8217;s because Microsoft&#8217;s claims are as follows:</p>
<p>1. &#8217;372 Patent (Web browser background image loading).</p>
<p>2. &#8217;522 Patent (Operating system provided tabs).</p>
<p>3. &#8217;551 Patent (Electronic selection with handles).</p>
<p>4. &#8217;233 Patent (Annotation of electronic documents).</p>
<p>5. &#8217;780 Patent (Web browser loading status icons).</p>
<p>Anyone who has worked in the IT industry for the last 30 or so years will clearly be able to identify prior art in most of the above. The rest are quite trivial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matti</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/pantech-next-to-pay-microsoft-over-android-patents-16209491/#comment-172318</link>
		<dc:creator>Matti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 06:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=209491#comment-172318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One has to wonder why Google isn&#039;t doing anything, and why these manufacturers don&#039;t seem to mind that Google isn&#039;t doing anything.

Google&#039;s prolonged muteness on the matter just adds weight to the argument that MS&#039;s patents do have a case. They&#039;re quickly getting the reputation of a company that only wants it&#039;s ads on as many devices/accounts as possible, not caring about their partners (this case) and users (overall android fragmentation). 

I hope they do something to prove me wrong here.  The last thing I want is to see is MS (or any corporation, for that matter) make this sort of practice a trend in the tech-world.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One has to wonder why Google isn&#8217;t doing anything, and why these manufacturers don&#8217;t seem to mind that Google isn&#8217;t doing anything.</p>
<p>Google&#8217;s prolonged muteness on the matter just adds weight to the argument that MS&#8217;s patents do have a case. They&#8217;re quickly getting the reputation of a company that only wants it&#8217;s ads on as many devices/accounts as possible, not caring about their partners (this case) and users (overall android fragmentation). </p>
<p>I hope they do something to prove me wrong here.  The last thing I want is to see is MS (or any corporation, for that matter) make this sort of practice a trend in the tech-world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James1865</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/pantech-next-to-pay-microsoft-over-android-patents-16209491/#comment-172315</link>
		<dc:creator>James1865</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 06:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=209491#comment-172315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[why are they paying patent fees to MS?
who really owns android OS ? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why are they paying patent fees to MS?<br />
who really owns android OS ? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qasim Gardner</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/pantech-next-to-pay-microsoft-over-android-patents-16209491/#comment-172300</link>
		<dc:creator>Qasim Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 03:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=209491#comment-172300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More money to The Evil Empire for Android.  Google, what are you going to do about it?  You&#039;re supposed partners are paying the competition for your OS!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More money to The Evil Empire for Android.  Google, what are you going to do about it?  You&#8217;re supposed partners are paying the competition for your OS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sopheak Maxx Hean</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/pantech-next-to-pay-microsoft-over-android-patents-16209491/#comment-172287</link>
		<dc:creator>Sopheak Maxx Hean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 01:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=209491#comment-172287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmm what patents are there?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm what patents are there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
