<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New code points to possible Ivy Bridge Chromebooks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/new-code-points-to-possible-ivy-bridge-chromebooks-05221715/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/new-code-points-to-possible-ivy-bridge-chromebooks-05221715/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 02:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Worblux</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/new-code-points-to-possible-ivy-bridge-chromebooks-05221715/#comment-200865</link>
		<dc:creator>Worblux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2012 15:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=221715#comment-200865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Google added a new commitment to Coreboot, a low level system process of Linux that talks to the computer’s hardware to function correctly&quot;
This isn&#039;t quite correct. Coreboot is not a system process of Linux. It is firmware or BIOS replacement that is responsible for the initial poking, proding and general initialization or the various essential hardware systems. After initial setup coreboot jumps into a payload and then stops running (keeping a few tables in memory though)

 You can have SeaBIOS as a payload with sets up the usual BIOS interface or tianocore, which provided UEFI sevices, or you can jump directly into a properly fomated ELF binary like grub or the linux kernel.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Google added a new commitment to Coreboot, a low level system process of Linux that talks to the computer’s hardware to function correctly&#8221;<br />
This isn&#8217;t quite correct. Coreboot is not a system process of Linux. It is firmware or BIOS replacement that is responsible for the initial poking, proding and general initialization or the various essential hardware systems. After initial setup coreboot jumps into a payload and then stops running (keeping a few tables in memory though)</p>
<p> You can have SeaBIOS as a payload with sets up the usual BIOS interface or tianocore, which provided UEFI sevices, or you can jump directly into a properly fomated ELF binary like grub or the linux kernel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gadgetmania - Wanderinglex</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/new-code-points-to-possible-ivy-bridge-chromebooks-05221715/#comment-200256</link>
		<dc:creator>Gadgetmania - Wanderinglex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 22:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=221715#comment-200256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ivy Bridge + Chrome OS = most wasteful use of hardware ever... I&#039;d just get an Ultrabook. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ivy Bridge + Chrome OS = most wasteful use of hardware ever&#8230; I&#8217;d just get an Ultrabook. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ronaldst</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/new-code-points-to-possible-ivy-bridge-chromebooks-05221715/#comment-200152</link>
		<dc:creator>ronaldst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 16:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=221715#comment-200152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d prefer ARM stuff.  Would be fun if the industry would work to get computers we&#039;d need to recharge only once per week.  Also glad Coreboot is getting back into the news.  Faster booting, more secure and cheaper stuff is always good.  UEFI is such an unnecessary layer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d prefer ARM stuff.  Would be fun if the industry would work to get computers we&#8217;d need to recharge only once per week.  Also glad Coreboot is getting back into the news.  Faster booting, more secure and cheaper stuff is always good.  UEFI is such an unnecessary layer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/new-code-points-to-possible-ivy-bridge-chromebooks-05221715/#comment-200146</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 15:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=221715#comment-200146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not really, people buy $500 iPads.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not really, people buy $500 iPads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiroglif</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/new-code-points-to-possible-ivy-bridge-chromebooks-05221715/#comment-200144</link>
		<dc:creator>hiroglif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 15:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=221715#comment-200144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i want a really cheap 15 inch &quot;ultrabook&quot; with next gen trinity.  or even cheaper next gen zacate follow up line. or even next gen intel atom clover trail with sandy/ivy like gpu. Big screen super light super thin super cheap (not using ivy for price reason)
win8 gon run just fine. jus need to put a decent ssd for these cheaper slower cpu.... ( hope all these would support sata3...)
cmon somebody make that happen.
cuz ima jew not willing to pay 1000+ for ultrabooks. got my desktop for performance.  dont need sandy ivy level ultrabook.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i want a really cheap 15 inch &#8220;ultrabook&#8221; with next gen trinity.  or even cheaper next gen zacate follow up line. or even next gen intel atom clover trail with sandy/ivy like gpu. Big screen super light super thin super cheap (not using ivy for price reason)<br />
win8 gon run just fine. jus need to put a decent ssd for these cheaper slower cpu&#8230;. ( hope all these would support sata3&#8230;)<br />
cmon somebody make that happen.<br />
cuz ima jew not willing to pay 1000+ for ultrabooks. got my desktop for performance.  dont need sandy ivy level ultrabook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: islesfan</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/new-code-points-to-possible-ivy-bridge-chromebooks-05221715/#comment-200139</link>
		<dc:creator>islesfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 15:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=221715#comment-200139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chromebook is still a niche item.  It is far too limited to have any practical use outside of elementary schools.  Maybe, if they were sub $100 they might catch on, but at the price of a basic Windows laptop, its hard to get anyone to bite.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chromebook is still a niche item.  It is far too limited to have any practical use outside of elementary schools.  Maybe, if they were sub $100 they might catch on, but at the price of a basic Windows laptop, its hard to get anyone to bite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
