<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon D800 and D800E DSLRs address low-pass filter debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/nikon-d800-and-d800e-dslrs-address-low-pass-filter-debate-07212359/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/nikon-d800-and-d800e-dslrs-address-low-pass-filter-debate-07212359/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 14:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: emanf8</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/nikon-d800-and-d800e-dslrs-address-low-pass-filter-debate-07212359/#comment-183045</link>
		<dc:creator>emanf8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=212359#comment-183045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow Amelia ....this is very relevant to the D800 / D800 E debate !!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow Amelia &#8230;.this is very relevant to the D800 / D800 E debate !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KEVINDARTMOOR</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/nikon-d800-and-d800e-dslrs-address-low-pass-filter-debate-07212359/#comment-182958</link>
		<dc:creator>KEVINDARTMOOR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=212359#comment-182958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WOW! half a stop! calm down mate, we can&#039;t all be as clever as you! Everyone is entitle to make a mistake, so long as they do it safely! let it go, you know it makes sences, specially to someone like you that knows sooooooo much. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW! half a stop! calm down mate, we can&#8217;t all be as clever as you! Everyone is entitle to make a mistake, so long as they do it safely! let it go, you know it makes sences, specially to someone like you that knows sooooooo much. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KEVINDARTMOOR</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/nikon-d800-and-d800e-dslrs-address-low-pass-filter-debate-07212359/#comment-182959</link>
		<dc:creator>KEVINDARTMOOR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=212359#comment-182959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WOW! half a stop! calm down mate, we can&#039;t all be as clever as you! Everyone is entitle to make a mistake, so long as they do it safely! let it go, you know it makes sences, specially to someone like you that knows sooooooo much. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW! half a stop! calm down mate, we can&#8217;t all be as clever as you! Everyone is entitle to make a mistake, so long as they do it safely! let it go, you know it makes sences, specially to someone like you that knows sooooooo much. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KEVINDARTMOOR</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/nikon-d800-and-d800e-dslrs-address-low-pass-filter-debate-07212359/#comment-182960</link>
		<dc:creator>KEVINDARTMOOR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=212359#comment-182960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WOW! half a stop! calm down mate, we can&#039;t all be as clever as you! Everyone is entitle to make a mistake, so long as they do it safely! let it go, you know it makes sences, specially to someone like you that knows sooooooo much. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW! half a stop! calm down mate, we can&#8217;t all be as clever as you! Everyone is entitle to make a mistake, so long as they do it safely! let it go, you know it makes sences, specially to someone like you that knows sooooooo much. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KEVINDARTMOOR</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/nikon-d800-and-d800e-dslrs-address-low-pass-filter-debate-07212359/#comment-182961</link>
		<dc:creator>KEVINDARTMOOR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=212359#comment-182961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WOW! half a stop! calm down mate, we can&#039;t all be as clever as you! Everyone is entitle to make a mistake, so long as they do it safely! let it go, you know it makes sences, specially to someone like you that knows sooooooo much. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW! half a stop! calm down mate, we can&#8217;t all be as clever as you! Everyone is entitle to make a mistake, so long as they do it safely! let it go, you know it makes sences, specially to someone like you that knows sooooooo much. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KEVINDARTMOOR</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/nikon-d800-and-d800e-dslrs-address-low-pass-filter-debate-07212359/#comment-182954</link>
