<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No 64 Bit PhotoShop CS3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/no-64-bit-photoshop-cs3-293212/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/no-64-bit-photoshop-cs3-293212/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/no-64-bit-photoshop-cs3-293212/#comment-13753</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 05:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/no-64-bit-photoshop-cs3-293212.php#comment-13753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[32 bit systems can address what, 4gb of memory? The MacBooks all have a cap of 2gb and the Pros 3gb. Gotta be honest. I&#039;m not sure this is a real problem yet. So the only Mac users for whom that will be a problem is Mac Pro users with deep enough pockets to afford a Mac Pro with more than 4gb of that fancy RAM Apple&#039;s using. Given that it&#039;ll only be a problem for a comparatively small number of people I just can&#039;t get excited about it. Let them focus on getting the UB out, then we can worry about adding 64 bittedness later.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>32 bit systems can address what, 4gb of memory? The MacBooks all have a cap of 2gb and the Pros 3gb. Gotta be honest. I&#8217;m not sure this is a real problem yet. So the only Mac users for whom that will be a problem is Mac Pro users with deep enough pockets to afford a Mac Pro with more than 4gb of that fancy RAM Apple&#8217;s using. Given that it&#8217;ll only be a problem for a comparatively small number of people I just can&#8217;t get excited about it. Let them focus on getting the UB out, then we can worry about adding 64 bittedness later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
