<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ode to the Nano, V to the izzA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/ode-to-the-nano-v-to-the-izza-30105402/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ode-to-the-nano-v-to-the-izza-30105402/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 00:04:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ode-to-the-nano-v-to-the-izza-30105402/#comment-67840</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=105402#comment-67840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to the author; I do like reading informing articles with personality-- unfortunately, I find most on-line articles to be poorly done so I want to thank you again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to the author; I do like reading informing articles with personality&#8211; unfortunately, I find most on-line articles to be poorly done so I want to thank you again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UnderDoc</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ode-to-the-nano-v-to-the-izza-30105402/#comment-67225</link>
		<dc:creator>UnderDoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 02:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=105402#comment-67225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I told you so... one month ago...

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;cite&gt;UnderDoc &lt;a href=&quot;http://discuss.slashgear.com/topic/ipod-nano-6th-gen-hands-on#post-16934&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;said&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/cite&gt;
Hands-on? More like finger-on. If you manage to fit two fingers on the itsy-bitsy screen, then it’s even multi-touch. So pointless that it&#039;s not even funny...
&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I told you so&#8230; one month ago&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p><cite>UnderDoc <a href="http://discuss.slashgear.com/topic/ipod-nano-6th-gen-hands-on#post-16934" rel="nofollow">said</a>:</cite><br />
Hands-on? More like finger-on. If you manage to fit two fingers on the itsy-bitsy screen, then it’s even multi-touch. So pointless that it&#8217;s not even funny&#8230;
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Pither</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ode-to-the-nano-v-to-the-izza-30105402/#comment-67219</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Pither</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=105402#comment-67219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Size does matter after all :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Size does matter after all :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bemymonkey</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ode-to-the-nano-v-to-the-izza-30105402/#comment-67217</link>
		<dc:creator>bemymonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 17:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=105402#comment-67217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The new iPod nano is about showing off touch technology. Multi-touch on a 1.6-inch touchscreen? I can barely fit two fingers on the screen, let alone spread them apart for a multi-touch gesture. The interface is lousy. It slows down the process of finding and playing music. It forces you to look at the screen, to deliberate, and perhaps to enjoy the pretty icons and the rotating screen gesture.&quot;

That pretty much sums up the thoughts of everyone I&#039;ve talked to about the damned thing. It looks great, but the functionality is pretty much borked.

Hell, I&#039;m already pissed off by the capacitive touch buttons on my iAudio 7... can&#039;t imagine how annoying a touchscreen would be to me (and I&#039;m a touchscreen fan!).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The new iPod nano is about showing off touch technology. Multi-touch on a 1.6-inch touchscreen? I can barely fit two fingers on the screen, let alone spread them apart for a multi-touch gesture. The interface is lousy. It slows down the process of finding and playing music. It forces you to look at the screen, to deliberate, and perhaps to enjoy the pretty icons and the rotating screen gesture.&#8221;</p>
<p>That pretty much sums up the thoughts of everyone I&#8217;ve talked to about the damned thing. It looks great, but the functionality is pretty much borked.</p>
<p>Hell, I&#8217;m already pissed off by the capacitive touch buttons on my iAudio 7&#8230; can&#8217;t imagine how annoying a touchscreen would be to me (and I&#8217;m a touchscreen fan!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