		<dc:creator>KEVINDARTMOOR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=212359#comment-182954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My primary work is LANDSCAPE, so, for me, I&#039;m only to glad of the extra pixies that are playing with thier magical power on this new sensor and the change from the minimum ISO of 200, now down to 100 ISO native and the removal of the AAF on the D800E is a bonus and I couldn&#039;t care less about frames per second, ONE a second would be enough for me as landscape tends to be a slow, methodical and relaxed photographic disciplin, or at least it should be. My D700 &amp; D300 will still get a good thrashing as they do now for my other passion, Military Aviation photography.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My primary work is LANDSCAPE, so, for me, I&#8217;m only to glad of the extra pixies that are playing with thier magical power on this new sensor and the change from the minimum ISO of 200, now down to 100 ISO native and the removal of the AAF on the D800E is a bonus and I couldn&#8217;t care less about frames per second, ONE a second would be enough for me as landscape tends to be a slow, methodical and relaxed photographic disciplin, or at least it should be. My D700 &amp; D300 will still get a good thrashing as they do now for my other passion, Military Aviation photography.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/nikon-d800-and-d800e-dslrs-address-low-pass-filter-debate-07212359/#comment-181761</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=212359#comment-181761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The D800 is about a half a stop better than the D700 mate, you have no clue what you are talking about.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> The D800 is about a half a stop better than the D700 mate, you have no clue what you are talking about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davidmayphoto</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/nikon-d800-and-d800e-dslrs-address-low-pass-filter-debate-07212359/#comment-181139</link>
		<dc:creator>Davidmayphoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=212359#comment-181139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also Other thing to say Nikon D2X sensor is professional, if read many reviews that 12.7MB D2X is the most sharper then all digital cameras such  like Canon EOS 1D mark 2 etc etc but I am not sure about D3 etc etc anyone knows??................]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also Other thing to say Nikon D2X sensor is professional, if read many reviews that 12.7MB D2X is the most sharper then all digital cameras such  like Canon EOS 1D mark 2 etc etc but I am not sure about D3 etc etc anyone knows??&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davidmayphoto</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/nikon-d800-and-d800e-dslrs-address-low-pass-filter-debate-07212359/#comment-181137</link>
		<dc:creator>Davidmayphoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=212359#comment-181137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also D800 need FX lenses all the time, no point use DX lenses as it will be 15MB which lower then D7000!!!!, D7000 is the most brilliant Nikon ever made.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also D800 need FX lenses all the time, no point use DX lenses as it will be 15MB which lower then D7000!!!!, D7000 is the most brilliant Nikon ever made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davidmayphoto</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/nikon-d800-and-d800e-dslrs-address-low-pass-filter-debate-07212359/#comment-181136</link>
		<dc:creator>Davidmayphoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=212359#comment-181136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bear the mind the more pixels of 36MB may cause slow flow with present computer, wait for two years time for better faster computer will handling 36MB????, Stock Photography accept all images 12 MB upward. I suggest 25MB is best buy. I guess Nikon D4 is about best buy. I have use D2X and D7000 are still very very good images up to 36 x 20.............]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bear the mind the more pixels of 36MB may cause slow flow with present computer, wait for two years time for better faster computer will handling 36MB????, Stock Photography accept all images 12 MB upward. I suggest 25MB is best buy. I guess Nikon D4 is about best buy. I have use D2X and D7000 are still very very good images up to 36 x 20&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: memmener</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/nikon-d800-and-d800e-dslrs-address-low-pass-filter-debate-07212359/#comment-181131</link>
		<dc:creator>memmener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=212359#comment-181131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[speed: the D700 can shoot 5fps, the D800 can shoot 4fps. the difference is minimal, and 4fps is more than sufficient for the rare occasion people shoot in burst mode anyways.. unless you&#039;re actually a real pro sports photographer covering NBA or NFL games. 
