<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OnLive Desktop app hits Microsoft roadblock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/onlive-desktop-app-hits-microsoft-roadblock-08217591/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/onlive-desktop-app-hits-microsoft-roadblock-08217591/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barefoot Waterskiier</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/onlive-desktop-app-hits-microsoft-roadblock-08217591/#comment-191889</link>
		<dc:creator>Barefoot Waterskiier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 01:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=217591#comment-191889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This reminds me of the bizarre licensing Microsoft had when they first delivered IIS (a web server) on Windows NT Server.  The only way you could access a website that was hosted on a Microsoft server, was to have a license to use that server.  You, as a consumer, would need a separate license for every web site (and server in the site), that you intended to access.   I assume a realistic licensing policy is on it&#039;s way for a virtualized Office desktop accessed via an Android, IPAD, or other device.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This reminds me of the bizarre licensing Microsoft had when they first delivered IIS (a web server) on Windows NT Server.  The only way you could access a website that was hosted on a Microsoft server, was to have a license to use that server.  You, as a consumer, would need a separate license for every web site (and server in the site), that you intended to access.   I assume a realistic licensing policy is on it&#8217;s way for a virtualized Office desktop accessed via an Android, IPAD, or other device.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barefoot Waterskiier</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/onlive-desktop-app-hits-microsoft-roadblock-08217591/#comment-191890</link>
		<dc:creator>Barefoot Waterskiier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 01:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=217591#comment-191890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This reminds me of the bizarre licensing Microsoft had when they first delivered IIS (a web server) on Windows NT Server.  The only way you could access a website that was hosted on a Microsoft server, was to have a license to use that server.  You, as a consumer, would need a separate license for every web site (and server in the site), that you intended to access.   I assume a realistic licensing policy is on it&#039;s way for a virtualized Office desktop accessed via an Android, IPAD, or other device.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This reminds me of the bizarre licensing Microsoft had when they first delivered IIS (a web server) on Windows NT Server.  The only way you could access a website that was hosted on a Microsoft server, was to have a license to use that server.  You, as a consumer, would need a separate license for every web site (and server in the site), that you intended to access.   I assume a realistic licensing policy is on it&#8217;s way for a virtualized Office desktop accessed via an Android, IPAD, or other device.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barefoot Waterskiier</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/onlive-desktop-app-hits-microsoft-roadblock-08217591/#comment-191891</link>
		<dc:creator>Barefoot Waterskiier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 01:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=217591#comment-191891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This reminds me of the bizarre licensing Microsoft had when they first delivered IIS (a web server) on Windows NT Server.  The only way you could access a website that was hosted on a Microsoft server, was to have a license to use that server.  You, as a consumer, would need a separate license for every web site (and server in the site), that you intended to access.   I assume a realistic licensing policy is on it&#039;s way for a virtualized Office desktop accessed via an Android, IPAD, or other device.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This reminds me of the bizarre licensing Microsoft had when they first delivered IIS (a web server) on Windows NT Server.  The only way you could access a website that was hosted on a Microsoft server, was to have a license to use that server.  You, as a consumer, would need a separate license for every web site (and server in the site), that you intended to access.   I assume a realistic licensing policy is on it&#8217;s way for a virtualized Office desktop accessed via an Android, IPAD, or other device.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LevonTostig</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/onlive-desktop-app-hits-microsoft-roadblock-08217591/#comment-191856</link>
		<dc:creator>LevonTostig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 23:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=217591#comment-191856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bollocks!

This means that anyone who accesses a virtual Windows 7 desktop must also be licensed for Windows 7 to do so.  So, if you have remote users (outsourced data entry, for example) attaching to your network, they&#039;d better have a Windows 7 license lying around.  This action essentially makes it illegal to run VNC or an RDP client on anything BUT a Windows device -- and that especially includes Microsoft&#039;s own RDP client for the Mac!

Put another way, if Microsoft wins this argument, they have the right to dictate what you can and can&#039;t do with the software you licensed from them.  What if you decide to write a new OS using Windows and they find out about it?  They could sue you -- and win.  What if you write a scathing blog post about them using IE?  &quot;It&#039;s against the EULA - pay up!&quot;

Imagine Hertz doing something like this: &quot;Want to rent that Chevy Camaro?  You&#039;d better own one first.&quot;

Nope, this is wrong.  If you have to run windows, stay on XP.  Virtualize the hell out of that.  Let Microsoft hang itself.  Of course, if they had ANY sense at all, they&#039;d virtualize Windows themselves and offer THAT as a service.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bollocks!</p>
<p>This means that anyone who accesses a virtual Windows 7 desktop must also be licensed for Windows 7 to do so.  So, if you have remote users (outsourced data entry, for example) attaching to your network, they&#8217;d better have a Windows 7 license lying around.  This action essentially makes it illegal to run VNC or an RDP client on anything BUT a Windows device &#8212; and that especially includes Microsoft&#8217;s own RDP client for the Mac!</p>
<p>Put another way, if Microsoft wins this argument, they have the right to dictate what you can and can&#8217;t do with the software you licensed from them.  What if you decide to write a new OS using Windows and they find out about it?  They could sue you &#8212; and win.  What if you write a scathing blog post about them using IE?  &#8221;It&#8217;s against the EULA &#8211; pay up!&#8221;</p>
<p>Imagine Hertz doing something like this: &#8220;Want to rent that Chevy Camaro?  You&#8217;d better own one first.&#8221;</p>
<p>Nope, this is wrong.  If you have to run windows, stay on XP.  Virtualize the hell out of that.  Let Microsoft hang itself.  Of course, if they had ANY sense at all, they&#8217;d virtualize Windows themselves and offer THAT as a service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dude!</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/onlive-desktop-app-hits-microsoft-roadblock-08217591/#comment-191830</link>
		<dc:creator>Dude!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 22:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=217591#comment-191830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Switch to Linux!

Serious just pre-install like Ubuntu with LibreOffice on the Onlive servers. Problem solved.

Or use Google Docs....

However something like Ubuntu can deliver a Desktop experience and launch most Windows apps with Wine.

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Switch to Linux!</p>
<p>Serious just pre-install like Ubuntu with LibreOffice on the Onlive servers. Problem solved.</p>
<p>Or use Google Docs&#8230;.</p>
<p>However something like Ubuntu can deliver a Desktop experience and launch most Windows apps with Wine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WiFiTechnicalSolutions</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/onlive-desktop-app-hits-microsoft-roadblock-08217591/#comment-191828</link>
		<dc:creator>WiFiTechnicalSolutions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 22:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=217591#comment-191828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has to be a better way. Each person needs a license!?! Crazy. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has to be a better way. Each person needs a license!?! Crazy. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
