Comments on: NVIDIA hits AT&T 4G LTE with Icera 410

By: Juanita Fleming

Juanita Fleming — Sat, 01 Sep 2012 00:02:00 +0000

Getting down to the chipset is too much for me. I just want to have good speed and bandwidth. I love the fact that I can store a large number of hairstyle pics on
my smartphone because of the amount of memory it holds, and the 4GLTE (via
AT&T, fyi) lets me sort through them quickly to show to clients.

By: Juanita Fleming

Juanita Fleming — Sat, 01 Sep 2012 00:01:00 +0000

That’s what I thought, too. NO?

By: TrentBradley

TrentBradley — Thu, 24 May 2012 17:27:00 +0000

Your right about the LTE but when your out of coverage area the NVIDIA chip has to be able to connect to 3G or 2G. The CDMA versions of those two technologies are not supported by NVIDIA to my knowledge.
——– Original message ——–
Subject: [slashgeardotcom] Re: NVIDIA hits AT&T 4G LTE with Icera 410

By: Good ol' JS

Good ol' JS — Thu, 24 May 2012 17:10:00 +0000

No argument here. HSPA+ was great for 3G, but LTE is just flat out awesome. No wonder they want to kick people off of their unlimited plans. I know quite a few that are using Verizon LTE as their home internet for several devices.

On a separate note, I thought LTE was LTE no matter which provider you got it from. I thought the only distinction was the backbone and the spectrum it’s using.

By: TrentBradley

TrentBradley — Thu, 24 May 2012 13:42:00 +0000

I may be wrong but I don’t believe any of nvidias chips support cdma. And yes Verizon has more widespread LTE but AT&T has a more advanced network as far as 3G tech is concerned.

By: Good ol' JS

Good ol' JS — Thu, 24 May 2012 13:07:00 +0000

Nvidia shot themselves in the foot by going with AT&T LTE. Verizon LTE far outstrips everyone else’s LTE service.