low light: stop being fixated on the mp count. although D800 has 3x as many pixels, its actual pixel size is 60% that of the D700&#039;s. the low pass filter has also been re-engineered and improved, reducing light loss to the sensor. if you factor in improvements in sensor technology (such as gapless micro lens design) since the D700 was introduced, and the new image processor, i have no problem believing the D800&#039;s low light/high iso is as good as, if not better than, D700.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>speed: the D700 can shoot 5fps, the D800 can shoot 4fps. the difference is minimal, and 4fps is more than sufficient for the rare occasion people shoot in burst mode anyways.. unless you&#8217;re actually a real pro sports photographer covering NBA or NFL games. <br />
low light: stop being fixated on the mp count. although D800 has 3x as many pixels, its actual pixel size is 60% that of the D700&#8242;s. the low pass filter has also been re-engineered and improved, reducing light loss to the sensor. if you factor in improvements in sensor technology (such as gapless micro lens design) since the D700 was introduced, and the new image processor, i have no problem believing the D800&#8242;s low light/high iso is as good as, if not better than, D700.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: memmener</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/nikon-d800-and-d800e-dslrs-address-low-pass-filter-debate-07212359/#comment-181127</link>
		<dc:creator>memmener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=212359#comment-181127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[just a minor correction; the D800E does have low pass filter. The filter is made without the anti-aliasing properties.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just a minor correction; the D800E does have low pass filter. The filter is made without the anti-aliasing properties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daredevil</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/nikon-d800-and-d800e-dslrs-address-low-pass-filter-debate-07212359/#comment-181016</link>
		<dc:creator>daredevil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=212359#comment-181016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Those of us who were looking for just a few more megapixels (up from 12 
to maybe 18?) and a wider ISO range because we shoot low-light events 
like sports, concerts and weddings (the kind of work that made the D700 
the best out there) are left scratching our heads.&quot; 

That camera is called D4. Yes it costs more... but that is how they segment the market now, just like Canon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Those of us who were looking for just a few more megapixels (up from 12<br />
to maybe 18?) and a wider ISO range because we shoot low-light events<br />
like sports, concerts and weddings (the kind of work that made the D700<br />
the best out there) are left scratching our heads.&#8221; </p>
<p>That camera is called D4. Yes it costs more&#8230; but that is how they segment the market now, just like Canon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nikonshooter</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/nikon-d800-and-d800e-dslrs-address-low-pass-filter-debate-07212359/#comment-180996</link>
		<dc:creator>nikonshooter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=212359#comment-180996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[enthusiasts and pros are saying the same thing: this is not a replacement for/next generation of the D700.  As stated in the article, the massive 36mp sensor in a small body will be fantastic for studio/fashion and landscape photogs.  Those of us who were looking for just a few more megapixels (up from 12 to maybe 18?) and a wider ISO range because we shoot low-light events like sports, concerts and weddings (the kind of work that made the D700 the best out there) are left scratching our heads. We have no idea if Nikon plans to make a product (full-frame sensor) that addresses any of this in the future.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>enthusiasts and pros are saying the same thing: this is not a replacement for/next generation of the D700.  As stated in the article, the massive 36mp sensor in a small body will be fantastic for studio/fashion and landscape photogs.  Those of us who were looking for just a few more megapixels (up from 12 to maybe 18?) and a wider ISO range because we shoot low-light events like sports, concerts and weddings (the kind of work that made the D700 the best out there) are left scratching our heads. We have no idea if Nikon plans to make a product (full-frame sensor) that addresses any of this in the future.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nikonshooter</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/nikon-d800-and-d800e-dslrs-address-low-pass-filter-debate-07212359/#comment-180997</link>
		<dc:creator>nikonshooter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=212359#comment-180997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[enthusiasts and pros are saying the same thing: this is not a replacement for/next generation of the D700.  As stated in the article, the massive 36mp sensor in a small body will be fantastic for studio/fashion and landscape photogs.  Those of us who were looking for just a few more megapixels (up from 12 to maybe 18?) and a wider ISO range because we shoot low-light events like sports, concerts and weddings (the kind of work that made the D700 the best out there) are left scratching our heads. We have no idea if Nikon plans to make a product (full-frame sensor) that addresses any of this in the future.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>enthusiasts and pros are saying the same thing: this is not a replacement for/next generation of the D700.  As stated in the article, the massive 36mp sensor in a small body will be fantastic for studio/fashion and landscape photogs.  Those of us who were looking for just a few more megapixels (up from 12 to maybe 18?) and a wider ISO range because we shoot low-light events like sports, concerts and weddings (the kind of work that made the D700 the best out there) are left scratching our heads. We have no idea if Nikon plans to make a product (full-frame sensor) that addresses any of this in the future.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
