<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NVIDIA Quad SLI not as good as anticipated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-quad-sli-not-as-good-as-anticipated-2510891/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-quad-sli-not-as-good-as-anticipated-2510891/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 09:19:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: .</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-quad-sli-not-as-good-as-anticipated-2510891/#comment-39479</link>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 23:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-quad-sli-not-as-good-as-anticipated-2510891.php#comment-39479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What wasnt mentioned in the text that the CURRENT nvidia drivers for 9800GX2  DO NOT support quad sli which makes this comparison quite irrelevant. nVidia has mentioned this several times and says that they&#039;re in process of making drivers that take advantage of this setup.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What wasnt mentioned in the text that the CURRENT nvidia drivers for 9800GX2  DO NOT support quad sli which makes this comparison quite irrelevant. nVidia has mentioned this several times and says that they&#8217;re in process of making drivers that take advantage of this setup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
